Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essay for soda tax
Why soda should be banned
Effects of soda on the body
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentative essay for soda tax
Do you like to have a big soda every once in awhile? Too bad, you can’t gave a large soda with your fries anymore because here comes the soda ban. In New York, Mayor Bloomberg attempted to pass a ban that prohibits all sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces to sold at restaurants or fast food places. Although some people think large soda should be banned because soda is unhealthy, the soda ban is not a good idea. There is no evidence it solves anything, many exceptions that make it pointless, and no fair vote on the law. The soda ban is a bad idea because there is no evidence it solves anything. In the argumentative article “Soda’s a Problem but…” by Karin Klein, she states “If people are so helpless against soda… people would simply buy two 16-ounce cups.” (Klein, 289) This evidence illustrates that if people wanted more soda they could easily get. So, even if there was a ban in place …show more content…
This is and illogical claim because if a decision, such as the soda ban, affects everyone and does not benefit all of them, then a vote should be required for the law. This would make sure all people’s opinions are being considered. In other words, some people may have no health problems and therefore, are able to drink soda when they want to. It is wrong to take away that personal choice just because some people make ignorant decisions. People should be allowed to make their own choices. In the argumentative text “Soda’s a Problem but…” the author states, “It is wrong for one man, even and elected official…, to dictate to people how big a cup of… soda they’re allowed.” (Klein, 288) This presents that drinking soda is a personal choice. No one is allowed to tell you what is good for you, because only you know what is. Some people can have soda and others can’t. Only you know what you want or need. In conclusion, everyone is different and needs to make their own
The article,“ Battle lines drawn over soda tax,” by Associated Press , the Press explains how there is an ongoing “national fight about taxing sugary drinks.” According to Associated Press, “ Health experts say the beverages contribute to health issues such as diabetes, obesity, and tooth decay.” This quote demonstrates that sugary drinks can lead to health issues. Since sugary drinks leads to health issues, people are considering soda tax. This is because thirteen percent of adult minorities are diagnosed with diseases such as diabetes.
The New York Soda Ban is a step in the wrong direction and efforts should be put towards making life better, rather than focusing on a movement that will have little to no effect. Realize that I am not stating the soda should be drank, because even I know that soda is harmful towards the body and is one of the leading causes of obesity. However, I believe that the soda ban will have little effect and that time and money should be applied somewhere where the act would have an effect of making life better. The reason I do not believe this ban will do as much good as stated, is because the ban is flawed. This brings me to my first point, which is, one cup of boysenberry juice has 256 grams of sugar, equaling to 225 calories. One cup of Cola only
Soechtig uses factual data and statistics to further prove the argument of the increasing rate in poor diet among most Americans. The data used puts into view of how large an issue American’s have on their hands. She provides an example of how much damage one drink can have on your body. She expresses that one soda increases the risk of obesity by 20% (Soechtig, 2014). By using this statistic, Soechtig demonstrates the impact sugar has on one’s health. The statistic challenges the people in the audience who believe the idea that “one won’t hurt.” The director is not criticizing those who drink soda, but does hope to encourage and persuade them to make a switch. Even right now, over half of the American
The Prohibition or the Eighteenth Amendment was a huge failure for a law in 1920. There were many factors that led to its downfall that included illegal means, rise of gangsters, and the Twenty- First Amendment. Despite the Prohibition, it did not stop the people from drinking it and accessing it through thousands of speakeasies. It became a most lucrative business for criminals that led to dangerous competition. In 1933, the failed amendment was repealed and most people rejoiced that alcohol was legal again. The Eighteenth Amendment was an experiment that went horribly wrong and did absolutely nothing to bring any positive change. This was proof “that you don’t have to be drunk to come up with a really, really, bad idea.” (Carlson. 141)
Issues: People might not drink soda. Someone might like a different type of soda. Someone might like both, Someone might only eat solid foods and think fluids are useless.
Pratt, Katherine. "A Constructive Critique Of Public Health Arguments For Antiobesity Soda Taxes And Food Taxes." Tulane Law Review 87.1 (2012): 73-140. Academic Search Complete. Web. 24 Mar. 2014.
The New York soda ban would not prove to be effective because it is will bring about a rebellious reaction in some people, it does not include supermarkets, vending machine and convenience stores and refills which means people can go around it and educating people should be the first step towards improvement in their lifestyle.
