Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of group decision making
Characteristics of group decision making
Characteristics of group decision making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics of group decision making
Numerous situations occur everyday where the psychology of being in a group, also known as mob mentality, can overtake someone’s thought process and cause them to act differently. Mob mentality differs from the mentality a person would have when alone. An individual’s behavior changes because there is a shield of feeling anonymous when in a group. This feeling can be exciting, but it can also completely destroy a being’s ability to act normally. People lose their personal ethics due to the sensation of being in this group. Usually, the group participants share a common reason for why they assembled, and it will only take one act to rile them. Because feelings of anonymity and common thought are present, the group usually acts as if they share …show more content…
only one mind, and each person will not act individually. The larger the crowd, the more likely that a person will feel that the size of the group will allow their actions to go unnamed. This mentality can result in consequences, causing actions to get out of hand. A few other names for this mindset include herd influence and the bystander effect. Research demonstrates how the effect of this mindset can take over and lead to various outcomes and even events during history. It is this anonymous way of thinking and acting that has caused many significant historical events, such as witch burnings, political protests, and racial aggression. Social changes in the 20th Century were mostly influenced by mob mentality. The Red Scare, World War II, and the Civil Rights Movement were all situations that arose due to this mindset. The First Red Scare, a fear of Communists in America during 1917 to 1920, arose when the Bolshevik Revolution occurred in Russia. After World War I, the casualties in Russia were overwhelming; there was hunger and disease throughout the country, and the government was failing. Russia’s monarchy, called a Czar, was not able to handle the harsh circumstances left behind by the war. The fall of the government led to protests in Petrograd in February of 1917. Two hundred and fifty thousand people armed with guns took the streets, angry about their lack of government. The Bolsheviks, led by VI Lenin, claimed that Russia’s only alternative was a government based on socialism. In November 1917, they overthrew the government, and started the spread of Communism in Russia. This rise of a new government in Russia caused Americans to fear that their democratic government and work industry was under threat. The end of World War II brought the Second Red Scare, where the United States feared invasion by Communists. In the 1950s, Communism was becoming a way of life in Russia and was dispersing around the world. The tension created by the Cold War also caused the United States to worry about Soviet spies infiltrating the government, as it had occurred before during World War II. Due to this alarm, America took matters into its own hands in order to protect their democracy and their country. The psychology of being in a group took over and acted as one of the most important causes during both Red Scares. This way of thinking was brought on by ideas that spread throughout America in response to chaos occurring in other countries. The Red Scare that began in 1917 was a fear of communism that appeared in the United States after World War I. Due to the rise of Labor Strikes in 1919, politicians and industrialists got the excuse to blame the protests on the Communists, or Reds. For example, during November of 1919 through January of 1920, raids to find, arrest, and question communists took place in America. These searches were called the Palmer Raids and were led by A. Mitchell Palmer, an attorney general, with the assistance of J. Edgar Hoover, a Justice Department worker. They created a list of suspected Reds and rebels, and, on November 7th, ordered the first round of raids. They had the help of many Federal agents and local police. The Palmer Raids are significant because it was not illegal to take part in the Socialist Party or the Communist Party of America. However, the raids occurred because Palmer and others suspected that Communists were the instigators of the labor strikes. These manhunts left America fearful and under the impression that Communists were all around. During January of 1920, Federal agents investigated suspected rebels’ homes without search warrants. They held around 5,000 suspects, and some were even deported. The Second Red Scare arose during the Cold War when the United States feared that Soviet spies were hidden in their government. A shocking development took place when President Harry Truman gave the Loyalty Order, which called for a search of workers and Federal employees to decide whether they were loyal to the United States. In addition, movie executives made lists to determine potential communists and radicals among their employees and fired people from their jobs. Both Red Scares displayed mob mentality, as American citizens indulged in the madness that was created without concrete proof. Leaders, including A. Mitchell Palmer and Harry Truman, gave orders to eliminate Communism, and others in the government and movie industry fired suspected “Reds.” The involvement of police and Federal agents in these raids only raised the fear that Communists were everywhere. However, because of mob mentality, citizens did not realize that they were discriminating against a group of people, because there were so many others involved in this persecution of Communists and they were overcome by their fear and worry. World War II, one of the most devastating wars of all time, came into place due to