Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effective leadership
Effective leadership
Explain the skills and attributes needed for leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effective leadership
All throughout history there have been a many leaders that range from the tyrannical, heavy-handed like Adolf Hitler to the compassionate and caring like Nelson Mandela. There is no set list of characteristics that define an effective leader. One's ability to influence people to achieving a goal, whether that goal be good or bad, is effective leadership.
Knowledge is power. It is what drives innovation and progression for the Army to move forward and carry on it’s mission of protecting this country. The Army is structured to utilize knowledge as a tool to develop leaders. That is why I believe educating Soldiers is a top priority for leaders. Soldiers must be knowledgeable of regulations, policies, their work roles and jobs. How can one possibly be an ideal role model without this knowledge? Regulations lay out the guidelines on how things are done. Policies generally outline and define your left and right limits for specific situations. Knowledge about how to perform all the tasks required to be proficient at one’s job is vital
…show more content…
There is clear cut guidance in the military to what is right and what is wrong. During these times of trial is where you can grow a stronger relationship with your Soldier. The Army has made a strong point to reinforce the use of counseling statements to reflect positive and negative events in a Soldier’s career. All too often the negative events are the ones that actually make it to paper. However, most things should not make it that far. I find it more effective to communicate with a Soldier to get down to the root cause of the situation. Some Soldiers may see negative counselings as building the gallows to eventually end their career and have the opposite effect than what the leader intended them for. Corrective training should be scaled to the magnitude of the problem; from one on one talking to
The question of “What makes a leader great?” is without one solitary answer. Effective leaders in the corporate and political arenas are deserving of praise, but because of the nature of their work, military leaders are arguably more complex and intriguing.
There are a variety of ways to define both leader and leadership. There is not, however, a clear definition of how to become one. There is no set list of mandatory traits, either innate or learned, that a person must embody to be considered successful or proved a failure. What I feel it takes is the right mix of strengths and weaknesses in a given situation to demonstrate effectiveness. No one person has abilities without accompanying deficiencies. It’s all in the way they are balanced. The balance in the way one uses his or hers’ abilities will ultimately determine the type of leadership one has throughout time. To support these claims I will examine a well-known leader throughout the military, General James “Mad Dog” Mattis. This essay will provide some insight into both his strengths and weaknesses while discussing some personality traits he is said to possess.
The circumstance of immoral orders is understandable, but a soldier should still meet his or her given instructions. The keys to a soldier's system are the policy letters and army regulations that dictate every given bit of information on the army and its moral history. Within each article and sub-article, the information is pertinent to the success of a soldier and shares the history as well. This can provide lessons to those who instruct other soldiers.
The Army requires its members to adhere to prolonged training and learn specialized skills. From the moment a soldier transitions from the civilian sector into the Army, he is indoctrinated with training. Regardless of rank, the Army demands each soldier to be technically proficient and mentally competent in order to be qualified in a respective Military Occupation Specialty. As a soldier progresses in his military career, he is required to continue his education and training. Army leaders are expected and required to continue developing their skills through academic studies, operational experience, and institutional training. An opposing view argues that anyone can learn these skills; however, statistics show less than 0.5% of the population serves in the armed forces, indicating a soldier is a rare mix of intelligence and character.1 These lessons are necessary qualifications to achieve what General Martin Dempsey describes as “effectiveness rather than efficiency.”2 Much like the profession of medicine which must heal, the media which must provide truth, and law which must provide justice, the profession of arms must provide secur...
Response on a soldier’s performance should not be kept for yearly appraisals and mandatory counseling. Instead, comments should be given as often as possible by the senior who oversees the developing leader most. Counseling, mentoring, coaching, teaching, and assessment can be used as tools to provide advice (Key-Roberts, 2014).
Young soldiers need to learn to live the Army values, which are loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, and personal courage. If these values can be instilled in us then we will have everything we need to make an excellent soldier but also a great person. These values also come into play when you are sent downrange because you want to have good fellow soldiers who will always have your back know matter what the situation you find yourself in. The army values also define our character traits as a person and they teach us discipline. The Army Values are a big part of our lives us young soldiers need to learn how to maintain them.
