Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing ancient china and india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing ancient china and india
Compare and Contrasting India and China During 2000 BC - 1000 AD, Chinese and Indian empires developing into thriving nations. With a strong government and a trade network they prospered. Both experienced periods of strength and also periods of weakness. The same policies in each empire led them to these previously mentioned periods. Although Chini and India are different because of their contrasting cultures, they are very similar due to their methods in economy, and running of the government.
In both Chinese and Indian empires, the economy was based on trade and farming. The large populations of farmers and peasants grew food to feed themselves and their families. They also grew a surplus to pay taxes. In India, as the emperor rented you land, you would pay taxes for the land and the crop. In China you paid taxes for the crop. During periods of soft policies, the farming class prospered and lived peacefully under dynasties. However, as tax policies were increased, farmers became unable to afford paying tax and resorted to them selling their land and working for the rich. This created a
…show more content…
In the Chinese dynasties; Song and Tang, advancements resulted in improved trade, economy, and art. With inventions such as the compass, paper money, movable parts, and porcelain. In India, the Gupta empire had advancements in math, science, astronomy, and medicine. With inventions like the concept of zero and new innovations in inoculation, metallurgy. Astronomers from India discovered seven planets, along with solar eclipses and the rotation of earth. Along with different developments the two cultures had different religions. In India, depending on the time period, Buddhism and Hinduism were the main religions. In China most people liked confucianism, a system of certain morals. However, these morals often intertwined with morals from Buddhism; like following the middle
The “Second-wave” civilizations are dated from 500 B.C.E to 500CE and were comprised Empires ins Persia, Greece, Rome and India as well as the Chinese Dynasty. These civilizations differed from First Civilizations in several ways, all of which lead to increased globalization.
The caste system played a great part in religion and philosophies as well. As shown in the graphic organizer, Father>son, older brother>younger brother. This supports the evidence of a caste system in china, not as strict as the caste system in Ancient India. The caste systems were separated by power, a father being more powerful than his son, and wife. His older son will have more power over the younger son, but the father has the power to control all of his sons. This was similar to the Indian caste system. Brahmins had more power over
All of the empires in chapter four certainly left their legacy. But what was their legacy about? As I see it, it was more about their destructive features than their ‘greatness’. Every empire had a rise and fall, the fall due to war or conflict. Rome and the Han Dynasty were the major two ‘empires’ with conflict. Next, Persia and the Greek empire’s conflicts.
The Han dynasty was adopting a religion and government, Confucianism and a Bureaucracy. The Roman was transitioning from Greek culture to a culture all of their own. In India they were going through a mix of both. During the American industrial revolution the American people were going through the same thing woman were starting to be able to work and help support their families.During this revolution the attitudes shifted to help the poverty stricken and laborers. The American revolution also acted the Roman empire with showing off to Britain how nice their new technology was and how well they were going without the British rule.Going on during this time period India just split from the Persian empire and transitioned into an aristocratic society with the new religion of Buddhism. All over the world technological advancements are bringing people together. After the Huns invaded the middle east a big boom in technological advancements bright them together. After all these new social reforms happen the attitude of the Han and Roman towards technology to what it is now. The Han attitude towards technology is for the common people and for the Romans it to show off their advanced
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were two grand empires that rose out of preexisting territories and provided relative peace over wide areas. The collapse of the Qin Dynasty (221-206 BCE), which was the first great land-based empire in East Asia, came after a period of war, confusion, and tyrannical rule. Due to the political disorder that stemmed from the early dynastic activity, the emergence of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE- 228 CE) sprung to focus on restoring order. On the other hand, the rise of the Roman Empire (44 BCE- 476 CE) originated from consolidating authority over aristocratic landlords and overriding the democratic elements of the earlier Republic. Instead, the Roman Empire redefined the concept of “citizen” as subjects to the Roman emperor. Both empires shared similar agendas to exploit their vast territories and resources, which helped them expand their political dominance; however, despite having similar political goals and foundations, their government system, cultural ideologies and imperial expansionist natures diverged.
The Qing Empire and the Ottoman Turkish Empire both comare as well as contrast. The Qing Empire lasted from 1644 to 1912. The Ottoman Turkish Empire lasted from 1299 to 1923. As you can see the Ottoman Turkish Empire lasted alot longer than the Qing Empire. All empires have declines and many problems that causes them to eventually dissolve.
