Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of culture in social behavior
Role of culture in social behavior
Cultural influence on social behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of culture in social behavior
Social Desirability as a Person Characteristic Early on in the conceptualization of social desirability, there was recognition that culture was important in classifying opinions and behaviors as desirable or not. Crowne and Marlowe (1964) suggested that socially desirable responding was motivated by "the need of subjects to respond in culturally sanctioned ways" in order to obtain social approval. Yet, cultural variation in social desirability and the possible impact of differential social desirability on cross-cultural surveys have never been seriously examined. We know from cross-cultural work that there are both universals and cultural specifics in social behavior. Some norms that have obvious implications for survey behavior, such as the …show more content…
Persons coming from more influential groups in society or from more influential countries tend to show lower scores on social desirability. In the previous section it was found that cultures do not seem to differ greatly in what is seen as desirable behavior. A combination of these results leads us to conclude that social desirability is an important source of cross-cultural score differences and that it can be fairly adequately measured in a cross-cultural framework. The psychological meaning is less clear-cut; there is some disagreement in the literature as to whether social desirability is "mere response editing" or is associated with various other psychological traits, such as agreeableness and need for affiliation. Yet, even within the latter view, it is important to take the role of social desirability into account in cross-cultural studies, as it constitutes an important source of score differences. It is probably the most common alternative explanation of country differences in survey research and deserves to be treated accordingly (e.g., by administering a measure of social
...r that students’ thoughts and ideas about moral behavior may differ based on their cultural background.
Geert Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Second Edition, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, 2001
Recently, there has been a spate of interest in how the variability in cultural values shapes one’s attitude, explicitly concerning about the extent to which one would comply to superior members in the community or society. How do Chinese and Japanese differ from Americans in ways and tendency to conform? There is now much evidence notably, the iconic Milgram Study (1974), supports his hypothesis of conformity to authority figures in Western Countries. However, some properties of conformity are still not completely understood. There are as yet few situations of how the influence of different cultural values works on compliance. The purpose of this paper is to identify any relationship to be respectful and self-conscious of own social status and tendency of conformity and compliance. It is hypothesized that countries emphasize the difference in social class and respect to parents at home will show a higher tendency in conforming to orders by authoritative figures.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
The authors identify that there are three main factors that effect how people act, think, and make decisions. The first is religion, in some countries faith plays an important role in all areas of life in the culture of the country and can influence many of their customs and behavior. The second factor is that of fact. In many countries their greatest desire is to find the best deal and the best product or services. The final factor is feeling, if a culture is based on feelings the people will conduct business accordingly. For example it would be essential to make a personal connection with this type of individual.
Stock and Genisyürek (2012) reported a study by global leadership and organizational effectiveness (GLOBE) which established 9 cultural aspects for the purpose of ascertaining the similarities and variations that are inherent in societies and in traits. The study was developed upon the findings of Hofstede on cultural studies. The aspects include uncertainty avoidance, power distance institutional collectivism, human orientation, in-group collectivism, assertiveness, future orientation, performance orientation and gender egalitarianism. The major variations that differentiate the GLOBE and Hofstede’s dimensions include the inclusion of the humane orientation which regards the issuing of collective rewards for the kindness and care for others
Sociocultural perspective contains two areas of study which are social psychology and cultural psychology. Both areas of study are about the effects one may have on another, which extends to large groups like cultures. Not only is the behavior of people for this perspective influenced by people, but also by society’s voice such as what’s “in” and what’s “not”. Cross- cultural research plays a part in this perspective because it shows the similarities and difference of a behavior in more than one c...
We all come from different backgrounds with different cultural influences. In this paper I will compare my value systems with those of others. I will look at my own personal unconscious biases and how I can overcome these blind spots. I will discuss ways of how I can grow in my cultural competence.
