More handpicked essays just for you.
The connection between Religion and Morality
Religion as source of moral values and society
The connection between Religion and Morality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The connection between Religion and Morality
Talking about ethics, a visitor asks:
What God commanded to do what is really good, or is considered to be good simply because it is God's will that its mandate is considered to be good?
-If you first: God is subject to the idea of good and we can dispense with the religion to behave ethically.
- If the latter: ethics is not objective nor to the theists or atheists. Morning God can change His commandments. (In fact, the cabio once: "You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy".
This is a question that is as old as philosophy. In fact, it goes back to some of the famous Dialogs of Plato, entitled "Eutrifon", and therefore my first intention to respond was simply put the link to the excellent Wikipedia article Euthyphro dilemma. I was
In order to understand the truth, people must have solid justified beliefs to prevent diminished autonomy. As humans, we are motivated to practice morally good actions since God provides love. His act of caring is compelling and promotes gratitude.
In both the Euthyphro and the Republic, Plato attempts to determine the good and explain its principles by examining definitions and utilizing analogies. The Euthyphro aims at determining the definition of piety through a well debated dialogue between Euthyphro and Socrates. Similarly in the Republic, Plato utilizes three specific analogies to best convey the likeness, the levels, and the journey to reaching the highest good. The sun analogy, the divided line, and the cave analogy all help demonstrate what the good is to Plato and how it relates to human knowledge, wisdom, and reality.
"Did God decide what goodness is? If so, then "good" is more or less the arbitrary decision of a frightening being to which we cannot relate, and that being could just as easily have made murder and stealing the ultimate moral actions without any contradictions. On the other hand, if God did not decide what goodness is, he cannot truly be omnipo...
god because they are morally good?, or 2) Are morally good acts good because they are
...what one does. God hopes that everyone lives a good, generous life. Everyone should perform actions from their hearts, because if one is forced to do something it is not love. For instance, throughout life one is taught that being there for the other or a friend is something that is out of love and is the significance of friendship. Everyone should be friends with the poor, get to know them, and lend a helping hand.
to do evil to their enemies, but to instead to them good, and to pray
In the book the Republic, by Plato, revised by G.M.A. Grube, an argument is made over what Justice is. How is justice defined? Can it be defined? What incentivizes one to be a just person? The group, specifically Socrates and Thrasymachus have concluded that Justice must be defined and proven worthwhile. The argument lies within this task as Thrasymachus hastily makes the bold claim that what society knows as “just” is simply not desirable. He states that Justice is actually the advantage of the stronger and claims that injustice is a virtue. Socrates and Euthyphro have a similar argument where “Holy” acts are attempted to be defined and the controversy alludes to that of being “Just”. Euthyphro claims that it is a holy act to prosecute those
This philosophical study will define the relationship between morality and religion in the Socratic dialogue of the Euthyphro by Plato. The primary argument put forth by Socrates is to determine the causality of morality/piousness in and unto itself or by the approval of the gods. Socrates attempts to question the moral and religious authority of Euthyphro, which defines the important originations of the “moral good” through the command of the gods. However, Socrates defines the original presence of the morality/piousness before the gods can “approve” or disapprove” of its goodness. This is the theoretical position of denying the issue of "divine command” of the gods’ existence before morality/piousness, which Socrates refutes in the arguments
Ethics are the principles that shape individual lives in modern society. It is a subjective idea that seems to have a standard in society. Ethics and morals are the major factors that guide individuals to make right and wrong choices. Something that is morally right to one person might be the very opposite of what another person would view as right. There are many factors that can trigger a change in an individual’s view of morality.
To be a good speaker, one must master the skill of listening. The vizier Ptahhotep discloses in “The Maxims of Good Discourse” different advices on listening and speaking, reveling that the secret for becoming a great specker, the secret for people listing, is listening to others; to remain silent until the moment one has acquire enough knowledge from the elders. Meanwhile, Plato in “Euthyphro” shares the manuscript a dialogue between Euthyphro and Socrates where the later wishes to learn what is piety and how he can use in his defense in court; the manuscript shows how great listener Socrates was. He employs different techniques to convince Euthyphro to share with him the characteristics of piety and impiety. Whether Socrates was successful or not, the dialogue shows that techniques such as paraphrasing the other’s ideas before introducing yours is a great technique to make people listen. Therefore, both Ptahhotep and Plato argue that people will listen if what you say is meaningful, but the worry that
Dr. David Jeremiah states, “One of the main issues we must understand is humanity is in a fallen state. Unfortunately, this is due to choices made in the garden that we have no control over.” The Bible says, “It is in the heart of man to do evil.” Hence, the scriptures are given to us for guidance and instruction on morality and relationships. (Ecclesiastes 8:11)
Agreeing with the third choice allows the theist to avoid all problems associated with the other two. William Laine Craig asserts this, “the theist does not want to say that the God is good simply because God happens to approve of it, since this makes morality arbitrary. Nor does he want to say that God approves the Good because it is, in fact, good, since this seems to entail the existence of standards of goodness outside of God.” In other words, we do not want a standard that is arbitrary nor one that exists outside or above God. Christians should affirm both God's power and His goodness. Since God's nature itself can serve as the standard of goodness, one can simply say that God’s nature is then unchangeable and entirely good, His will is not arbitrary and that His declaration...
Ethical quality is something that comes to mankind notwithstanding the requirement for survival of humankind. Actually once in a while, to act in the most good way that could be available, survival is put in danger. One can in this manner expect that there must be another power that oversees why we are moral. Furthermore, this outer power one can reason is along these lines God.
[1] Ethics is defined as “the code of moral principles and values that governs the behaviour of a person or a group with respect to what is right or wrong” (Samson and Daft, 2005, p.158)
Each individual has his or her own set of values. These values determine how we will act in a given situation; what decisions we will make based on these values. These actions and decisions are going to be different from one person to the next because each of us has our own set of values. Many of these values have a basis in a person’s religious upbringing and how they define their own personal religion. This paper will show how my own actions and decisions are based on my values regarding my religious viewpoint. My religious viewpoint is that I neither believe nor disbelieve in God, or any god for that matter, and because of this ambivalence, my values, and therefore how I act in a given situation, is based on my own morality developed from my social and life experiences rather than theological doctrine.