Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Operation Anaconda
Operation anaconda case study essay
Operation anaconda case study essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction Even though, at times it seemed that joint functions appeared in chaos, the end-state was a unified effort. There were obstacles that precluded this in the beginning and that are why the joint function of Operation Anaconda nearly failed. The shortages of staff, lack of detailed information flow, and the slow movement on Operation Anaconda D-day was the key factors that nearly led to the failure. Shortage of Staff United States Army prompted and selected Major General Hagenbeck to command the 10th Mountain Division to establish forward Headquarters. Major Gen. Hagenbeck had some significant hurdles to cross. The thinly stretched and highly stressed division headquarters was undermanned because their manpower was already …show more content…
committed and deployed elsewhere in country. Central Command MacDill AFB, FL (CENTCOM) placed stringent manning restrictions on the 10th Mountain Division, stating that only 50 to 60 troops would be needed for deployment. Gen Hagenbeck’s staff informed him of the strength problem so Gen Hagenbeck gave his staff the commander’s intent to improve on getting more troops for the mission. The 10th Mountain left to deploy to Uzbekistan while 101st Airborne Division held in reserve for possible operation in Iraq. The most mindboggling was 101st Airborne Division, with no deployments ongoing and able to perform conduct helicopter air assaults, CENTCOM could have been solved the operating problem by deploying the 101ST as a Forward Headquarter. Lack of Information The flow of information was in chaos because commanders of task forces in the field was doing their own reporting information, also not sharing information between task force elements, air components and Special Forces groups.
My opinion CENTCOM did not have adequate control of the US forces in Afghanistan. Once 10th Mountain Division commander realized the problem, therefore; staff of Gen Hagebeck starts putting a plan into effect to establish C4I command, control, communication, and Intel and computer networks. The biggest problem was getting information flowing. The terrain makes it extremely hard for US forces to communicate and perform their command and control functions. With limited communications and many forces in heavy contact, the level of high-priority radio traffic exploded with spot reports. This was a very slow process for sending spot reports back to 10th Mountain Division. More problem can forward, that 10th Mountain needed to have Tactical Control (TACON) so everyone could share information, therefore organizations would report to 10th Mountain Division commander not directly to CENTCOM Commander. By doing it this way, 10th Mountain would report all activity in country. Order to bring cohesion in the command structure, 10th Mountain commander appointed two generals as deputies, which BG Gary Harrell and BG Mike Jones, both experienced as Special Forces Officers, well known among the special operation group. This gave the 10th …show more content…
Mountain commander a useful liaison with the special operation groups and black operations. By establishing a plan for information flow, the commanders in the field was able to share information. D-day moment help the Forces It’s were time for 10th Mountain Division to start planning for D-day for all forces to be under one command.
Staff of 10th Mountain Division took over the planning for Operation Anaconda around the middle of February. Writing plan and operation order of the Operation Anaconda “D-day was originally set for February 25, but it fell during a religious holiday, it was moved to February 28. Once CENTCOM approved the operational concept on February 25, planners from all the task forces worked quickly to finalize the details.” Operation orders said, “The operation was supposed to last roughly 72 hours total, Gen Hagenbeck received a surprise gift, the weather forecast was bad, so Gen Hagenbeck had to delay the mission until March 2. The weather was so bad, gave 10th Mountain Division time to get more manpower to engage in the fight. By CENTCOM reinforce 10th Mountain Division is made the fight little easy, but it was difficult in Afghanistan because of the terrain and weather. The reinforce manpower came from Fort Campbell, Kentucky and aircraft carrier, John F. Kennedy arrived ready to fight in theater. Operation Anaconda was successfully because all U.S. and coalition troop work as a unity forces to defeat the adversary. On March 16 10th Mountain Division Commander declared the end of Operation
Anaconda.
