Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organizational commitment literature review
Job satisfaction and organizational commitment
Organizational commitment literature review
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organizational commitment literature review
The study of employee voluntary turnover is an important organizational issue that has received great attention for many decades. According to Mobley (1982), when an employee decides to leave, many effects can occur to the organization and to employees. Researchers studying turnover have identified a vast number of variables scattered throughout the turnover and work attitude literature (Griffeth, Hom & Gaertner, 2000; Maertz, & Griffeth, 2004). According to Steel (2002), most of the qualitatively relevant core models focused on job attitudes as the main reason for leaving, and were based on March and Simon’s model (1958) that dissatisfaction ultimately influences employee turnover (Mobley, 1977). However, although job satisfaction (JS) is a key predictor of employee turnover (Mossholder, Settoon, & Henagan, 2005), Griffeth and colleagues (2000) sustained that the strength of the relationship between satisfaction and turnover was weak. Previously, Judge (1993) argued that the relationship between satisfaction and turnover could be mediated by one or more variables. Furthermore, Mathieu and Zajac (1990) sustained that the dominant view on voluntary turnover assumed that satisfaction influences commitment and that organizational commitment mediates the effect of satisfaction on turnover intention. In particular, Mathieu and Zajac (1990) argued that “the most common use of organizational commitment in causal models mediated the influences of personal characteristics and work experiences on employee turnover processes” (p. 188). According to Wagner’s meta-analysis (2007), all three components of commitment influenced turnover and were negatively correlated with both turnover intention and voluntary turnover. However, although the corr...
... middle of paper ...
...ond other core aspects of traditional models (Crossley, Bennett, Jex, & Burnfield, 2007). According to Mossholder and colleagues (2005), the absence or reduction of social attachments may create a contextual force that drives employees to choose to quit the organization.
The purpose of this study is to develop and test a conceptual model of turnover processes through which both work and non-work variables influence turnover intention, taking into account the role of two off-the job variables: WFC and CE. The theoretical grounding for the turnover process is derived from the empirical model of Price & Mueller (1981a). The rationale for the effects of work-family conflict and community embeddedness on turnover process is provided by Role Conflict Theory (Kahn et al., 1964) and JE theory , respectively (Mitchell, et al., 2001). Figure 1 shows the hypothesized model.
Over time, this dull pain can erode the self-confidence and passion of even the strongest people, which in turn, affects their spouses and children and friends in subtle but profound ways… Though it may be difficult to quantify, the dissatisfaction of employees has a direct impact on productivity, turnover, and morale, all of which eventually hit a company’s bottom line hard,” (p. ix –
Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (2008). Organizational change and the importance of embedded assumptions. British Journal of Management, 19S20-S32.
advancement and turnover intentions: The mediating role of job and employer satisfaction. Women in Management Review, 21(8), 643-661.
The cause of this is that job satisfaction is a primary cause for employee turnover and lack of work effort or involvement. Remember the Exit, Voice, Loyalty and Neglect Model (EVLN)? EVLN is a template that identifies ways that employees respond to dissatisfaction. Another cause is poor company culture. YakkaTech has a highly rigid organizational structure that creates an organizational culture surrounding individual work.
High satisfaction with one's direct supervisor leads to lower levels of employee turnover. In other words, employees who are highly satisfied with their direct supervisor are less likely to leave an organization than employees who are dissatisfied with their
This case study was about the president of Bubba Gump Shrimp Company, a restaurant chain specializing in seafood, whose practice structure and secret to success was to have and maintain minimal management turnover. In fact, his focus on turnover was so successful that he did not have a general manager leave for 3 years, and he has decreased management turnover from 36% to 16% in 2 years. The motivation of an organization’s employees significantly affects it success. Additionally, employee turnover, absenteeism, and tardiness weaken employee productivity.
Driving factors to high turnover and workplace dissatisfaction in my experience were due to be poor leadership and job opportunity. When leadership has an open and evaluative mind, employees can openly make recommendations to make positive changes. The Navy often does this through command climate surveys. As you have
Employee turnover costs are very costly to a company. Turnover not only affects the bottom line but also affects the company’s morale. We are analyzing the problems within our company that are causing our employees to become unsatisfied with their job. Then we are going to find solutions. And then do the cost estimates of the turnover costs and the turnover savings after our solutions are implemented.
