Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Limitation of trait theory leadership
The Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Effective Leadership
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Limitation of trait theory leadership
Dan DeRusha
Executive MBA Class 22
Management 810 – Leadership
August 29, 2014
Summary of Reading:
Full Range Leadership Development, Sosik & Jung, Chapters 1, 2, and 3
The Full Range Leadership Development (FRLD) model is introduced as a premier leadership training model. The authors present the model as one that is based strongly in scientific and academic research and builds upon the work of Bernard Bass and Bruce Avolio of the Center for Leadership Studies at the State University of New York at Binghamton. The authors studied under Bass and Avolio while earning their Doctoral degrees at SUNY Binghamton.
The FRLD model has been successfully applied in many environments and is used in the teaching of leadership at several well recognized
…show more content…
These leaders are exemplary role models, have an exciting vision, challenge the status quo and continually innovate (even at the peak of success), and coach and mentor their associates to achieve their full potential and performance.” (Chapter 1 Location 803)
At the end of the first chapter the authors present their theories and the FRLD model in the context of historical thought on leadership and in comparison to other leadership theories.
A valuable table is presented and is best referenced directly rather than summarized: Table 1.3 How Full Range Leadership Development Relates to Other Leadership Theories (Chapter 1 Location 812)
The other theories referenced are: Trait theory, Psychodynamic theory, Skills theory, Style theory, Situational leadership-oriented theory, Contingency theory, Path-goal theory, Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory, and Authentic leadership
…show more content…
The authors encourage readers to take time to reflect on how they can view their own situations and start to evaluate and apply their learnings while developing Transformational Leadership behaviors within their own environments. The section “View Your World Through a FRLD Process Model Lens” leads the reader in this self-reflection direction.
Chapter 3, Idealized Influence Behaviors and Attributes, moves beyond the background and basis for the FRLD model and starts focusing on the specifics of the FRLD model behaviors. Idealized influence focuses on the personal behaviors and attributes that you must internalize to be an effective leader for your followers. You must have a team behind you to be a successful leader and that success is derived from your own actions as a role model for your followers.
“…idealized influence involves being a positive role model that exemplifies high levels of moral/ethical and performance standards. To be moral and ethical means that you hold and display character strengths and virtues valued by society. It also means that you put your group’s best interests ahead of your own personal interests. To hold high performance standards means that you aim high in all of your work processes, products, and outcomes, and you raise the bar for others.” (Chapter 3 Location
Leadership is a topic of great importance not only in military or organisational settings but all most in all settings which involves people. It’s a universal activity evident in humankind (Bass,1990). It is a wide and diverse field of knowledge. Leaders are individuals who help their followers or subordinates to carry out a particular task in an efficient and an effective manner. Researches on the topic of leaders and leadership have been taking place for past many decades. One of the more recent styles of leadership which has been considered to be very effective is the transformational leadership. It’s a concept explained by James McGregor Burns in 1978 who was influenced by the work of German sociologist Max Weber. The concept was then further refined and developed by Bernard.M.Bass. The whole concept of transformational leadership talks about how leaders can transform their followers into doing a task better than what is expected from them and how it can help in the betterment of the organisation and the followers. The purpose...
Bruce J. Avolio and Bernard M. Bass, Developing Potential Across a Full Range of Leadership: Cases on Transactional and Transformational Leadership, 17.
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Full range leadership theory. Effective (FRLT) Full Range leadership theory is described as putting together of transformational and transactional models (Bass & Avolio, 1994, 1997, 1999, 2004). Transformational leadership stresses on the relationship between the leaders and subordinate and workplace situations that result to surpassing expectations. By the application of FRLT, SAHC leaders will effectively manage the MDCs facing the leadership. According to Mhoon-Walker (2013), stimulating inducement, intellectual encouragement, and customized deliberation are three features of transformational leadership utilized to motivate subordinate performance. The application of FRLT has demonstrated to be appropriate in leadership improvement, as a
First when a leader focuses on the strengths of the employees the odds of the employee being engaged will increase dramatically. This compares to chapter one of our text book in that it says an effective leader is one who helps group members attain productivity. The second key is that the most effective leaders surround themselves with the right people and maximize their team. The book suggest when leaders try to be good at everything they will not be great at anything. Although it is often preached to be well-rounded this results in mediocrity. So instead trying to be good at everything, find and know your strengths and hone those skills to be a more effective leader. The authors say there are four domains of leadership with thirty-four themes that break-down under the domains and these explain the actual strengths of the leader. The domains are executing, influencing, relationship building and strategic thinking. In our text book all but influencing are listed as one of the ten roles of leadership. ...
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B., (2007). The leadership challenge, (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Leaders who fail to provide true and proper command, inspiration, motivation, and strategic vision for their company leave a battered organization. An incompetent or dysfunctional leadership team misleads others which results in poor performance for individuals and organizations, which leads to a failed business. leadership theories all help leaders to lead followers in a productive way preventing this increasing effectiveness and give leaders ways to help followers with paths to follow to reach goals for both organization outcomes as well as individuals.
Moreover, the Burke-Litwin model associates leadership with the ability to provide direction. This direction can steam from the need of change and can come from anyone in the organization in order to serve the organizational needs. The model lists “vision change; using one’s intuition, influence, persuasive and presentation skills; and rewarding people with personal praise and providing opportunities to learn new skills (Burke, 2014).”
Two of my strengths I discovered in Full Range Development Leadership (FRDL) that is a part of transformational leadership were individualized consideration and inspirational motivation. Since, transformational leadership is the most active and effective form of leadership according to the Senior Noncommissioned Officer Academy student guide it is critical to have some strengths within FRDL in relations to Deliberate Leadership. Individualized consideration is where leaders become a mentor or coach and can hear their subord...
Hall, Peter, & Norris, Peter. (1993). Learning for leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 14(7), 35. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 81758).
Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
There are different leadership theories developed throughout the history. Most popular ones are trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. The author of the post will briefly discuss two theories, Fiedler contingency theory and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and compare and contrast their strengths and weakness.
For example, under this theory the leader would employ High Directive/High Support leadership behaviors to the Disillusioned Learner. Ideally, the leader helps the followers as they progress through the stages to achieve the Self-Reliant Achiever/Delegating level. While I do not necessarily fully subscribe to the theory, it does seem to have merit and I do believe that it is important for an effective leader to have the capability and flexibility to adapt his or her style to the needs of the followers in order to encourage everyone’s success. I also believe that an effective leader plays a significant role in promoting and molding individuals’ readiness as it relates to motivation and commitment. As such, I developed my leadership assessment with these points in mind. The assessment focuses on 14 attributes that I believe are important not only for a leader to be successful within the parameters of the SLT, but...
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (2007). The Leadership Challenge (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA 94103-1741: Jossey-Bass.
The primary leadership theory I believe in comes from John Maxwell and speaks to the dual nature of leadership: leaders are both born and made. I believe that some individuals are born with innate leadership qualities and that those characteristics, though infantile, if cultivated, evolve through lifelong experiences, training and development. Maxwell asserts that born leaders require cultivation: “Leadership is developed, not discovered. The truly “born leader” will always emerge; but to stay on top, natural leadership characteristics must be developed”(Maxwell, 1993 p. viii). Maxwell indicates that individuals who want to become leaders fit into one of four categories: the leading leader, the learned leader, the latent leader or the limited leader.