Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should a government have a say in our diet? introduction
Argumentative essays on food and nutrition
Argumentative essays on food and nutrition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Obesity in the United States Obesity is a problem all around the world not only the United States, but many other places! My forte and the stand against the reasoning against the government exploiting regulating the food and drink habits is that they shouldn’t be going around banning what Americans eat, or even drink; it’s our choice to eat and drink what we want not the government they don’t choose what we eat and drink we do! Us Americans, and also my point of view is that we should be able to come home and eat something that Americans want to eat because we want to, not only should we be allowed to eat what we want, but citizens’’ should also be able to drink what we want not have the government regulate everything that we eat and also drink. …show more content…
Also the government is trying to regulate how much we can drink at gas stations or even anywhere in general, they are also banning things over 16OZ’s in the places we eat. This idea might be appealing to some, my dispute against this is that we should be allowed to get a drink that can last us all day. America is the land of the free, now they try to regulate what size drinks Americans and other citizens’ can drink? American citizens should be allowed to stand for this! Americans work for the drinks that we are paying for, is this hurting the government obviously it’s not; it’s effecting our obesity. The government should not be allowed to go and regulate something that Americans work for because it’s what we are doing, it is not fair that they can go and do this. We are not hurting the government by just buying a 32oz, then just having regular …show more content…
It would never change anything, people already knew if it was bad for you, or if it was healthy which is just based on knowledge. People are not going to change the way they eat because they are putting calories on the menus, my thought being because no one wants to change how they eat because they have more knowledge on what they are eating. The government should not regulate what we choose to eat, people would just not listen and keep doing what they do if they were to regulate it. It would put more issues to the American government, If American citizens really care about their health or the way they look, then they will watch out for what they eat and drink; also eat healthier food. Regulating on what we eat and drink is also not a very good idea, to me and we American citizens stand to this choice. Overall, Americans have the knowledge on what’s healthy and what isn’t but it’s only our choice if we want to have obesity, or be overweight. My argument stands against the government regulating on what we eat or drink, because it’s my choice not theirs. There are two sides of the story, which has the good and the bad, but both has to have knowledge. It just depends on if you want to be fat or not, maybe if people really cared about how they looked they could
Radley Balko, The author of the essay “What You Eat is Your Business”, would agree that in order to stop obesity, we must turn this public problem around and make it everyone’s individual responsibility. Instead of inflicting the importance of personal ownership, government officials, politicians and congress make obesity a public problem by prohibiting junk food in school vending machines, federal funding for new bike trails and sidewalks, and restrictive food marketing to children. Overall I agree that this manipulation of food options is not the proper way to fight obesity, however, I think that government should inform people about the food they are eating because then they have no excuses for not taking responsibility of the actions.
If gluttony is one of the seven sins then we have many sinners in America. Obesity is a large problem in this country and more needs to be done to combat obesity. No one good solution, I believe, has been proposed to solve this epidemic. Jonathan Swift had an ingenious proposal to solve the problems of Ireland by feeding the children to the rich, after they reached the age of one. His proposal would have been beneficial because it would have solved many other problems. I have a solution to the obesity in this country that will solve several problems and benefit the country and its people. After people reach maturity and if their stomachs stick out more than 4 inches past their chest cavity, that area between the pectorals, then they should cut this excess flab/flesh and eat it.
Throughout the past years and more here recently obesity has become a fast growing problem in the United States and around the world. Since this has become such a problem certain authors are starting to take a stand in how they think the solution should be fixed. The solutions are discussed in the following articles: How Junk Food Can End Obesity by David H. Freedman and What You Eat Is Your Business by Radley Balko. Both articles have clear and distinct arguments, but the argument by Balko entices his readers and has a clear purpose and tone that allowed his article to be more effective.
This article is talking about a mayor banning beverages larger than 16 oz. at restaurants, sports arenas and movie theaters. The reason this mayor wants to ban large sodas is because he is afraid for all of New York’s health. That’s a good thing because a lot of us don’t know what we drink and eat most of the time. We just eat our food we don’t even bother to look what’s really in side such as calories, fats and oils in our food. This Mayor is doing New York a huge favor by banning large sodas. He’s helping everyone in New York about their health but people of New York doesn’t see that. There are people who are trying to not let him pass this law because some of them probably drink 16 oz. every day of once a week or twice a week or even more.
Obesity in the United States continues growing alarmingly. Approximately 66 % of adults and 33 % of children and teenagers in the US are overweight. Obesity is the result of fat accumulated over time due to the lack of a balanced diet and exercise. An adult with a BMI (body mass index) higher than thirty percent is considered obese (Whitney & Rolfes, 2011, pg. 271).