Recruitment becomes a greater challenge in organizations with high turnover due to the increased number of vacancies. Nationwide, only 14% of employees feel satisfied with their jobs (Clawson & Haskins, 2011). This lack of satisfaction can...
... Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991-1007. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991
Employee satisfaction, employee turnover, and workplace environment are inseparably linked. Workplace environments heavily influence employee satisfaction, which directly affects employee turnover rates. When employees feel they are not being supported within their first months of hire, they will inevitably leave the company. Employees want to have the security that if they need assistance, someone will be there to guide them. Therefore, it is imperative for organizations to develop a thorough onboarding program and a long-term retention plan.
Layoffs are one means by which an organization can reduce expenses with the intent of improving its bottom line. Despite being typically performed as a last resort, layoffs often have a negative impact on the remaining workforce. As a manager, there are numerous areas for concern in managing the workforce going forward. The human costs related to downsizing are “immense and far-reaching” with one of the most profound being survivor syndrome according to Hanson (2015, p. 187). Also known as survivor’s guilt, this condition relates to the emotions felt by those still employed and some of the effects include decreased motivation, moral, and job satisfaction, as well as an increased proclivity to search for other employment. This volunteer turnover being another grave concern for managers, and retention of the remaining workforce is usually dependent on their existing perception of the organization and its culture (Sitlington & Marshall, 2011). Also relayed by
Employee turnover in organization is one of the main issues that extensively affect the overall performance of a workplace (Tariq, Ramzan and Riaz, 2013). Various studies show that employee turnover negatively affect the overall efficiency at the organization (Tariq, Ramzan and Riaz, 2013). Xiancheng, (2013) mentioned the employee turnover is a method of personal issues who decided to stop associate with the company for better advantage. There are two types of turnover which are voluntary and involuntary turnover. Voluntary turnover can be defined as the termination of the official and the psychological contract between the employee and employer (Krausz, 2002; Macdonald, 1999; Mclean Parks et al, 1999; Rousseau, 1995) while involuntary turnover inescapably lead to direct negative results such as current job is insecurity, work difficulty, and status fluctuation (Gowan and Gatewood, 1997). However, other researchers such as Haven-Tang and Jones, (2012) concluded poor management, lack of salary, bad working environment and paucity of job opportunities could be the highest causes of turnover among organization. This statement was support by Kusluvan et al., (2010) where is they had stated that poor management, low payment of salary, work environment and lack of employees’ job opportunities on the organization will make employee want to quit from their job. Turnover intention situation will appear when labour had feeling that they want to quit from current job, so voluntary and involuntary turnover will become final stage for them as their decision (AlBattat and Mat Som, 2013) but it is different for researchers such as Mosadeghrad, Ferlie and Rosbenberg (2013) when they conclude that employee turno...
Every organisation in the world today is putting a lot of efforts, time, and resources in the human management. As this is, an excepted reality that no organisation in the world can vie in this globalised world just on the mere basis of their product and services. In order for an organisation to be successful, it has to invest substantially into the domain of people skills, and their behaviour. Due to stressful working environment, many organisations loose employees due to lack of motivation, stress, lower employee job satisfaction and other contributing factors of behavioural sciences and psychology. All these factors have negative effects on the organisation and organizational behaviour simultaneously. Many experts are in concord that all these factors create disoriented and unmotivated employees and affect the organizational overall targets and higher dissatisfaction of the employees.
673), retention management must be based on three types of turnover, voluntary, discharged, and downsizing. Not all businesses are freighted by turnovers, for some it is the way of life and cost is built into the budget. However, for others any type of high turnover can be detrimental for company profit, employee wage and benefits offered. First, let’s take a look at voluntary and involuntary turnover that affects retention. Voluntary turnovers are caused by many different reasons. Turnover may result from topics such as job dissatisfaction, job mismatching, knowing that job opportunities are plentiful. Two reasons that I will discuss more are micromanagement and employee loyalty. Like stated before in the introduction, when employees are dissatisfied, possibly due to being placed in an area that doesn’t fit with their skill set, one is more likely to seek new employment. Another part of turnover is discharging and downsizing. Discharge is just that, members being discharged due to discipline and job performance. While downsizing turnover is a result of business being overstaffed (Heneman III, Judge, Kammeyer-Mueller, 2015, pg. 675). There are also other reasons for voluntarily employee turnover, such as generation differences when it relates to employment. The current generations are more likely to see a job as one piece in their life puzzle rather than as the first, indispensable anchor piece without