the instability that was created by the First World War in Europe. Due to the issues that arose, Adolf Hitler had the ability to take control of defeated Germany. He re-armed the nation, preparing them for war, because he believed that the only way to enlarge the Aryan, or pure German, race was to go to war. Hitler quickly took control over the unstable countries in Europe, because they did not have enough strength to fight back against restored Germany. The events of World War II would not have occurred if not for the psychology of mob mentality. Hitler blamed Jews for Germany’s defeat in World War II, which helped him gain his following of Nazis, members of a political party dedicated to the power of Europe and the take down of Jews. On November 9th of 1938, Kristallnacht, or the Night of the Broken Glass, occurred throughout the streets of Germany and Austria. Nazis and citizens participated in destroying Jewish homes, businesses, and synagogues. The damage from these riots consisted of countless destroyed properties, 100,000 arrested Jews, and over 2,000 deaths. Kristallnacht displayed the true consequences that can appear under the feelings of anonymity created by mob mentality. Terror for the Jews also came from labor and concentration camps. Beginning after Kristallnacht, male Jews were imprisoned and sent to forced labor camps. Concentration camps existed to hold arrested Jews starting in 1938. Some included: Dachau, Buchenwald, and Sachsenhausen. At these camps run by the Nazis, people died of starvation, fatigue, and exposure to harsh conditions. While Germany was losing and World War II was coming to an end, Hitler relied on a “Final Solution” to kill all the Jews on a large scale. Kill Centers in Poland and camps were created to help with the plan. They consisted of gas chambers and gas vans, in which Jews went in large groups to be killed. Finally, on May 8th, Germany surrendered, ending the war in Europe. Although war was over, a total of 6 million Jews, and 5 million others, such as Communists and the disabled, died; many were shoved into mass graves. One million Jewish victims were children. Mob mentality is the hidden cause behind each of these examples of Jewish persecution executed by the Nazis.
German citizens and Nazis did not realize the massive damage they, as individuals, were causing for families because they felt anonymous amidst the anti-Jewish feelings that Hitler created, and all shared the common idea that Jews were the source of Germany’s defeat in World War I. Hitler was their leader who convinced them of the need to have a pure Aryan race, and the Germans followed. Some followed through their destructive actions, and others followed by their absence and failure to speak against what was happening. As a survivor of Kaiserwald Concentration Camp says, It was “one of the darkest chapters in man’s history… It should never happen again.” World War II left behind many changes for families and Europe as a whole, and mob mentality is the most logical explanation for why, and how, a countless amount of people followed Hitler in his …show more content…
madness. The path to the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s was carved by the Jim Crow Laws. Jim Crow Laws were created to restrict African Americans and their rights. They were segregated in terms of the bathrooms they could use, the schools they could attend, the theaters they could visit, the trains they could ride, and even more. Blacks were tired of being discriminated against and controlled by these rules and in by the everyday actions of Whites around them. As a result, many Blacks began to seek a way to create social change. The Civil Rights Movement stood as an important example of mob mentality causing alterations in society. Beginning in 1955, after being constantly restricted by the Jim Crow Laws, African Americans in the South decided to stand up. Blacks were fed up with being shoved to the “back of the bus.” In Montgomery, Alabama, Rosa Parks refused to give her bus seat to a white man and ended up getting arrested. This event triggered the African American community to boycott and refuse to ride the buses. The Montgomery Bus Boycott, led by Martin Luther King Jr., encouraged Blacks everywhere to engage in other protests. On February 4th, 1960, four students from North Carolina Agricultural and Technical College started a rash of sit-ins at Southern lunch counters. These protests extended quickly and many people were involved. On August 28th, 1963, more than two hundred thousand people gathered to hear Martin Luther King Jr. deliver his “I Have a Dream” speech. The goal of his speech was to motivate the government to demolish segregation. Eventually, on July 2nd, 1964, President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbade the discrimination of a person based on their race, color, origin, or religious beliefs. This monumental social change transpired due to the peaceful protests among African Americans, which expanded due to mob mentality. African Americans shared a common anger because of a lifetime of segregation. Rosa Parks began the phenomenon by standing up for her rights and not giving her seat to a white man. After that, many African Americans followed in her footsteps to fight for their civil rights. As their movement grew in size, it may have been easier for others eager to get involved, because there was a feeling of safety, pride, and anonymity in that large of a group. The enormous crowd felt the excitement in supporting this just cause and, they were rewarded by the progress that was made. The positive impact of mob mentality allowed African Americans, as well as some whites, to join the Civil Rights Movement in an effort to bring about social change. The Red Scare, World War II, and the Civil Rights Movement are all events in the 20th Century that were fueled by mob mentality.
