Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discuss diversity
The theory this paper employs is that one’s introvert or extrovert personality characteristics and their national culture impacts one’s susceptibility to groupthink. If businesses understood the importance of how various personality types and cultures influence decision-making, groupthink could be better avoided leading to better solutions of problems. This theory is important because it can lessen the burdening effects of groupthink by understanding and acknowledging individual differences among members, resulting in better outcomes. The first variable is personality type. We will define this by Gordon Allport’s definition that personality is “the dynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his unique adjustments to his environment” (Lakshmi, 2008). For the purpose of this study we will use the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator because of its popularity and significance – two and a half million Americans a year take the test and 89 of the US Fortune 100 use it for selection, recruitment, and a way for employees to better understand themselves and each other (Psychometric Success, 2013). The dimensions of the variable include introversion versus extroversion, sensing versus intuition, thinking versus feeling, and judging versus perceiving (Myers & McCaulley, 1985). We will be focusing specifically on introversion and extroversion and will refer to psychatrist Carl Jung’s definitions of the terms - an introvert is someone who withdraws into himself and tends to be shy and an extrovert seeks the company of others and is likely to be very sociable (Lakshmi, 2008). The literature takes this independent variable into account in Vijaya Lakshmi’s study of extroverts and introverts. Understa... ... middle of paper ... ... that means they want to reduce their risks as minimal as possible and want to avoid uncertainty as much as possible. The literatures takes this independent variable into account in Zhang’s study of the ways one’s culture influences decisions made under majority influence. Since conformity is partially a product of culture, different cultural perspectives and experiences will impact decision-making. One’s national culture impacts the original relationship because it helps shape one’s personality, which helps shape their susceptibility to group think. Therefore one’s national culture acts as a partial mediating variable, because it influences both personality type and one’s susceptibility to groupthink. My hypothesis is that those with high UAI scores are more likely to succumb to groupthink and those with low UAI scores are less likely to succumb to groupthink.
The purpose of my test is to measure whether a person falls on the spectrum of being a more introverted or extroverted being. Introversion can be defined as someone who keeps more to themselves and prefers being alone, rather than in large groups. While extroversion can be seen as someone who is more outgoing and prefers to be around bigger groups of people. Ambivert is a category as well, in which someone can fall right in the middle between the two. The target audience for this test is high school students, particularly ninth and tenth grade students. The test will be referred to as SEAT (Simplified Educational Adaptive Test). This test was created to help them determine their personality type, in which can help better match which career
According to Carl Jung’s typology theory each individual develops personal preferences which become the foundation for how they face life’s challenges and interact with others. Based on this knowledge Isabel Briggs Myers developed the Myers-Briggs Type indicator (MBTI). This test helps individuals identify and study their individual preference and those of others. After taking the Jung Typology Test, which is based on the MBTI, it was confirmed that my four dominate personality preferences are Introversion, iNtuition, Thinking and Judging. Each personality preference is discussed in detail including strengths and weaknesses. The combination of the four make me a INTJ of the world. This is also discussed in detail including strengths, weaknesses,
Over several years, psychologist and other scholars have studied the personality types of a variety of people in many different environments. Much of the studies emphasize how different personalities effects humans within their daily lives. These personalities have been divided and revealed as Extravert or Introvert, Sensor or Intuitive, Thinking or Feeling, and Judging or Perceiving; all of which can be classified in sixteen different personality types. In this study you will find the personality of a woman whose dominant preferences are Extraverted, Sensing, Thinking, and Judging. This paper will further provide an understanding of how an ESTJ woman finds ways to understand one’s self and communicate better in her personal life and professional
“ …my first concern must be with the two general types I have termed introverted and extraverted. But, in addition, I shall also try to give a certain characterization of those special types whose particularity is due to the fact that his most differentiated function plays the principal role in an individual's adaptation or orientation to life.” (Jung)
"Personality Test Based on C. Jung and I. Briggs Myers Type Theory."Personality Test Based on C. Jung and I. Briggs Myers Type Theory. Humanmetrics, 1998. Web. 11 June 2014. .
