Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of creative and critical thinking
The importance of creative and critical thinking
The importance of creative and critical thinking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of creative and critical thinking
I have a strong interest in education; in fact, I am currently in college going after my degree in liberal studies, in hopes of becoming an elementary school teacher in the near future. This year I signed up to volunteer as room mom in my daughters second grade class in order to get more of a hands on experience and really figure out if this is the career I see myself wanting and having. Something that I didn’t realize until becoming more hands on in a classroom setting are the effects of the “Common Core Curriculum” having on children. For the first time in our nation’s history, beginning with the 2013-2014 school year, more than 90 percent of public schools will operate under the same learning standards for literacy and math, from kindergarten through grade twelve in order to become “college and career ready” (Nichols, p.36). At first glance, adopting the common core curriculum may seem ideal considering, “having the same standards in all states will help students get a good education, even if they change schools or move to a different state” (Core, Common). But what came to me as more of a concern is children, who generally perform well on tests and in class, are now faced with challenges due to the common core exam questions that are not at an age appropriate level, which I might add are given to the children multiple times throughout the year. All of this is at the expense of children and furthermore, it not only takes away from any creativity or talent that children may possess and might never know what they are capable of, but it also undermines any independence and creativity of the teachers as well.
The common core requires higher standards, standards that are supposed to provide children with a deeper understanding of ...
... middle of paper ...
...on needs, in order to live their unique life. Schools need to encourage creativity and be flexible in the way they operate (Williams p. 24)
It is hard to blame just the curriculum, tests, students or teachers for the difficulties seen in the new adopted common core. It is also hard to disregard all the documentation and evidence of the damage that has been done to the children and schools from the newly adopted curriculum. Our only hope for our future means we have to rethink the fundamental principles on which we are educating our children. Maybe the Core curriculum does not need to be shipped out, but instead needs shoring up. If the common core is to continue being implemented in our school system the districts need to adjust its curriculum to not only better fit what the tests ask, but also, not rob our children from what makes them an individual, creativity.
Along with a strong appeal to logos, the speaker uses a sentimental tone to support the points that we stopped kids from doing creative things. From his personal experience, Robinson maintains, “When you were kids, things you liked, on the grounds that you would never get a job.” The essence of the speaker’s argument is that we only encourage our kids for doing something worthy. When we say that things they like to do have no scope, this emotionally affects kids. Ultimately, guardian just put the weight of their ambitions on the delicate shoulders of their kids. This builds the pressure on students to meets with the expectations of their guardian. Therefore, one should understand that every child has his own specialty, potential, and liking.
The Common Cores are set of guidelines that each teacher must meet during each school year. These guidelines are met during exams and other types of testing. In Stop The Madness: On “No Child Left Behind” by Diane Ravitch she begins her argument against the NCLB-No Child Left Behind- saying that it worthless for it forces the school to focus only making test requirements instead of students actually getting the main reason why students that go to school, it is to receive knowledge. “One of the unintended consequences of NCLB was the shrinkage of time available to teach anything other than reading and math...Test scores became an obsession” ( Paragraph 7 Ravitch). The “test scores” are wrecking and straying away from true purpose of the schools around the country. The obsession made many educators focus on more test taking skills then the actual knowledge of the subject in order to reach the stranders that the administration have given them . Despite the test scores, the United States are not high rank in math according to the U.S Math Performance in Global Perspective by the Harvard University and Stanford University. In the US itself, the percentage of students that are taking advanced classes are 11.4% in Massachusetts. This is the highest percentage in the US that students are taking high scores. Yes, not every student has the ability to do the
Creating a learning and safe environment where students can grow through a system the gives them the attention and healthy activities they need to expand their minds. I got a quote from John Gatto in his writing “We Need Less Schools, Not More” he states “education is about discovering the meaning and purpose of oneself” (54). Gatto is illustrating that a working education system should push students towards the path of what they enjoy and what they want to learn so they can understand their meaning and purpose when they graduate and walk off into the world. That is why I agree with Gatto on his view of helping students find out there purpose and meaning and adding on to that Gatto also incorporated the importance of making students unique as he also was quoted for saying “your education should make you unique” (56). The importance of being unique is because you bring a different aspect to the table when another people speak upon different ideas. You are able to see things others cannot. Incorporating a trait such as unique will take time but will only benefit us as a country that is why I installed it into my education
Forty-two states have adopted Common Core State Standards. These standards were created to focus only on English and Mathematics. In effect of states adopting Common Core Standards, all other subjects taught in school seemed less important. History and Science standards are no longer stressed. Students are limited to being proficient in only two subjects. The Common Core deprives students’ ability to be skilled in multiple areas. These standards do not provide a slight “break” from the challenging fast past teaching of English and Mathematics. In addition to limiting education to English and Mathematics, Jill Bowden explains that the Common Core is affecting kindergarteners by taking “away from materials that encourage playful learning.” (36).
