Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Amount of zinc oxide in calamine
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Amount of zinc oxide in calamine
Calamine Investigation
Introduction.
Calamine is a mineral containing Zinc Carbonate (Zn CO ). On heating
it decomposes as follows:
ZnCO -------ZnO+ CO
(C= 12, O= 16, Zn= 65)
The equation allows you to calculate a theoretical conversion of
calamine into zinc oxide. In the chemical industry they need to be
able to calculate % yields in order to make sure that their processes
are economical.
Aim.
I am going to compare the results from the experiment with the
theoretical result to see if they have any similarities or
differences.
I have already been told how to find out the theoretical result by
using balanced equations and reacting masses.
Prediction.
I predict that the experimental yield won’t be the same as the
theoretical yield.
This is because the experiments weren’t as accurate as they could have
been. My measurements of zinc carbonate weren’t as accurate as they
needed to be, to ensure a fair test. This was because it is almost
impossible to weigh exact measurements on electronic scales.
Another problem was there could have been moisture inside of the test
tube, which could have affected the results. Even with these problems
I think the results will be quite similar to the theoretical yield.
I choose to change the amount of zinc carbonate I used, because I can
easily see from these results whether there are any similarities
between the theoretical yield and the experimental yield.
Fair Testing.
I will heat the tubes, which contain more zinc carbonate for longer to
ensure that the tests were fair. I will also use the same electronic
scales for all of my experiments, as this will ensure that the tests
are fair. I will also were safety goggles to protect my eyes. When I
have finished the experiment I will check to see if there were any
anomalies, and if there any I will change them, provided if I have
enough time.
Method.
The experiment was not a success, there was percent yield of 1,423%. With a percent yield that is relatively high at 1,423% did not conclude a successful experiment, because impurities added to the mass of the actual product. There were many errors in this lab due to the product being transferred on numerous occasions as well, as spillage and splattering of the solution. Overall, learning how to take one product and chemically create something else as well as how working with others effectively turned out to be a
The purpose of the Unknown White Compound Lab was to identify the unknown compound by performing several experiments. Conducting a solubility test, flame test, pH paper test, ion test, pH probe test, conductivity probe test, and synthesizing the compound will accurately identified the unknown compound. In order to narrow down the possible compounds, the solubility test was used to determine that the compound was soluble in water. Next, the flame test was used to compare the unknown compound to other known compounds such as potassium chloride, sodium chloride, and calcium carbonate. The flame test concluded that the cation in the unknown compound was potassium. Following, pH paper was used to determine the compound to be neutral and slightly
The question that was proposed for investigation was: Can the theoretical, actual, and percent yields be determined accurately (Lab Guide pg. 83)?
There were no significant error factors that may have affected the arrangement of the lab experiment. Everything went smoothly with relative ease.
3.) Divide your 30g of white substance into the 4 test tubes evenly. You should put 7.5g into each test tube along with the water.
The procedure of the lab on day one was to get a ring stand and clamp, then put the substance in the test tube. Then put the test tube in the clamp and then get a Bunsen burner. After that put the Bunsen burner underneath the test tube to heat it. The procedure of the lab for day two was almost exactly the same, except the substances that were used were different. The
Experimental: The experimental procedure outlined in the OU Physical Chemistry Laboratory Manual was followed without any deviations.
Discussion: The percent of errors is 59.62%. Several errors could have happened during the experiment. Weak techniques may occur.
One possible source of experimental error could be not having a solid measurement of magnesium hydroxide nor citric acid. This is because we were told to measure out between 5.6g-5.8g for magnesium hydroxide and 14g-21g for citric acid. If accuracy measures how closely a measured value is to the accepted value and or true value, then accuracy may not have been an aspect that was achieved in this lab. Therefore, not having a solid precise measurement and accurate measurement was another source of experimental error.
This piece of data was used to find the mass of water driven off. In order to find the mass of water driven off, another value--the final mass of anhydrous crystal, was subtracted from the initial mass of hydrated crystal. This value was found to be .90 grams. The mass of water driven off was determined to be .61 grams. The molar mass of water, which is 18.02 grams, was used together with the mass in grams of water driven off to find the moles of water driven off. The moles of water driven off was calculated to be.034 moles. This value was a crucial half of the experimental formula, and thus crucial to the lab. The final mass of anhydrous crystal was used together with the molar mass of CuSO4 to find the moles of anhydrous crystal. The molar mass of CuSO4 was found by using the periodic table to find the total mass in grams of one copper atom, one sulfur atom, and four oxygen atoms. The moles of anhydrous crystal was determined to be .0056 moles. This was the other crucial half of the experimental formula, thusly crucial to the lab. The experimental mole ratio of H2O CuSO4 was found to be 6.1:1. This information was used to find the experimental formula of the hydrated crystal. The experimental formula was found to be CuSO4 6.1H2O. This formula was compared to the theoretical formula in order to derive the percent error. The percent error was calculated to be 22%. This crucial value was what described how successful the experiment ultimately
There are several factors that need to be controlled during experiments that determine if creatine can improve body composition. First and foremost, the amount of creatine given to each patient should be consistent. If some patients are given more or less creatine, the results of the experiment will be skewed. In respect to the amount of creatine distributed to the experiment group, the size of the patients will need to be similar. A similar dose of creatine given to a smaller person will not have the same effect on someone with more lean body mass. The patients will need to be of similar weight and body mass for the impact of the supplement to be accurately measured. Another factor is weightlifting experience. Less experienced weightlifters
== § Test tubes X 11 § 0.10 molar dm -3 Copper (II) Sulphate solution § distilled water § egg albumen from 3 eggs. § Syringe X 12 § colorimeter § tripod § 100ml beaker § Bunsen burner § test tube holder § safety glasses § gloves § test tube pen § test tube method = == = =
The recent rise in popularity of drugs like Adderall amongst young adults in the US has sparked controversy lately, as critics question whether long term use of the drug is effective, or even safe for long-term use. Today, Adderall is marketed and prescribed as a treatment for ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder), commonly used as a means of improving productivity in work or school, but this was not always the case. Amphetamine (Adderall’s main ingredient) dates back to 1930’s when it was initially introduced as a treatment for depression. During World War II, both Allied and Axis troops experimented with Amphetamine on their troops, claiming the drug increased soldiers’ awareness in battle and minimalized their fear of death. Throughout
Defying Robinson Appleby 's agreement to never teach a Negro how to read, Mamed, the overseer with a raised cane, proposes Aminata an offer which she cannot decline. Being the overseer in Appleby 's plantation, Mamed 's duty is to ensure that the plantation is properly functioning while Master Appleby is absent. In fear of being disciplined for divulging the prohibited prayer, Aminata recognizes Mamed 's humanity as he murmurs, “Allahu Akbar”. With Mamed 's offer to Aminata to tutor her how to read and write, perhaps if “Georgia was teaching [Aminata] how to survive in the land of the buckra, but maybe Mamed could teach [her] how to get out” (Hill, 216). Mamed 's teachings start with the pronunciation of Aminata 's name to eventually forming a sentence with basic, common words to the rules and procedures established in Appleby 's hacienda. As Aminata 's fear of Mamed eventually subsides, Aminata apprehends the idea of Mamed being a different man, “like a man who was willing to teach” (Hill, 218).
There is also the potential of human error within this experiment for example finding the meniscus is important to get an accurate amount using the graduated pipettes and burettes. There is a possibility that at one point in the experiment a chemical was measured inaccurately affecting the results. To resolve this, the experiment should have been repeated three times.