Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Different learning styles of students
Different learning styles of students
Strengths and benefits of learning styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Different learning styles of students
STUDENT SELF DEVELOPMENT
Experiences are a very important part in one’s life. They teach us a number of things in life. As we all are different human beings and are brought up in different atmosphere and environment we react in a very different way due to different personalities and perceptions. We as individuals have a very different style of learning things. Different individuals learn things differently some learn through observations, while some learn through personal experiences. In short, it can be said as that different person’s different natures and styles nothing can in common. Our cultural and social influences also vary which also have some impact over our learning styles. Doctors, psychologists have come up with number subjective theories which talk about different styles of learning that an individual can have. Studies have come up with conclusions that learning styles depend on the personality of the individual. Since personality traits of each individual is different the learning styles is also different due to different working patterns that they have. The theories talk about three different types of learning styles, they are activists and reflectors and pragmatists.
During this module I was given a questionnaire to fill, after filling that questionnaire I learned about my learning style that is ACTIVIST LEARNING STYLE.
What is ACTIVIST LEARNING STYLE?
An activist learning style is a way of learning in that one will probably want to get involved in a project or specific assignment to develop the skills on the job. Activist learners will tend to act first and consider the consequences afterwards. They tend to thrive on the challenge of new experiences and involve themselves fully and without bias in new experience...
... middle of paper ...
... and dividing time accordingly and following it. IMPROVING MY GENERAL Reading newspaper
KNOWLEDGE daily.(Every day)
LEARNING GERMAN Joining an institute
ECONOMICS Taking extra classes and attending lectures and tutorials
David Kolb published his learning styles theory, in 1984, after many years of development. His theory stated that people learn in two different steps, inputting information and processing information. How people do this is also different. Think of inputting information on a vertical line, one person may prefer concrete examples at the top and abstract concepts at the bottom. Processing information is on a horizontal line with active experimentation on the left and reflective observation on the right.
According to the textbook, “learning styles refer to the ways in which and conditions under which learners most efficiently and most effectively perceive, process, store , and recall what they are attempting to learn” (p.122). People have different learning style depending on how each person learn best based on interest and situation they are under. I am personally more visual and sensory in practical world than the theoretical matter. However, I can manage to learn both ways depending on what kind of information I am gaining and how it is presented to me. I have to be ready to learn and should be somehow interested on the information I am about to receive or in the process of receiving. Which means that I am more interested in auditory, sensory, and visionary leaning presentation approaches. I do understand and remember things more by listening, sensing, and observing than a
Learning is defined as a permanent change in attitude or behaviour that occurs as a result of repeated experience (Sims & Sims, 1995). Understanding one’s learning style has many advantages as it can help one to identify the learning method or activities that can help to optimise the learning experience. It has been suggested that the importance of one’s learning style has been identified through studies and research on how one can maximise the potential for success and further learning development (Honey & Mumford, 2006). Learning styles are unique to each individual and are developed in childhood (Chase, 2001). We all have different personalities; therefore we all have preferred learning styles that suit us best. The way one learns depends on preference. Some learn by observing, listening and imitating others and draw conclusions from their experience. There are several factors that affect our learning style; for example, background, culture, religion and environment can have a major influence on one’s learning.
The need to understand cultural differences is obvious today. Many societies are multicultural, and many people and organizations collaborate across different ethnic and cultural boundaries. It is important that a person can recognize other people's different ways of living and working and learning. The different experiences that one undergoes plays a large role in how one my acquire knowledge. The purpose of the paper is to discuss how culture and cultural differences in learning styles can be analyzed and understood.
A big component of my learning style is hands-on experience; learning while doing. This usually involved someone with more experience instructing me as I performed the task. Through the hands-on approach, I picked-up the knowledge and gained proficiency as I went along. My learning style also involved standard classroom instruction, which usually meant listening to lectures and taking notes. My note taking was not the best so in order to make up for what I lacked in note taking, I would read the textbooks repeatedly until I understood what I was reading. I learned that in order for me to get a complete understanding from my readings and notes, there had to be a lot great deal of repetition ...
