Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The philosphy of mission command
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Mission Command as defined by the United States Army consists six distinct and critical principles. During World War II there were many examples of exemplary mission command that led to stunning victories for the Allies but also many examples of failure. The Battle for Arnhem or Operation Market-Garden was such a failure. Major General Robert Elliot Urquhart, the Commander of the 1st Airborne Division failed in not only in tactics but the ability to lead his division to victory. He did not completely misunderstand the principles of mission command, but four main areas in which he made critical mistakes were; Build a Cohesive Team Through Mutual Trust, Create a Shared Understanding, Accept Prudent Risk, and Exercise Disciplined Initiative. …show more content…
The plan for Operation Market-Garden was to secure bridges crossing the Rhine river into the German industrial heartland to have a timely end to the war in 1944. Field Marshall Sir Bernard Montgomery, commander of the 21st Army Group, issued the orders on 12 September, the plan intended for airborne troops to capture key bridges at three towns; Eindhoven, Nijmegen, and Arnhem. Codename “Market” was to be the airborne seizure of the bridges, and “Garden” was to be the simultaneous ground plan. The airborne operations were to take three days to complete, and 1st Airborne Division’s mission was to be a road, rail, and pontoon bridge crossing the Lower Rhine in and around the town of Arnhem. Build Cohesive Teams through Mutual Trust The first tenant of mission command that MG Urquhart exemplified was to “build cohesive teams through mutual trust” . Building trust takes time, and Major General Urquhart became the commander of 1st Airborne in a rather unconventional manner. Traditionally British airborne units promoted from within, MG Urquhart had served and commanded previously in North Africa, Sicily, and Italy, but in light infantry units. Urquhart was aware of his situation and did his utmost to win the respect and admiration of his troopers. During the battle, Major General Urquhart exemplified true leadership and trust with his subordinates. His soldiers thought of him as “a bloody general who didn’t mind doing the job of a Sergeant” . During the battle, he visited his soldiers constantly, and in one instance was helping move radio batteries from out of storage and into his command trench, where in which his subordinate did not realize who was assisting him and continued on his tasks. He absolutely won the admiration and respect of his men and encouraged the soldiers of 1st Airborne Division. Create a Shared Understanding Creating a clear understanding especially during the midst of a battle is vital to the success of the mission, and for Major General Urquhart this was absolutely an utter failure.
1st Airborne from the outset was having communication issues, and on many occasions, MG Urquhart left his headquarters to gain understanding from his subordinate commanders. At one point in the battle Major General Urquhart and Brigadier Lathbury, his second in command were both hiding in an attic to avoid German forces, greatly diminishing the command and control node of 1st Airborne Division. Communications issued plagued the operation but the Dutch telephone service was still operable during the battle and could have alleviated many problems faced by Major General …show more content…
Urquhart. Major General Urquhart did not create a shared understanding of Operation Market during the preparation phase of the operation. While he and his deputy commander were cut off from the rest of the division, Brigadier Hicks took command of 1st Airborne. Brigadier Hicks was securing Landing/Drop Zone’s in the early actions of the battle. His lack of understanding of the operation led him to believe that Lieutenant Colonel’s Frost’s 2nd Parachute Battalion was the decisive operation. Brigadier Hicks lack of understanding of the terrain and the enemy gave him a false understanding of the emerging situation. He ordered three battalions into an area called the Den Brink Area, a 200-meter corridor, on which the Rhine was on one side and high ground on the other. Along this route, the Germans were able to place on the high ground a Ant-aircraft battalion and a engineer battalion. Across the Rhine the Germans had also emplaced a reconnaissance battalion. These three battalions had a devastating effect on the reinforcements for the 2nd Parachute Battalion. Unfortunately for Major General Urquhart, the German forces had a very clear understanding of Operation Market-Garden. The Germans were swift to react to the noticeable airborne operation in broad daylight but were also in possession of the Allied orders that were found on a dead officer. This allowed the Germans commanders to understand just as well as the Allied commanders the concept of the mission and the goals the Allies had hoped to achieve. Accepting Prudent Risk Accepting prudent risk is key to being a commander, MG Urquhart did not adequately understand the risks involved at Arnhem. It was reported that on 15th September before the Friday before the operation was to begin, MG Urquhart was playing golf, rather than providing guidance and leadership to his staff and soldiers. This was/is completely unacceptable before the largest airborne operation was about to commence. General Browning was quoted saying to Major General Urquhart “I shouldn’t worry about learning how to parachute. Your job is to prepare this division for the invasion of Europe. Not only are you too big for parachuting but you are also getting on.” Meaning that Major General Urquhart was not even going to be parachuting into Arnhem, but rather flying in on a glider. MG Urquhart’s lack of understanding of the situation and his responsibility in coordinating and planning the operation were paramount, possibly if he was trained from within the airborne community he would have had a better understanding of what his mission and the flawed intent of his higher headquarters. Due to MG Urquhart’s lack of experience in airborne operations, it can be inferred that many of the faults in the operation were due to his lack of understanding and knowing the risks that were posed by the operation.
