Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship between job satisfaction and job performance
Challenges in employee retention
Challenges in employee retention
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In many organisations, managers and bosses have found it a struggle implementing successful strategies to improve job satisfaction and productivity among its employees. While dealing with unproductive, unmotivated and unsatisfied employees, there is an increased risk for turnover, which can be prevented. The risk of high turnover is a problem to workplaces as turnover has been proven to ‘take its toll’ on productivity as it disrupts current projects and increases workloads for other employees. It also has a negative impact on team cohesion (Patrick and Sonia, 2012). Job satisfaction is one’s general attitude to the job, and higher the job satisfaction, the more likely he/she will hold a positive attitude towards their job (De Menzes, 2011). De Menzes (2011) believes that employees who are satisfied with their jobs are likely to be more committed to their organisation and be more productive. People are significantly more productive when they are content and achieving individual and organisational goals are able to be fulfilled in a work environment where employees feel happy and motivated. Interventions which can be used to improve job satisfaction and productivity to decrease rates of turnover and unmotivated employees include an increase in workplace training, as well as performance pay.
Improving job satisfaction and productivity is an issue which is imperative among all employees and workplaces. There are various issues contributing to the decrease of job satisfaction including conflict, issues with pay, stress and workplace training. Low productivity rates and unsatisfied employees increase the risk for absenteeism and employee turnover. Occupational stress can often occur in the workplace, leading to an increased rate of ab...
... middle of paper ...
...n organisations of lack of job satisfaction and productivity amongst unmotivated employees, and related the problem to the risk of turnover. Conflict, absenteeism and stress were identified as major causes of loss of job satisfaction and productivity, potentially increasing the the loss of staff. The solution proposed was to implement additional training and performance pay. It was argued that training in the workplace improves an employee’s sense of worth and self-esteem, by increasing their skills and thus contribution to work efforts. This raises productivity, and in addition improves job satisfaction. Performance pay was advocated as a means of developing the organisation to support motivated and capable employees. Self-disciplined workers would receive recognition for output, improving job satisfaction; as well as financial incentive, keeping productivity high.
Some of the things that companies could do to improve job satisfaction for example, would be to identify when an employee is bored on the job, address it, obtain feedback from the employee for ideas to make their job more interesting and challenging. This would allow a leader to assist this individual in designing different ways to perform duties or depending on individual’s future career goals and performance level, may need more responsibility or promotion in order for the employee to maintain job satisfaction and retention with t...
In today's complex business environment; traditional approaches like monetary incentives are not the only prime motivators. In addition to expecting financial incentives for their performance, employee's expectations are much more. Appreciation, recognition and opportunities for personal growth; must be catered for to harness maximum productivity. Furthermore in an era where change is imperative for the organisation's survival, highly motivated employees, represent flexibility and show willing to change; a vital component for the success of any organisation.
There is no doubt on the positive correlation between happiness and productivity. So it goes without saying that happy employees are definitely going to be more productive than unhappy ones. Employees and their perceptions of the organisation they work in have a very strong impact on the branding of the organisations since those would reflect in their interactions with stakeholders – customers included. If you can really understand your employees and give them what they want you would be creating a workplace where every person feels happy and satisfied. This is turn would positively impact your branding both as an employer and as a business.
Statistical evidence shows a positive correlation between employee satisfaction and improved job performance. (Wright, Cropanzano & Bonett, 2007) An improvement
Based off of the gratification an individual contains towards their work, job satisfaction is a key. The productivity could either be positive or negative, while the relationship between the productivity and satisfaction may not be consistent. There are multiple internal and external factors in job satisfaction that can impact the behavior of an employee and engagement over time. The way the worker’s attitude concerning their field affects the performance they perform on a daily basis. One who is satisfied with the job they do, succeeds at what they do.
The problem of job dissatisfaction is a global workplace issue. Although Americans are happier in their jobs, satisfaction in the United States is declining due to downsizing and overburdening. (Robbins & Judge, 2009). Before outlining job dissatisfaction a definition of job satisfaction is needed. Job satisfaction is “[an] individuals’
When it is discovered that a worker can fulfill the requirements of their job, but are experiencing shortcomings in doing so, many times it is believed that worker motivation may be the root of the problem (Laird 95). What, though, is work motivation? According to Laird (2006), “motivation is a fundamental component of performance “ and “is the reason that someone chooses to do some things and chooses not to do others”. In other words, work motivation is what energizes workers to the level of output required to fulfill a task, directs their energy towards the objectives that they need to accomplish, and sustains that level of effort over a period of time (Steers et al., 2004). In essence, worker motivation is what gets the job done. Employee motivation has always been a central problem in the workplace, and, as an individual in a supervisory position, it becomes ones duty to understand and institute systems that ensure the proper motivation of your subordinates. Proper motivation of employees can ensure high productivity and successful workflow, while low worker motivation can result in absenteeism, decreased productivity rates, and turnover. A large body of research has been produced regarding motivation, and much of this research is applicable to the workplace. Due to the nature of man, motivation varies from individual to individual, and, because of this, there is no one system that is the best for ensuring worker motivation in every organizational situation, and, as a product, many theories have been created to outline what drives people to satisfactorily complete their work tasks. Throughout the course of this document, the three main types of these motivational theories will be outlined and examples of each as well...