When comparing different societies in ancient history you may not think that Han China and Ancient Rome had a lot in common. These two great societies had many similarities and differences, especially in their social structures. These similarities and differences are all due to Han China’s and Ancient Rome’s governments, family structures and religions. Both of these wonderful empires lasted for approximately 400 years and had lasting effects on the lands they conquered.
Two important, mighty Asian empires in history are the Ottoman Empire and the Ming China. These two empires are in totally different areas of Asia – the Ottomans were in the very west, the Chinese were in the oriental east. Therefore, these two empires, naturally, formed completely different cultures. However, surprisingly, these empires had many parts in common as well. The Ottoman Empire and the Ming Dynasty had both many different and distinct parts, as well as many similarities.
Today we can look around ourselves and see thousands of technical innovations that make life easier; But if we take a step back and ask ourselves “How?” we will soon realize that most often, these technological advancements did not just “poof” into existence, but are usually the outcome of building upon yesterday’s technology. If we follow this cycle back into time, we can attribute almost any modern day invention to an ancient civilization during its golden age. China was no exception. China’s Song and Tang dynasties fostered scientific advances comparable to Rome’s during its Pax Romana. The most significant and impacting of these were the development of primitive gunpowder and porcelain of the Tang and paper money, and the magnetic compass of the Song Dynasties. Although these may seem very far off, if you look hard enough, you can see traces of their impacts in society today because most of the advancements today we owe to them.
More than two thousand years ago, two great empires arose. The Chinese and the Roman Empires. Having different locations, there were obvious differences from the start, assembly and the collapse of the empires, but there were also astonishing similarities. Located in modern time Asia and Europe, the Chinese and Roman empires were revolutionary with their ideas and accomplishments in their time from the start to the end of their empires.
It is interesting that two cities over 7,000 miles apart from one another, and in completely different time periods, could have so many similarities. The city of Chang’an in China during the Tang Dynasty was set up in a grid fashion similar to that of modern day New York City. Flourishing trade was of great importance to the development of both cities, but very different political systems were used to govern each. Modern day New York City and Chang’an during the Tang Dynasty share key similarities as both were important trade centers in strategic locations, but were run on very different political lines.
Ancient Egypt and Ancient China often seem like polar opposites in almost every way. However, in one way, they are more similar than most people think. The beliefs of both of these civilizations were remarkably parallel, yet perplexingly different at the same time. Religion before 600 B.C.E. varied from society to society all around the globe, with just a few major religions taking hold in large areas. In both Egyptian and Chinese religions, they adhered to a polytheistic religion. Boths religions believed there were many gods who individually ruled over the many different parts of life, instead of one god ruling over all. Both Egyptian and Chinese cultures believed in life after death. Each one of these religions believed in some form of
Regarding religion, Chinese culture saw the emergence of Confucianism and Buddhism as the major influence. Confucianism stressed filial piety which meant respecting elders and superiors, ruling righteously, and obeying commands and orders. Confucianism was introduced by the Chinese thinker Confucius. Buddhism was brought to China, but originated in India and was founded by Siddhartha Gautama. Followers of Buddhism worshipped Buddh...
India and China during the 1400’s shared many similarities. Chinese and Indian economies were highly developed and supplied much of the Old World with their manufactured goods. However, their political differences were more apparent. Both social systems had a present hierarchy with select people considered “higher” then others, India was not a unified empire during the time of the 1400’s, however China was. Other differences between the two were India had both political disunity and unity imposed by outside conquerors. According to Marks, “Although India looks like a “place” on a map because of its distinctive geography, it was never really politically unified until the mid-1500s, and then only tentatively because it broke apart again by the mid-1700s.” (Marks, 2007, p. 51 eBook). China’s social system did not have a social ladder. They had a simple three caste social ladder. The Bureaucrats and landowners were considered the highest class, then peasants and farmers, and then merchants. China’s social system gave individuals the opportunity to move their social status. The Indian caste system was stricter with a formal leader in the Brahmins, or priests, then the Warriors, Merchants
Evidence shows that Chinese civilization originated in the Yellow River basin (805). Indian civilization began in and around the Indus River valley. It is not remarkable that each of these great civilizations sprang from the land around a river system. Life is drawn to water, and seasonal floods often regenerate the soil around the watershed. The mo...