Compare And Contrast Han China And Imperial Rome

477 Words1 Page

Imperial Rome and Han China were significant classical empires which have influenced history. Although Imperial Rome and Han China shared centralized governments, infrastructure, and military control of large governments, they differed in their particular methods and values that supported the development of their empires.
Although Rome and China both had a centralized government, their method of centralization differed. Han China built their system using bureaucrats, or state officials. Their method was based upon the Confucian system, whereas the Romans based theirs on Greek and Republican Roman values. Both Rome and China had vast empires controlled in a patriarchal manner. Both had the notion that men should be in control; however, the Chinese supported the notion through filial piety whereas the Romans supported it through families. Both had a singular leader with support, but Rome’s leader was considered to be at least partially divine while China’s …show more content…

They both had large empires, thus needed similar systems in order to control them. Both had a centralized government based upon their culture. Imperial Rome had been deeply influenced by Republican Rome and Greece, thus stuck to similar values. Since Rome gained power by expanding their reign, their army was molded to fit that purpose. The Chines, however, had a reason to defend their empire, thus had a defensive military. The Chinese remained true to their Confucian ways. Rome and China had seas and rivers, thus they created canals and roads such as the silk roads and needed infrastructure. Imperial Rome and Han China shared centralized governments ruled by single powerful ruler, militaristic control for expansion and defense, and infrastructure especially pertinent to water, yet they differed in their particular methods and values that supported the development of their

Open Document