Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The difference between job satisfaction and organization commitment
Job stress and its effect on employee performance
Job stress and its effect on employee performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1.3.16
Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment and stress.
1.3.17
Making employees happier is a good way to motivate them. But sometimes, high satisfaction do not related to high performance. When the satisfaction is too high which make people think what they get are not relate to their work, they will think they do not need to work hard.
1.3.18
It is very important, because if they do not feel the company like home, when there are another company can give higher level satisfied, they will go there. That mean when the company is facing a problem, the employee will leave the company.
1.3.19
Young and old people have different want, because their age is different, like young people like challenge, fun and emotional, many young
…show more content…
2.1.4
Business expansion problem, hard to keep the sustainability of the company, communication, keep the values of culture, reduce the cost, difficult to develop the business, lack of clear policy, lack of clear penalty system, high cost on salary, communication, complicated financial situation ( stock market).
2.1.5
she has a higher sales volume, lower inventory at year end, and less liquidation. She still keeping the HannaHelps program, helping children around the world.
2.1.6
Unity of Commend and Direction, it is because your employee should listen to you and follow your order, it is the basic of controlling you organization. Responsibility, the manager should show his responsibility of his management to his own employees to make his leadership and make the organization be a team. Remuneration, paid fairly to the employees can make them think you are a fair and can trust manager, then they will work for you happily.
2.1.7
Stick to the knitting, the manager should does as best as he can. Hands on, Value Driven, show the management commitment, both of idea think that to show your hardworking and your great ability of managing organization is very
…show more content…
In planning, having a big picture of the relationship, abilities and even the fate of the employees can be more easy to set the mission, the goal and the strategy for workers. You can understand how to use your workers is most effectively. In organizing, understanding the network of members can realize which part of work they should belong to. Leading, creating a great leadership of the company needs to make the team listen to you. Understanding, the workers need and their like, can help make a direction of becoming a manager employees like. Talking about controlling, if you know the employees well you can make them to to what you
Listen to your employees. A management team placing value on the concerns or suggestions from your front-line shows your commitment to them and their needs. When an employee feels their employer truly values them, they are happy and engaged. That excitement and enthusiasm is passed o...
They’re already established and strong in the organization, Nancy and Jennifer can target the essential funding and time on brand responsibility.
Managing: Planning, recognising top priority, making decisions, facilitating change, and keeping the system functioning well. They all take effort to move toward its goals and vision
Giving sufficient training chances to your staff and communicating your trust in their work tells them that you are invested in them. Strong managers/supervisors dodge the desire to perform all aspects of an undertaking themselves, however permit workers to decide, organize undertakings and plan tasks and projects. Leaders who are focused on their groups attempt to guarantee that all representatives are dealt with similarly and that special treatment is not given to a specific worker or
An organisation is a deliberate arrangement of team consisting different personal identities to accomplish some specific goals and managers are the ones who hold the responsibility of mastering and placing them together to strive for that purpose (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, and Coulter, 2008). Robbins et al. (2008) have stated that managers are people who coordinate and oversee the work activities of others so that the goal is accomplished effectively and efficiently. Managers usually possess qualities such as having strong communication skills, flexibility, imagination, enthusiasm, problem solving skills, and of course the desire to be a great leader (Phdinmanagement.org, 2014). The structure of management conducted by a manager is often influenced by the four functions introduced by Henri Fayol (planning, organising, leading, controlling); how Henry Mintzberg’s management roles play in the organisation and also the three essentials management skills proposed by Robert L. Katz (Robbins et al., 2008).
It is well established reality that organisations in the world today can no longer survive without focusing on their employees. If they have to be at the competitive edge they have to invest in human resource, and placing their employees on top priority. This notion has lead to the strategies that, most organisations are pursuing through employee management. To achieve the optimum performance from employees organisations must motivate their employees, and have to engage them in activities that will benefit and help employees in achieving their predetermined goals and objectives. In order to achieve this, it is imperative for managers to set in motion work conditions that will help employees to achieve satisfaction of their job, low turnover and absenteeism rate and promoting the environment that promotes the organizational commitments and organizational citizenship behavior. Job satisfaction has been identified as a major requirement for organisations which aim to achieve excellence in their operations. Armstrong (2003) refers to job satisfaction as the attributes and feelings people have about their work. By extension, job satisfaction will mean positive or favourable attitudes towards one’s job whilst a negative or unfavourable attitude indicates job dissatisfaction.