This article is talking about a mayor banning beverages larger than 16 oz. at restaurants, sports arenas and movie theaters. The reason this mayor wants to ban large sodas is because he is afraid for all of New York’s health. That’s a good thing because a lot of us don’t know what we drink and eat most of the time. We just eat our food we don’t even bother to look what’s really in side such as calories, fats and oils in our food. This Mayor is doing New York a huge favor by banning large sodas. He’s helping everyone in New York about their health but people of New York doesn’t see that. There are people who are trying to not let him pass this law because some of them probably drink 16 oz. every day of once a week or twice a week or even more.
How would you react if you were informed that Congress was passing a law that would make alcohol illegal to buy, sell or consume in the near future? Believe it or not, during the roaring twenties alcohol was banned due to the ratification of the Eighteenth Amendment. During the 1920’s prohibition was approved by Congress to decrease addiction and immoral activity amongst society, but instead it ignited the creation of organized crime. The research I performed supports why prohibition was fought for and legalized, how Americans who opposed prohibition challenged it, and how organized crime was formed.
During the New York soda ban the city produced a regulation banning restaurants and similar venues from serving soda and other sugary drinks over 16 ounces. Conly explains that this is a justifiable action “because there is an obvious obesity epidemic, and there is considerable evidence linking this back to increased portion sizes in restaurants” (Conly 243). I believe that the government does not have a role to protect people from themselves. “Justified hard paternalism” equates the government with being every citizens father, which defeats the purpose of being a free country. From a freedom prospective, there is not a clear distinction as to where you draw the line when telling citizens that it is a good or bad decision for there happiness and well-being. Conly might argue that we protect each other from hurting one another so there is no difference in stopping one another from hurting our own self. Hurting another person is a far stretch from hurting yourself when it comes to drinking too much soda because you are making the decision for yourself and the value of your future. For example, going to church is universally good for every single person in the world, and as a father I will make my children go to church, but if we are a lawmaker in
In the past couple years people all around the nation, whether it's in New York City or an 8th Grade classroom in Michigan, people have been pressed with the question, whether the New York Soda Ban, is a good thing, improving health, or if there is a larger issue. Is this decision showing evidence of the Government interfering with our basic civil liberties?
Reconsidering the use of Soda? What is a soft drink? As defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a soft drink is “a usually carbonated nonalcoholic beverage; especially soda pop” (“Soft Drink”). Why is it called this? Soft drinks are a term that differentiates from alcoholic drinks that are called non-alcoholic drinks.
In May of 2012 Mayor Bloomberg announced his portion cap rule proposal (Renwick, 2013). This proposal would ban the sale of sweet and sugary beverages that are over sixteen ounces in size. This ban would affect movie theaters, restaurants, street vendors, and any other commercial entity that is regulated by the New York City health department (Yee, 2013). This proposal is commonly referred to as the New York City Soda Ban.
It is sad. People from all races and backgrounds are obese. In a recent survey done at Henry Ford College, 43 percent of students were overweight. Whether it is because they do not follow a healthy diet or they inherited it from their parents. Being overweight is correlated with lacking exercise or physical activity and not watching what is on the plate. Obesity can cause many illnesses, including diabetes, which is very common. As the debate whether soda tax should take effect arises, critics say that the tax will help those with obesity-related illnesses. What about exercising and maintaining a healthy lifestyle? These two factors cannot be forgotten knowing they are the most important. Americans have consumed 12 percent of soda and become less active since 1970. A soda tax aims to stop consumers from buying soda to help those who are obese. This will not be effective. Therefore a soda tax will not be good public policy.
Have you ever thought how much soda you consume and how bad it can be for you? Many people will drink soda instead of water, simply because it tastes better. The government should limit the intake of sugary beverages because it can lead to many different problems such as heart disease, obesity, and overall it is an unhealthy life-style. “The average person consumes almost 100lbs of sugar a year, with the single biggest source being soda.” A sugary beverage occasionally would be ok, but drinking it every day would cause problems for you overtime. People drink, more soda than they do water. People should be consuming at least eight 8-ounce glasses a day. Mostly no one will drink that amount of water a day. In today’s society, it can be easy to grab a soda for one dollar and carry on. They may taste better but they are not better for your health. “Sugary drinks include soda, fruit punch, lemonade, and other “aides” sweetened powdered drinks, and sports energy drinks.”