Through the use of Extrinsic Proofs, I can include myself as a Proximate Authority. Through this authority, I will know about the Common Core based off of being present while it was administered to schools. The Common Core was started in 2009. This method was a way that educators could make sure students around the country are learning the same. This meant that a student in California will learn the same things that a student in New York would. The fact that 20.2 million people are attending college as of 2015, means that when the speech is delivered in 5 years t hat number should be hitting the 50 million range. The Common Core sets standards that are good enough to get a student through their first year of a college credit English course. Being part of the product of the Common Core makes me a …show more content…
We also went over proper citation and writing differences between fiction and non fiction writing in school. When I took the placement exam for English classes at LIU, I was able to place into English 16, which is the first college credit English course a student takes. Even though all teachers have the abilities to create their own lesson plans, they still have to use the Common Core’s standards in order to successfully teach their classes. Students how are introduced to the Common Core and adhere to them should be able to succeed in college. Understanding this has also helped me to learn how to properly put together a cover letter and resume for employment. Although the Common Core is created to help prepared students for college, these standards are also beneficial to obtaining or advancing in career opportunities. I have been able to obtain many jobs and I consider it to be because of what I learned from the Common Core. Saying this, I can be a good Proximate Authority because I have experienced the teachings of the Common Core. Although I am not an expert, I know first hand what the material is like and the difficulty of
The Common Core State Standards has been adopted by many states in the United States already. This issue is gaining both positive and negative opinions within the education world and society. Some want to know why the standards were created and what the meaning behind these standards is. What is the reasoning for implementing these standards, and why is there so much controversy that follows. Why do these four words cause such controversy? The following will analyze and evaluate The Common Core State Standards in hopes to understand why education is being overtaken by them.
Common core has been the program calling all the shots in most school systems in the United States. Since the year 2008, the common core standard testing has been sneaking its way into the school systems. The common core has brought up many different situations within the schools. One situation consists of determining the education level of students by using the same standardized test. Another situation is by requiring teachers to teach to a certain test, even though students do not fully learn what they are being taught. The government should not be able to evaluate students and teachers by one certain test. Attention must be brought up to how common core has changed our education system to the unproductive side, but then explain how our schooling systems can fix the problem that has been made. The common core can be fixed for the best, but the most fulfilling way to fix this problem is to get rid of the program altogether. The best results of students’ education can truly be viewed accurately once the common core is fully out of the school curriculum.
The Common Core Standards prepare students for a competitive global economy and has been designed to leave room for tailoring to specific state populations who must adopt at least eighty five percent of the standards, leaving fifteen percent to tweak. The Common Core Standards were designed by a diverse group of teachers, experts, parents, and school administrators to reflect aspirations for student achievement and an understanding of the realities of the classroom.
The Common Core State Standards have made tremendous gains for the world of education. Students nationwide are learning the same standards and skill sets. Nationwide standards are clearly necessary, so one state isn’t far more advanced or lagging behind other states. Not only has the Common Core provided national standards, it has created rigorous standards that encourage critical thinking, and prepare students for college curriculum and careers pursued after their schooling. Before Common Core, teachers could teach anything they wanted without purpose and support. CCSS have required teachers to b...
Common Core is a set of high-quality academic standards in Math, English, Language Arts, and Literacy (“Common Core”). The standards outline what every student should be able to interpret by the end of the grade (“Common Core”). The standards are supposed to allow students to be ready when they graduate from high school regardless of where they are taught (“Common Core”). Forty-two states, the District of Columbia, four territories, and the Department of Defense Education Activity have adopted and fully believe that Common Core is necessary (“Common Core”). However I do not agree with the Common Core Curriculum in any way. I believe that every child learns in a different way and at a different pace. If we continue to hold children
Initial Reflective Essay When I first thought of what I wanted to do with my life after college, the first thing I thought of was helping people. The next step in deciding what I wanted to do with my life was to examine how I could accomplish this goal. I started pondering and I was thinking about how much I love to take care of my body. Health care and personal hygiene has always been an important factor in my life. So I decided to major in Health Sciences.
The common core requires higher standards, standards that are supposed to provide children with a deeper understanding of ...
