Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media influence on culture
Media influence on culture
Media impact on culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media influence on culture
This essay is supposed to be on “contested meaning,” an argument over what is the true meaning of something, of someone. The only problem with that is that meaning is just something that humans make up. All of this “meaning” that humans talk about is just a bunch of connections that we have made through knowledge of other connections we have made. If we step far enough back in time we can take the example of an non-sentient creature. This creature has been imbued with some patterns that their ancestors have seen to not change throughout generations, and we have given these the name of instincts. But as a (draw good example to maybe a tiger cub learning and playing).
Wrapped inside this word meaning, we often attribute a value to go along with this meaning. It is very difficult as well as very rare for a single person or small faction to create any value in any single thing or concept. Instead, these meanings are handed down to the people from those who are above on the political ladder. This political ladder is the same one MacDonald writes of, referring to more of the “broad sense of the working of power” (190) and the hierarchy of such rather than electoral systems, etc. It is in this way that the “haves” execute their hegemonic power over the “have-nots.” This hegemony is fueled, supported and driven by the media and a certain control it wields and gives. As a result of the control of the media, the “haves,” due to the media’s selling of identity rather than product, create an ideal person that consumers strive to be. Kline states this in her documentary “No Logo.” By creating something that the consumer strives to be, they have invisibly flexed their controlling arm; if one is striving for something, they are c...
... middle of paper ...
...n a revolution. Would overthrowing this hegemony be possible or even beneficial? Could there be a movement toward a completely “Open source” language system, as there was with computer operating systems? Is the need to change not seen since we don’t pay for language as we do with operating systems? Well, we don’t pay with currency.
Language is just meaning and this meaning consists of nothing other than random connections that man has made to try to bring order to the chaos of the world. This assemblage of the signifier (the word) and the signified (that which the word is describing) has no foundation other than that inherited from tradition. Would the world be any worse off if the name for a cow was “duck”? Most of the human population is forced into only a certain set of actions by the media, by the man, by their own language. Is there any escape from this?
In the essay The Chosen People, Stewart Ewen, discusses his perspective of middle class America. Specifically, he explores the idea that the middle class is suffering from an identity crisis. According to Ewen’s theory, “the notion of personal distinction [in America] is leading to an identity crisis” of the non-upper class. (185) The source of this identity crisis is mass consumerism. As a result of the Industrial Revolution and mass production, products became cheaper and therefore more available to the non-elite classes. “Mass production was investing individuals with tools of identity, marks of personhood.” (Ewen 187) Through advertising, junk mail and style industries, the middle class is always striving for “a stylistic affinity to wealth,” finding “delight in the unreal,” and obsessed with “cheap luxury items.” (Ewen 185-6) In other words, instead of defining themselves based on who they are on the inside, the people of middle class America define themselves in terms of external image and material possessions.
This is seen through Zygmunt Bauman’s ‘seduced’ and ‘repressed’ argument. Bauman (1988) cited in Hetherington and Harvard (2014), stated that people in contemporary western societies can be divided into two groups of consumers, these groups are the ‘seduced’ and ‘repressed’ Bauman claims that we now live in a consumer society and no longer live in an industrial society – but that society is still not equal, just as it was not equal in the past, however, he believes the types of inequality and freedom in consumer society differ from what was before (Hetherington and Harvard, 2014, p.125). Bauman’s seduced is defined as being those who can participate in the current consumer society, this also included individuals who are seen as valued
Language is one of the most important thing in our culture since it allows us to pass on knowledge and can be used as power. Language can act as power when someone change the information that we know which make the person the only one with proper knowledge. If there was no language, our history would have changed dramatically, also even though we had language, the history of our culture might no be true. Names are also another important thing in our culture since it gives us information on what an object is meant to do. Therefore, in a society, the society’s condition is represented by language which can be affected or shown by how much time is passed after the catastrophe, whether an object or person has a name or not, and the belief system that the world has.
Words have meaning. To different people, words mean different things and have different effects. Words can affect our emotions, way of thinking, personality, and our general way of life. words and language are strong tools that we use in our everyday life.The words in our language, written or spoken, mean different things to different people. Not only do they mean things different things to different people, words mean different things coming from different people.For example the word nigger.The word nigger coming from a black person directed at another doesn 't have much of an effect. In fact, it 's a form of greeting or recognition.
As children we are taught the gift of language through mimicking and training. We are introduced to a bevy of words and sounds and their meanings. We learn tone and pitch and which words to use to emphasize a particular point(s) that we are trying to make. What we aren’t taught however is that the language that we may learn and speak at home may not necessarily be the language that is widely accepted in the outside world (i.e. school, work, interviews, public functions). Unfortunately our linguistics skill or lack thereof do define us as people and give unwilling clues to our level of intelligence and whether or not we are reliable sources of information (depending...
