Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on gender discrimination in the workplace
Essays on gender discrimination in the workplace
Essays on gender discrimination in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on gender discrimination in the workplace
Being brought up in America, we are lead to believe that we are all equal. We are lead to believe that no matter what your race, color of skin, sex or creed is, we are free from discrimination. However, I beg to differ. In America, that’s actually not the case. We’re as far as we can get when it comes to equality. With the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, many people assumed that discrimination in the work place will no longer be an issue. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. It made it illegal for employers to discriminate in relation to hiring, discharging, compensating, or providing the terms, conditions, and privileges of employment (Employment Discrimination). Sadly though, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 left out one crucial part and that was no employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Employment discrimination against gays, lesbians and transgenders is running rampant in the work force and many feel there’s no end in sight. That’s why it is of utter importance that Senate Bill 815: Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2013 should be passed and implemented in the work place to finally put an end to employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
Sponsored by Jeff Merkley, a Junior Senator Democrat from the state of Oregon, Senate Bill 815: Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2013 prohibits covered entities (employers, employment agencies, labor organizations, or joint labor-management committees) from engaging in employment discrimination on the basis of an individual's actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. The Bill Declares that it shall be unla...
... middle of paper ...
... themselves when it comes to their gender. If this bill does not get passed, only one group of people can be blamed and that is the Republicans in the House. After nearly 4 decades of trying and failing, if this bill gets passed, those who this bill is intended to protect can finally be judged on their productivity rather than their sexual orientation or gender identity. Just as Senator Jeff Merkley said regarding this bill, “Discrimination is just plain wrong. It is shocking that there is still anywhere in America where it is legal to fire someone for their sexual orientation or gender identity. Americans understand that it’s time to make sure our LGBT friends and family are treated fairly and have the same opportunities as all Americans. Now it’s time for our laws to catch up. People should be judged at work on their ability to do the job, period (VoteTocracy).”
The supporters of the Equal Rights Amendment seem to feel sex discrimination laws are simply not enough. The federal laws and regulations contain many loopholes, are inconsistently interpreted and may be repealed outright (NOW 1). Many supporters claim the Equal Rights Amendment is needed "to clarify law for the lower courts, whose decisions still reflect confusion and inconsistency about how to deal with sex discrimination claims (Francis 2). There is a supporting theory argument that "an amendment of equality would absolutely shift the burden away ...
So I 'm washing my hands and a woman comes out of the stall. She looked at me for a second and told me I was in the wrong bathroom and I didn 't belong in there (Masculine Presentation).” The woman is correct, he does not belong in the women’s bathroom, but people don’t consider situations like that when they endorse these bills. By supporting a bill that forces people into the bathroom of their assigned gender at birth, they are putting transgender men in the women’s bathroom. If that were to happen women would become accustomed to having people who are and who look like men in their bathroom. This opens the door to the very thing they are trying to prevent which is, cisgender men going into the woman’s bathroom and claiming they are
It is very important that we have special protection in place because without it many people may lose their job simply because their employer has certain religious views and no longer feels they want to employ someone anymore because of their sexual orientation. Governor Brownback’s strong religious beliefs have had a large impact on individuals
While both race and gender have very real societal and, in some instances, personal consequences which enables both to be categorized as real neither race nor gender is more real than the other. Both of them faced and still face overt and covert discrimination, and both of them are built upon a mountain of logical fallacies that are able to ultimately be reduced down to societal standards and obligations forced upon them by the dominant group. Since they are also both deeply embedded in our culture they have become integrated into our sense of who we, as humans, are and in our perceptions of other people and situations.
Although, the fear of people that are cisgender posing as transgender for devious acts is an entirely unrelated situation that has added to the panic behind the new legislation. Regardless, that argument is also lacking because there have been few (if any) assault cases involving a cisgender male identifying as a
Racism can take on many forms that plague the brain with irrationality that affects an individual’s thoughts and actions. Racism can be a physical form, through an external action, or can branch off into unethical thoughts. This is more known to be a discriminative thought, judging a person based on impressions. This social problem can also be ignored by the oblivious persons of the crowd. Many individuals speak out about how racial tension is long gone and forever forgotten ever since the first African-American was elected to be president in 2008, but this can be evidently proven false. Racial tension is still here to target the minorities in the forms of affirmative action and Ferguson conflicts.
In addition, being lesbian, gay, bisexual or queer: LGBTQ, during the 1960’s is view as a crime and a mental illness and totally immoral in the United States. Amber faces oppression at work as well by her union representative. One time her boss was flirting with her and asking her to sleep with him, however, she told him that she was not sexually attracted to men and then she went to the union to let them know that her boss was disrespecting her, but the union representative told her that it was none of his business. The only reason why the union does not care about Amber's complaints is because she is a lesbian. It is an outrage that a human being must resist an inhuman injustice by being attracted to someone of the same sex. Amber got another job where they used to say they did not care about anyone’s sexuality, however, she got fired from that job after she appeared with her girlfriend at a party where her coworkers invited her. Both she and her girlfriend were “beat up, or left with anonymous nasty notes and ugly homophobic pictures in our lockers...” Amber got involved into political to fight against oppression and prejudice for the LGBTQ because “the cost of being both
For decades women have fought for equal rights in this country and countries all over the world. They have fought a tough fight and have come a long way. This makes a blatant message of sexual discrimination all the more outrageous in this day and age. The message is unequal health insurance coverage for women and even in the year 2003 it continues to be a serious issue.