During the battle, COL Hughes moved to areas under heavy fire to advice his commanders directly and motivate his Marines to push forward. He exhibited extraordinary professionalism as he maintain his presence as a true ground commander who fought side-by-side with his Marines. Initially, cloud cover was heavy and poor weather prevented close air support (CAS) and artillery support. With organic assets readily available, he personally directed fire support on enemy defenses slowly weakening Communist forces hold on the city. Clearly, COL Hughes was able to inspire trust to his subordinates whose end result was a cohesive team that fought a successful battle
The award-winning novel by Stephen Ambrose, Band of Brothers: Easy Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest, discusses one of the greatest examples of mission command in the form of 1st Lieutenant Richard Winters and his role in the Brecourt Manor Assault. This battle is a textbook example of how to fight against a superior enemy force that outnumbered the unit by four times as much. Facing overwhelming odds with just 16 paratroopers against over 60 German Soldiers, 1LT Winters nevertheless prevails and succeeds in achieving his objective while minimizing casualties to just three Soldiers lost. Looking back further into the American Revolution, the Battle of Bunker Hill on the American side is one of the earliest examples of Mission Command under the command of COL William Prescott.
The 2nd Brigade of 101st Airborne Division found out in the summer of 2004 that they had to prepare for the war in the Middle East more particularly for Iraq. With Colonel Todd Ebel in Command of the 2nd Division with a year to prepare over 3,400 men and woman he got right to work. Colonel Ebel started by choosing his staff and who he thought was fit to take charge and lead this ever more complicated war. It was a huge religious civil war taking place in Iraq at the time with the Sunnis at war against the Shi’ite and after the capture of Saddam insurgency started uprising immediately. This uprising along with the uprising of Muqtada al-Sadr a key leader that had lots of violent followers that soon grew into a form of a militia called Mahdi Army which became another huge problem for the U.S. because the line between a legitamite populist movement and a huge theocratic organized-crime and terror ring was a thin one. The 2nd Brigade Infantry Battalions consisted of 1-502nd (First Strike) and 2-502nd (Strike Force) and 2nd brigade as a whole is known as the “Black Hearts”. Ebel’s mission was to deny insurgent’s access to Baghdad through his AO and as intelligence increased to uproot and destroy insurgent safe havens, while also training the IA so they could ensure the stability of the region later on. Ebel chose Lt. Col. Kunk as commander of “First Strike” 1-502nd and Lt. Col. Haycock as commander of “Strike Force” 2-502nd. By Ebel’s personality evaluations of Kunk and Haycock he decided that Kunk would work in the area that involved him being more engaging where populist centers were and work with local officials and Haycock more in the fighting areas. Kunk was in command of 3 rifle companies, 1 weapons company, 1 logistics company...
The book Black Hearts by Jim Frederick is an in-depth narrative about the 1st platoon, Bravo Company 1-502nd Infantry 101st Airborne Division deployed to Iraq in 2005. The leadership failures documented in this book range all the way from the general officer level down to the lowest private. LT general Ricardo Sanchez failed to understand the climate his command group was entering as they were deployed into Iraq. From then on the entire leadership failures continued to compound upon each other with improper time to plan. It is customary to have a six month lead time to have a proper battle hand off when preparing to take over an AO from another unit. To compound this problem, the entire time the 502nd was in pre-deployment training, they were preparing for the rigors of urban combat. In reality, they were given six weeks to recon their new area of responsibility and were going to a countryside crafted by the heavens for guerilla warfare. As Colonel Ebel said in the book, “It is not going to be an easy road. They are not even sure of what they have in the area. It just feels bad. We can expect a real fight.”
Unfortunately for the entire army group, Operation Market Garden was to be planned in 7 days. Major General Urquhart’s report on Operation Market states that there was adequate time for the planning of the mission but that due to the necessary risk of multiple airlifts over three days led to the divisions fighting strength to be that of a brigade. In his planning of this Operation, Major General Urquhart had requested more Allied gliders and planes, but seemed content enough to go ahead with the
The SPCC is targeted to commissioned officers in grades 0-5 (Lieutenant Colonel) or 0-6 (Colonel) who have been centrally selected to command TO&E (Troops, Organization & Equipment) Sustainment Units. This course provides training in modular force operations for newly selected command designees, enabling them to function effectively throughout their command tour. The focus is current and emerging sustainment doctrine and leadership topics for commanders. Training received during the SPCC at Fort Lee is intended to complement the Pre-Command Course (PCC) program of instruction (POI) at Fort Leavenworth, KS; making training consistent at both locations.