Undeniably, Honey and Mumford’s approach has been useful in emphasizing that we all learn in different ways, and that uniform approaches will not suit every individual (Caple and Martin 1994). Honey and Mumford argue that people learn most usefully from experience, however experience alone does guarantee effectual learning. They believe that the learning experience should be reviewed, conclusions drawn from the review and action taken to build upon the conclusions drawn (Caple and Martin 1994).The Honey and Mumford learning style is typically represented as a cycle. The cycle identifies four distinct approaches to learning; activists, reflectors, theorists and pragmatists. Activists learn best when they are actively involved in concrete tasks and learning experiences. Reflectors prefer reviewing and thinking over what has happened and how they have acted. Theorists learn best learn best by relating new information to concepts or theories whereas pragmatists often learn by relating new information to real-life issues (Morley at al. 2004). The Honey and Mumford questionnaire identifies the preferred learning styles or style that people have. Learners who score on all four styles are best equipped to deal with all stages of the learning cycle, but the majority of people display distinct preferences (Pont 2003). When I took the Honey and Mumford questionnaire I found that I scored highly in the pragmatist category and scored rather low in the theorist category. This conclusion is reinforced by the fact that I find I learn best by seeing how I can put what I’ve learned into practice in the real world. It is obvious that weather a person is an activist, reflector, theorist or pragmatist their preferred approach to learning will influence their learning by a great
McGill, I. & Beatty, L. (1996, 2nd edn.) Action Learning: a practitioner’s guide London: Kogan Page.)
Honey and Mumford say (Gallagher K., 2013, p. 23-24) that idyllically someone has a composed learning style, though some individuals have a robust preference for a particular style.
McCarthy, M. 2010. Experiential Learning Theory-From Theory to Practice. Orland. Available from http://www.gimi.us/CLUTE_INSTITUTE/ORLANDO_2010/Article%20111.pdf [Accessed 2nd December 2010]
“A learning style is a way of learning and refers to the way that you learn new information” (2). Most people have one preferred learning style and perform to a lesser standard when learning in a different style than what they’re used to. Nowadays, children are told to take a quiz in school to determine what their preferred learning style is, but after a few years, not many of these children remember what their preferred learning style is, or even if they do, they don’t apply it to their learning.
Adjusting learning and studying strategies can be a fast easy way to improve a college grade from a B to an A. Through studies of learning styles I have been able to decipher my learning types. I am a visual learner, have an integrated brain, meaning I use both hemispheres, and ranked highest in bodily-kinesthetic and logic-mathematical intelligence.
Education serves as the foundation to a lifetime of learning. Since every child is unique, I believe that it is important for them to learn in an environment that is both secure and stimulating. By creating this type of atmosphere, the students will be able to realize their intelligence and use it constructively. As a future educator, it will be my goal to establish a classroom that is, 1) non-authoritarian, 2) student-centered, and 3) focused around student experience. These three elements are part of Progressivism, the educational philosophy I plan to incorporate in my classroom.
The future of our nation rests greatly on how we educate our children. The children of today will soon be the driving force of tomorrow. In order to properly prepare our future citizens of society, we must provide them with an education that teaches them not only the basics of reading, writing, and arithmetic, but also social skills and critical thinking. Progressivism offers this approach of educating the “whole child.” This student-centered approach to learning applies learning in a social manner and allows students to apply what they are learning to real life. This type of learning is much more meaningful than rote learning. Curriculum and assessment are based on the child and their level of interest and ability, and instruction is varied to adjust to different learning styles. Children learn by doing, and progressivism believes in incorporating a hands-on approach to learning. The teacher in the progressive classroom is not a dictator but more of a mentor and guide to the student. She takes the children into consideration in everything she does and allows them to offer their input. The progressivist teacher also facilitates social interaction among the students and groups them together for projects so that they may learn how to work cooperatively. Progressivism is the key to a more educated, better-rounded society.
Thought out our lives, we are faced with many different learning experiences. Some of these experiences have made a better impact than others. This can be attributed to everyone’s different multiple intelligences or learning styles. A persons learning style is the method though which they gain information about their environment. As a teacher, it is our responsibility to know these styles, so we can reach each of our students and use all of the necessary methods.
“Education is a social process; education is growth; education is not preparation for life but is life itself.” John Dewey describes and supports progressivism, an education philosophy that I professionally identify with. Progressivism is a student centered philosophy that focuses on experiences, opportunities, and values that enhance a student 's learning and life. The role of the teacher is to act primarily as a facilitator of learning, they encourage and guide students to explore and promote individual development. As a future educator I believe it is important to involve students and allow them to take responsibility for their own learning and achieving their goals. The role of the student is to discover, engage, and express themselves.