When a soldier doesn’t follow the orders they were given it doesn’t only affect themselves, it also affects everyone in the team and the mission they were assigned. When a soldier does not comply with the order, the goal is hurt and the chance to win the war diminishes. When you're in the army you need to stop and think about it if it will hurt you or your battle buddies. When a soldier does not obey orders in combat zone, it makes the mission ineffective. If a single soldier is ineffective in the combat, it will lower the chances of winning the war. For example, if the Sergeant tells a private before going out for the mission that he needs to get the gun ready — so they can be ready and fully play their roles when it's needed in the combat – it does not matter if the private does not know why he has to do what he was told, the soldier needs to follow the order without any problems. When the soldier follows the instruction without any problems, it is very helpful and improves the likelihood of winning the war. Soldiers must be able to obey the order, and effectively accomplish these tasks because it helps release tension from the leader and other members of the team and it allows every soldier in the team to know what their tasks and goals are. Eventually, everyone will work as a team and get the job done
According to Dickstein et al. (2010), behavioral health professionals within the military have initiated a robust educational campaign to address the negative perceptions surrounding military members seeking treatment. By providing these educational resources to personnel, over time behavioral health experts were able to alter the perception of the mentally ill amongst military personnel. Previously those who sought treatment were considered individuals of weak character and ones who lack self-control.
The best Army leaders will effortlessly find some way to get others to do exactly what they need them to do. They do this by giving soldiers a
...issue, it will create a psychological and an emotional gap between the victim and the NCO. In addition, it will produce a hostile unit environment, especially if the NCO took the offender’s side. NCOs must take full responsibility for their own actions and mistakes. Denying problems or pretending they did not exist when confronted, will result in a negative reaction, which will worsen the situation. In addition, NCOs must recognize how prejudice are their decision making processes, be aware of other Soldiers feelings when making decisions or taking any additional actions. NCOs must identify how their behavior and performance affect others, especially their subordinates. Finally, if all NCOs followed and lived the NCO creed and the Army values, they will success and achieve the military goals by creating a positive equal opportunity climate in their place of duty.
Non-Commissioned Officers are deficient in vital areas of leadership due to a lack of training. This leads to inexperienced Soldiers becoming inexperienced leaders. The NCO corps needs to develop and enforce comprehensive interactive training that will challenge the next generation to achieve a functional level of communication skills before advancing to leadership positions. This will generate leaders who can write effectively, speak meritoriously and teach adaptively while training others to do the same.
Many Scholars characterize the core qualities and skills necessary for an effective leader. Useem defines leadership as “Creating a vision and translating that vision into actions”. Historically, an effective leader was assumed to be exceptionally knowledgeable, authoritative, and dominate. Those leaders applied the command and control method to lead an organization. With the passage of time, this definition has been changed. The modern definition of an effective leader is honest, courageous, trustworthy, inspirational, and result-oriented. Today’s leaders create shared values and vision, and empower others to achieve their targets.
As stewards of the Army Profession, they are the epitome of what Soldiers aim to be. Through professional and personal experiences, Sergeants Major (SGM) acquires necessary skills and tools to effectively deal with adversity. It is for this reason that in the midst of challenges, chaos, and difficult situations Sergeants Major are the beacon of light, the common sense in the equation, the “Go To” person for guidance and hope, or the solution for all issues. Applying positive psychology, Sergeants Major are able to provide sound judgment and advice to commanders, staffs, and subordinates. Additionally, the application of positive psychology fosters camaraderie, builds a healthy work environment, and creates a positive culture within the organization. The purpose of this paper is to describe the concepts of positive psychology, positive leadership, and master resilience training (MRT) and how Sergeants Major promote these factors to enhance organizational
An officer's ability to lead his or her soldiers is contingent on the officer's knowledge of his soldier's skills. The US Army Officer is a professional, providing expertise, leadership, and an example for his soldiers to follow. Every soldier is a subject matter expert, trained in a specific competency. An officer, that soldier's leader, needs to be able to employ that soldier effectively. That means understanding a soldier's skills. An Officer needs to further have the ability to train that soldier outside of the US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) schools. This means a successful officer must become proficient in, if not an expert of, his soldier's competencies. For an average soldier, this would mean several MOS style training schools. In intelligence, a soldier can be anything from a Prophet...
“A vision without action is merely a dream.” (Kevin Gates) The Army Profession Model is a great vision but if we do not fixed the basics in our upbringing of Soldiers then it will only be a dream. Imagine a panoramic view of an early morning sunrise over a military base. The sun is starting to burn off the morning dew. Formations of soldiers are starting to pop into the picture. Each soldier is in uniform dress sharp and moving as a single unit. Some formations are double timing moving out. Everyone has a purpose and stepping off to get to his or her next obstacle of the day. All Non-commissioned officers are enforcing nothing less than exceeded standards. Soldiers are toe to line in formations for inspection. Senior Non-commissioned