More handpicked essays just for you.
History of education in america
The history of the american education system
The history of the american education system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Common Core Standards
1. The Common Core definition There are many studies have conducted on the Common Core issue. I am interested in reading and knowing this topic, the Common Core Standards in the American perspective. According to State Standards Initiative, the Common Core State Standards established curricula for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects “the Standards” are the peak of a prolonged effort to carry out the charge supplied by the states to build the generation of K-12 standards to help guarantee that all learners are college and occupation ready in knowledge at the end of high school. (Schutz, n.d.).
In this paper, I would like to discuss the Common Core Standards
…show more content…
(2014) exclaimed that why do 62 percent of parents think the Common Core is not perfect for their kids, despite it has fascinated some entrepreneurs such as Bill Gates and the secretary of education. In a case in point, parents should get more involved in the education of their children if they do not approve of measures being used. She agrees to the idea of a federal government using incentives to adopt their specific education program, but then again she only sees that parents complaining and not taking action. In another context, “parents have no choice about whether their kids will learn Common Core, no matter what school they put them in, if they want them to go to college, because the SAT and ACT are being redesigned to fit the new national program for education”. (Pullmann, J. 2014, September 24, p. 1). In fact, Porter (1989) states that the Common Core standards became as opposing to teachers and teaching occupation, and the tactics are not good strong enough for enabling teachers to be dependent. The teacher is often understood to be the planned without rules. Moreover, some voices against the criticism of the common core, they believe that it is meaningless because districts are still permitted to select which material goes out with stem the basis stated by the Common Core …show more content…
Eventually, the problem is not with having Common Core, but the matter is with the way how it is done and applied.
3. Conclusion As a final point, the following points are the sum up of what and why I am not in favor with the Common Core:
● The problem is that well acting schools have spent countless hours adapting the curriculum to align with common core, and sometimes moving backwards.
● The children who were receiving a high quality education before the national curriculum is being used to work out the bends in this new system. If we were going to have national standards, there should have been some effort to design a baseline curriculum to be used in the first design of textbooks and testing materials. But I would guess a mix of things, but mostly political pressure and the threat that standardized testing would use common core as its guide and those tests could affect educational funding.
● Some people’s idea behind common core is not really that bad, they think a national educational standard is for each grade level to feed the student with the same amount of
The Common Cores are set of guidelines that each teacher must meet during each school year. These guidelines are met during exams and other types of testing. In Stop The Madness: On “No Child Left Behind” by Diane Ravitch she begins her argument against the NCLB-No Child Left Behind- saying that it worthless for it forces the school to focus only making test requirements instead of students actually getting the main reason why students that go to school, it is to receive knowledge. “One of the unintended consequences of NCLB was the shrinkage of time available to teach anything other than reading and math...Test scores became an obsession” ( Paragraph 7 Ravitch). The “test scores” are wrecking and straying away from true purpose of the schools around the country. The obsession made many educators focus on more test taking skills then the actual knowledge of the subject in order to reach the stranders that the administration have given them . Despite the test scores, the United States are not high rank in math according to the U.S Math Performance in Global Perspective by the Harvard University and Stanford University. In the US itself, the percentage of students that are taking advanced classes are 11.4% in Massachusetts. This is the highest percentage in the US that students are taking high scores. Yes, not every student has the ability to do the
Forty-two states have adopted Common Core State Standards. These standards were created to focus only on English and Mathematics. In effect of states adopting Common Core Standards, all other subjects taught in school seemed less important. History and Science standards are no longer stressed. Students are limited to being proficient in only two subjects. The Common Core deprives students’ ability to be skilled in multiple areas. These standards do not provide a slight “break” from the challenging fast past teaching of English and Mathematics. In addition to limiting education to English and Mathematics, Jill Bowden explains that the Common Core is affecting kindergarteners by taking “away from materials that encourage playful learning.” (36).
and critical thinking, but the process will be slow, teachers will be stress about changing
With the common core standards students now will be able to transfer schools and understand what is going on because the Common Core Standard provides a clear understanding to all students of what they are expected to learn. It will provide all of the students with an equal opportunity to learn same curriculum no matter which school they are going to. These standards will not limit the students with different level of achievement among students; instead they will ensure a more consistent exposure to materials and learning experience though instructions and teacher preparation. However, two c...
The Common Core State Standards has been adopted by many states in the United States already. This issue is gaining both positive and negative opinions within the education world and society. Some want to know why the standards were created and what the meaning behind these standards is. What is the reasoning for implementing these standards, and why is there so much controversy that follows. Why do these four words cause such controversy? The following will analyze and evaluate The Common Core State Standards in hopes to understand why education is being overtaken by them.
Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, the American educational system has undergone much transition in response to our changing society. Though there have been many problems raised throughout the years in regard to what our school systems should be teaching our children, there have also been many developments.
...ting a new curriculum. The system needs an entire restructuring, from the top to the bottom.
Common Core is a high set of K-12 academic standards in English and mathematics. It was developed in 2010 by Forty-two states, the district of Colombia, four territories, and the department of defense education which have also adopted the common core practices that are supposed to increase the knowledge of an individual. Common Core standards are research and evidence based, aligned with expectation in the future, and use higher order thinking. These standards were set to define what students should know and provide a deeper understanding of the material they are learning. Common Core was also created to ensure that students learn and develop skills that they will benefit from in the future.