The 7th Cavalry Regiment's destruction at the Battle of the Little Bighorn in June 1876 is the subject of over a century of debate. LTC George A. Custer failed to exercise four key responsibilities that were expected of him as the regiment’s commander. He failed to understand the problem and environment, visualize a feasible solution, clearly describe it to his subordinates, and effectively direct his forces. These four aspects of mission command are integral to the operations process and help Soldiers understand and execute their commander's intent. Custer's failure to properly fulfill his role in the operations process resulted in his death and a strategic defeat for the nation.
Lieutenant Colonel George A. Custer was assigned to the 7th Calvary Regiment directly under the regimental commander Colonel Samuel Sturgis. During his assignment, LTC Custer temporarily filled the role of the regimental commander, reporting directly to Brigadier General Alfred Terry. BG Terry issued all battle orders and plans to him.
The fight on Hamburger Hill took place during Operation Apache Snow, the second part of a three-phased campaign intended to annihilate North Vietnamese Army (NVA) bases in the treacherous A Shau Valley. Five infantry battalions were leading the attack under Major General Melvin Zais, Commander of the 101st Airborne Division. Three units were American (the 1/506th, 2/501st, and 3/187th Infantry) and two came from the 1st Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) Division (the 2/1st and 4/1st ARVN). Colonel Joseph Conmy, Commander of the 3rd Brigade of the 101st Airborne, controlled and lead the main effort of the attack. His plan called for each of the five battalions to "air assault" into the valley by helicopter on 10 May 1969 and to search its assigned sector for enemy troops and...
3 Colonel John T. Carney Jr., No Room for Error, 273. 4. Richard Kugler, Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan, 3. 5. General Tommy Franks, American Soldier, 1988. 6 Todd Marzano, Criticisms Associated with Operation Anaconda, Can Long Distance Leadership Be Effective, 4. 7 Todd Marzano, Criticisms Associated with Operation Anaconda, Can Long Distance Leadership Be Effective, 6. 8 Sean Naylor, Not a Good Day to Die, 121.
The battle I will be discussing is the battle of Tora Bora. The engagement took place in the mountains of eastern Afghanistan from December 12, 2001 to December 17, 2001. The units involved were from the CIA, numerous Special Forces groups, Pakistani soldiers and local anti-Taliban fighters. The mission given to the forces was to kill Osama bin Laden from the caves, leave the body with the Taliban and disrupt the Al Qaeda organization by removing their leader. The intent was to infiltrate the cave system, remove bin Laden and return home.
It began to emerge the differences in tactics. The question was whether to continue so far the Supreme Allied Commander of the Allied Forces Europe, General Eisenhower’s tactics attacking on a broad front, or due to problems of supply to take just one mighty blow. In that period Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery developed a new operation plan, which would include the use of 1st Airborne Army (Lieutenant General Lewis H. Brereton), actually 1st Airborne Corps (Lieutenant General Frederick Browning). The Corps comprised of 82nd US Airborne Division (Brigadier General James M. Gavin), 101st US Airborne Division (Major General Maxwell D. Taylor), and 1st British Airborne Division (Major General Robert “Roy” E. Urquhart) supported with, under his command, 1st Polish Independent Parachute Brigade (Major General Stanislaw Sosabowski). These units should be dropped along the roa...
The Battle of Antietam could have been a devastating and fatal blow to the Confederate Army if Gen. McClellan acted decisively, took calculated risks, and veered away from his cautious approach to war. There are many instances leading up to the battle and during the battle in which he lacks the necessary offensive initiative to effectively cripple and ultimately win the war. This paper is intended to articulate the failure of Mission Command by GEN McClellan by pointing out how he failed to understand, visualize, describe and direct the battlefield to his benefit.
A defined chain of command with equal representation from all the armed services coupled with standardized clear communication and training throughout the branches, results in an elite fighting force with endless capabilities. Efficiency is the major goal behind Joint Warfare and so long as the clear channels of communication throughout the services hold true, this goal is attainable. This efficiency, though almost impossible to fully achieve, was seen during Desert Storm. During the Desert Storm campaign, General Schwarztkopf was Commander and Chief of US Central Command (USCINCCENT). His first order of business was to name component commanders.
Communication is critical to any organization and is necessary in every aspect especially in a military. Communication plays a role in Soldier development, peer to peer relations, Chain of command management, and virtually every aspect of a military operations. Commanders require it the most so that they can execute large scale operations without flaw and that alone requires ceaseless effective communication. If soldiers are informed and engaged, communications with other units are likely to be robust as well.