Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Navy budget cut impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Navy budget cut impact
Budget and personnel cuts can be detrimental to any organization and certainly can limit its efficiency. During stressful times such as these in organizations and our case the military, active leadership is crucial to maintaining effectiveness in the unit and keeping morale high. Many of us serve our military because of our pride in service and dedication to our nation supporting affective commitment. Driving factors to high turnover and workplace dissatisfaction in my experience were due to be poor leadership and job opportunity. When leadership has an open and evaluative mind, employees can openly make recommendations to make positive changes. The Navy often does this through command climate surveys. As you have …show more content…
To those without military knowledge or experience, particularly of the Navy, there are three traditional community areas of the Navy. The community areas relate to Surface (ships), Subsurface (submarines) and Aviation (piloted aircraft or unmanned aerial vehicles). Each community grows into a culture embracing their unique esprit de corps. My career began in 2005, originally in the field of Naval Aviation, as an enlisted maintainer until receiving a commission in 2012 to attend flight training in Pensacola, FL. After several months of training, I had determined that a flying career was not suited for me, so I had elected to leave the program and continue service as an Aviation Maintenance Officer. Due to some downsizing in the maintenance community, I was unable to continue within Naval Aviation and my service was required in Surface Warfare. Once transitioning to this new job and community, I had faced some workplace discrimination and prejudices based on my background in Aviation. Adverse judgment was placed on my prior service as a former “brown shoe,” as aviators and aviation members are referred to in the
SUBJECT: Army Doctrine Reference Publication (ADRP) 6-22 Army Leadership – August 2012. 1. What is the difference between a. and a. Purpose. The. To provide Special Forces Warrant Officer Advance Course (SFWOAC) Class 002-16 a concise overview of ADRP 6-22 Army Leadership.
Dwight David Eisenhower (1955), the 34th President of the United States, gave an explicit definition of leadership, “The job of getting people really wanting to do something is the essence of leadership….” The Army, like any other civilian organization, defines different levels of leadership depending on a size of a unit a leader is in command of. Tactical and organizational leaderships are two first interconnected levels of leadership in the Army. Both levels of leadership have many commonalities regarding duties and responsibilities; yet they are very different in the way the leaders develop themselves, train, and take care of their soldiers.
“In order to be a good leader, there are two things to remember. Lead from the Front and always set the Example. From these two leadership principles, everything else will fall into place.”
Introduction “Leaders have always been generalists”. Tomorrow’s leaders will, very likely, have begun life as specialists, but to mature as leaders they must sooner or later climb out of the trenches of specialization and rise above the boundaries that separate the various segments of society.” (Gardner, 1990, pg. 159). The. In a recent verbal bout with my History of the Military Art professor, I contended that the true might of a nation may be inversely proportional to the size of its military during peacetime.
For some time the Army has been using a certain expression to defines what an Army leader actually is. To keep it basic, the three words be, know and do explains it all!
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.
. A job well done is the goal of every Coast Guardsman. We seldom agree on how that goal is best achieved and we have different levels of motivation for achieving the goal in a given timeframe but we all still feel good when we get there. A good leader knows that he must work with the tools he has. The tools in this case being the personnel he is leading. Every unit is different and every unit is staffed with a unique crew of individuals which all have their own strengths and weaknesses, skills and personalities. A good leader will quickly recognize the self starters and those who require more direction; those who work well alone and those who work best in a team. A good leader also understands that everyone has value and its okay if some have more value than others. Nothing in life is fair and some members are going to work harder than others. Unfortunately, in my career, I have had more poor leaders than good
Employee turnover and the retention of valued employees are major problems facing business in the U.S. The average turnover rate is hovering at 15%. The costs associated with that turnover can be high - generally 25 percent of the individual's annual salary. Unemployment in the United States is at a 24-year low. Employee loyalty is down. Never before has it been so critical to focus on strategies for keeping good employees. However finding a solution to high turnover is not easy.
Employee satisfaction, employee turnover, and workplace environment are inseparably linked. Workplace environments heavily influence employee satisfaction, which directly affects employee turnover rates. When employees feel they are not being supported within their first months of hire, they will inevitably leave the company. Employees want to have the security that if they need assistance, someone will be there to guide them. Therefore, it is imperative for organizations to develop a thorough onboarding program and a long-term retention plan.
Military leaders are challenged daily with the charge of affecting positive change in their organizations. Throughout this essay, several ways in which traditional leadership theories, as well as how various leadership styles are used to satisfy this demand will be explored. Also explored will be the use of transactional and transformational leadership styles associated with military leaders as well as the roles that military leadership plays in an organization’s vision, mission, and strategy.
I have had the opportunity and privilege to work with a variety of military and non-military leaders who taught me important lessons in leadership. I obtained these lessons through direct mentorship or observation as I watched how they conducted themselves. Those lessons, combined with my own personal beliefs and experiences, have helped me develop my own leadership philosophy. My leadership philosophy focuses on balancing mission accomplishment with Soldier welfare. As a leader, I place significant emphasis on creating an environment built on trust and mutual respect, personal and professional development, and Soldier welfare.
Or how to keep the employees they currently have even if recruiting for more. Employers spend a lot of money to hire on individual, however if they are too able to retain them, then they have not only wasted that, but also have to spend the same again to seek and hire another. To keep employees, company’s need to try and keep them engaged, somewhat satisfied, and motivated. Without these items turnover rate can be very high, because these individuals also affect new and potential employees, through their direct attitudes and word of mouth. According to Gallup’s 2013 State of American Workforce report: 18% of employees are actively disengaged, dissatisfied, unmotivated workers with attitudes that can be contagious, doing minimum required to keep their job, but without any real connection to their work. Management plays a role in retention, if you have poor management with poor communication, and unclear expectations. One could also expect higher turnover due to dissatisfaction, and lack of
Leaders are dishonest. Although some are unintentionally dishonest, it can lead to the deterioration of trust between the leader and his or her followers. An ideal leader is effective when there is trust established between both the leader and the followers. According to Michelle Bligh, trust is an “expectation or belief that one can rely on another person's actions and words and that the person has good intentions to carry out their promises” (21). Leaders gain trust when they are consistently honest and communicate well with their followers. In return, followers respect an honest leader and obey commands without issues. Respect causes a positive environment because authoritative figures and subordinates can rely on each other to achieve the
I would like to start my essay with the words of Peter Ducker that “Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things”. I think these words perfectly outline the difference between a manager and a leader which is quite often confused. Being a good leader is something that I aspire which can not be achieved overnight and requires lots of energy and dedication. This question often came to my mind: how should I become a good leader and what should I do for it? There has been many debates whether leaders are born or bred but actually I agree with the thought of Jim Collins that good leaders (level 5 leaders) have special seed which they need to develop compared to others. However reaching level 5 leadership and becoming an outstanding CEO of the company is a pinnacle for me which might not be even realized however I do believe that you can become a good leader within your company, within your circle and within your team. I aspire to become level 5 leader however in order to get there I need to constantly work on myself.
Leadership is the life blood of a military officer’s. Although, it has been variuosly defined, general accepted view is that leadership in the military is the ability to inspire and direct a group of people to achieve goals. While going through the leadership traits, it might appear impossible to have a perf ect military leader. Human nature by design is f lawed. So, it will be futile to look f or perf ection. If we study the lif e and works of great military leaders we f ind that each had his strong points and his weaknesses. What distinguished them f rom common mortals is their ability to appreciate their strong and weak areas. They then capitalized