Obesity has become an epidemic in today’s society. Today around 50% of America is now considered to be over weight. Fast-food consumption has been a major contributor to the debate of the twenty-first century. Chapter thirteen, titled “Is Fast-Food the New Tobacco,” in the They Say I Say book, consists of authors discussing the debate of fast-food’s link to obesity. Authors debate the government’s effects on the fast-food industry, along with whether or not the fast-food industry is to blame for the rise in obesity throughout America. While some people blame the fast food industry for the rise in obesity, others believe it is a matter of personal responsibility to watch what someone eats and make sure they get the proper exercise.
Everyday Americans die from the diseases they carry from obesity. Many Americans over eat because their social problems or because they are hereditary. Many plans have been discussed but finding the solution is the problem. Junk foods and unhealthy beverages have corrupted children’s minds all over the nation and putting a stop on it could lead to other benefits. Unhealthy foods and drinks should be taxed and healthy foods should be advertised more to help prevent American obesity.
The soda ban is a bad idea because there is no evidence it solves anything. In the argumentative article “Soda’s a Problem but…” by Karin Klein, she states “If people are so helpless against soda… people would simply buy two 16-ounce cups.” (Klein, 289) This evidence illustrates that if people wanted more soda they could easily get.
The government must have a say in our diets. Because the issues of obesity have already reached national scales, because the costs of obesity and related health issues have gone far beyond reasonable limits, and because fighting nutritional issues is impossible without fighting poverty and other social issues, the government should control the range and the amount of available foods. The cost of healthier foods should decrease. The access to harmful foods should be limited. In this way, the government will be able to initiate a major shift in nutritional behaviors and attitudes in society.
The obesity epidemic is the country's most serious health issue, When walking down the street notice half of all people you may come across are overweight. This is the reason obesity is now so known because of the way people look, and the weight they put on. Obesity is common and the government wants to ban certain liquids that people drink because of the weight they gain from them, however, I believe people should be able to drink as much as they want even if weight is gained. People shouldn’t be controlled on what they drink because they are their own person, why be controlled when they have the right to drink what they want when they want. In the article “A Ban Too Far” Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York has made health his number one priority
I believe we are the only ones that can determine how we eat, how much we eat, and what we eat. As a society we would want to have full control of our food and I believe their should be some laws or regulations to govern our size of portions in food. I also believe that some companies should change their ways by making their food more nutritious to the consumers. If there is such thing as “healthy readily foods” then their should be more of it. In the three articles “The Business Case for Healthier Food Options by Michelle Obama, “Downsizing Supersize” by James Surowieki, and “Why Shame Won't Stop Obesity” by Dhruv Khullar all talk about obesity and how we can change from it happening to the people in our country.
Society should consider the physical and emotional problems of obesity in our nation. “Obesity is defined as an excess proportion of total body fat (Mayo Clinic).” American society has become increasingly obese, “characterized by environments that promote increased food intake, unhealthy foods, and physical inactivity (cdcinfo@cdc.gov).” Our nation increasingly has become consumers of a fast food diet. It is so simple to just pick up food on the go and not deal with the hassle of cooking and cleaning up afterwards. What are nation needs to acknowledge is the health risks they will obtain if they do not acquire a healthy life style.
By taking a stand against the rise of obesity, America’s bodies will be in healthy condition, and are able to be the positive motivation for others to follow. Once more people choose to live a happy and healthful life, the decrease of obesity will begin to show. The solution to solving the issue of obesity in America can be possible by: eating healthier foods, getting proper exercise, and setting boundaries on what fast-food industries can sell to customers. People need to get up and get moving for the problem of obesity and its trail of nasty effects will consume the healthy way of life everyone knows today.
Many people may argue that banning these foods and drinks will cause businesses to lose money; however, these foods and drinks are causing way too much obesity. Every year the obesity numbers rise. If a person is obese for a long
Brandon R. clark Part of the freedoms of being an American is the ability to decide your own path in life including obesity. When the government interferes with one’s ability to consume beverages either artificially sweetened or naturally sweetened, part of what our nation was based on has been violated. That is what the New York City Health Department did with their experiment against anti-obesity. The ban would prevent retailers from selling sweetened beverages in containers larger than 16 oz. I do not support such ban because I believe in personal choice and the freedom to be an independent thinker. In this report, I will indicate the benefits of my decisions and the negative consequences to retailers and consumers.