EDUCATION, CHANGE AND SOCIETY
ASSIGNMENT 2 – ESSAY
Success, achievement and participation at school are not simply a matter of intelligence or ability. Discuss this statement with reference to the concepts of cultural capital, hidden curriculum, class and socioeconomic status.
Since the beginning of education there have been many forms, which have been passed on from one generation to the next. Over the years education has evolved and is now seen as the education system all over the world. Today the education system is seen to be much more complex, but it still involves notions that have been around since the beginning of success, achievement and participation. Not only do these three aspects continue to contribute to the success of educating young people who are involved in the ever changing society that we live in. Intelligence and ability does have an impact on the success of individual students and there are also other impacts that can affect the outcome on individual schools and the education system. This essay will provide a brief overview of cultural capital, hidden curriculum, class and socio economic status and discuss the affect the success, achievement and participation has on a student’s education.
Holmes, Hughes and Julia (2007) defined cultural capital as an understanding and knowledge about culture, power and communication within a society a child lives in. All students will bring a backpack to school which will contain items such as a lunchbox, books, homework and personal belongings. Often education and university experts talk about a different type of backpack that students might bring to school. This backpack is often referred as a “virtual backpack” (Thomson 2002). Throughout Thomson’s (2007) book...
... middle of paper ...
...gast D and Bahr N (eds), Teaching middle years, Allen and Unwin, pp. 101-118.
Holmes, D, Hughes & Jullian, R, 2007, ‘The more you earn the more you learn: Education Today’ Australian Sociology Pearson Education Australia, Sydney, pp.217-244.
Meadmore, D, 2004, How do social class and education make the great divide, in eds, Burnett, B, Meadmore & Tait, G, New Questions for Contempoary teachers, Pearson Education
Partington, G. (2001). From play school to peer groups socialisation and socialising agencies. Sociology of education. 2nd ed. (chp 6), pg 109-128.
Robert Hardingham, PUTTING THE PIECES TOGETHER: building healthy communities for our most vulnerable generation, Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, vol l, no 1, May 2001.
Thomson, Pat (2002). ‘Vicki and Thanh’ Schooling the Rustbelt Kids: Making the difference in changing times NSW; Allen & Unwin: 1-16
Cater, the author of the book Keepin’ It Real: School Success Beyond Black And White, became interested as of why minority students were faced with white society challenges in school systems? In her book, Keepin’ It Real: School Success Beyond Black And White, she offers an insightful look at the educational attainment in low-income urban communities. Carter suggest that these students are embraced the dominant opportunity ideology, they acknowledge the dominant cultural to obtain status and goods. However, they use their own cultural to gain status in their own communities. She conducted a research to study the importance of cultural authenticity for minority, such as African American and Latino, students. She examines how cultural authenticity influences minority students’ relationship with the values they believe are privileged in schools. Cultural authenticity reflects on the beliefs and values of everyday society. Carter questioned, why do so many African American and Latino students perform worse than their Asians and White peers in class and on exams? And why might African Americans and Latino students are less engaged in
Some people may believe that education all over the United States is equal. These people also believe that all students no matter their location, socioeconomic status, and race have the same access and quality of education, but ultimately they are wrong. Throughout history, there has been a huge educational disparity between the wealthy and marginalized communities. The academic essay “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” by Jean Anyon, an American critical thinker and researcher in education, conveys that depending on the different economic backgrounds students have, they will be taught in a specific way. He reveals that the lower economic background a child has then the lower quality their education will be and the higher their economic background is the higher quality their education is. Anyon’s theory of a social ladder is extremely useful because it sheds light on the
The novel “Women Without class” by Julie Bettie, is a society in which the cultural you come from and the identity that was chosen for you defines who you are. How does cultural and identity illustrate who we are or will become? Julie Bettie demonstrates how class is based on color, ethnicity, gender and sexuality. The author describes this by researching her work on high school girls at a Central Valley high school. In Bettie’s novel she reveals different cliques that are associated within the group which are Las Chicas, Skaters, Hicks, Preps, and lastly Cholas and Cholos. The author also explains how race and ethnicity correspondence on how academically well these students do. I will be arguing how Julie Bettie connects her theories of inequality and culture capital to Pierre Bourdieu, Kimberle Crenshaw, Karl Marx and Engels but also how her research explains inequality among students based on cultural capital and identity.
