Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lab # 6 calorimetry
6.03 calorimetry lab
Science chapter calorimeter
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction: In this lab, I determined the amount of heat exchanged in four different chemical reactions only using two different compounds and water. The two compounds used were Magnesium Hydroxide and Citric Acid. Both compounds were in there solid states in powder form. Magnesium Hydroxide was mixed with water and the change in heat was measured using a thermometer. The next reaction combined citric acid and magnesium hydroxide in water. The change in heat was measured as well. For the third reaction citric acid was placed in water to measure the change in heat. In the last reaction, citric acid was combined with water. The heat exchanged was again measured. It is obvious we were studying the calorimetry of each reaction. We used a calorimeter …show more content…
The first law of thermodynamics simply states that heat is a form of energy and heat energy cannot be created nor destroyed. In this lab we were measuring the change in temperature and how it affected the enthalpy of the reaction. During this reaction the solution gained heat. This is what we were monitoring. The reason why the solution gained heat is because the reaction lost heat. Energy is lost when two elements or compounds mix. The energy lost/ gain was heat. Heat is a form of energy as stated above in the previous paragraph. The sign of enthalpy for three out of the four reactions matches what was observed in the lab. For the last reaction, part four, the reaction gained heat not the solution like parts one through three. The negative enthalpy value for part four indicates that the reaction gained …show more content…
This would influence the results by making the reaction perform better. Without contaminates the two compounds can react with just each other instead of what has contaminated the water. The second assumption is that the water is just a vessel for the chemical reaction between magnesium hydroxide and citric acid. Assuming that magnesium hydroxide and citric acid don’t individually react with water this would make the water a vessel. Due to part one and part three of the lab this assumption is incorrect. One possible source of experimental error could be not having a solid measurement of magnesium hydroxide nor citric acid. This is because we were told to measure out between 5.6g-5.8g for magnesium hydroxide and 14g-21g for citric acid. If accuracy measures how closely a measured value is to the accepted value and or true value, then accuracy may not have been an aspect that was achieved in this lab. Therefore, not having a solid precise measurement and accurate measurement was another source of experimental error.
Thermodynamics is essentially how heat energy transfers from one substance to another. In “Joe Science vs. the Water Heater,” the temperature of water in a water heater must be found without measuring the water directly from the water heater. This problem was translated to the lab by providing heated water, fish bowl thermometers, styrofoam cups, and all other instruments found in the lab. The thermometer only reaches 45 degrees celsius; therefore, thermodynamic equations need to be applied in order to find the original temperature of the hot water. We also had access to deionized water that was approximately room temperature.
This process is then repeated. In the second trial, the Mg ribbon did not completely dissolve and the results were thrown out. The third trial (referred to as the second in the following analysis due to the exclusion of the previous one) was successful, and measurements can be seen below. We then moved onto the second reaction using magnesium oxide and hydrochloric acid in the fume hood. We measured 200.1 mL of HCl and placed it in the calorimeter, and an initial temperature reading was taken.
In this experiment, there were several objectives. First, this lab was designed to determine the difference, if any, between the densities of Coke and Diet Coke. It was designed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of several lab equipment measurements. This lab was also designed to be an introduction to the LabQuest Data and the Logger Pro data analysis database. Random, systematic, and gross errors are errors made during experiments that can have significant effects to the results. Random errors do not really have a specific cause, but still causes a few of the measurements to either be a little high or a little low. Systematic errors occur when there are limitations or mistakes on lab equipment or lab procedures. These kinds of errors cause measurements to be either be always high or always low. The last kind of error is gross errors. Gross errors occur when machines or equipment fail completely. However, gross errors usually occur due to a personal mistake. For this experiment, the number of significant figures is very important and depends on the equipment being used. When using the volumetric pipette and burette, the measurements are rounded to the hundredth place while in a graduated cylinder, it is rounded to the tenth place.
Possible sources of error in this experiment include the inaccuracy of measurements, as correct measurements are vital for the experiment.
