Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of common core state standards
Disadvantages of Common Core
The importance of common core state standards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of common core state standards
In these changing times one of the biggest aspects of society that should be updated on a regular basis is education. Changes in curriculum as well as methods of teaching need to be revised each and every year. With this idea came the idea of the Common Core State Standard which is currently being adopted by forty-four out of fifty states in the United States. This new rework is designed to help better prepare students for college, universities, and the work place. However, not everyone believes this is the right move education should be taking at this moment. Those in support state this is the best decision possible to teach the children of the 21st century. Others say the cause for the decline in the quality of education in the United States stems from other sociological factors not from how the system is currently being worked. Even more are concerned if schools will be ready for this new wave of change. Will Common Core be effective in helping prepare high school graduates for the future? Only time will tell if the Common Core Standards proves effective in further helping students be prepared for the future.
Common Core redefines learning goals in the areas of mathematic, language arts, and literacy. Common Core breaks away from conventional teaching methods with a focus on content to a system that is more focused on teaching skills. This new system also provides a great way for all students across the United States to be on the same educational plane. As Nancy Gardner, an English teacher at Mooresville High School, says in the article The Common Core is a Change for the Better, “Standards shared across geographical lines will help students develop increasingly complex skills regardless of what state, school district, or c...
... middle of paper ...
... Common Core is a Change for the Better.”
Phi Delta Kappan 95.4 (2013): 49. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost Web March 28 2014
Gullen, Kristine. "Are Our Kids Ready For Computerized Tests?." Educational Leadership 71.6 (2014): 68. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost Web. 25 Apr. 2014.
Jones, Allison G.King, Jacqueline E. "The Common Core State Standards: A Vital Tool For Higher Education." Change 44.6 (2012): 37. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost Web. 28 Apr. 2014.
Krashen, Stephen. “The Common Core. (Cover Story.)” Knowledge Quest 42.3 (2014) 36-45. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost Web. 29 Mar 2014
Ohler, Jason. “The Uncommon Core.” Educational Leadership 70.5 (2013): 42. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost . Web 30 Mar 2014
Ripley, Amanda. “The New Smart Set”, Time, 182, 14, [.32, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost Web 24 April 2016
The article "Let`s Really Reform Our Schools" by Anita Garland discuss the trouble faced by American High Schools. According to her, students are more concerned about their looks than learning, and this results in poor academic performance. She states that there is a need for American High Schools to be completely restructured. The worst students must be kicked out of the schools because they are troublemakers, and they distract others, which includes their fellow students, teachers, and administrators. Troublemakers lack fear of suspension from school, and suspension from school doesn’t improve their behavior. Troublemakers do not care about punishments at all. After all, they don’t want to be in the school, and they are not learning anything
A child’s first day of school is often viewed as a rite of passage; the first step on the road to a happy and successful life. This is true for most children from affluent families who live in the best school districts or can afford expensive private schools. But what if a child’s first day of school is nothing more than the first step on the road to poverty and possibly even illiteracy? The documentary Waiting for “Superman” addresses many issues in a failing school system and the innocent children that system leaves behind. Although the documentary spends little time suggesting parents’ roles in their children’s education, it clearly shows that we must make changes to help children from low-income families and improve the teacher’s unions.
Forty-two states have adopted Common Core State Standards. These standards were created to focus only on English and Mathematics. In effect of states adopting Common Core Standards, all other subjects taught in school seemed less important. History and Science standards are no longer stressed. Students are limited to being proficient in only two subjects. The Common Core deprives students’ ability to be skilled in multiple areas. These standards do not provide a slight “break” from the challenging fast past teaching of English and Mathematics. In addition to limiting education to English and Mathematics, Jill Bowden explains that the Common Core is affecting kindergarteners by taking “away from materials that encourage playful learning.” (36).
Many individuals have been affected negatively by trouble makers in school. Troublemakers have either disrupted classes or bullied other students. Yes, trouble makers may harm one’s learning environment, but should they be kicked out of school? Though many individuals argue that troublemakers will not change and hold the class down, they should not be kicked out because they need help. Most of these kids that are disobedient do not know the distinction between right and wrong. We should not withdraw trouble makers from school, rather, we should help these troublemakers and teach them right from wrong. In the article “Let’s Really Reform Our Schools” by Anita Garland, she states that American high schools are disasters because there are troublemakers (694). She asserts that the withdrawal of troublemakers in schools would make the learning environment peaceful for students who want to learn
The proposed Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act identifies key factors for college and career-ready students. The act asks that states adopt rigorous college and career ready standards in English/language arts and mathematics along with assessments aligned to these standards. In June of 2010, the NGA Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) released the Common Core State Standards which 45 out of 50 states have currently adopted. Additionally, states are required to develop a system of accountability that rewards successful schools, requires interventions for the lowest-perfor...