The constant debate over the school systems in America, have yielded a discussion over whether these school systems promote individuality through ones’ schoolwork or if the whole system is set up to conform every student. Some important issues to discuss when looking at schools causing individuality or conformity are school dress codes, rigid school schedules and classes, and little creativity promoted in schools.
The Common Core State Standards has been adopted by many states in the United States already. This issue is gaining both positive and negative opinions within the education world and society. Some want to know why the standards were created and what the meaning behind these standards is. What is the reasoning for implementing these standards, and why is there so much controversy that follows. Why do these four words cause such controversy? The following will analyze and evaluate The Common Core State Standards in hopes to understand why education is being overtaken by them.
It is my strong belief that each child is entitled to a safe, secure, stimulating and caring learning environment. I always believed that each child is a unique individual with much curiosity and many academic, social and emotional needs. Children need our support in order to mature emotionally, intellectually, physically, and socially. As a teacher, one should aim to help students in fulfilling their dreams to become successful and educated individuals. We must provide them with a safe learning environment for their learning to succeed.
These learning goals outline what a student should know and be able to do at the end of each grade Anya Kamenetz author of "Tough Week for the Common Core" writes that “[t]he Common Core [is] not, strictly speaking, national standards. They were developed independently of the federal government, and states are not under a mandate to adopt them,” but then goes on to say that the “standards received a big boost in the form of funding incentives from the Obama administration” (1). These “big boost[s]” are what concerns many like Bobby Jindal. “A few years ago, Jindal was one of the Common Core 's biggest proponents. But he has since had a change of heart” (3). Bobby Jindal, along with many other opposers, question what would happen if state who had implemented common core in their schools suddenly dropped the plan? Anya Kamenetz furthers her article by stating that the three states who have already done this “now face spending tens of millions of dollars to create new standards, adopt new materials to go with them and retrain teachers” (1). Some might say that this decrease in funding is expected because the federal government had agreed to fund a specific program and although schools don 't have to use that program, those who don 't have to find the funding for their programs themselves. But how is this
Common core has been the program calling all the shots in most school systems in the United States. Since the year 2008, the common core standard testing has been sneaking its way into the school systems. The common core has brought up many different situations within the schools. One situation consists of determining the education level of students by using the same standardized test. Another situation is by requiring teachers to teach to a certain test, even though students do not fully learn what they are being taught. The government should not be able to evaluate students and teachers by one certain test. Attention must be brought up to how common core has changed our education system to the unproductive side, but then explain how our schooling systems can fix the problem that has been made. The common core can be fixed for the best, but the most fulfilling way to fix this problem is to get rid of the program altogether. The best results of students’ education can truly be viewed accurately once the common core is fully out of the school curriculum.
The American system of education is considered to be one of the most progressive in the world. One of the surveys on attitudes toward teaching around the world found that the United States is unique in its strong emphasis on "good teaching." My experience at State College has helped me to understand better how this system works, and what methods and techniques American teachers use to motivate their students for creative and active learning. However, I can also see that this system doesn’t work perfectly in every classroom. Reading Ernest Boyer’s article “Creativity in the Classroom” helped me with my understanding of the main problem that nowadays exists with the American college education system. According to the author, the problem is that teachers and students don’t see each other as one team doing the same business; therefore, in most classrooms the process of learning becomes a boring procedure instead of being mind-blowing. Moreover, reading this article, I could analyze the reasons of this problem that the author identifies through my own experiences at State College.
● Some people’s idea behind common core is not really that bad, they think a national educational standard is for each grade level to feed the student with the same amount of
. Furthermore, our lower standards allowed other countries to surpass us on international achievement comparisons (Wallender). Also, the goal to increase rigor in education was in the forefront of both Bush Sr. and Jr. and Clinton administrations. Furthermore, G. H. W. Bush proposed “America 2000” promoted national standards, but it was never enacted. Also, Clinton reauthorized the ESEA as “Improving America’s School Act” focused on standards called “Frameworks” to align curriculum and assessments (Wallender).
Which brings me to Common Core, I am currently being taught with the methods of Common Core. The goal of Common Core according to Dr. Susan Berry it is aimed to "close the achievement gap between white and minority students and make U.S. students "college and career ready." ' (Dr. Susan Berry) Common Core being the new teaching way is a big issue in my community. I am a senior in high school, but in a program where I take my classes at a community college allowing me to get up to two years of college done while still being
I found that Sir Ken Robinson 's presentation on the lack of support given to promote creativity in public education can be interpreted in the structural functionalist perspective. I believe this because what Sir Robinson seems to describe is an imbalance in education where we value and teach mathematics and english far more than we do the arts. Sir Ken Robinson explains how the public education system is "educating people out of their creative capacities" and mistakes become stigmatized. He continues and points out that the same hierarchy of subjects exists around the world with mathematics and english at the top and the arts at the bottom. Through this system, Robinson concludes that
From my point of view, school machinery and environment help satisfying a student basic thoughtful needs in two complement methods. One is supplying them with knowledge and the other is providing them with a professional guardianship that specializes in producing perfect and complete human being as much as possible.