In my opinion, kendamas at school aren't really a good thing. They're unsafe, some people aren't responsible with them, and it's just a craze. Kendamas should be banned from school. One reason kendamas should be banned from school is because they can cause injury. When playing with a kendamas, someone could get hurt. One of the parts could hit someone, the handle or stick part could hit/poke someone in the eye, or when a kendamas is worn around the neck, the string could actually end up choking someone. It would be safer for students if kendamas were banned. Another reason kendamas should be banned is because some people are irresponsible with their kendamas. For example, many students bring their kendamas to class. It caused distractions when the students started playing with them during class. I know several people that had their kendamas before class because if they had it with them during class, they would play with them instead of paying attention. That's why they had been banned from classrooms on campus. Another example is that some owners gamble their kendamas in a game called Ken-for-Ken; A game where you compete with kendamas tricks. The loser has to give their kendama to they winner. They have to give up their kendama that they/a relative had payed $20 or more for. It would be like handing over that much money just …show more content…
because of losing a little game. This shows that some students are not responsible to have kendamas with them during school. Another reason that kendamas should be banned from school is because it is just a craze.
There were lots of famous trends that grew old very quickly. They were very popular, but soon everyone else moved on to a different famous object. Old things like Gangnam Style, Rainbow Loom, What Does the Fox Say, etc. have been things that have had their 15 minutes of fame. The kendama used to be famous a long time ago, then it became famous again. But if kendamas grew old back then, it's likely that soon they won't stay famous for long. It is likely that they will last 1-2 years at most. Someday, students would not be famous
anymore. Therefore, kendamas should be banned from school. They can hurt people, some of their owners are too irresponsible, and it is really a trend. An object having its 15 minutes of fame. So I hope that you, as the reader, agree that kendamas should be banned from school.
Firstly, if there are no more troublemakers in the school, the students that want to learn will be able to learn without any distractions; also, there would be no one to bully them, and there would be no interference in their ability to learn. If we permanently ban such students from school, educators could focus more on the students who want to learn instead of focusing on troublemakers. Secondly, the students that doesn`t want to be in schools wouldn’t be wasting their time anymore. Troublemakers do not learn anything by attending the school because they have no interest in studies, and all they are doing is wasting their time. They could use this time for doing something that they want to do, or something that they are interested in. Lastly, their absence will provide a safer school environment. Troublemakers always try to get into fights against others; in fact, they have no fear of security. By their actions, they could put other students into big troubles. Their mind is always seeking for attention, and they could do anything to attain others` attention; as a result, the environment of the school gets disturbed. By not letting them into the school, we could provide a safer environment for the students that really wants to learn. Overall, banning troublemakers would be helpful for students that are serious about their
In order to understand how banning books in schools affect student learning, it is important to understand why books are banned in the first place. If parents describe a book as inappropriate or offensive for children, they can complain about it to the school district to have it banned. If the school district agrees with the parents, they will ban the book from the school curriculum and forbid teachers from teaching the book to students. Parents might think that the book goes against religious or moral...
Why should this novel be banned from use in schools? Students should be able to hear these words and talk about them and not use them offensively. Racial content, tension, and slurs are used in people’s everyday lives. If people can use these words outside of school why would they not be allowed to be talked about in school? It is important for everyone to be informed about these racial tensions. This book also shows the reader what is was like to be growing up in this time period. Although this book uses the n-word, it uses it in a historical way. Using these racist words explains the way of thinking of the south in the 1930s. To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee is appropriate to use and read in school.
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
Why do you think gum should be chewed in school ? Reasons why i think gum should be chewed in class is because it can help students in class. Gum can improve student's memory and help them concentrate more.Why gum should be allowed to chew in school/classes.
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
The existing rule is you can't bring your chargers to school.This would make it a lot easier on the kids.Here some big reasons why we should change this
Just as any other subject, guns being allowed on school campuses has cons and pros. Some pro-arguments are that guns can prevent a slaughter and safe many people’s lives in case someone try to use his/her gun against others. For example, if a person who is in a classroom, knows how to use a gun and also has access to one, if a criminal starts a shooting you can use your gun and shoot against the criminal and safe your life and the others’ lives. This is a great argument to allow arms on schools or public places because it would prevent people’s
I agree that they should ban certain books from school there are many reason's why. There many book that contain topics that are unsuitable for young readers. Why put those kind of bad books in school for young readers? There are millions of different book that don't have to be unsuitable for young readers. Many book contain negative stuff such as drugs,bad word,and even racial issues.
First, banning books that educate kids in school is a good thing because is can cause murder, suicide and justice. When books have murder and suicide scene
Gum chewing is banned in many schools. But should it be kept that way? Many are against the gum chewing not permitted in schools. But others say it should be kept that way. Gum chewing can cause many problems.Such as dental decay, and health problems. In addition, it can get stuck anywhere if the person who chewed it was to be irresponsible. Finally, it can be disruptive to many classmates
Some proposed solutions include arming teachers and improving security measures. Not only would these solutions be expensive, but experts say that they wouldn’t be very effective (Source A). They could instead lead to many complications that would invalidate them. For example, arming teachers could cause accidental firing or the weapon could be stolen. Expensive security measures can easily be bypassed by using force, making them a waste of money.
Picture this, there has been a school lockdown, the suspect cut the landlines so no one could call the police for a rescue. However, the suspect was captured by the police much faster than he imagined. The last scene wouldn’t have happened if it was one decade ago, because cell phones were not popular in schools then. When it comes to cell phones, some people think they should not be permitted in schools, and other people think they should be permitted in schools. I agree with the latter opinion for the following reasons: Cell phones are an efficient way to communicate when emergencies occur in school; cell phones can be a great tool for learning during school hours; and the current prohibitive rules on cell phones are merely fruitless efforts. Cell phones should be permitted in schools, because they could be very beneficial and practical in schools.
The opposition believes that they should not be able to because it can cause way more school violence than we already have. Teachers play a paramount role in our children life as keeping them safe as much as they can. School violence and shootings are happening way more than ever.
Given the unquestionable results regarding the use of cell phones by students in school there should not be a ban on the cell phones in schools. This is because students can learn to enhance their learning from the technology such as the cell phone. Students will also become more independent in their work and more motivated to learn. Students like being permitted to making their own choices.