With the common core standards students now will be able to transfer schools and understand what is going on because the Common Core Standard provides a clear understanding to all students of what they are expected to learn. It will provide all of the students with an equal opportunity to learn same curriculum no matter which school they are going to. These standards will not limit the students with different level of achievement among students; instead they will ensure a more consistent exposure to materials and learning experience though instructions and teacher preparation. However, two c...
The Common Core State Standards has been adopted by many states in the United States already. This issue is gaining both positive and negative opinions within the education world and society. Some want to know why the standards were created and what the meaning behind these standards is. What is the reasoning for implementing these standards, and why is there so much controversy that follows. Why do these four words cause such controversy? The following will analyze and evaluate The Common Core State Standards in hopes to understand why education is being overtaken by them.
The controversial topic about the function of school is discussed at many school board and PTA meetings throughout America. In Anita Garland’s opinion, schools are not functioning properly. Garland states her reasons as to why the purpose of school has to change in her article, “Lets Really Reform Our Schools”, where she starts off by saying, “Desperate illnesses require desperate remedies. And our schools are desperately ill.” She proceeds to list the remedies in order to transform our schools into a more healthy, successful environment. First, Garland claims that the students who are not interested in studying should not be allowed, better yet, never forced to attend school with kids who want to receive
These learning goals outline what a student should know and be able to do at the end of each grade Anya Kamenetz author of "Tough Week for the Common Core" writes that “[t]he Common Core [is] not, strictly speaking, national standards. They were developed independently of the federal government, and states are not under a mandate to adopt them,” but then goes on to say that the “standards received a big boost in the form of funding incentives from the Obama administration” (1). These “big boost[s]” are what concerns many like Bobby Jindal. “A few years ago, Jindal was one of the Common Core 's biggest proponents. But he has since had a change of heart” (3). Bobby Jindal, along with many other opposers, question what would happen if state who had implemented common core in their schools suddenly dropped the plan? Anya Kamenetz furthers her article by stating that the three states who have already done this “now face spending tens of millions of dollars to create new standards, adopt new materials to go with them and retrain teachers” (1). Some might say that this decrease in funding is expected because the federal government had agreed to fund a specific program and although schools don 't have to use that program, those who don 't have to find the funding for their programs themselves. But how is this
There are many studies have conducted on the Common Core issue. I am interested in reading and knowing this topic, the Common Core Standards in the American perspective. According to State Standards Initiative, the Common Core State Standards established curricula for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects “the Standards” are the peak of a prolonged effort to carry out the charge supplied by the states to build the generation of K-12 standards to help guarantee that all learners are college and occupation ready in knowledge at the end of high school. (Schutz, n.d.).
Common Core is a set of high-quality academic standards focused mainly on mathematics and English language arts and literacy (ELA), according to corestandards.org. These learning goals are the outlines of what a student should know and should be able to achieve at the end of each grade level (Common Core States Standards Initiative, 2016). Although strides for equality in teaching and learning were made, many schools around the country were not achieving the same level of academic success. For decades, the educational progress of our nation’s scholars has been stationary so much so that we have fallen behind out global peers (Common Core States Standards Initiative, 2016). One source has been an “uneven patchwork of academic standards that vary from state to state and do not agree on what students should know and be able to do at each grade level” (Common Core States Standards Initiative, 2016). Lewin (2010), also sites imbalanced state principles and or policies a reason the United State students have fallen behind internationally. The disproportion of each state’s standards was further exacerbated under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
Someone who is very determined and ready to make a change for the better is the definition of Joe Clark. As he becomes the principle of the school, he also becomes a father figure and also a very important person to some individuals. Being a forceful principal he is able to make decisions which are often for the better of everyone. He really does make a change to the school and to the people with the discipline he has which also results in extreme actions. As he wanted to make the school a better place, Joe Clark influenced staff and students of the school, treated staff and students the same way and also made extreme actions which resulted in consequences. With the changing of the school, Joe Clark makes very extreme decisions in making the school a better place reminding one that these decisions are what made the school a better and safer place.
The cost for teachers, kids and schools is just too high for a brand new standard that hasn’t been proven to work. But there is no reason to say that it couldn’t work. The first step starts with each state's education department. By laying out each standard and making it clear on what kids are suppose to know, teachers can teach the proper way. The next step in making Common Core better is hearing experts on childhood development to rewrite the standards. The original Common Core standards were written by people who have never worked in education. It is clear that the current school system needs some reform, but with a little work, Common Core can be good for our
Robert Hardingham, PUTTING THE PIECES TOGETHER: building healthy communities for our most vulnerable generation, Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, vol l, no 1, May 2001.
This country has been struggling with education reform for a very long time and it has not been succeeding. These reforms have not been succeeding because of a lack of some core values such as the appreciation of teachers, the uniqueness of each child (and how he or she should be approached), and the apathy that an increasing number of children harbor towards learning. The Common Core Standards tried to fix these problems, but they went about fixing the problem the wrong way and with the wrong people. Common core also instilled these changes way to fast and did not give the former education system time to see what is wrong with the standards in order to attempt to fix it. Common Core Standards are a good idea, but so far, as it played out through the states, it has had far more negative than positive effects.