Unfortunately for the entire army group, Operation Market Garden was to be planned in 7 days. Major General Urquhart’s report on Operation Market states that there was adequate time for the planning of the mission but that due to the necessary risk of multiple airlifts over three days led to the divisions fighting strength to be that of a brigade. In his planning of this Operation, Major General Urquhart had requested more Allied gliders and planes, but seemed content enough to go ahead with the
plan. The entire 1st Airborne Division was to be dropped 8 miles away from the road bridge that was to be secured at Arnhem instead of coordinating landing zones closer to their vital objective. For a typical airborne operation, the objective should not be further than 5 miles away from the drop/landing zones. Major General Urquhart acknowledged the risks in his report of Operation Market, but did not fight General Browning before the Operation commenced in changing the plan so 1st Airborne Division had a better chance of succeeded at their mission. This allowed for the Germans to have adequate reaction time to set up blocking positions 1st Airborne Division’s mission statement “was to capture the bridges at ARNHEM and to establish a bridgehead round them, so that formations of 30 Corps and SECOND Army could pass through without delay on their advance northwards”. In creating a shared understanding with his subordinates before the operation took off he was successful. Exercise Disciplined Initiative During the battle 1st Airborne Division lacked the ability to take the initiative. Subordinate commanders were not audacious enough to seize opportunities that could have shifted the course of the operation. On 17 September, while Major General Urquhart was not in his command post, Major Gough, the commander of 1st Reconnaissance Squadron, had found a ferry at Heveadorp to aide crossing the Rhine. With the leadership elsewhere in the battle, this ferry went unsecured. This was a critical failure of the 1st Airborne Division. If Brigadier Hicks took the initiative to secure this ferry and dug in and waited for the ground forces from XXX Corps he could have contributed to the success of the operation. Instead of still focusing on securing the bridge at Arnhem, Brigadier Hicks did not undertake the initiative and understand the purpose of 1st Airborne Division. Conclusion Overall Operation Market Garden did not achieve its intended purpose. The Allies were not able to seize the bridges crossing into the German industrial heartland and bring a swift end to hostilities. Major General Urquhart and the 1st Airborne Division (UK) had mixed results which ultimately led to the failure of their assigned mission. At the end of the Operation the division suffered 80% casualties and would not see combat again for the rest of the war. If Major General Urquhart and his staff had a better understanding of their mission, they could have taken more acceptable and prudent risks and took the initiative to secure their objectives by other means.
The book Black Hearts by Jim Frederick is an in-depth narrative about the 1st platoon, Bravo Company 1-502nd Infantry 101st Airborne Division deployed to Iraq in 2005. The leadership failures documented in this book range all the way from the general officer level down to the lowest private. LT general Ricardo Sanchez failed to understand the climate his command group was entering as they were deployed into Iraq. From then on the entire leadership failures continued to compound upon each other with improper time to plan. It is customary to have a six month lead time to have a proper battle hand off when preparing to take over an AO from another unit. To compound this problem, the entire time the 502nd was in pre-deployment training, they were preparing for the rigors of urban combat. In reality, they were given six weeks to recon their new area of responsibility and were going to a countryside crafted by the heavens for guerilla warfare. As Colonel Ebel said in the book, “It is not going to be an easy road. They are not even sure of what they have in the area. It just feels bad. We can expect a real fight.”
