Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Foucaults power theory disciplinary power
Critique of michel foucault theory of power
Foucaults power theory disciplinary power
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Foucaults power theory disciplinary power
“Doomed from day one” is what many people said about Westray coal mining which began moving into Pictou County, Nova Scotia in the fall of 1991. With the economy suffering and no stable jobs in that area, it was nearly impossible for many of the men to refuse joining Westray’s dangerous working environment because of the promise they made to provide 15 years of prosperity. However, within the first month of production there had been three major rock falls, yet with no other means to provide for their family the men of Westray continued to trudge underground day after day. Furthermore, not only was coal dusk threatening these men’s physical health but with a concentration of 5% to 15% of methane in the tunnels combined with coal dusk even a …show more content…
Similar to Marx, Foucault believed the state’s role was to use its power as violence as a means of social control over the population. Furthermore, his theory better examines modern power as it states, modern power can be understood as techniques rather than rights, modern power works by normalization instead of law, and modern power works to control the population rather than punish them. Furthermore, with advancements in technology and science, truth and knowledge could only be accepted and understood if it met the scientific criteria which was only accessible to few. In terms of Westray, the power was imposed on the workers by people like Clifford Fran and the managers who simply wanted to control their workers and normalized the work they were doing even though it was unsafe. Furthermore, even though Foucault does not address workers experience and disqualifies their voice, this is what happened to the Westray miners because they were aware that their working conditions were unsafe and that it was tremendously affecting their health but because they were not considered experts their knowledge was ignored. Additionally, the knowledge was accepted by Albert Maclean, who was an inspector, even though he had never worked in a mine before and told workers that even with the examples of unsafe working conditions they provided him he was not able to shut down the mine, which was
The Coal Company exploited the workers by underpaying them and restricting their freedom as consumers. The miners were forced to buy their own tools, clothes, food, etc. from the Ôcompany storeÕ many times at higher prices than necessary. This created circulation of money from the company to the laborer back to the company. The miners worked for obvious reasons: to supply themselves and their families with shelter, food and clothing. They relied on company power to supply a means of employment. However, the company in turn relied on the laborers, because without them the company would have no means by which to excavate the coal and continue the production process.
The Stone Mountain Coal Company wielded monopoly control over the town of Matewan through a feudal system of economic, cultural, political, and environmental processes. Every person in the town of Matewan came under the power of the company in one way or another. The employees of Stone Mountain were under a bondage contract with the company. Once they came to the company it was impossible to leave and at the same time maintain a basic standard of living. They could not leave also because once they signed on with the company they owed the company a large sum of money for everything ranging from the ticket for the train that brought them to Matewan to the equipment they needed to work there. In this way it was as if they were paying the company to let them work in the mines rather the other way around. They did not have the rights basic to capitalism such as the right to join a union, the right to sell their labor in a labor market to the bidder of their choice, and the right to spend their wage freely.
The Making of a Hardrock Miner written by Stephen M. Voynick, describes his own personal experiences as a hardrock miner in four different underground mines in the western United States, the Climax molybdenum mine in Colorado, Hecla Lakeshore Project a copper mine in Arizona, and two uranium mines in Wyoming. Rather than a book telling of the fortunes gained and lost, this book was about the relationships gained, but then also lost through mining. Stephen M. Voynick’s direct words and simple writing style provided a book that was an easy read and educational about mine work and safety.
...ing the conditions faced by coal miners and their families in addition to events leading up to the uprising. However, some additional research should be done in regards to the West Virginia Coal Wars and the Battle of Blair Mountain.
Martin, John. “The Blast in Centralia No. 5: A mine disaster No One Stopped.” Public Administration: Concepts and Cases. Stillman, Richard Joseph. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010. 31-44.
Culturally, the Stone Mountain Coal Company is able to maintain control over the residents of Matewan by promoting ignorance and fear of the unknown—“strike breakers,” races, and unions. Pitting Matewan’s resident workers against the incoming strikebreakers allows the Company freedom to raise competition levels for jobs that all the workers need to live, while lowering the amount of mone...
The documentary ‘Gasland” is a telling tale of the terrible consequences of natural gas mining in the US. The filmmaker, Josh Fox, travels around the country visiting different homes that are in very close proximity of natural gas drilling sites after receiving a $100,000 offer from a natural gas company to use his land as a drilling site . The film focuses on how the drilling sites not only leave ugly scars on the land, but also the horrendous health problems people get from drinking the contaminated groundwater.
Coal mines in these times were glorified death traps and collapsed. Often. Workers or their families were basically never compensated for anything, and even when they took things to court, essentially no court was sympathetic toward any coal miner or their family, and if their father or brother died, they were on their on for the rest of their life, often then forcing child boys to work if they weren’t already. Also, not many workers spoke proper english in the mines, so they could not read instruction signs, and by misuse of equipment, killing themselves and/or other
Every year, almost 1,500 people who have worked in the nation’s coalmines die from black lung disease. That’s equivalent to the Titanic sinking every year, with no ships coming to the rescue. While that disaster which took place so long ago continues to fascinate the nation, black lung victims die an agonizing death in isolated rural communities, away from the spotlight of publicity.
In Foucault’s analysis, the concept of Panopticon is developed based on the manipulation of knowledge and power as two coexisting events. He believes that knowledge is obtained through the process of observation and examination in a system of panopticon. This knowledge is then used to regulate the behaviors and conduct of others, creating an imbalance in power and authority. Not only can knowledge create power, power can also be used to define knowledge where the authority can create “truth”. This unbalance of knowledge and power then marks a loss of power for the ends being watched, resulting in an unconditional acceptance of regulations and normalization.
"Stakeholders Realtions (Oil Sands) Pdf." CBSR. Canadian Buisness for Social Responsibility, May 2009. Web. 9 Jan. 2014. .
The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Animal testing is a morally debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong. This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as my own opinion.
Foucault uses the expression ‘power/knowledge’ to indicate that through accepted forms of knowledge, understanding and ‘truth’ scientifically, power is constituted. Power is what makes us what we are as human beings on a diverse level. Foucault sees that power is not just a negative, coercive, or repressive act that forces us to “conform” but it can be a necessary and productive force that is positive in society. Foucault’s ideas of power in society points to many of the ways that norms of society can be so embedded in us beyond perception and this causes us to discipline ourselves even without thinking of the wilful intimidation from
What comes to mind when you think of coal mining? If you're like me, coal mining means living in darkness and a cold hearted industry. Other words that come to mind are poverty and oppression. Coal mining is not a job that you dream about or get a degree for. People who are coal miners do not chose a life full of danger and repression, they get stuck with it. There are many dangers that come along with coal mining, not only for the workers, but for the environment. Coal mining and the coal industry have caused irreversible damage to our environment and has killed innocent miners.
In exploring the markings of modern power, Michel Foucault coined the term “governmentality” – a concept meant to open up enquiry into the myriad of more or less calculated and systematic thoughts and actions that seek to shape, regulate or manage the way people conduct themselves by acting upon their hopes, circumstances and environment.1 He was of the opinion that governing a state is most effective when it colonizes modes of thought. Foucault’s own work examples in “The Subject and Power”, discuss a number of struggles of resistance that have developed over the past few years such as “opposition to the power of men over women, of parents over children, of psychiatry over the mentally ill, of medicine over the population, of administration over the ways people live”.2 Despite their diversity, these struggles were significant for Foucault because they share a set of common points that allow us to recognize them as local forms of resistance to governmentality. These oppositional struggles focus on the effects of power experienced by those individuals who are immediately subject to them.