These occurrences all began with an influential leader. Whether A. Mitchell Palmer, Adolf Hitler, or Rosa Parks, these people gained an influx of supporters who acted in the same way as they did, with one mind and one goal. In addition, the safety of feeling anonymous and the urge of acting with a single mind allowed people to engage in acts ranging from discrimination, to destruction, to protests. The collective mindset created by a mob mentality was at the heart of these major historical events. The influence of being a member of a group led to these social changes of the 20th Century and can even be seen in modern day society. Prison and stadium riots and behavior at political rallies are a few current examples of the impact of mob mentality. This phenomenon will likely continue throughout years to come, as future social changes will continue to grow out of mob
mentality.
In several cases, folks will set aside their personal beliefs or adopt the opinion of the rest of the group. Group-think influences police officer’s rationalizations for some behaviors by preventing members of the group from reconsidering their beliefs while causing them to ignore warning signs. Group-think tends to occur more in situations where group members are very similar to one another and is more likely to take place when a powerful and charismatic leader commands the group. Situations in which the group is placed under extreme stress or where moral dilemmas exist also increase the occurrence of groupthink (Haberfeld et al.2014,
In the teleplay “The Monsters are Due on Maple Street” written by Rod Serling, a small street in a suburban American town falls into chaos after they lose all electricity, and in an effort to find the monsters responsible, they become animals. They search for a scapegoat and let their imagination et the best of them because “for a moment their fear almost turns their walk into a wild stampede, but Steve's voice, loud, incisive, and commanding, makes them stop. ‘Wait a minute...wait a minute! Let's not be a mob!’ The people stop as a group, seem to pause for a moment, and then much more quietly and slowly start to walk across the street. ” (Rod Serling ?). The residents of Maple Street fall victim to herd mentality. They rush to find the culprit and they lose all sense of moral and judgement. As they are about to become a mob they listen to Steve as he advises that they do not. All the residents of Maple Street listen to him and sure, he did use mob mentality to do good, but it goes to show the amount of power one man holds. Similarly, in the article “Why People Follow The Crowd” written by ABC News, the article discusses how humans are willing to let go of their beliefs, morals, and
Mob violence was a persuasive feature of the Revolutionary War in every port city, particularly Boston. These mobs, which were often described as motley crews, were central to protests and ultimately played a dominant role in significant events leading up to the American Revolution. Throughout the years, leading up to the American Revolution, many Americans were growing tired of British rule and thus begun to want to break free from Britain and earn their own independence. Some of these Americans, out of anger, madness, and in defense of their rights, began terrorizing towns, sometimes even to the point of paralysis highlighting grievances and concerns that the common man couldn’t say with mere words. These groups would then be absorbed into a greater organization called the Sons of Liberty. With the use of violence and political strategy , these radicals defending their rights, struck terror into anyone opposing them but also carried out communal objectives ultimately pushing for change which was a central theme for the American Revolution. It will be proved that these men through their actions not only were the driving force behind resistance but also proved to be the men who steered America toward revolution.
As smoke poured into the room the three strangers waiting in the lobby just sat there until it was unbearable to breathe. Believe it or not people do this, just so that they don’t get embarrassed. Carol Tavris’s essay she is successful in getting the point across that people act different in groups than they do alone. She has many appeals to emotion, logic, and being the renown psychologist she is, she has credibility. She wasn’t trying to change the way people act in this essay. just to try and make people realize what happens in groups and the horrible things that could conspire.