In analyzing Hofstede’s five dimensions of culture we can better understand the cultural differences between the U.S. and Europe. (Hall, 2014) “The cultural dimensions represent independent preferences for one state of affairs over another that
There are countless of characteristics that composed the “self”. Self-awareness, self-esteem, self-concept and self-efficacy. This individualities are self-possessed by the setting their surrounded and most importantly how they see themselves. Even though most people devote their time puzzling how to delight humanity and be suitable among peers and colleagues, no factual level of achievement can be attained without distinct pursuits within his or her personality and profound of opinions. In a resulting optimisms of a superior indulgent and amplification of their own individual personalities, characteristics, visions and motivations.
In the article “Applying Differential Coercion and Social Support Theory to Police Officer’s Misconduct”, authors Zavala and Kurtz strive to provide a connection between police officer misconduct and the emerging theory of differential coercion and social support. This is done by giving a brief description outlining the main components of differential coercion and social support theory and then examining coercive forcers, social support, intimate partner violent (IPV), and alcohol consumption among police officers (2016). The authors are able to measure these factors by using data collected from the Police Stress and Domestic Violence in Police Families in Baltimore, Maryland in 1997 – 1999. Furthermore, after running their analysis, the authors
Of the many aspects distinguishing humans from other animals, language is probably the most fundamental; not only does it enable communication of ideas, opinions and emotions, it also provides us with many of the sophisticated cognitive faculties we associate with our superiority as a species. In examining the origins of language rather than attempting to determine how it functions, a more fundamental question arises of why language evolved. To investigate this question we must endeavour to find the original beneficial function of language that caused it to be naturally selected and further adapted. Conventionally, language was thought to have evolved as a faculty for exchanging information about the environment, such as planning hunts or giving instruction on how to fashion tools. This theory has since been refuted, largely by drawing on the lack of correlation between early human brain size (upon which language is contingent) and tool complexity (Wynn, 1988). Over the last decade, an alternate explanation for the advent of language has been proposed: its social function. Nonetheless, there remains much discussion as to precisely which of the many social functions was responsible for the evolution of language. I will here discuss: Dunbar’s (1993, 1996a) ‘linguistic grooming’ and ‘social gossip’ theory; Deacon’s (1997) ‘social contract’ theory; a criticism of the social function hypothesis regarding its presupposition of advanced cognition; and finally, an alternative approach based on Gould’s (1996) theory of non-adaptive spandrels.
... that means they want to reduce their risks as minimal as possible and want to avoid uncertainty as much as possible. The literatures takes this independent variable into account in Zhang’s study of the ways one’s culture influences decisions made under majority influence. Since conformity is partially a product of culture, different cultural perspectives and experiences will impact decision-making. One’s national culture impacts the original relationship because it helps shape one’s personality, which helps shape their susceptibility to group think. Therefore one’s national culture acts as a partial mediating variable, because it influences both personality type and one’s susceptibility to groupthink. My hypothesis is that those with high UAI scores are more likely to succumb to groupthink and those with low UAI scores are less likely to succumb to groupthink.
According to Feist, J., Feist, G.J., & Roberts., (2013), one of McCrae and Costa’s five factor model of personality is agreeableness, which distinguishes soft-hearted people. People that are considered trusting and have a good nature personality (pg. 382). One person stood out to me to have a personality of agreeableness was Abraham. Abraham was soft hearted he prayed for Sodom, he did not want any righteous people to be killed because of the sins of others (Genesis, 18:22-35). Abraham asked God if he find ten righteous people would he save Sodom. However, God was soft-hearted as well because he stated to Abraham in the Bible “I will not destroy it for the sake of ten” (Genesis 18:32, NKJV). Abraham was generous as well he welcomes three men
Surveys are an effective and popular method for research because of the efficiency, versatility and generalizability. Generalizability is the ability to sample and draw research conclusions for large populations (Bachman & Schutt, 2012). In order to effectively maximize outcomes in survey research, surveys must be structured to avoid unclear or confusing questions. Demographic related questions should be avoided if not pertinent to the research study (Bachman & Schutt, 2012). Generally, the motivation of the researcher is clearly identified in a survey, and the respondent has the option of declining involvement in the survey. There are fewer ethical dilemmas with survey research than other types of research methods.