The Jung Typology Test is designed to give the participant a 4-letter formula which describes strength preferences of one’s personality type. The formula is based on whether the participant favors Extraversion or Introversion, Sensing or iNtuition, Thinking or Feeling, and Judging or Perceiving when it comes to the participant’s general attitude. One will also receive a Temperament, which is based on one’s personality type formula, and can be used to make somewhat accurate predictions of the participants preferred behavior. In this essay I will discuss the results that I received after taking the test. Having a personality type that prefers extraversion, sensing, feeling, and judging comes with many strengths and weaknesses when working in
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is another model that attempts to inventory personality traits. Isabel Briggs Myers created the MBTI based on psychologist Carl Jung’s work regarding psychological types. Myers developed the model to “help people understand themselves and each other so they could find work that matches their personality.” (Phillips & Gully, 2014) Four scales are explored with the MBTI. The first scale assesses extroversion/introversion; the same idea described in the first dimension of the Big Five. The second scale identifies sensing or intuitive individuals. Sensing individuals are detail and fact oriented when focusing on information, whereas intuitive people interpret and add meaning to information. The third scale classifies
Those in collectivist cultures value their group membership, respect group processes and decisions, and expect other in-group members to look after or protect them in case of needs or crisis. For them, keeping good and harmonious relationships inside their in-group is a priority; and avoiding loss of face is important. Their identity is based on the strong and cohesive in-groups to which they belong. In collectivist cultures, cooperation is high within in-groups, but is unlikely when the other person belongs to an out-group. As a comparison, people in individualist cultures are good at forming new in-groups and getting along with those from out-groups.
This paper researches the typical traits of the INTJ personality type according to the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator. Additionally, I will be discussing the opposite personality of INTJ, type ESFP. I will detail two past experiences where my INTJ personality posed problems. This paper will also explore strategies that may benefit the INTJ personality type, myself included.
After taking the online personality test I learned that I am an INTJ personality. Consequently, this was not a big surprise for me because I had already taken a similar test in my psychology class and ended up with the same result. I did not learn how accurate the test was the first time since I did not do further analysis on the exact meaning of my personality type. The 16 personality type’s website de...
Groupthink is the psychological phenomenon in which groups working on a task think along the same lines which could have drastic results. It is the result of group polarization where discussions are enhance or exaggerate the initial leanings of the group. Therefore, if a group leans towards risky situation at the beginning of the discussion on average they will move toward an even riskier position. (Marks, 2015). The idea when everyone think the same no one is really thinking. The drastic outcomes result from people trying to avoid conflict with one another, being highly cohesive, and results is questionable decision making (Oliver, 2013). Houghton Mifflin publication of Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions
Culture forms the framework for our thoughts and behavior and is defined as sets of values and principles individuals have about how nature and society work, as well as the norms of behavior, derived from that set of values (Gorodnichenko & Roland, 2014). According to Heine (2012), cultures that are individualistic include a variety of customs that encourage individuals to place their own personal goals ahead of those of the collective. In contrast, cultures that are collectivistic include many cultural practices, institutions, and customs that encourage individuals to place more emphasis on collective goals. Furthermore, the dimensions of collectivism and individualism help us to understand cultural differences in a wide variety of psychological
Working in groups is challenging at times. Other times it is very rewarding. We are so focused on life that we do not take time to reflect on things as much as we should. Being in a Groups class has opened my eyes to a whole new world. I have begun to question, explore, and even understand how things work. I even get how they work sometimes. Not only is there a process involved in making individual decisions, process is involved in group decisions as well. This paper attempts give insight into my reflection of my group decision process.
Individualism and collectivism are essential terms that researchers use to help one understand culture differences and the impact they have on group behavior. It is important that one obtain the knowledge of both attributes because it can help individuals understand and recognize the different attitudes and behavior of other cultures. Although each attribute has its own advantages and disadvantages, they do share some similarities; and are believed to be the opposite of each other. However, for one to understand the full concept of individualism; one must first have an understanding of collectivism.
Several experiments and researches have been conducted that have focused on how people behave in groups. The findings have revealed that groups affect peoples’ attitudes, behavior and perceptions. Groups are essential for personal life, as well as in work life.