Mob mentality is a dangerous group of people that may cause harm to people and places around them. There are current examples of mob mentality comparable to gatherings after sporting events, or even to inmates in a prison. Mobs can happen anywhere. An example from the text is, “…if a person is in a group that is vandalizing a building, he or she might believe than there is a less of a chance of getting caught than he or she acting alone” (Smith 1). With more people they believe they cannot arrest everyone, so more people join the mob in hopes of not getting punished or arrested. Mob mentality is also part of our country’s past. An example is in the 1930’s two black men were lynched the other was shot, and then hanged. The other man was hung while he was still alive; they had to break both of his arms so he could not escape. As many as 10,000 people came to see the lynching occur, because they thought it was amusing. There were families, kids, and even pregnant women that went to see people that had not been proven to be guilty be slaughtered. If they did not follow the laws they would be lynched, an illustration is in 1930’s blacks everywhere were lynched by mobs of white people. They were lynched for not following their rules, such as being accused of raping a white woman. A photo was taken at a lynching; it shows that during that time period they would do anything to get “justice”. They would even go to
After Germany lost World War I, it was in a national state of humiliation. Their economy was in the drain, and they had their hands full paying for the reparations from the war. Then a man named Adolf Hitler rose to the position of Chancellor and realized his potential to inspire people to follow. Hitler promised the people of Germany a new age; an age of prosperity with the country back as a superpower in Europe. Hitler had a vision, and this vision was that not only the country be dominant in a political sense, but that his ‘perfect race’, the ‘Aryans,’ would be dominant in a cultural sense. His steps to achieving his goal came in the form of the Holocaust. The most well known victims of the Holocaust were of course, the Jews. However, approximately 11 million people were killed in the holocaust, and of those, there were only 6 million Jews killed. The other 5 million people were the Gypsies, Pols, Political Dissidents, Handicapped, Jehovah’s witnesses, Homosexuals and even those of African-German descent. Those who were believed to be enemies of the state were sent to camps where they were worked or starved to death.
History repeating itself, manslaughter, homicide, and riots are all forms of mob mentality of which is shown in the book, A tale of Two Cities, by Charles Darnay. Taking the given words into consideration, ask yourself “Have I ever taken part in mob mentality?” The answer for most people will be “yes”. Mob mentality is something so negative and aggressive yet we still take a part in it. We are all too caught up in trying to fit in with everyone else, that we make it into something that isn’t such a big deal to us.
German children would grow up under the impression that the Holocaust was “sins of their Fathers” and would be expected to deny the existence of the event. Studies show that most German children did not in fact think anything of the lack of Jewish in their environment due to the denial by their own people5. During the time of the Holocaust, the media and education was very meticulously manipulated to where it wasn’t as obvious as to what was taking place. German schools would educated pupils in a way that portrayed Hitler as good and Jews as different. Hitler also would found something known as the Hitler youth program in which the German children would attend in order to have early learning and military training. Youth were taught at a young age to respect the government and the leader, and would not be allowed to complete any action or thought that could conclude mistrust or suspicion to authority. The kids would live a life of mistrust and oblivious thinking due to events of the Holocaust, these practices have been passed down to further generations as
The term groupthink in this report is defined as, the social psychological phenomenon that results in groups during pressure situations. This social psychology theory is broken down into eight signs. Illusion of invulnerability, Collective rationalization, Belief in inherent morality, Stereotyped views of out-groups, Direct pressure on dissenters, Self-censorship, Illusion of unanimity, Self-appointed “mindguards”. According to research conducted by Irving Janis, there are three conditions to groupthink. The first, "high group cohesiveness" which is the direction for a group to be in unity while working towards a goal, or to satisfy the emotional needs of its members. Secondly, the structural faults such as insulation of the group, lack of norms and central leadership, in addition social background of group members. The third, situational context includes the circumstances of the groups meeting, social roles and expected behavior. This notion is exemplified during the movie, "12 Angry Men". The purpose of this essay is to examine the movie content to display the groupthink symptoms in place. Groupthink consists of eight major factors that occur during the film's scenes, as the twelve men debate a premeditated murder court case. All of the factors continue to rise as the jury discusses the young man's fate. During the film, a unanimous vote must be reached, despite this one man refuses to vote guilty. In 1957 the Orson Welles directed film opens as the judge explains the case and its severity. Soon after the group forms as the 12 men enter the jury discussion room. During these scene frames, the case evidence is explained. As the men talk they give details of an old man living beneath the boy testified, that he heard a fight, stat...
