Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of good military leadership
The importance of good military leadership
Importance of leadership styles in military
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of good military leadership
General George C. Marshall Jr. was born on December 31, 1880 in Uniontown, Pennsylvania and was the youngest of three children. As a child, George was the sibling that always got in trouble, especially when it came to school. Eventually he metamorphosed into a distinguished military officer. Marshall contributed to both World Wars, served as Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, as well as took a leadership role in the American Red Cross Association. From assisting in the planning of the St. Mihiel and Meuse- Argonne offensive to establishing Operation Overload and having a main part in training and organizing the troops in World War II, George C. Marshall’s career reflects his execution of the officer attributes and competencies.
His
…show more content…
contributions to both World Wars, his service as Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, as well as his role in the American Red Cross demonstrate how well-rounded his character is, which is required of a great leader. Other very distinguished men, such as Winston Churchill and Harry S. Truman only had magnificent things to say about Marshall. Truman explained, “The more I see and talk to him, the more certain I am he’s the great one of the age” (Uldrich). Winston Churchill once stated, “There are few men whose qualities of mind and character have impressed me so deeply as those of General Marshall… He is a great American, but he is far more than that… He has always fought victoriously against defeatism, discouragement and disillusion. Succeeding generations must not be allowed to forget his achievements and his example.” In this quote, one can see that Marshall never quit or accepted defeat. As soldiers, it is our duty to uphold the Warrior Ethos and this meaningful opinion from Churchill exemplifies that Marshall appreciated the Warrior Ethos. The Warriors Ethos is a code of conduct that embodies all the Army values into four statements. Marshall dedicated his life to the Army values and that included committing himself to the Warriors Ethos. By upholding the Army values and the Warrior Ethos, Marshall built a strong character and other individuals, such as Churchill, recognized it. Marshall diffused the values and the ethos into his own style of leadership. Every person who met Marshall respected him and appreciated his work. The main reason for this was because Marshall genuinely cared about strengthening others and this demonstrates the “Develops” competency. Marshall said, “I don’t want you fellows sitting around asking me what to do. I want you to tell me what to do” (General George Marshall). This quote stuck with me because he is trying to get his subordinates to be leaders and to think and to learn. George C. Marshall had nine different principles of leadership that he followed: Action, Integrity, Selflessness, Candor, Preparation, Learning and Teaching, Fairness, Vision, and Caring. These principles are a main factor in his achievements. For instance, Marshall displayed the Principle of Candor when he was promoted to Deputy Chief of Staff. He was in a meeting with President Roosevelt about Hitler and the plan to force Hitler to retreat and Marshall spoke his mind. He told Roosevelt, not what he wanted to hear, but what he needed to hear (Uldrich). He demonstrated the Principle of Integrity, which is also an Army value, particularly in preparation of World War II. He realized the intensiveness of the war in Europe and expressed his opinion that they needed to keep all the troops whose time in the Army was almost complete. The vote was in the hands of Congress and the members of the Congress wanted to cheat their way out of it and hand the decision over to the President. Well, General Marshall refused that option and influenced Congress to do the right thing (Uldrich). In the end, Congress, by one winning vote, decided to keep the troops and three months later the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor. The next principle of leadership involved another Army value, the Principle of Selflessness. A great example of his selfless service includes his reaction to the choosing of the commander for Operation Overlord. Marshall was extremely important in the planning of this operation and desired to be commander of it. However, Roosevelt, knowing the wonderful politician Marshall was, decided to make Eisenhower commander and use Marshall to his advantage in Washington. All Marshall could respond was, “I will serve wherever you need me, Mr. President” (Uldrich). He put his country and the needs of the president above his wants and desires. He also lead by the Principle of Caring and realized that no matter how great leaders are, the troops are the ones doing a lot of the work. Marshall made sure they had everything they needed and that they were physically and emotionally ok. There are going to be those superiors that only care if the work gets done and are not necessarily concerned about the well-being of their soldiers, but the ones that genuinely care, such as Marshall, will have their subordinates’ complete trust and respect. Marshall fulfilled the competency “Leads” by building that trust with his subordinates and setting a positive example. Marshall dedicated a lot of his time to make a challenging lifestyle that much easier for his soldiers. General Marshall frequently demonstrated the attribute intellect. Marshall was very tactically competent; he knew how to carry out missions on a full spectrum. A great example includes the Operation Overlord; with critical thinking and problem solving, he was able to develop a plan that helped win the war. He also achieved this competence through his Principle of Action. An example I came across was the production of Jeeps during World War II. He was given an idea that Jeeps would change the outcome of the war, so he approved the making of the Jeep. By the end of the war, there were