Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effectiveness of after school programs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The movie “PRECIOUS KNOWLEDGE” is about the state of Arizona banning ethnic studies. The movie’s main focus is on Tucson High school, specifically the class known as the Mexican American/Raza Studies. They learned about the honest truths about America along with their own culture. However, many politicians saw this class as un-American and “Stalinist”. This movie showed that the students became thriving adults because they were able to learn about their own cultures. During a political meeting, many politicians felt like this was an unnecessary class that was wasting their tax dollars. One law maker goes as far to say that if Mexican Americans want to learn about their culture, they should go back to Mexico. Many people saw these Mexican American students as lazy and disinterested. This is related to the “canary in the mind pit” analogy because …show more content…
The improvement in their education that these Mexican American students with the Raza Studies is very similar to the affect that Afterschool programs had for the students in “Pass or Fail in Cambodia Town”. When students from both films were taught about their culture/ history they did better in school. The main point of “Precious Knowledge” is that students thrive when learning about multicultural education, especially students who are underrepresented by mainstream Eurocentric education. However, due to a history of systemic racism and a general lack of knowledge or understanding, many leaders choose to suppress the voices of underrepresented communities. When looking at the main point of “Precious Knowledge”, one must consider teaching strategies that deal with “difference” in the classroom. A difference that was extremely prevalent in “Precious Knowledge”, was dealing with different races/ethnicities and cultures within the class room and outside of the classroom. A teaching method that I think is good at dealing with different races
In Subtractive Schooling: US-Mexican Youth and the Politics of Caring, Angela Valenzuela investigates immigrant and Mexican American experiences in education. Valenzuela mentions differences in high schools between U.S born youth and immigrants such as how immigrants she interviewed seemed to achieve in school as they feel privileged to achieve secondary education. However, she found that her study provided evidence of student failure due to schools subtracting resources from these youths. Both are plagued by stereotypes of lacking intellectual and linguistic traits along with the fear of losing their culture. As a Mexican American with many family members who immigrated to the U.S to pursue a higher education, I have experience with Valenzuela’s
Cowhey’s uses a quote from the Dalai Lama that perfectly explains the difference between wanting a classroom with a Multicultural Education and actually having one. “Its not enough to be compassionate. You must act”. This book showed me that it takes more than understanding what Multicultural Education looks like, but how persistent you must be to achieve this type of education. Cowhey’s book is relevant to educators and the general public because it can inspire individuals from all walks of life to teach children how to be compassionate, empathetic, activists, critical thinkers, and so much more than what is usually expected of them. This book is relevant to my teaching practices because it made me realize how much more teaching is. Teaching is more than creating and implementing lessons, but so much more in
A student should never be denied the right to learn and become successful because of a different skin color, or because they speak a different language. “No saco nada de la escuela” by Luis Valdez is a play that discusses the racism in schools. The play starts with students going to elementary school and then ascending to middle school and college. At the beginning the students were not aware of what racism really was because of their innocence. However, the teacher that they had was very racist and bullied the students of color. That experience made the other kids realize that not everyone was the same and because of color or language they should be treated differently. There are five different students who take part of this play, two of those students were white, and there were two Chicanos and one black. That is great diversity of cultures. The teacher that the students have in elementary school was an example of the other professors they were going to have throughout their school years. Very arrogant and not understanding of the minority students. Their teachers were not really interested in teaching the minorities and always showed her discontent of having students of color. Their teachers didn’t believe that students who were part of a minority should be placed in the same classroom as the white students. Maybe that was because they didn’t know the potential a minority student could have. One Chicano student named Francisco never denied his roots and became very successful. He had many obstacles in his learning environment, but at the end he becomes a great example of perseverance. Francisco is the student who I think showed the greatest development in the play. He had to deal with racism all the time, but that didn't stop ...
In the documentary, Precious Knowledge, it stated that M.A students weren’t allowed to speak their native tongue Spanish and administration were given the power to use corporal punishment ( POC are targeted more than their White counterparts). There was a purposeful segregation when it came to various ethnic groups, it was no surprise that Whites had the College Prep courses and all other minorities were given vocational courses since policy makers came under the false assumption that Whites were going to strive and POC were just going to end up being in agriculture. POC were given an unfair and unequal opportunities that not only underestimated their intellectual capabilities but also negated their chance at upward mobility in society and decreasing their likelihood of getting a stable, well-paying job in their lifetime. Under these harsh conditions, these M.A students and their allies sparked what is now considered the Chicano Movement. This powerful activism led Tucson city council to set up the Ethnic Studies department across their schools to boost Latinx achievement and cut their high school dropout rates. It’s important to note that these programs were born out of the same protests mentioned above and confrontation of the police (Movement
The Chicano Movement was a time that pressed forth for the equal opportunity of the Latino community and proved to America that Mexican Americans were a force to be reckoned with. In the documentary Latino Americans – Episode 5: Prejudice and Pride, it centralizes on the success of the oppressed community through significant leaders in that period. Union activists César Chavez, along with Dolores Huerta, playwright Luis Valdez, teacher Sal Castro, US Congressman Herman Ballido, and political activist José Ángel Gutiérrez all contributed to egalitarianism of Latinos across the nation. This documentary reflects on the importance of equal prospects within the workplace, the academic setting, and the social and political features in society.