In figure 2, the class mean calculated was 147.8kJ. The difference between the two measurements is 2,122.2kJ. This shows how low the accuracy for this experiment was. The macadamia nuts had a true energy value of 3040kJ per 100g. Looking back at figure 2, the class mean calculated was 224.4kJ which leaves a difference of 2,815.6kJ. Once again, a low accuracy. Lastly, the popcorn had a true energy value of 1910kJ. The class mean equalled to 144.1kJ. The difference between the class mean and the true value is 1,765.9kJ which shows this experiment being low in
The data which was collected in Procedure A was able to produce a relatively straight line. Even though this did have few straying points, there was a positive correlation. This lab was able to support Newton’s Law of Heating and Cooling.
Many systematic sources of error may have occurred during this experiment leading to faulty in the collection of data, overall result and outcome of the experiment. One example of this is the age of each Alka-Seltzer tablet. If one Alka-Seltzer had been older than another, the amount of time it took for each tablet to react to the water would be different. Specifically, the older tablets would most likely take a longer time to the react to the water because they were more stale than the newer tablets that would be more fresh. This systematic error could have been avoided by making sure all the tablets came from a fresh new box and not different boxes. To be even more accurate, check the date on the back of the box to make sure all the tablets were made at the same time and that they were all recently made.
4.For this question simply look at the number you calculated as your enthalpy of reaction. Is it positive or negative? It is positive so this means that it is in fact endothermic. It requires energy in order to create
An error that occurred in the experiment was during the ceric nitrate test because solution 4 should have produced a color change. During a base hydrolysis of aspartame, aspartic acid, phenylalanine and methanol are produced, therefore the ceric nitrate test should have been a positive for alcohol. A reason that this could have shown a negative result is because methanol is a volatile substance and it could have evaporated out, which would have caused a negative ceric nitrate test
This is expressed as Δ +ve (delta positive). If the total energy put in is less than the energy created, then the substance warms up (it is exothermic). This is expressed as Δ -ve (delta negative). I will investigate eight different alcohols using an alcohol or spirit burner, to measure the energy change during burning by measuring the change in temperature of some water held in a container.
" This means that therefore the enthalpy change of a reaction can be measured by the calculation of 2 other reactions which relate directly to the reactants used in the first reaction and provided the same reaction conditions are used, the results will not be affected. We have the problem set by the experiment to determine the enthalpy change of the thermal decomposition of calcium carbonate. This is difficult because we cannot accurately measure how much thermal energy is taken from the surroundings and provided via thermal energy from a Bunsen flame into the reactants, due to its endothermic nature. Therefore, using the enthalpy changes obtained in reaction 1 and reaction 2 we can set up a Hess cycle.
The first law of thermodynamics is the conservation energy can be converted from one form to another but cannot be destroyed or created in an isolated system. An example is a potential energy that is not used and kinetic energy which is being used, for example, the water in a dam is potential energy, and when the water is released from the dam, it becomes kinetic energy.
The experiment’s purpose was to determine whether the rate of reaction was impacted by reactant concentration or temperature. Based on scientific research, it was said that if the reactant concentration was increased, then the rate of reaction would also increase. Also, if the reactant temperature was increased, it was believed the rate of reaction would increase as well due to the increased kinetic energy and speed of the molecules. Based on the results, my first hypothesis was not true. The reaction with the lowest concentration of pea extract had the fastest rate of reaction, while the highest concentrated pea extract finished second. The second hypothesis was found to be both true and false because the warmest temperature reaction
Also the investigation will be performed in a sensible manner and there is no dangerous behaviour. Prediction When the experiment is taking place I believe that the magnesium in the hydrochloric acid will begin to bubble and then disappear, I also
There is also the potential of human error within this experiment for example finding the meniscus is important to get an accurate amount using the graduated pipettes and burettes. There is a possibility that at one point in the experiment a chemical was measured inaccurately affecting the results. To resolve this, the experiment should have been repeated three times.