Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cognitive bias flashcards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
While people deal with everyday life, a plethora of events is occurring throughout the day. Most people usually do a multitude of actions to resolve these events without thinking as well. This can be anything from trying to get to class as soon as possible, talking to someone that recently was introduced, or doing a kind of tradition at a football game. Cognitive Biases is defined as a systematic pattern of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment, whereby inferences about other people and situations may be drawn in an illogical fashion. This article will talk about a small sample of these situations and clarify what the meaning behind them. It shall discuss Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, Gamblers Fallacy, and Illusion of Control …show more content…
with examples of prior situations of my life. As I look back into my past, the main memories that are projected out are unpleasant and unwanted. This is the definition of negativity bias. Continuing, focusing on the erroneous of a situation or characteristic. This is seen in my past semester with the business communication class. We were asked to review other student’s presentation and give well-placed feedback as well as critiques on their performance. Hence, most people disregard the positive remarks and indulge themselves in the negative. This has also been seen when looking over past performance recordings, like a with e-sports players, athletes, debaters, and speakers. When meeting people for the first time, everyone says that the first impression is the most important one to put oneself in a good light; this is so because of Confirmation Bias.
It is defined as the tendency to search for, interpret, focus on and remember information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions meaning that the first time an individual is exposed to a new subject, that being an individual, place, or activity, their initial thoughts towards it will stay. This happened when I first tried ranch dressing on a salad and had a horrible experience with it. The bad event corresponding to eating with ranch left me with a bad memory. Ever since then, that dressing has been of pure disgust, though others approve of consumption especially if something within the food tasted …show more content…
subpar. Continuing, as people play games of chance and gamble away money that could have been used to make less risky decisions. When people try to deal with future probability while thinking that past events will alter the chance of a certain outcome occurring is called the Gamblers Fallacy. This can be seen with people dumping massive amounts of money into a game, thinking that the past probability will change the outcome of the next slots, roll, card pack pulls, or lottery number scratch. I have experienced this with buying Magic the Gathering cards at my local game shop, I tried to pull a specific card from a set of over 300 cards in a 15 card pack, and spent over $100 trying to get claim some cards that were unlikely to be attained. I have also seen this happen to people who buy cases or $1,200 worth of booster boxes trying to complete a set of cards from the current expansion. While the probability of gaining the desired outcome is higher compared to a casino, past results of probability should not be considered when looking into new chances. Finally, as people go to sporting events, they will see people doing certain traditions to promote, at least within themselves, a sense of control to an external factor that they have no power towards; this is known as Illusion of control.
Many examples of this are seen, with octopuses deciding the “winner” of the next Super bowl, to a tradition of watching a game get a desired outcome for the Stanley Cup. Areas, where people see this, are mainly in sporting events but are not limited to that area. I have dealt with this when going to any football game, hockey match, or Magic the Gathering tournament. It seems everyone thinks that their own ritual will change any situation. This essay touched on the topics of Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Gamblers Fallacy, and Illusion of control. Each is just a few samples of a massive plethora of biases and theories based upon humanity. Most people have certain biases that govern their subconscious and will trigger if certain scenarios are met. It is hard to change some effects, like confirmation bias, after it has occurred because it easier to go along with preconceived notion rather than put the effort in reshaping thought
patterns.
Furthermore, the authors aim to unfold the scientific logic of their analysis of the effects of hidden biases so people will be “better able to achieve the alignment,” between their behavior and intentions (Banaji and Greenwald, 2013) preface
Higgins, Tory. “Self-Discrepancy Theory: What Patterns of Self-Beliefs Cause People to Suffer?”(1989). Advances in Experimental Social psychology, Vol.22 (1989):93-136. Academic Press Inc.
I thoroughly enjoyed reading about Goldacre’s (2010) “Why Clever People Believe Stupid Things.” This article ultimately allowed me to not only understand the biases that individuals possess, but it also allowed me to better understand my own personal biases. Clever people may believe “stupid” things due to “intuition” and instinctive. All individuals encompass a unique set of opinions, sentiments, and, perceptions. This ultimately makes us biased. I truly enjoyed reading about the six main “traps”, and applying these fascinating ideas to my daily life. These ideas present how information may be evaluated poorly, and ultimately lead to misunderstanding and poor decisions.
“Everything can be taken away from man but one thing—the last human freedom, to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances” (Viktor Frankl, as quoted in Seaward 217). It’s not what happens to us, but how we react to it that matters. According to scholars, it is not the event that is stressful to us, but the way we perceive the event. Cognitive distortion occurs when a person blows a situation out of proportion. There have been times where I’ve distorted a situation, making it worse than it actually is. At the beginning of every semester when you nervously read over each syllabus only to see the hundreds of assignments and tests that you are expected to complete can be very stressful. There have been times in the past where I’ve
Cognitive dissonance is widely regarded as a post decision theory, meaning that it’s constructs are enacted when individuals attempt to persuade themselves after a decision or course of action has already been carried out (Dainton & Zelley, 2015). This persuasion only occurs when the individual must confront the inconsistency between their actions and beliefs. Because this confrontation occurs within the individual, Cognitive Dissonance Theory is a psychological perspective. This means that different psychological variables will affect the behavior of the individual.
