Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the significance of Common Core State Standards in today’s classrooms
American education system
Disadvantages of Common Core
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There is a current issue in society that people don’t pay much attention to, but when they do they notice that this problem goes from facing-the-facts to in-your-face. This issue is as small as two words but comes to a really big matter, the common core. Shocker isn't it, and yes we have all heard complaints against it in the past and angry parents speaking out, but does anybody really focus their full attention on topic such as this, of course not. Most people say "at least they are getting an education" but last time I checked the definition of education comes from the Latin word educere, which means "leading out" the students into a wider world of knowledge, not having a them memorize what they are told. With the new common core kids and …show more content…
teachers are now required to just read and memorize which is part of what makes it an issue. Why are we focused more on our tangled headphones, but not if a child out there is getting a good education.
When people bring up a discussion on issues in society you would hear stuff like, debts, equality, presidency, taxes, etc. but why not education or the common core and how instead of us "improving" education we are actually going backwards from where we once started. Teachers are now just reading out of a book and transferring that information to students to store in their brain for a test or a quiz, then one week later all that information is gone. Research has shown that students learn better and store information easier during class discussions rather than just copying bullet points down off a board for them to remember before a test. Society is losing the children rather than having them engage in what they are learning and providing them with content that actually interests them. Furthermore, the common core standards mainly focuses on the English Language Arts and mathematics and stem, and not much time the arts. In a Huffington Post article it states "New York City schools, for instance, saw an 84 percent decline in spending for arts supplies and equipment between 2006 and …show more content…
2013. What’s worse, 20 percent of the schools do not have an arts teacher of any kind." This is to show how schools mostly focus their attention on stuff like how the Pythagorean theorem is going to help students in life, yeah okay, and those who aspire to be an artist, dancer, singer, etc. Just sit in the back of the class struggling with the rest of class. To add on, Common core supporters claim is the most pressing reason, they say that American school children are not prepared for the "twenty first century global economy". Yet the common core standards don’t even define what they mean by "twenty first century global economy", they just use it to scare parents and learners.
Or "college and career readiness", another slogan used by the Common Core to give a distorted view on education. The common core is a federal takeover on our education, they are basically in control where it’s the books written by the common core that’s teaching us and not the teachers, leaving them with so little control over their classrooms. The common core is not only bad for teachers but is also bad for all students because the common core is a one-size-fits-all that assumes every student learns the exact same way, a good education policy would meet all the students needs, learning styles, preferences, and paces. Not only that but the common core effects some states because they would have to move their standards backwards so that they would comply with the common core. Now I can sit here all day and list about 100 more problems but I would like yo state a last problem saying that the common core is bad for taxpayers and taxes are another society issue. The common core requires a big price that would be paid by taxpayers in those states so while taxpayers are paying all this money I myself self don’t see the education quality improving, so where is all that money
going. No kid wants to stand up to a bunch of grown ups who think they know what is best for us, well if they did then why are drop outs rates increased after the common core took place, and why do we have things such as opt outs when it comes to common core standardized tests? Do they really know what's best for us and our education or do they have nothing better to do than give tests that determine your knowledge based on an entire school year all crammed up in one test, taken in one day. Our brains are more than just a grade on a paper and all students should be taught how to think, not what to think. They don’t know what goes on behind our classroom door or our struggles behind a passing grade. It's time issues like these start getting more attention because "The children of today are the citizens of tomorrow".
Forty-two states have adopted Common Core State Standards. These standards were created to focus only on English and Mathematics. In effect of states adopting Common Core Standards, all other subjects taught in school seemed less important. History and Science standards are no longer stressed. Students are limited to being proficient in only two subjects. The Common Core deprives students’ ability to be skilled in multiple areas. These standards do not provide a slight “break” from the challenging fast past teaching of English and Mathematics. In addition to limiting education to English and Mathematics, Jill Bowden explains that the Common Core is affecting kindergarteners by taking “away from materials that encourage playful learning.” (36).
Kevin Kumashiro has many topics in his great book that explains why the school system is the way it is and why is not being changed in many ways. He shared his experience teaching in another country and how he realizes that the school system was bad in both countries. The common sense of what is the academic education needed for the students to know is how to read write, and do math and many other courses do not have a lot of value in our school system. There is more subjects than math, writing and reading that should be important to our society. His writing talks about how standardized testing is just making the teachers have to teach what is in the test and not actually teach the students the necessary information and skills needed to succeed in their lives.
History of LaGuardia Community College: LaGuardia Community College was founded on January 22, 1968 by a declaration of the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, a New York State agency which was the agency in place before the Board of Trustees of the City University of New York. The college's first president was Dr. Joseph Shenker, who had been Acting President of Kingsborough Community College. At age 29 he was the youngest community college president anywhere. In October 1970, the Board of Higher Education, named the new college after Mayor LaGuardia. The college was officially opened on September 22, 1971.
The proposed Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act identifies key factors for college and career-ready students. The act asks that states adopt rigorous college and career ready standards in English/language arts and mathematics along with assessments aligned to these standards. In June of 2010, the NGA Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) released the Common Core State Standards which 45 out of 50 states have currently adopted. Additionally, states are required to develop a system of accountability that rewards successful schools, requires interventions for the lowest-perfor...
