On Euthyphro's Dilemma and Divine Command

1747 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Two strenghts and weaknesses of divine command theory

On Euthyphro's Dilemma and Divine Command

In Plato's Euthyphro, Socrates presents a fundamentally meta-ethical problem to

Euthyphro by asking “whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy,

or holy because it is beloved of the gods” (Plato 219)? I will relate this question to the

Divine Command Theory of morality and discuss the philosophical implications

associated with each possible answer to the dilemma while demonstrating fallacies and

inequalities within each.

Divine Command Theory (DCT) asserts that “morality is somehow dependent

upon God, and that moral obligation consists in obedience to God’s commands. Divine

Command Theory includes the claim that morality is ultimately based on the commands

or character of God, and that the morally right action is the one that God commands or

requires” (Austin). The seemingly paradoxical dilemma Socrates puts forth to Euthyphro

is thus illustrated by its two horns: 1) Are morally good (or pious) acts commanded by

god because they are morally good?, or 2) Are morally good acts good because they are

commanded by God?

To define God in any specific relative term would nonetheless be a monumental

undertaking for which I fear I would not do justice, but in the sense of constructing any

sound and reasonable argument in favor of any one thing or the other there must first be

some concrete premise to build upon. Staying true to the subject at hand I will notZellner 2

attempt to undertake any ontological argument, but for the sake of these arguments

pertaining to DCT we shall not solely define God in the apologetic sense as the

Judeo-Christian God of Abraham, but as the omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly

benevolent Supreme Being whom transcends all re...

... middle of paper ...

...concrete theories and empirical truths, no matter how factual, that we may attempt to use

to understand his attributes.Zellner 8

Works Cited

Austin, Michael W. "Divine Command Theory." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

University of Tennessee at Martin, n.d. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.

Luther, Martin, et al. Luther And Erasmus: Free Will And Salvation. Philadelphia:

Westminster Press, 1969. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 15 Apr. 2014.

Moreland, James P., and Kai Nielsen. Does God Exist?: The Debate between Theists &

Atheists. Buffalo, N.Y: Prometheus Books, 1993. Print.

Plato. "Euthyphro." Plato: The Complete Works. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. 3 Rd ed. South

Bend, IN: The Complete Works Collection, 2011. 199-231. Print.

Russell, Bertrand. Why I Am Not a Christian: And Other Essays on Religion and Related

Subjects. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1957. Print.

Show More
Related

  • The Universe: The Design Argument by William Paley

    1139 Words  | 3 Pages

    Russell, Bertrand. “Why I Am Not a Christian,” in Introduction to Philosophy. 6th edition. Perry, Bratman, and Fischer. Oxford University Press. 2013, pp. 56-59.

    Read More

  • Traditional And Utilitarian Approaches To The Euthyphro Dilemma

    1862 Words  | 4 Pages

    "Consider this: Is the pious being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by the gods?" (10a)

    Read More

  • Euthyphro, By Socrates: What Is Pious?

    1521 Words  | 4 Pages

    Everyday people make choices, whether they are good or bad. These choices are usually known as good or bad, already. What makes them good or bad? Are they good because morally we think they are, or is it something more? In the words of Socrates, “Is it pious being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by the gods? (10a)” From reading Euthyphro, I found that there is not a clear answer, but rather it is more of an opinionated answer. To come up with an answer, one must really dive into their thoughts, and reason out why they think a certain way, just like Socrates did with Euthyphro. While I read, I could not help but think that not all gods agree on everything, and not all religions do, either. How are we to know which is right? For example, people are strictly forbidden to get tattoos in Islam, but in Hinduism they are allowed. How would we know which the gods loves? If we agreed that all gods loved the same things, like Euthyphro and Socrates do, we still have a problem on whether or not we agree or disagree with what the gods love or hate. The use of Euthyphro and my own thinking made me decide that the pious is pious for no other reason than it being

    Read More

  • WR 121 Final Self-Assessment

    723 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... reasons why. This strengthens my argument as I develop relevant reasons to my position while agreeing on a middle ground.