However as the division commander, he failed to establish trust with his brigade commanders and build cohesive teams amongst his four brigades who took heavy losses in men and officers the day prior. Pettigrew had two men new to brigade command; Colonel Marshall took over Pettigrew’s own brigade and Colonel Birkett Fry took over for the wounded General Archer. General Davis and Colonel Brockenbrough were still in charge of their brigades, but were known to be inexperienced and poor leaders respectively. Pettigrew was aware of the shortcomings of Davis and Brockenbrough but did little to affect their deficiencies. For Davis, Pettigrew took “great pains before the assault to see that the division moved out properly.” This pestering did not make Davis more confident in his role and did not serve to strengthen the relationship or build trust between Pettigrew and his new brigade
Montgomery’s arguments and George Marshall and Henry Arnolds keenness, to use the First Allied Airborne Army, caused Operation Market-Garden. The debate had simply led to a horrible rift with the two Army group commanders who are the European Theater of Operations. Bradley protested to Eisenhower the important part of supplies was given to Montgomery, he kept Bradley’s protests in great shape. Bradley’s Army Group soon covered a very wide front in hilly country, that had hard parts in bringing to trial a great broad-front offensive in a hard country with a smart enemy that was recovering his
While performing his duties as a Brigade Commander during the invasion of Sicily in 1943 Gavin demonstrated his capabilities at problem analysis as well as implemented the processes through his unit. In this instance Gavin defined the problem and generated alternative solutions. Interestingly enough he allowed his Paratroopers to evaluate and choose the appropriate solution based on their situation. Then as the brigade would begin to assemble into a fighting force the leaders and Gavin would continue to implement and follow up on the solutions to the problems that they faced. Carlo D?Este wrote Jim Gavin?s War (2015) in this work he describes one of the key problems that Gavin encountered during the invasion of Sicily. Gavin?s Paratroopers were spread over miles of terrain after the Air Force failed to drop them near their objectives (para.3-5). Gavin perceived that this would become a problem after similar issues during pervious airborne operations. Now that Gavin had a defined problem he developed alternate courses of actions for his Paratroopers which included secondary objectives. He also provided guidance for alternative courses of action in case Paratroopers failed to link up with a large enough force to assault planned objectives. This
The planning of Operation Overlord was an idea that formed early in 1942. One of the key points that helped move the planning along was the idea that the German U-Bats were no longer a threat to the Allies. This now created an ocean that would be safe for the flow of supplies from the United States to Britain. November 1943 the agreement to plan an immense operation to cross the English Channel and liberate France was in effect. “ The broad outline of the attack was relatively simple: find suitable beaches, gather landing forces, isolate the battlefield by attacking bridges, tunnels, and rail networks so that German defenders could not be easily reinforced, and land the troops. Once a beachhead was established, the plan was to pour in the supplies needed to sustain an offensive and then break out into the French Countryside” (Encarta)
In April 2003, Major General David Petraeus led the 101st Airborne Division in combat operations into the northern Iraq city of Mosul. The 101st Airborne Division advanced faster and further than expected. The initial call to end major combat fighting resulted in the strategy of the U.S. military changing tactics. The military went from combat operations, to policing, and ultimately policy enforcers. Gen. Petraeus understood Mission Command and set into motion steps to improve the post war reconstruction of Mosul. As the commander, Gen. Petraeus had to analyze the mission and variables in order to accomplish the mission. With little to no guidance Gen. Petraeus
The separated 3rd Platoon needing help. One of the two Americans in that platoon were dead. They had to call Air support to keep the enemy back, when they call the planes for support, the Air Force had made some changes again to the mission plans without informing anyone.