“To ensure all students are ready for success after high school, the Common Core State Standards establish clear, consistent guidelines for what every student should know and be able to do in math and English language arts from kindergarten through 12th grade” (What Parents Should Know, n.d.). Children are entering a world that is requiring more and more than before. Society is changing meaning education must change to keep up with society. “The standards were drafted by experts and teachers from across the country and are designed to ensure students are prepared for today’s entry-level careers, freshman-level college courses, and workforce training programs” (What Parents Should Know, n.d.). The focus is to allow students to think critically and be able to problem solve; skills needed in life. The Common Core State Standards are also providing ways for teachers to track each student’s progress as they grow and learn throughout the year. Common Core has many good qualities, but nothing is perfect. There will always be issues no matter the
James Baldwin’s works were influenced by the times in which he lived, as an African American writer he strove for equality and used his pen to work for civil rights through elements of his childhood among other aspects.
These learning goals outline what a student should know and be able to do at the end of each grade Anya Kamenetz author of "Tough Week for the Common Core" writes that “[t]he Common Core [is] not, strictly speaking, national standards. They were developed independently of the federal government, and states are not under a mandate to adopt them,” but then goes on to say that the “standards received a big boost in the form of funding incentives from the Obama administration” (1). These “big boost[s]” are what concerns many like Bobby Jindal. “A few years ago, Jindal was one of the Common Core 's biggest proponents. But he has since had a change of heart” (3). Bobby Jindal, along with many other opposers, question what would happen if state who had implemented common core in their schools suddenly dropped the plan? Anya Kamenetz furthers her article by stating that the three states who have already done this “now face spending tens of millions of dollars to create new standards, adopt new materials to go with them and retrain teachers” (1). Some might say that this decrease in funding is expected because the federal government had agreed to fund a specific program and although schools don 't have to use that program, those who don 't have to find the funding for their programs themselves. But how is this
According to Alexander (2012), “justifying you actions is a function of leadership; policy analysis allows you to fulfil that function”. Lost is the justification for such reform like NCLB and Common Core. Both of these initiatives to move the education system forward received a lot of attention, but fell flat within 4 years of implementation. If foresight by policy makers had taken its rightful place, that might not be the case. In my opinion the problem lies with the individuals making these policies, the majority of the time they are not educators in any fashion. They lack insight on that a classroom looks like today, and the everyday struggles of teachers. Furthermore, they lack foresight of the repercussions of such failed initiatives. Educator reform needs to be more focused on the pragmatic approach that views education as part of the democratic society and “favor a working relationship between school and society and might consider that the key to schooling is developing knowledge by doing (p. 16). This was evident in Race To The Top under the Obama administration, as well as the STEM initiative that is present in education today. Future education reforms should follow a full policy analysis in order to develop effective initiatives to move the education system
The common core requires higher standards, standards that are supposed to provide children with a deeper understanding of ...
The Common Core has been a highly debated educational initiative based in the United States that provides children of all race, religious denomination, and socioeconomic background the same educational path from kindergarten through senior year of high school or the 12th grade. The Common Core provides six standards on its website that serve as its oath. “The standards are: 1. Research- and evidence-based. 2. Clear, understandable, and consistent. 3. Aligned with college and career expectations. 4. Based on rigorous content and application of knowledge through higher-order thinking skills. 5. Built upon the
The Common Core State Standards are simply learning goals that are outlined for the students. This outline is a way to show the students what they should be able to do at the end of each grade. These learning goals are supposed to “provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them” (Top Ten Things to Know, 2015). These certain standards are also supposed to be designed to be “robust and relevant to the real world, reflecting the knowledge and skills that our young people need for success in the near future” (Top Ten Things to Know, 2015). Common Core State Standards were actually being introduced while I was attending
The education system needs to make sure the students are learning and not just passing. Teachers need to teach outside the lesson and teach the students about real-life situations and problems that may occur to them outside of school. School is about learning the basic core classes but it is also for preparing kids for life and teaching them lessons. America's education system is failing their students today, for example in class the teacher said, “ who is the vice president?” the room grew quiet, teachers should discuss information like this with their students even if it has nothing to do with the lesson, it doesn't even have to be your history teacher. It is very obvious that the education has a lot of work to do because of its many
(2014) exclaimed that why do 62 percent of parents think the Common Core is not perfect for their kids, despite it has fascinated some entrepreneurs such as Bill Gates and the secretary of education. In a case in point, parents should get more involved in the education of their children if they do not approve of measures being used. She agrees to the idea of a federal government using incentives to adopt their specific education program, but then again she only sees that parents complaining and not taking action. In another context, “parents have no choice about whether their kids will learn Common Core, no matter what school they put them in, if they want them to go to college, because the SAT and ACT are being redesigned to fit the new national program for education”. (Pullmann, J. 2014, September 24, p. 1). In fact, Porter (1989) states that the Common Core standards became as opposing to teachers and teaching occupation, and the tactics are not good strong enough for enabling teachers to be dependent. The teacher is often understood to be the planned without rules. Moreover, some voices against the criticism of the common core, they believe that it is meaningless because districts are still permitted to select which material goes out with stem the basis stated by the Common Core
Schools exist to produce well educated youth that society will benefit from. From personal experience, ill-informed adults make for an unstable, rotten community. Schools hold a big responsibility. They should create a safe haven for students that creates a love for learning, and then also nurtures that same admiration for learning. Schools that students don’t feel safe in usually house students that aren’t interested in subjects that are being taught. They should maintain a well-educated faculty who is all passionate about what they do. If there is a lazy faculty, it will influence the students to become lazy. Schools need to produce the change that this world needs- well rounded, creative, knowledgeable individuals. An effective school in today’s society would have a strong basis on the common core, but make it so that the information is fun to learn. From experience, once the information fun to learn, the rest goes by
Swasey, Christel. "Top Ten Professors Calling out Common Core’s So-called College Readiness. 07 Sep 2013. Web. 17 Jan 2014.