Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of common core state standards
Advantages and disadvantages of common core curriculum
The importance of common core state standards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Common Core State Standards are new curriculum guidelines that provide
teachers, parents, and students with clear goals and expectations to make sure that all
students have the knowledge and skills that are needed to succeed in college, career, and
life. There are controversies whether the common core state standards will work or not,
but we are not able to know because these standards are new to the curriculum. I will be
discussing the pros and cons to the common core curriculum in the next paragraphs
below.
There are many pros in relating to the Common Core State Standards, but I will
only be discussing three. The first pro is that these standards are internationally
benchmarked. In other words, the common core standards
…show more content…
I believe that this is important because if the students know what and
the reason why they are learning something, then they will get a greater sense of the
purpose of learning it. For example, I really do not remember that any of my teachers
told me about the reasons of learning something and I think that this is important in our
education in order to reach our goals.
On the other hand, there are also a lot of cons towards the Common Core State
Standards. Again. I will be only discussing three cons. The first con that concerns me is
that it will be a really difficult transition. Teachers and students need to adjust to these
common core standards and at first this will not be easy. Teachers are not used to teach in
this way and neither students are used to learn in this way. In my opinion, this will slow
down the process since it will be difficult for them to get used to this. The results will
take time and the process will be slow. The second con that I would argue is that the
common core standards will cost money to schools since most of the assessments will be
online. This means that school need to provide every student with a computer or
…show more content…
I believe that this can definitely happen any time when adjusting
a way of teaching.
My position regarding to the common core curriculum is that I am against it. For
some reason, I do not thing that rushing students to learn a lot of things will make things
better. I am saying this because through my observation in the high school and my
sibling’s experiences, I know that now kinder students are learning what students were
used to learn in the second grade. I also think that the transition will be very difficult for
teachers and students. It is true that students that this will help to increase their reasoning
and critical thinking, but the process will be slow, teachers will be stress about changing
their teaching style, and the students will be a little confused about the changing of the
curriculum. We need to wait at least ten years in order to know if these common core
standards worked. As a perspective teacher, I know that I need to do research more about
this even though I do not agree with this. I have to keep in mind that these are the new
standards and that I will need to use them in my
There are five standards listed under this domain and I only received the maximum amount of points for one of the standards. The standard that I exceeded the expectations on was creating a culturally inclusive environment. I receive the highest score here because it was evident during my interaction with the students that cultural inclusivity existed in the classroom. I will continue to create a culturally inclusive classroom that promotes safety, respect, and fairness for all students at my second teacher intern experience. Maximizing instructional time is a standard under this domain that I only received two of the three points on. Although the standard was met, in order for me to raise this score at my next experience I would need to work on my transitions and procedures more. I will be doing many activities during my lessons, and I will need to have efficient transitions and procedures to better manage my class time. This can be done by planning ahead and thinking about how students at this age level act. I would need to be very simplistic and thorough about procedures when working on activities that require moving. The next standard I will discuss is using multiple strategies to foster appropriate student behavior according to individual and situational needs. I met this standard at my last experience according to my score, but to obtain a higher score I will have to research ways
Forty-two states have adopted Common Core State Standards. These standards were created to focus only on English and Mathematics. In effect of states adopting Common Core Standards, all other subjects taught in school seemed less important. History and Science standards are no longer stressed. Students are limited to being proficient in only two subjects. The Common Core deprives students’ ability to be skilled in multiple areas. These standards do not provide a slight “break” from the challenging fast past teaching of English and Mathematics. In addition to limiting education to English and Mathematics, Jill Bowden explains that the Common Core is affecting kindergarteners by taking “away from materials that encourage playful learning.” (36).
...ce they begin to see those small changed and realize that they can indeed have a positive effect on how the students view school it will motivate everyone, both the students and the faculty, to keep trying to narrow that gap that exists with the graduation rates.
Regarding academic standards, more than six out of 10 said the expectations for what students should learn is important to school improvement. But a majority - 54 percent - is opposed to the Common Core State Standards, the K-12 academic benchmarks adopted by 43 states and the District of Columbia that have been under fire by critics on the left and right.