Like regret and envy, free will is a distinctly human quality that appears to influence – and be influenced by – counterfactual thinking. In one study about the link between free will and counterfactual thinking, the researchers found that people who believe more strongly in free will are likely to view their choices in a given situation as being more mutable, which in turn makes them more likely to engage in counterfactual thinking (Alquist, Ainsworth, Baumeister, Daly, & Stillman,
Reading Kathy A. Bobula,’s article on brain development, I learned a lot of new things for myself. I want to note that it is especially interesting to learn not only about the processes of formation of explicit or implicit perceptions in general, but also about the important detailes of brain formation since childhood. Some of the explanations answered the questions that arose at the time I passed the test for revealing hidden prejudices. I also liked the specific and simple descriptions of the concept of bias and its types (prejudice, stereotype, attitude).
The greatest concern of this cognitive bias is that the time needed to complete a task is often greatly underestimated (Davies, 2014). As per Hofstadter’s Law: “It always takes longer than expected even when you take into account Hofstadter’s Law” (Hofstadter, 2000). This is in great part due to the inability to predict the unexpected future, which leads to the development of the most optimistic scenario for completion of a task. Due to this narrow focus and the lack of consideration for any variables within the idealistic scenario, individuals are left at the original deadline with a task still yet to be fully
My favorite topic that we have discussed during the scholar’s seminar was week 7 when we talked about perspective, context and media. The topic really interested me as many new stations and social media outlets have biases against one another and can possibly distort the news headlines. For example, in an article by The Washington Times named “Mainstream media maligned: 10 examples of blatant bias” written by Kelly Riddell talks about news stations who “blatantly” showed a bias in articles or their news. But it is ironic because the Washington Times isn’t mentioned at all showing a bias towards their own company, which makes sense. I took away that I must check to make sure sources are reliable and although may have a bias research more to
The first thing that we must remember is that cognitive biases in the brain are unavoidable
For example, you buy 20 Powerball tickets and believe that because you bought 20 you have a better chance to win the lotto. While you chance increases, it does depend on the average number of tickets bought per person. If the average is 25 tickets per person you are below the mean and do not have a better chance than even 50% of the people playing. It is the same when you are raising your hand to be called on to ask a question at a convention. You raise your hand as fast, hard and tall as you can raise it thinking that you are raising your hand differently than the other 50 people raising their hands. Everyone believes they have a better chance, but really that fact does not change the likelihood of being called upon. Unreal optimism is another self-serving bias. This bias suggests that human’s general think the best outcome will happen. An example of this is when you were in high school and a huge snow storm is headed your way. The weather man is calling for at least two feet of snow and surrounding schools are starting to cancel school. You go to bed after completing several snow day rituals thinking that there will be a snow day
Every day Americans are bombarded with media culture. Companies are constantly trying to buy us, convince us of certain ideas, and force us to pick a side on specific issues such as politics or religion. Many Americans accept the fact that in 2015, our news is biased. The world always credits Americans for being lazy, and this reflects in our laziness to find quality of sources for our news. Finding reliable sources takes time and Americans do not typically like things that take time. Even if we know something is bias, we still may continue to accept it as truth just out of laziness. This known distrust occurs because corporations own so many sources of our news. Corporate ownership does not necessarily bias every piece of news, but it does
As people, we often presume that the actions displayed by a person are piloted through their individual thoughts and opinions, however the cognitive dissonance theory (CDT) shows that this is not always the case. Labeled by some as an action-opinion theory, the theory of cognitive dissonance explains how people are compelled to commit actions contrary to their beliefs. The basic principle behind action-opinion theories is that these types of theories insinuate that actions can influence one’s beliefs and attitudes. This idea is counterintuitive in that it would seem logical that our actions are a reflection of our thoughts and opinions and not the cause of them. Nevertheless, theories like these, particularly
Have you ever wondered how your mind comes up with decisions and how it works the way it does? Maybe that question is too deep for you, but the answer is really in this simple theory called cognitive dissonance. [ADD STORY OR ANECDOTE] Cognitive Dissonance has a powerful influence over our actions or behaviors, which essentially means the decisions that we make. It affects us in so many aspects of our lives, and as students, we have to make little decisions every day. I chose this topic as I lack decisiveness and usually find myself looking to others to make decisions for me. This theory has brought up some interesting examples and reasons for why me and so many other young adults suffer from this state of cognitive inconsistency.
My experimental design is in the field of superstition. For this I have researched appropriate past studies and chosen those that examine the notions of illusions and beliefs based on concepts of superstitious behaviour, superstition and superstitious rules. Many experiments in this field point at the fact of how causal learning could be distorted by biased beliefs. Langer (1975) has indeed done many experiments and has gone on to define the aspect of ‘illusion of control’. And this, Langer has defined as one that stems from an expectation of personal success probability inappropriately higher than the objective probability justifies. Skinner (1981) also goes on to posit that illusions of control and expectancy that do not match with the contingencies arranged by the environment can be dependent on adaptation mechanisms in different levels of analysis and thus explains why people sometimes act at odds with what is defined as reality.