As a political identity, ‘Chicano’ came to mean more than simply a race-based identity and was greatly supported by many influences. It’s difficult to say who were only described as ‘Chicano’ because the community and cultural production was connected with the Mexican American experience and there were many different race and culture mixes. Jackson excerpts film scholar Rosa Linda Fregoso, on her argument defining that any form of Chicano production is to incorporate racial tendencies into ideologies that fight racism instead of the ideas that relate to the Chicano Movement and surpass the negative ideas that perpetrate social inequality and injustice. Besides this, organizations like The Mexican American Movement and “The Mexican Voice” are important for their efforts in creating a more appropriate representation of the experiences as a Mexican origin but living in the U.S. Consequently, the identity ‘Mexican American’ emerged during this period among students and community activists to gain full representation in society without having to
This movie is based on changing the lives of Mexican Americans by making a stand and challenging the authority. Even when the cops were against them the whole time and even with the brutal beatings they received within one of the walk out, they held on. They stuck to their guns and they proved their point. The main character was threatened by the school administrators, she was told if she went through with the walkout she would be expelled. While they wanted everyone who was going to graduate to simply look the other way, the students risked it all and gave it their all to make their voices
Success rates of students will increase with the implementation of ethnic studies courses in schools. In the movie precious knowledge, the dropout rate for students was 50%. When their ethnic studies course was added the gradation rate of the students enrolled was 93%. In these ethnic studies classes the method of teaching isn 't the normal banking
Allowing any students to select and learn about their own or another’s ethnic background from African-American, Hispanic, and Mexican-American to mention a few from the film, Precious Knowledge. It teaches students to understand a certain culture, to know where they come from, to reflect, reconcile, and take action, positive action. It is educational, and keeps students in school because they are interested in learning about this culture, and their community. This recognizes the increasing diversity of cultures within a community, yet the disadvantage of it, is that it portrays to some that it is a selective ethnicity group teaching or grouping of heritage teaching (Precious Knowledge
The quote “None of us is as smart as all of us” by Eric Schmidt literally means that no individual possesses the same amount of knowledge that a group of people possess. The amount of knowledge that a group of people will contribute to a discussion will always be much more than what a single person would contribute and hence we are always better off as a group.
Knowledge is something that can change day to day, which can be learned through both the natural and human sciences. Knowledge changes in the natural sciences when an experiment is conducted and more data has been gathered. Knowledge changes in human sciences when patterns are recognized in society and further tests have been conducted. Does our knowledge of things in the natural and human sciences change every day? I think that our knowledge grows everyday but does not necessarily change every day. The areas of knowledge that will be discussed in this essay are natural and human sciences. In History we can see that at one point something that was considered knowledge then transformed into different knowledge, especially in the natural sciences. However, in the past, due to lack of technology, it might have been more of a lack of knowledge that then turned into knowledge on the topic.
It challenges America’s status quo by breaking the standards of American classroom traditions. Back in the days, the typical American classroom was taught by white women and white men, filled with white students. They all came from the same background, culture and economic status. There is no wrong in having people of the same culture, and race, come together in one classroom, but students and teachers do not gain as much opportunity or rich experience as they would if they were surrounded by diverse students and teachers.... ...
Shaping knowledge is similar to reevaluating what a person may consider to be true. While this is neither a positive or negative thing, it impacts the progression of the world, in terms of societal cues, which is constantly reliant on continued shared knowledge among individuals. Shared knowledge shapes personal knowledge, and this is done by strengthening personal knowledge or by bringing its validity into question. This is dependent on the individual accepting knowledge. Some people may not have experienced a certain type of situation, so they would
Often it is assumed that our source of personal knowledge stems from the core of shared knowledge, however this is a common misconception as it is only valid to a certain scope. The Ancient Japanese proverb, ' 'none of us is as strong as all of us ' ', agrees with the assumption as it can be deduced the intent of this proverb is to indicate that shared knowledge overpowers personal knowledge, and to an extent tells us personal knowledge overall leads to the formation of shared knowledge. However, the validity of this conjecture is not entirely predisposed, through the Areas of Knowledge of Mathematics and Art a bidirectional argument is formed. Shared knowledge is highly structured, is systematic in its nature and the product of more than one individual. While individuals contribute to it, shared knowledge does not depend only upon the contributions of a particular individual—there are
The misundersatnd that this approach influences the entire educational system as it plays a role in instruction, policy, leadership, evaluation and learning climate. Educators need to incorporate multiculturalism content and perspectives when teaching math, science, or social studies. Teachers should not just have students memorize facts about civil rights but instead be able to critically analyze events. In addition, multiculturalism requires an interdisciplanary approach and include a truthful representation of social problems. Further, the contributions of individuals of different races and genders need to be incorporated into the curriculum. Most importantly, ethnically diverse students are going to feel more encouraged and welcome in a situation in which a range of human experiences and accomplishments are included in the