These learning goals outline what a student should know and be able to do at the end of each grade Anya Kamenetz author of "Tough Week for the Common Core" writes that “[t]he Common Core [is] not, strictly speaking, national standards. They were developed independently of the federal government, and states are not under a mandate to adopt them,” but then goes on to say that the “standards received a big boost in the form of funding incentives from the Obama administration” (1). These “big boost[s]” are what concerns many like Bobby Jindal. “A few years ago, Jindal was one of the Common Core 's biggest proponents. But he has since had a change of heart” (3). Bobby Jindal, along with many other opposers, question what would happen if state who had implemented common core in their schools suddenly dropped the plan? Anya Kamenetz furthers her article by stating that the three states who have already done this “now face spending tens of millions of dollars to create new standards, adopt new materials to go with them and retrain teachers” (1). Some might say that this decrease in funding is expected because the federal government had agreed to fund a specific program and although schools don 't have to use that program, those who don 't have to find the funding for their programs themselves. But how is this
(Common Core State Standards Initiative) Many find flaws in the system such as Valerie Strauss of the Washington Post. Strauss points out in her article Eight Problems With Common Core Standards that the standards set by the Common Core should not be limited to school subjects, but should step outside the box and tie in real world scenarios. (Strauss) Strauss also says the lack of diversity in the curriculum puts students at a disadvantage because of the changing world around teachers should not be limited to teaching information provided by an initiative that makes students from all over the nation learn the same material. (Strauss) Strauss is especially skeptical of the Common Core’s preparation for standardized test as she says, “The Common Core Standards are a set-up for national standardized tests, tests that can’t evaluate complex thought, can’t avoid cultural bias, can’t measure non-verbal learning, can’t predict anything of consequence.” (Strauss) Strauss explains how the Common Core destroys any form of originality by stating; “The word “standards” gets an approving nod from the public (and from most educators) because it means “performance that meets a standard.” However, the word also means “like everybody else,” and standardizing minds is what the Standards
With a standardized curriculum comes standardized testing. A standardized curriculum limits what students learn. Students master content areas (Cole, Hulley, & Quarles, 2013). Students are not encouraged to go in depth of content knowledge. According to Adler (2013), objectives of the school should be the same for the whole school. To obtain these objectives teachers use lecturing, textbooks, coaching, and supervised practices. Students are not exploring the content beyond what is expected. Teachers are teaching to the test because that is what is expected of them. Students are not growing and exploring with knowledge. Content is watered down and vague for students (Noddings, 2013).
The article states Common Core has become scapegoat for many arguments in (or adjacent to) education most of are not related to CCSS. There are viable arguments from both those who oppose Common Core and those who support it. The essential goal to remember is kids need to learn skills for new jobs. Will they be ready, and who is to blame if they are
This was as a direct result of the teachers complaining that they are not properly equipped to teach to the requirements of the standards required by the Common Core. They highlighted a survey by State Education Agencies (SEA) 2011 and found that from states that adopted the CCSS 45% reported planning with IHE to align academic content or adjust pedagogical content in their teacher preparation program. Three years after that a follow up study showed that 96% had or were planning on aligning their teacher preparation program with CCSS (Murphy & Marshall, 2015). It can therefore be implied that CCSS has caused IHE to adjust or consider adjusting programs offered to teachers to represent the CCSS
Teachers no longer cover the vast range of topics a certain subject may include but, rather, teach only those found on the standardized state test. This unfortunate method of teaching is a result of the NCLB’s heavy stress on the student success on the tests it issues. The Educational Research Newsletter says it best in it’s article, “The Pros and Cons of NCLB: What Research Says”: “By imposing standards on students’ minds we are, in effect, depriving them of their fundamental intellectual freedom by applying one standard set of knowledge. Standardized tests oversimplify knowledge and do not test higher-order thinking skills…. One-size-fits-all standards either dumb down instruction to the lowest common denominator or condemn low-ability students to frequent failure”. Because schools that fail to meet the AYP, “Adequate Yearly Progress”, often receive various consequences, teacher administrations have, sadly, rejected rigorous teaching methods that were once so prevalent in the learning institutions of this country. Instead of going to school to learn, children are going to school to pass a test, losing the opportunity to receive a well-rounded
When people bring up a discussion on issues in society you would hear stuff like, debts, equality, presidency, taxes, etc. but why not education or the common core and how instead of us "improving" education we are actually going backwards from where we once started. Teachers are now just reading out of a book and transferring that information to students to store in their brain for a test or a quiz, then one week later all that information is gone. Research has shown that students learn better and store information easier during class discussions rather than just copying bullet points down off a board for them to remember before a test. Society is losing the children rather than having them engage in what they are learning and providing them with content that actually interests them. Furthermore, the common core standards mainly focuses on the English Language Arts and mathematics and stem, and not much time the arts. In a Huffington Post article it states "New York City schools, for instance, saw an 84 percent decline in spending for arts supplies and equipment between 2006 and