(Common Core State Standards Initiative) Many find flaws in the system such as Valerie Strauss of the Washington Post. Strauss points out in her article Eight Problems With Common Core Standards that the standards set by the Common Core should not be limited to school subjects, but should step outside the box and tie in real world scenarios. (Strauss) Strauss also says the lack of diversity in the curriculum puts students at a disadvantage because of the changing world around teachers should not be limited to teaching information provided by an initiative that makes students from all over the nation learn the same material. (Strauss) Strauss is especially skeptical of the Common Core’s preparation for standardized test as she says, “The Common Core Standards are a set-up for national standardized tests, tests that can’t evaluate complex thought, can’t avoid cultural bias, can’t measure non-verbal learning, can’t predict anything of consequence.” (Strauss) Strauss explains how the Common Core destroys any form of originality by stating; “The word “standards” gets an approving nod from the public (and from most educators) because it means “performance that meets a standard.” However, the word also means “like everybody else,” and standardizing minds is what the Standards
In these changing times one of the biggest aspects of society that should be updated on a regular basis is education. Changes in curriculum as well as methods of teaching need to be revised each and every year. With this idea came the idea of the Common Core State Standard which is currently being adopted by forty-four out of fifty states in the United States. This new rework is designed to help better prepare students for college, universities, and the work place. However, not everyone believes this is the right move education should be taking at this moment. Those in support state this is the best decision possible to teach the children of the 21st century. Others say the cause for the decline in the quality of education in the United States stems from other sociological factors not from how the system is currently being worked. Even more are concerned if schools will be ready for this new wave of change. Will Common Core be effective in helping prepare high school graduates for the future? Only time will tell if the Common Core Standards proves effective in further helping students be prepared for the future.
Through the supervision of the NGA and CCSSO, many professionals wrote and critiqued the standards. According to the Official Common Core website, governors, teachers and curriculum and testing professionals wrote and reviewed the standards. Though more field-testing is needed, the Common Core writers affirm their standards will prepare students for college and career through more rigorous standards and achievement tests. Common Core writers and most validation committee members agree the standards will compete with other international standards.
There are many studies have conducted on the Common Core issue. I am interested in reading and knowing this topic, the Common Core Standards in the American perspective. According to State Standards Initiative, the Common Core State Standards established curricula for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects “the Standards” are the peak of a prolonged effort to carry out the charge supplied by the states to build the generation of K-12 standards to help guarantee that all learners are college and occupation ready in knowledge at the end of high school. (Schutz, n.d.).
One of the main issues with Common Core was how it was and still is being taught. The actual intent is now blurry because every teacher teaches differently and has interpreted it in their own way. This applies especially to those teachers who dislike Common Core and find it unnecessary to try and fit their given standards. Common Core itself has created more standardized tests than our education system has ever provided over the course of a school year (“Psych Today”). The problem with standardized tests is that there is no room for complex thought, can’t account for non-verbal learning, and unable to avoid cultural bias. (“Preparing America’s Students for Success”) Along with the increase of standardized tests, the weight of them towards a student’s education has increased as well. This has created an outburst from the students who are currently going through this newly developed curriculum. Students believe that having a standardized test account for how ready they are for college simply isn’t fair. The most common way that teachers seem to prepare their students for these standardized tests is by repetition which is a form of memorization. They have them take multiple practice tests in order to “prepare” them for what to expect during a test. This is ironic because Common Core was designed to abandon the old emphasis on memorization and
Common Core is a controversial issue concerning many different kinds of people. Teachers are concerned because they feel like the new standards implemented restrict their abilities to create a lesson that fits their specific student’s needs. Students are concerned because of the increased amount of testing associated with Common Core. Parents are concerned because they have no say in what their children learn. Lastly, the government is concerned because of the state our country is in education wise and how far behind we are falling.
The Common Core State Standard is “an education initiative that aims to align state curricula along national standards” (“National Poll Reveals That Cursive Writing Education Is In Danger.”). It is a recent initiative and since then has been well received throughout 45 states in the United ...
Pullman, J. (2013, 04 14). Common Core Standards - Fact and Fiction. Retrieved from You Tube: retrived from; http://youtu.be/EXf91AGW2QA