Successful and effective management really depends upon your team management skills and abilities. If a manager can work in a team, then he can also expect a positive response from his sub-ordinates. Manager should lead b...
“It is therefore imperative for a company to understand the attitude of its workers and measure the job satisfaction of its employees, as job satisfaction is essential for productivity” (L. Bradshaw para. Therefore, the individual can still attain high job productivity without having the satisfaction in their field of work. This happens when money is just their motivation, or if they’re trying to receive a promotion. Others try to increase their productivity due to just the satisfaction they obtain from their work.
In many organisations, managers and bosses have found it a struggle implementing successful strategies to improve job satisfaction and productivity among its employees. While dealing with unproductive, unmotivated and unsatisfied employees, there is an increased risk for turnover, which can be prevented. The risk of high turnover is a problem to workplaces as turnover has been proven to ‘take its toll’ on productivity as it disrupts current projects and increases workloads for other employees. It also has a negative impact on team cohesion (Patrick and Sonia, 2012). Job satisfaction is one’s general attitude to the job, and higher the job satisfaction, the more likely he/she will hold a positive attitude towards their job (De Menzes, 2011). De Menzes (2011) believes that employees who are satisfied with their jobs are likely to be more committed to their organisation and be more productive. People are significantly more productive when they are content and achieving individual and organisational goals are able to be fulfilled in a work environment where employees feel happy and motivated. Interventions which can be used to improve job satisfaction and productivity to decrease rates of turnover and unmotivated employees include an increase in workplace training, as well as performance pay.
Improving employee job satisfaction brings along additional benefits such as a direct impact on increase customers’ satisfaction and employees’ work performance. Satisfied employees tend to add extra effort to job performance, then work harder and better. Hence the organizational success totally depends on human capabilities, highly satisfied work force is completely essential for an organization.
I learned that for me to be an effective leader I have to be able to change follower’s behaviors, and make them both satisfied and perform well. When I become a manager I have to realize that I will be working with a diverse group of people and what works for one person might not work for everyone. It is important to have a leadership style that leads to positive outcomes that is valued by the organization. I think it will be important for me to make each employee feel like they are appreciated and that their voice matters in the company. I think it is important to give frequent feedback so employees can know how their performance and know how they are doing. I would like workers to see me as a fair manager that distribute duties and outcomes fairly doesn’t show favoritism. I would like to be able to keep everyone motivated and working together as one to keep employee moral high so it can benefit the
The purpose of this report is to brief the management on the importance of employee satisfaction in achieving the competitive goals of the organization through increasing the retention of the employees.
Additionally, employee satisfaction are directly correlated to employee commitment and the loyalty which again directly related with the business and work productivity (Papazisi, Raidén, and Sheehan, 1995). Smart leaders knows that keeping their employee satisfied and motivated are essential for their organization (Sher, Bakhtiar, Muhammad &Ali, 2010).
They are liable to design the jobs in the organization (Martin, 2009). They should design the jobs in such a way that motivates the employees. Designing the jobs in according to the needs of the organization would be too much conducive. Here the goals of the job will be mostly connective to the goals of the organization. The job condition would be of such that it demonstrates the needs and skills of the employees in the respective position. If the goals of job are aligned with the organizational objectives then there would be the creation of positive work environment (Gilmore, and Williams, 2009). The designing of the job should follow the ethical standards in the organization. If the jobs are designed according to the needs of the people as well as organization then at one side the organization will be benefitted and at another side the employees would be more willing to do the job and get motivated. Jobs must be designed to some specific areas. A single job should fill up a single goal. Functional areas should be separated (Chen, 2009). There should be designing of good feedback is successes are made in the given
...s in the corporate world by setting new standards to promote and better satisfy their employees. We chose four leading companies in four different industries. The above analysis definitely reveals that perhaps one of the reasons why these companies are the leaders in their industry is because they are well aware of the importance of the work force. They mention in their mission statements as well that yes in deed customers are important but in order to make the customer happy they first need to motivate and satisfy the employee as well. According to Citibank, the general belief is that a happy worker is a motivated and loyal one. So keeping employees' spirits high is a sure-fire way of maintaining a productive workforce. A productive work force would ultimately lead to a healthy organization which would not only promote the society its working for but also itself.