With the common core standards students now will be able to transfer schools and understand what is going on because the Common Core Standard provides a clear understanding to all students of what they are expected to learn. It will provide all of the students with an equal opportunity to learn same curriculum no matter which school they are going to. These standards will not limit the students with different level of achievement among students; instead they will ensure a more consistent exposure to materials and learning experience though instructions and teacher preparation. However, two c...
Teachers help us expand and open our mind by giving us skills throughout students’ early life to help students when they are older. By learning information from teachers, students become better people, in a couple of ways. Besides inquiring knowledge from their teachers, students learn to work with one another, open their mind to other peoples’ thoughts and ideas, respect one another, and learn different techniques for life’s issues.
...ting a new curriculum. The system needs an entire restructuring, from the top to the bottom.
Common core is not a new method. America has set standards since at least the 1950’s and many schools have since then implemented a curriculum supporting this ideal. These standards in language arts and mathematics are supposed to help the nation prepare students for college and their future careers. The effects of common core, both positive and negative, lead to the debate on whether or not it should still be implemented in schools today, but thanks to federal funding it has made it hard to get rid of the program. It is because of this that the governor of Louisiana, Bobby Jindal has decided to sue the federal government for violating the 10th amendment. Although many can agree that having standardized goals gives both the students and staff
“World class academic standards are helping ensure that every single student is held to the same high expectations- and given the solid educational foundation-they need to succeed in both school and career” (Rust, 2013). These are the words of Ed Rust, chairman and CEO of a major corporation, State Farm Mutual, when speaking about the Common Core State Standards. “The Common Core is a set of high-quality academic standards in mathematics and English language arts/literacy (ELA)” (About, n.d.). The Common Core State Standards, or CCSS, is reforming education in that it outlines common goals and understandings for students all across the nation. Educational standards aren’t a new idea; state standards were first in the early 1990’s, but each state was different. This meant that one states definition of proficient could be completely different from another’s. Nationally, students in the same grade were learning different skills and finishing each grade with vastly different abilities. Implementation of the CCSS is the reform education needed and will prepare students for 21st century learning and lifelong career skills across the nation.
(Common Core State Standards Initiative) Many find flaws in the system such as Valerie Strauss of the Washington Post. Strauss points out in her article Eight Problems With Common Core Standards that the standards set by the Common Core should not be limited to school subjects, but should step outside the box and tie in real world scenarios. (Strauss) Strauss also says the lack of diversity in the curriculum puts students at a disadvantage because of the changing world around teachers should not be limited to teaching information provided by an initiative that makes students from all over the nation learn the same material. (Strauss) Strauss is especially skeptical of the Common Core’s preparation for standardized test as she says, “The Common Core Standards are a set-up for national standardized tests, tests that can’t evaluate complex thought, can’t avoid cultural bias, can’t measure non-verbal learning, can’t predict anything of consequence.” (Strauss) Strauss explains how the Common Core destroys any form of originality by stating; “The word “standards” gets an approving nod from the public (and from most educators) because it means “performance that meets a standard.” However, the word also means “like everybody else,” and standardizing minds is what the Standards
The first thing an educator has to consider is the curriculum students should be taught. Educators must use the common core standards for ELA and Math, as well as the Georgia Performance Standards for Science and Social Studies. They use these standards to plan what is to be learned, how it is to be learned, in what order it is to be learned, and how to determine the strengths and weaknesses of individual students. Classroom teachers
I believe that teaching and learning is both a science and an art, which requires the implementation of already determined rules. I see learning as the result of internal forces within the person student. I know that children differ in the way they learn and grow but I also know that all children can learn. Students’ increased understanding of their own experience is a legitimate form of knowledge. I will present my students with opportunities to develop the ability to meet personal knowledge.
Learners need to know- Why am I learning this? What is it that I am learning? How will it help me? How is it important? In summary, if I need it, then I will learn it.
The professional expectations could be changing, which in turn call for a change in the curriculum.
Students need to be inspired to think critically. By this they comprehend what has been learned and be able to use it. I hope my students will be able to achieve their greatest potential that they can accomplish anything they set their minds to. We can give our children these building blocks thru education to use in decision making situations, moral value of their thoughts and actions. This will guide them to realize how their actions and decisions will affect themselves and others.