over two million made, and the German officers even admitted that it gave them great maneuverability (Uldrich). This was a new technology that developed and he took initiative and had success with it. A leader cannot always be sheltered and stuck inside their comfort zone. They need to take risks, learn new skills, and be innovative in order to improve themselves and the organization; this is exactly what Marshall executed. He showed his sound judgment by using one of the 21st Century Soldier Competencies: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving. He used this through his Principle of Preparation. He was involved in both World Wars and therefore, was able to take the mistakes from the first war and apply them to the second war. For example, when World War II began, he did not wait till we were attacked at Pearl Harbor to prepare our troops. Instead, he critically thought and rewrote the Army curriculum. They began training their troops and arranging the right leadership in order to be ready for an attack (Uldrich). Marshall exemplified mental agility through the competency Adaptability and Initiative. When we were attacked at Pearl Harbor, many leaders wanted to take action on the Japanese, but Marshall saw the larger picture and believed Germany was the one to go after first. He would look ahead to the future and see what was the highest priority, and then he would take initiative and seek ways to get his soldiers to adapt to make it their highest priority as well (Uldrich). Marshall was a lifelong learner dating back to his days at VMI. He took every opportunity there was to learn and better himself. He understood that leadership involves self-improvement and learning as much as you can. A leader who can disseminate knowledge to others is exponentially more valuable to an organization than someone who knows only so much. There is no doubt in my mind that General Marshall does not display character and presence. He was a man of integrity who always demonstrated moral courage and no matter what the situation, he would do the right thing. Marshall was ambitious and determined to improve conditions. Throughout his life, one could easily see that he embodied these officer attributes and competencies. He devoted himself to his country and his team and should be a role model for future leaders. The main core of being a great leader is obtaining the Army values.
If an individual can live by these values and others are able to recognize them, then he/she is on the right track to being a remarkable leader and obtaining the officer attributes and competencies. General Marshall demonstrated every single one of these values. He was loyal, not only to his country, but his subordinates and loved ones. He never failed to accomplish his duty. In the many positions he had, he was successful in every one and could always be held accountable to get the work done. Marshall respected his subordinates and his superiors, and they definitely respected him. He consistently showed signs of selfless service and always put others before himself. Marshall lived through the Army values and honored them. He was a very honorable man and could be trusted. The president had him as his right hand man during the war, and that speaks for itself. He was not ashamed to do the right thing or afraid to speak his mind. Marshall held integrity at a high standard and expected everyone to be truthful and honest. Lastly, he embodied personal courage. General Marshall was not frightened to take risks and was not afraid of failing. He took those mistakes and learned from them and had the courage to take the fault for it as well. Overall, General George Catlett Marshall was an incredible U.S. leader who I now look up to. Those individuals who are aspiring to be leaders in both the military world and political world should learn and understand Marshall’s ways of being a
leader.
Military leaders may find themselves in questionable situations: perceived as unethical; lack moral consciousness, or question their character. Dwight Eisenhower demonstrated moral courage by leveraging the ethical principles of duty, loyalty and subordination in endorsing the French Vichy leader Admiral Darlan.
Sanderson, Jefferey. "GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.” Last modified may 22, 1997. Accessed January 4, 2014. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCwQFjAA&url=http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a331356.pdf&ei=tYbHUtv3HcGs2gX2u4HAAQ&usg=AFQjCNFU5EzdWjKlt81w8gh_Bj2UEttaZw&sig2=aAz3jIZg7U6peDzL_i8w9w.
General George B. McClellan was born to a prestigious upper class family in Pennsylvania. He attended the Military Academy at West Point and graduated second in his class in 1846. He served during the war with Mexico and earned three brevets for gallantry and sound professional service. He resigned his commission but returned early during the Civil War and immediately given a high rank. He led a successful campaign in West Virginia. These events fueled General McClellan’s egotistical and elitist attitudes.
The history of Lieutenant General Lewis B. “Chesty” Puller is not well known outside of the U.S. Marine Corps, but as the most decorated marine in history his legend will live on and continue to inspire the marines of tomorrow. The enlisted corps has idolized him, frequently encouraging one another to do that last push up when motivated by fellow marines saying “Do one for Chesty!” The purpose of this essay is to demonstrate that Chesty, using current day leadership theories, was a visionary and ethical leader who exemplified the characteristics that our nation’s military needed during World War II and still needs today. I will explain how he embodied some principles of Full Range Leadership Development that are taught today. Then I will describe how he demonstrated his ethical leadership through combat actions when faced with general military ethics situations. Finally, I will examine how my own leadership abilities, though noncombat focused, compare to how Chesty led his marines. Let’s begin by exploring the visionary leadership that Lt Gen Puller exhibited.