Companies put thousands of dollars into decor, food and beverage display, maintaining the property grounds and so many other things, and forget the key element of a successful relationship with customers- their employees. Many factors go into keeping employees satisfied, Wagenheim and Anderson (2008) concluded four key factors that impact job satisfaction, number one is rewards and recognition, researchers have identified extrinsic rewards, including salary and benefits as the most important factors for retaining employees, while others contend that intrinsic rewards such as working conditions, status, and security drive employee satisfaction (Leavitt, 1996: Savery, 1996). Number two factor would be personal choice and development, not all employees are fuelled by pay and benefits alone, some found more of a value in career development for their job satisfaction (Leavitt, 1996). The number three factor was a healthy work and life balance within employees, researchers present that there is a direct connection between life satisfaction and employee satisfaction, Bauer (2000) believes either employee satisfaction impacts life satisfaction or life satisfaction impacts employee satisfaction, although Hagedorn and Sax (1999) believe it is reciprocal. And finally, the number four factor includes employee training and development, Howard and Frink (1996) found that employees who perceive growth opportunities are more satisfied. The first objective of this study was to determine the impact employee satisfaction has on customer satisfaction. The second objective of this study was to determine the organizational impacts on employee satisfaction. These objectives will be determined through the study of eight journal articles and select...
Every organisation in the world today is putting a lot of efforts, time, and resources in the human management. As this is, an excepted reality that no organisation in the world can vie in this globalised world just on the mere basis of their product and services. In order for an organisation to be successful, it has to invest substantially into the domain of people skills, and their behaviour. Due to stressful working environment, many organisations loose employees due to lack of motivation, stress, lower employee job satisfaction and other contributing factors of behavioural sciences and psychology. All these factors have negative effects on the organisation and organizational behaviour simultaneously. Many experts are in concord that all these factors create disoriented and unmotivated employees and affect the organizational overall targets and higher dissatisfaction of the employees.
In this section it describes the main ideas included in thesis report of the research. These ideas are Job Satisfaction, Performance and Organizational Rewards. It is the common explanation that Job Satisfaction is an mind-set to work. Moreover, Job Satisfaction is an emotional or affective reaction to many features of one’s career. An individual with an increase rank of Job Satisfaction contains optimistic behavior to his or her profession, whereas a human being who is discontented with his or her work contains pessimistic behavior about the work. Luthans (1985) states a complete meaning specified by Locke. A pleasant or affirmative affecting condition
It has been observed that motivated and satisfied employees have directly relate with the business performance, profitability and eventually, its stability (Shemiah, 2009). However, dissatisfied and less committed employees have a negative impacts on the performance and profitability of an organization (McKinley, Sanchez, & Schick, 1995). It should be taken into account that disengaged and less efficient employees cost the organization thousands while losing the productivity (Hislop,
Everyday, there are workers who come home from their jobs with a high amount of health issues. Headaches, aching muscles, exhaustion, and many more health issues have workers wondering why this is happening. All of these symptoms can be linked to stress in the workplace. Job stress has become more of a problem than ever before. Numerous studies show that job stress is the major source of stress for American adults and that it has escalated progressively over the past few decades (“Workplace Stress,” 2004).
Job satisfaction can be influenced by an employee’s ability to complete required tasks, the level of communication in an organization, and the way management treats employees. If employees feel satisfied with what they are doing or j...
An important part of the retention of staff, reducing staff turnover and minimising absenteeism at work is ensuring that staff are properly motivated. This is not as easy as it sounds. At first glance, you might be tempted to think that merely increasing wages is the way to motivate! Not so. Most thinkers on the subject would argue that motivation is a far more complex issue than merely 'money'.
... staffs of the company (Rong-Chang Jou, 2013). In addition of the perspective, Porter and Lawler, (1968) inferred job satisfaction was a discrepancy between what individual wants in his or her job and what tasks that she or he must perform as a part of the job. The lower that the discrepancy was between preferred job and the actual tasks, the higher the employee experienced job satisfaction. So, job satisfaction can affect employee turnover and this statement has been supported by Mobley (1997) that workers that have higher turnover tendency was affected by the lower of job satisfaction. According to Thatcher et al. (2003) added more dimensions to the relationship between job satisfaction and turnover, including the interactions among job satisfaction, employee retention, the desire to quit experienced by the employee and opportunities or ease of quitting.