The 77th division under the command of major Whittlesey had inexperienced soldiers put into their ranks. Major Whittlesey was given an order to advance into the argonne forest and capture the Charlevaux mill up on hill 193 hill ,and after taking casualties wished to fall back to receive supplies and reinforcements but were told that under no circumstances were they to give up ground to the germans "WE ARE NOT GOING BACK BUT FORWARD!" –General Alexander. They continued the advance into the Argonne while sustaining heavy losses to snipers and fortified german gun positions. The attack was successful and caught the germans off guard which was fortunate for them due to all the inexperienced soldiers. The battle fractured the individual units of their divisions and took the commanders a few days to regroup them back into their divisions. When they were back in their divisions the AEF attacked deep in the Argonne forest which proved to be an obstacle and caused the advance to be slow due to exhaustion, bad weather, combat stress and the constant resistance
The attack covered a 50 mile stretch of coast. (Source F). The total armoury involved was five army divisions in the first phase of attack, and more than 7000 sea vessels. 11 000 aircraft were also dispatched. Altogether 75 215 British and Canadian troops and 57 500 American troops landed by sea on the day. A further 23 400 were landed by air. (Source D). This operation was known as Operation Overlord. (Source F).
Staff of 10th Mountain Division took over the planning for Operation Anaconda around the middle of February. Writing plan and operation order of the Operation Anaconda “D-day was originally set for February 25, but it fell during a religious holiday, it was moved to February 28. Once CENTCOM approved the operational concept on February 25, planners from all the task forces worked quickly to finalize the details.” Operation orders said, “The operation was supposed to last roughly 72 hours total, Gen Hagenbeck received a surprise gift, the weather forecast was bad, so Gen Hagenbeck had to delay the mission until March 2. The weather was so bad, gave 10th Mountain Division time to get more manpower to engage in the fight. By CENTCOM reinforce 10th Mountain Division is made the fight little easy, but it was difficult in Afghanistan because of the terrain and weather. The reinforce manpower came from Fort Campbell, Kentucky and aircraft carrier, John F. Kennedy arrived ready to fight in theater. Operation Anaconda was successfully because all U.S. and coalition troop work as a unity forces to defeat the adversary. On March 16 10th Mountain Division Commander declared the end of Operation
Thesis: Even though Operation Anaconda was reported as a successful mission, Joint Operations Commanders failed to recognize the challenges they would face by not properly training their units for joint operations between military branches.
The flow is logical, starting with an introductory overview which quickly takes us to our abrupt realization in 1940 that war with Germany is imminent. His description of General Lesley McNair as being the mastermind of WWII’s combat divisions is thorough and provides enough information to the non-military reader to provide a clear visual of the U.S. Army’s training and mobilization program, the training of much needed officers along with the composition of the various divisions.
The evasion of Sicily in World War II code named Operation HUSKY provides an excellent case study to evaluate joint functions. Operation HUSKY demonstrates the complexity of joint operations between air, land, and sea, while providing relevant lessons for today’s leaders. Operation HUSKY was successful in achieving its objective to capture and control Sicily as a base of future military operations. However, this essay will evaluate operational level leadership failures with regard to the joint functions of command and control (C2), movement and maneuver (M2), and protection.
military decided to conduct an assault on the Shahikot Valley in Afghanistan using a sizable amount of U.S. ground forces. This was due to the Taliban having control over the Shahikot Valley. However, there was no Unity of Command established. Due to this sizable ground force, General Franks appointed the 10th Mountain Division Commander, Major General (MG) Hagenbeck as the Combined Joint Task Force (CJTF) commander. MG Hagenback was appointed only days before the operation was to take place. As with COL Mulholland, MG Hagenback did not have control over all of the SOF and CIA Operatives. This lead to the lack of planning within the command and control element of the Operation. Therefore, there was not a defined command structure for Operation Anaconda, resulting in a poor Unity of
The Allied forces failed to leverage command and control with joint fires to achieve a decisive victory in Sicily. The ability to provide operational sustainment to the force ensured eventual success over the Axis forces. Alexander wasted an opportunity to gain a position of relative advantage over the Axis forces by failing to contain Axis forces in Sicily. This failure stemmed from not synchronizing and integrating all joint functions and utilizing effective command and control.