Dwight D. Eisenhower, the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces during World War II, was close to not achieving commander status. If this had happened, a different person would have taken control over Operations Torch, Avalanche, and Overlord. Eisenhower, in fact, was the key component in the victory for the Allies. Had he not been assigned by George Marshall to a planning officer in Washington D.C., President Harry Truman might not have saw Eisenhower’s potential. Eisenhower’s past 30 years of military experience, his strong mental and social stature, and his ideas and tactics were all key factors for his triumphant victory in World War II.
This legendary General was born on February 12, 1893 in Clark, Missouri (“Omar Bradley Biography”). The population of Clark, Missouri today is around 300 people, and one might not think that a small-town boy like Bradley would eventually have the opportunity to grow up and become an officer in the military. But, when Bradley was working as a boiler maker at the Wabash Railroad, he was asked by his Sunday school teacher at to take the entrance exam for the US Military Academy at West Point. Originally, Bradley had planned on saving money to enter the University of Missouri in Columbia to study law, but when the opportunity arrived, he took it immediately.
“The world has achieved brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know about living” (Bradley 258). Given command of the reactivated 82nd Division, he oversaw its training before fulfilling a similar role for the 28th Division. In both cases, he used Marshall's approach of simplifying military doctrine to
Douglas MacArthur was one of the most famous American Generals. He commanded troops in the Southwest Pacific during World War II (1939-1945). He also commanded the successful occupation of Japan after the war, and was in charge of the United Nations forces during the Korean War(“Douglas MacArthur Biography”). MacArthur was talented, outspoken, and in the eyes of many, egotistical. Douglas MacArthur was one of the most influential generals in United States history.
Well, what are the standards of a U.S. military officer? I mean, what characteristics must a person posses in order to reach the level of Colin Powell? I am certain that there are more than a few characteristics one must exhibit in order to become an officer in the U.S. military (not just anyone can be an officer, you know), but the three that I find the most essential are: a person must be able to think rationally in the time of a crisis; a person must display determination and confidence when confronting a crisis; a person must keep in mind those who depend on the decisions he or she is making. If someone possesses these three abilities, I think the person can be considered a good leader.
“If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more, and become more, you are a leader” (John Quincy Adams). However, not all leaders are ethical leaders. Nonetheless, not every ethical person is a leader. Indeed, there are many people that are both ethical and a leader, in fact, I believe that Malcom X was an Ethical leader. Personally, I believe ethical leaders must have a purpose that is both morally correct and inspires many. I believe that the following quote by Malcom X shows the essence of his ethical leadership, “A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything” (Malcom X). Malcom X was a man who stood for the truth regardless of the situation, therefore Malcom X was an ethical
Young George didn't want to be just any soldier; he had his sights fixed on becoming a combat general. He had one major obstacle to overcome, however. Though he was obviously intelligent (his knowledge of classical literature was encyclopaedic and he had learned to read military topographic maps by the age of 7), George didn't learn to read until he was 12 years old. It was only at age 12 when George was sent off to Stephen Cutter Clark's Classical School that he began to catch up on his academic skills; he managed to find plenty of time for athletics as well. While at school, the path toward his goal became focused he planned on attending West Point as the next major step in the pursuit of his general's stars.
Theodore Roosevelt "The leader must understand that he leads us, that he guides us, by convincing us so that we will follow him or follow his direction. He must not get it into his head that it is his business to drive us or rule us. His business is to manage the government for us. "-- Theodore Roosevelt GROW Gain Knowledge – read 3 books a day! Reach Out to Others
Standing in a crowd of hundreds, anxious about what is to come—combat; waiting for a man whose reputation greatly precedes him…the man who will lead you into battle—into a nightmare. As he took the microphone and declared, “you are here because you are real men and all real men like to fight.” These words are those of General George Patton…and he has your attention. Inspirational and blunt are just a couple of the many terms used to describe General Patton. General Patton was also a visionary in employment of combat forces; in fact, he was an expert on the subject. The manner in which he led his troops was in itself visionary. Despite his military prowess and formidable leadership, General Patton was humble in leadership and intellect. These three attributes will demonstrate that he was above all, a visionary and ethical leader.
Many of his fellow generals even called his tactics reckless or uncanny of a German officer. However, this tactics were effective and efficient at neutralizing Allied forces with what little he had. His leadership style would be best described as Transformational, yet his personal interaction with individual soldiers would be Transactional. He was a transformational because he led the men by example, he believed that a commander should be more physically robust then his men, that commanders should always show them the example. He even gave up some special privileges to "live hard" with the men to raise morale and understand their conditions. Hence the men under his command were inspired and motivated on completing the missions at
Nobel Prize winner, George Bernard Shaw, once penned the words, "You see things; and you say, 'Why?' But I dream things that never were; and I say, ‘Why not?’ (1921).