When the infamous Hitler began his reign in Germany in 1933, 530,000 Jews were settled in his land. In a matter of years the amount of Jews greatly decreased. After World War II, only 15,000 Jews remained. This small population of Jews was a result of inhumane killings and also the fleeing of Jews to surrounding nations for refuge. After the war, emaciated concentration camp inmates and slave laborers turned up in their previous homes.1 Those who had survived had escaped death from epidemics, starvation, sadistic camp guards, and mass murder plants. Others withstood racial persecution while hiding underground or living illegally under assumed identities and were now free to come forth. Among all the survivors, most wished not to return to Germany because the memories were too strong. Also, some become loyal to the new country they had entered. Others feared the Nazis would rise again to power, or that they would not be treated as an equal in their own land. There were a few, though, who felt a duty to return to their home land, Germany, to find closure and to face the reality of the recent years. 2 They felt they could not run anymore. Those survivors wanted to rejoin their national community, and show others who had persecuted them that they could succeed.
A majority of novels use the symbol of water. Water often symbolizes peace or baptism. However, this is not the case in A Tale of Two Cities. In A Tale of Two Cities, water symbolizes mob mentality. Mob mentality is how people influence their peers to act or behave a certain way. This is evident in the novel when the peasants storm the Bastille, when the peasants look for Foulon, and when the Aristocrats lock up Gaspard in prison.
After reading and viewing the mob mentality pieces, I conclude that many violent mobs may have been started by just few people; the rest just followed. Billie Holiday’s strange fruit describes a scene where men are unfairly hanged in a tree. The hanging probably occurred because of mob mentality. Mob mentality is behavior of people when they are in a group. “The night before, on Aug. 6, 1930, they had been arrested and charged with the armed robbery and murder of a white factory worker(Beitler).” After this incident, a mob gathered outside of the jail where the men were being held. They were dragged out into the streets towards a tree. The first two were hanged, but the last, James Cameron, was spared. Lawrence Beitler’s famous photograph was
A man danced alone on a hill showered with sunlight at a sitting concert, jumping wildly to the beat of the song being played. The onlookers who rested quietly on the blades of grass, silently judged the man dancing. The first follower joined the first man, and the first man embraced the new man warmly-- they danced together. A few seconds later, another man joined. He called to his friends and they joined. Soon, more and more onlookers merged with the group of people dancing upon the hill. The beat was thumping along with the people as they jumped. The crowd of people still sitting quickly stood in order to combine with the assembly. The lone man started out looking ridiculous-- a lone nut. But as soon as the first man joined in his flamboyant
During the storming phase, the way in which group members should behave and relate towards one another are not always clearly defined. However, the storming process helps group members to extract the necessary norms that will allow for the group to get to a point where they can work together to reach common goals. It is in this stage where more positive emotions are exhibited (Gladding, 2017). For example, in 12 Angry Men (Lumet & Rose, 1956) the men finally began to listen to one another as they discussed their understanding of the case and the evidence that was presented. Group members began to respect one another’s opinion and even give assent to thoughts that were beneficial in reaching a verdict. Part of this was due to the process of identification, where group members began to feel a connectedness with one
Groups influence our everyday lives in ways that we don’t even realize. Most of what is learned from groups are societal norms that are being reinforced on a micro level in everyday life. Group influence on individuals is a clear tangible proof of societal norms by institutions. The groups we become a part of therefore can have a greater influence on our individual actions then we are aware of. As an individual we like to believe we have agency over our actions and what we decide but a lot of our own actions is more a part of a group mentality. Also, individual’s go along with a group’s influence so they feel better about themselves because then they won’t be ostracized. This paper will analyze different aspects of individual behavior and