    Read More

  • Plato Euthyphro Rational Thinking

    721 Words  | 2 Pages

    Euthyphro’s second definition of piety is “the pious is what the gods love”. Socrates takes this idea and

    Read More

  • Challenges to Male Authority in Sophocles’ play, Antigone

    1137 Words  | 3 Pages

    high reverence. She feels that the laws of the gods should be obeyed above all others,

    Read More

  • Reason Vs Hume Essay

    814 Words  | 2 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... However, including God in the discussion of morality is difficult due to God not being a naturally occurring sentiment that would affect judgment. Both stances on the subject of morality are very valid as well as very different, but I believe both feelings and reason are necessary to find an accurate moral philosophy model.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Plato's Euthyphro Dilemma

    734 Words  | 2 Pages

    ​Dating all the way back to ancient Greece, Plato raised a challenge by merely asking, “Is it right because God commands it, or does God command it because it’s right?” Nowadays, this simple yet complex question poses a problem to modern day Christians. When understanding this question, you are forced to believe you only have one of two choices to accept. Those being either it is right because God commands it or God commands it because it is right. If it is right because God commands it then anything, specifically evil, could be right. On the other hand, if God commands it because it is right then the standard of goodness is no longer. Both options are hostile to Christianity. However, after further investigation, there is a third option: God’s very nature is the standard of goodness. By closely examining Plato’s Euthyphro Dilemma, it’s clear that a theist should undoubtedly accept the third option, being that of God’s nature is the standard of goodness.

    Read More

  • Thrasymachus And Euthyphro: A Continuation

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thrasymachus then turns his own argument around by turning his thoughts on their heads and exploring a new concept; that injustice is right, which begins to foreshadow the concept of censorship from from further in The Republic. Euthyphro defines what is holy is what is agreeable to the gods. Through the Greek history, the gods were all powerful beings, beings that were literally at the top of Mount Olympus, looking down upon their subjects in the

    Read More

  • Socrates's Argument Of Pious Being Loved By The Gods

    852 Words  | 2 Pages

    Euthyphro was arguing that by doing what the gods believe is holy and pious you are making them better, in other words you are taking care of them and it is like a kind of service that you are doing towards the gods. Euthyphro said, “The kind of care, Socrates, that slaves take of their masters” which meant that you are taking care of them in the sense that you are making them better and not actually caring for them (17, 13d). In other words, you are helping improve them and this is a service that the gods appreciate and want you to do. He believed that this service is improving the gods and that they like this service. The gods believe that being holy is a service towards them, therefore there should be a reason on why the gods use us and want to reward our holiness. He believes that the gods choose what is holy for a reason and should be approved by

    Read More

  • Divine Command Theory: The Euthyphro Dilemma

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    The dilemma consists of two “horns.” The first, according to our class discussion, asks whether or not the Gods love the pious because it is pious? Or the second horn, questioning rather that pious is pious merely because the Gods love it? To explain why this is a dilemma, we need to discuss both parts individually.

    Read More

  • The Human-like Gods

    1158 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, through the remained literatures of the ancient Greeks, one can see that the Greeks believed that they were created to glorify their gods and that the exchange between human beings and gods are obvious. Hence, one should please the gods to be blessed.

    Read More

  • Playing God: An Argumentative Analysis

    681 Words  | 2 Pages

    The source also states that “the love of God above all is a morally good act” since God is good always (Scotus

    Read More

  • Plato's Nature Of Piety

    1392 Words  | 3 Pages

    Religious people, to varying degrees, try to interpret religious texts to comprehend how to live their lives. But by its very nature, interpreting the totality of a deity’s creed arguably exceeds a mortal’s comprehension. As such, actions based on claims of according with higher-power principles are often met with skepticism and a desire to understand how the promoter arrived at such a conclusion. In Plato’s dialogue Euthyphro, two men dialectically discuss the nature of piety to reach agreement on the term in an attempt to understand one’s foundation for claiming his actions as pious. By using Socrates as a literary tool to repeatedly question and refute Euthyphro’s assumptions on the nature of piety, Plato reveals the difficulty and presumptuousness of understanding the desires of higher beings, ultimately concluding the piece without a satisfactory understanding of the nature of piety.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Christian Morality

    1383 Words  | 3 Pages

    When considering morality, worthy to note first is that similar to Christian ethics, morality also embodies a specifically Christian distinction. Studying a master theologian such as St. Thomas Aquinas and gathering modern perspectives from James Keenan, S. J. and David Cloutier serve to build a foundation of the high goal of Christian morality. Morality is a primary goal of the faith community, because it is the vehicle for reaching human fulfillment and happiness. Therefore, great value can be placed on foundations of Christian morality such as the breakdown of law from Aquinas, the cultivation of virtues, the role of conscience in achieving morality, and the subject of sin described by Keenan.

    Read More

More about On Euthyphro's Dilemma and Divine Command

Open Document