In today’s society, the mind is a set of cognitive elements which enables an individual’s consciousness, perception, thinking, judgement, and memory. In addition, without our minds and/or conscious experiences, a person would not be able to understand what makes them who they are. Similarly, in Thomas Nagel’s essay “What Is It Like to Be a Bat,” Nagel claims that even though there is something it is like to be an organism, humans are not capable of fully knowing what it is like to be a bat. In addition, Nagel supports his claims through the importance of an organism’s conscious experiences, memories, and knowledge which allow an individual to identify themselves. Therefore, in this paper I will discuss Nagel’s argument which I believe
Language is a powerful tool and manner on how we, as people, live and socialize. It is a gateway to communication and how to interpret things. As humans, we often distinguish ourselves as individuals through language, creating a sort of identity through linguistics among our fellow peers. In present times, it is just as significant how we say things as to what we say. It has become the norm to categorize others based off how they speak. This act of divergence is powerful, the judging prematurely of and setting standards to certain social groups leads to stereotyping and cultural bias. Linguistic determinism
What really is a language and how does it affect the world around us? Language is just a structure of words put together to communicate with one another. When one speaks all they are doing is causing their vocal cords to vibrate to produce different sound waves. This sounds so simple, but there are thousands of languages spoken throughout the world and each language is usually connected to a certain place. When someone travels to a different place where a language is foreign to them it can be life-changing as in The Naked Eye. Language constricts our thoughts and identities with the world around us. I’m arguing that language is as much of a necessity in our world as food or water, it’s the basis on how we get through each and every day.
Stuart Hall’s theory of encoding/ decoding is where the notion of audience activity begins, he tried to account for active consumption also (Moores 1993). The encoding part of Hall’s theory (producing the media) was done by an individual but the messages ‘have a complex structure of dominance’ ( During 1993:477),meaning the encoding part is bound by institutions that constrain individuals. The message needs to be decoded meaningfully (Hall 1977) as the messages that are encoded are designed to give a preferred reading (Hall 1977) which has dominant ideology and a means for consumption. Due to the preferred meaning having an ‘institutional/political/ideological order imprinted in them’ (Hall 1977: 482) they then also have social order entwined in them.
Additionally, speciesists argue that human beings are the only creatures who are self-aware. They believe that due to this characteristic, they are able to think rationally while all other nonhuman animals cannot. Speciesists claim that this enables them to think and act morally, and so entitles them to a higher moral status. This argument, like many other speciesist arguments, fails when “the argument from marginal cases” is applied. The argument from marginal cases argues t...
It also hints at the average American’s values, as he regards materialistic goods higher than basic essentials. So why do consumers spend money—typically on credit, money they do not have—on these glamorous objects? Julia Halpert, a journalist writing for The Fiscal Times, has the answer in her article “Millennials: Young, Broke, and Spending on Luxury”. Halpert expertly employs Jason Dorsey, a millennials expert, who explains that “brands represent a lifestyle and luxury goods provide a strong visual representation ‘that either I've made it’ or ‘I want to tell you I've made it’”. This justification demonstrates the common narcissist agenda, that possessing material goods are essential and it makes you socially above another person. A narcissist purchases luxury goods to show off, to display his elevated status and wealth in comparison to others. He wants to garner the jealousy and attention of others and create an environment that concentrates only him. And he, the narcissist, learns through celebrities and the
In this serious article, author Jack Rosenthal argues about language that’s being written and spoken in order to inform readers to know the difference between the two. I can connect this to today’s society. We are now creating our own language by using abbreviations. For example: “OMG”, “LOL”, or “LMAFO”. I notice that what’s not being typed is what we choose to speak. “Spoken language is by nature casual, so its ascendancy has brought informality,” (Rosenthal 15). I believe Rosenthal means that once language is spoken, it can influence everyone to speak the same. I believe this is very true. Without technology, I’m sure I would speak very formally. Now, I see all types of different slang words that I would have never known about unless I had
Just as every coin has two sides, so does language. For every negative, there is a positive; for every failure, a success. Language plays an extremely important role in life, has a great impact, and opened up a new perspective. On the other hand, language also creates major issues in society, such as stereotypes. Language influences people's lives, resulting as in positive and negative outcomes.
Humans have many unique characteristics and attributes that make us very different from the animals around us. With these attributes, we are also able to dominate and manipulate our environment around us to our personal benefit. Some of these attributes that humans possess are self-awareness, higher emotion, and personal memory. Humans are able to use these tools to make our world better because of the phenomenon of language. According to a Columbia paper, “Language is implicated in most of the phenomena that lie at the core of a social psychology: attitude change, social perception, personal identity, social interaction, intergroup bias and stereotyping, attribution, and so on…”
The Frankfurt School (Marjoribanks, pg 471) further extend this idea by understanding media as commodifying culture, viewing the media as a hegemonic force, conversely presenting the audience as passive. This perceived passivity has been widely contested (Macionis & Plummer 2002 cited in Marjoribanks, pg 471), and even Gramsci (1971, cited in Majoribanks, pg 471) has critiqued this notion by indicating that in order for a hegemonic ruling to happen it must be consented by the public, thereby placing the choice of submitting to the media and its influences on the audience. Marjoribanks makes a valid point in highlighting the idea of ‘hegemony’ indicates a possibility that the audience can challenge the dominant ideas and overturn consent, presenting the notion that the audience is an active group, rather than passive. Extending this argument Hall’s (1973) encoding and decoding is mentioned; which found that the accepting and rejecting of media messages is controlled by an individual’s upbringing, values and ideals, thereby diminishing the perceived strong power that hegemonic forces have over the public. Morley (1992) agrees, highlighting Counihan’s (1973:43 as cited in Morley (1992) pg 72) conclusions that the media-audience