According to the US Census Bureau, women today still earn 77 cents for every dollar a man makes. In virtually every single occupation, women still earn significantly less than men and experience a gender wage gap of at least 22 percent. The glass ceiling women must overcome is greatly emphasized by Borden in her film as women are always the first to go and are treated as scraps. Another big issue portrayed by Borden is the unjust treatment of the LGBT community which continues today as seen by the implementation of the HB2 bill by the government of North Carolina. HB2 prohibits transgender people from using the bathroom of their choice and greatly limits their rights and is an infringement by the government which further translates from Borden’s film as a corruption of a so-called democracy. Instead, HB2 deems that transgender people must use the bathroom that coordinates with the gender they were born with. Perhaps the biggest violation of rights by the LGBT community is that the bill legally prohibits North Carolina government from discrimination against sexual orientation and gender, but will allow business to discriminate and refuse service to members of the LGBT community if they wish. Not only is sexism and homophobia portrayed by
A more recent policy issue that came up in 2014 is gender identity being allowed in anti-discrimination laws. President Obama signed an executive order barring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity among federal contractors. However in the Supreme Court case Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, the Supreme Court ruled that individuals do not lose their religious freedom when they open a family business. The Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) is an interest group fighting for equal rights within the community who share political and social concerns about the discrimination of sexual orientation and gender identity. Opponents of LGBTQ groups have worked equally as hard to pass laws known as Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, which allow business to deny services to LGBTQ people based on their religious beliefs. Each interest group will lobby to a political figure, or political party in order to get their voices heard. With the case involving Hobby Lobby the bureaucratic agency that help with this case was the Department of Health and Human Services, because Hobby Lobby did not want to provide medication for an employee in the health coverage plan the company provided. With future cases involving the LGBTQ they would be able to go to another regulatory agency like
The level of judicial scrutiny that should apply to claims of discrimination based on sexual orientations is level 2: intermediate scrutiny. The reason why is because these are classifications based on gender and illegitimacy, which is part of intermediate scrutiny. Governments that distinguish between groups because of gender or illegitimacy must prove that the laws are “substantially related to an important government people.” This level relates to gender; therefore, heterosexual, bisexual, or homosexual can fall into that category. Some people with different sexual orientations are criticized harshly and have limited rights to them because they are treated differently. In the Supreme Court’s analysis in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000),
Women have every right to do what their male counterparts do regardless of sex and the changes that we have seen today reflect the willingness of the American people to accept that women are capable of performing the same functions in society as men. Contributing to establishing equal rights for women according to D’Arelli (2014) is the gradual blurring of traditional gender roles and improved attitudes of women’s success in the workplace. Again, there are many areas where gender discrimination still occurs and sexual harassment of women in the workplace is one of those areas. There are safeguards in place prohibiting sexual harassment or other forms of harassment in the workplace that protect women. These safeguards have cost companies millions of dollars in law suits and cost many men their careers. These protections show women that they are equal to men and that such actions will not be tolerated at any level. Even if the equal rights amendment would have passed, harassment and discrimination in the workplace would not have been eliminated. People have beliefs which laws cannot change. What we can do as a society is enforce policies and procedures and provide training to employees regarding the importance of equal rights for men and women. It will be the
For this assignment, I chose to write about Virginia’s newly elected state representative, Danica Roem. On November seventh of this year, Roem defeated a thirteen-term incumbent, Robert G. Marshall, and became one of the nation’s first openly transgender elected officials. (Washington Post, 2017). This is not only a monumental achievement for the LGBT community because Roem is a transgender woman, but it is also an epic win because her opponent is a self-proclaimed homophobe, and was responsible for the “bathroom bill” that died in committee earlier this year. (Washington Post, 2017). In her speech that she made on Tuesday evening, Roem attacked her opponents’ stance on LGBT issues by stating, “discrimination is a disqualifier.” (Washington Post, 2017). She went on to discuss how she plans to celebrate the individual personalities of those whom she would be serving in the thirteenth district, and how she
Florida’s, Texas’s and Kentucky’s new proposed bathroom laws have “caused fear and dismay among transgender people around the country” (Tannehill). Kentucky laws are more focused on the school systems but Florida 's and Texas’s laws treat transgenders as if they were criminals. Both of these states have regulations that will give transgenders civil and or criminal charges for using the bathroom they identify with (Tannehill). A transgender could be charged a fine for using the wrong bathroom and “people who report a transgender people in the bathroom to claim civil damages, for example a bounty” (Tannehill). Florida and Texas are trying to look out for the best interest of the majority population, however, “we all have to use the bathroom, but these laws would seemingly force transgender people to choose between fines and jail, risking horrific violence or leaving the state” (Tannehill). These laws have been seen as unreasonable to the transgender community and have been fought by the ACLU lawyer Joshua Block, “We’re talking about people who also have their sense of privacy and modesty, and who are not going to want to have everyone see an anatomical part of themselves that they feel should never have been there in the first place,” (Marcus). It has also been found that it’s illegal for employers to carry out such rules, “The Equal Employment
Prejudice and discrimination have both been prevalent throughout human history. Prejudice deals with the inflexible and irrational attitudes and opinions that are held by others of one group against those of another. Discrimination on the other hand refers to the behaviors directed against another group. Prejudiced individuals have preconceived beliefs about groups of people or cultural practices. There are both positive and negative forms of prejudice, however, the negative form of prejudice leads to discrimination. Individuals that practice discrimination do so to protect opportunities for themselves, by denying access to those whom they believe do not deserve the same treatment as everyone else. An example of discrimination based on prejudice involves the Jews. “Biased sentiments and negative stereotypes of Jews have been a part of Western tradition for centuries and, in fact, have been stronger and more vicious in Europe than in the United States. For nearly two millennia, European Jews have been chastised and persecuted as the “killers of Christ” and stereotyped as materialistic moneylenders and crafty business owners (Healey, p.65). The prejudice against these groups led to the discrimination against them.