Anoyn, J. (n.d.). From social class and the hidden curriculum of work In EDUC 160 Urban Education (Spring 2014, pp. 127-136).
The first scholarly essay I am going to discuss is Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work by Jean Anyon. Anyon believed that students of different economical statuses and the schools in their communities taught differently. She used schools in four different types of communities. The four types of communities are working class, middle-class, affluent professional and executive elite. She studied the students, teachers, principals, and staff as well as
Jean Anyon’s “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” claims that students from different social classes are treated differently in schools. Anyon’s article is about a study she conducted to show how fifth graders from the working, middle, and upper class are taught differently. In Anyon’s article, she provides information to support the claim that children from different social classes are not given the same opportunities in education. It is clear that students with different socio-economic statuses are treated differently in academic settings. The curriculum in most schools is based on the social class that the students belong to. The work is laid out based on academic professionals’ assumptions of students’ knowledge. Teachers and educational professionals assume a student’s knowledge based on their socio-economic status.
In their minds, if they do well in school, they can get a career that can help them become successful. Although the students do not put limits on the relationship between social class and education, the school system does. The view that the school system has for the classifications of intellectualism leaves out the interests of most of the students. The writer Graff address this in his article within the lines, “ Only much later did it dawn on me that the sports world was more compelling than school because it was more intellectual than school, not less. Sports after all was full of challenging arguments, debates, problems for analysis, and intricate statistics that you could care about, as school conspicuously was not.” (Graff 790) In those lines, he speaks about sports, which is a topic that is not considered to hold intellectual value by the school system. He shows that other interests besides the things we learn in school can have intellectual value. He makes it apparent that it does not matter the individual’s economic status because they can still be smart. This article shows that everyone can connect and contribute to learning with their different interests, and their interest can bridge the gap that society creates between the social classes if they decide that they want to be successful and take their education
O’Hear, A. (1981). Education, Society and Human Nature, pp. 129-30). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Jackson, B and Marsden, D (1966) Education and the working classes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul plc.
Graetz, B. & McAllister, I. 1994, Dimensions of Australian Society, 2nd edn, Macmillan Education, South Melbourne.
King, M., Sims, A., & Osher, D. (n.d.). How is Cultural Competency integrated in education? Retrieved July 7, 2014, from http://cecp.air.org/cultural/Q_integrated.htm#def
Finally, it is a general opinion among many that academic performance is a manner of will and determination of an individual rather than their socioeconomic status. For instance, in schools of higher learning, there are a lot of students from richer backgrounds who do not perform well as compared to those perceived to be from poor backgrounds (Sacerdote, 2002). Research has shown that while socioeconomic status may influence the availability or access to learning materials, it is the student’s personal determination to excel that determines the kind of lifestyle they
Going to school and getting a great education is important for a successful future in today’s world. Years ago, many children did not go to school and many young adults opted to work instead of attending college. In today’s society, gaining a high level of education is almost always mandatory for many jobs. There are many changes being done to the education system along with new items and ways of teaching in the classroom. There is a growing amount of changes in the classroom such as technology, teaching time, teaching styles, and freedom of space.
Education is a vital part of society. It serves the beneficial purpose of educating our children and getting them ready to be productive adults in today's society. But, the social institution of education is not without its problems. Continual efforts to modify and improve the system need to be made, if we are to reap the highest benefits that education has to offer to our children and our society as a whole.
As previous discussed Bernstein’s research has shown that the language of teachers and school is that of the elaborate code, this leaves students from working class backgrounds often lagging behind in the classroom. (Gibbons, 1989). Teachers themselves tend to be come from a middle class background and this in itself effects how they view their students, they will value certain cultural capitals and will be bias towards students who possess these culture capitals. (O’Higgins-Norman, 2011) For teachers to be truly inclusion in their classroom they need to teacher outside their own culture. However this is not always the case as students from working class backgrounds are often judged unfairly on language, subculture values and material factors; which all lead to lower expectation. The social background of both students and teachers effect their classroom interactions. (Gorlewski, 2011). According to Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968) result of lower expectation of students by their teacher will result in decreased performance, known as the Pygmalion effect. This study used the impact a teacher’s expectation can have on a student, so when a teacher expects students from a lower class to do badly this will happen, the student internalises this expectations and become a self fulfilling prophecy. This is particularly the case when teachers’ beliefs