More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast Hamlet film and text
Compare and contrast Hamlet film and text
Compare and contrast Hamlet film and text
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The interpretation of Hamlet’s, To Be or Not to Be soliloquy, from the Shakespearean classic of the same name, is an important part of the way that the audience understands an interpretation of the play. Although the words are the same, the scene is presented by the actors who portray Hamlet can vary between versions of the play. These differences no matter how seemingly miniscule affect the way in which someone watching the play connects with the title character. For example, one way that the Kenneth Branagh and David Tennant interpretations differ is in the speed and inflection of the soliloquys, as well as the ambient audio or lack of, in Tennant’s case, during the respective scenes. During the Kenneth Branagh portrayal of Hamlet the speech is faster and in a forceful tone that gives a feeling that Hamlet is trying to make a point rather than understand the complexity of the situation in his own right. An David Tennant’s approach to the scene is the opposite of the aforementioned Branagh interpretation. Tennant’s Hamlet in a manner in which he is isolated and the only audio that the audience hears is the actor’s voice, in addition to a slow, detached speech Tennant’s version connects with the audience in a more real way, making the onlooker feel as if he or she could be in Hamlet’s position and the weight that he feels in that moment. In comparison to the Branagh version of this scene, where there is less of an emotional emission of angst and more of a pointed anger, thus taking away from what the gravity of the statements in or out of the context of the play. In conclusion, the Branagh interpretation of Hamlet’s scene does not match the emotional connection of the much better staged, inflected, and embodied version starring David
He speaks in a harsher tone than Gibson, and the camera play is though Hamlet is preaching the speech to himself, all the while knowing the other two men are behind the mirror. This in one way Hamlet can take his claim on acting crazy. He even pulls out the dagger and points it at the mirror in a threatening fashion. After his speech he also meets up with Ophelia and this version follows the play.
Both the Tennant and the Branagh version repeat the same soliloquy from the original Hamlet. However they are in different settings with different characters present. They also both speak in a slightly different tone in this speech. In Tennant’s version, Hamlet seemed more sad when giving the speech compared to Branagh’s version, who seemed more calm and relaxed. The Hamlet in Branagh’s version was holding a knife up to the mirror, looking as if he was debating or not to end his life, while the Hamlet in Tennant’s version was just staring off into the distance. They were both in a room, but the Hamlet in Branagh was looking into a mirror. Hamlet in Tennant’s version was by himself, while in Branagh’s version, there were two characters present behind the two-way mirror. I liked Branagh’s version more than Tennant’s version in this scene, because Hamlet’s character I feel fit the speech. It made it seem more interesting to me. With Tennant’s version, I feel it was a little boring because he was not really doing anything, just looking from behind a wall. This is why I like Branagh’s version better in this
Kenneth Branagh’s version of the ‘to be or not to be’ soliloquy, although slightly overdramatic, was superior in delivery and setting. First, Hamlet’s tone held a faint aggressiveness, which helped emphasize his growing dissatisfaction with his current disposition. The other films’ depictions of the scene were dull and lacked the proper emotion required to give life to Hamlet’s internal debate. In addition, the mirror Hamlet faces as he speaks alludes to the derivative and folly of his, and his father’s, vengeful pursuits. Hamlet’s obligation to fulfill his father's demands causes him to self loathe, which leads him to question his existence. As Hamlet approached the mirror with his sword drawn, both Polonius and Claudius flinched in fear,
...ears or express emotions over her death or her madness. Therefore the Kenneth Branagh version of Hamlet was able to show a closer interpretation of the play Hamlet and the significance of the characters.
To play one of Shakespeare’s most complex roles successfully on stage or on screen has been the aspiration of many actors. William Shakespeare’s Hamlet has been the focus on various accounts throughout the 20th Century, each actor attempting to bring something unique and unmarked to the focal character. Franco Zeffirelli and Kenneth Branagh, both film directors, introduce varying levels of success on the screen through downright differences in ways of translation and original ideas. Zeffirelli’s much shorter interpretation of the film is able to convey the importance of Hamlet as a masterwork by using modern approaches to film but still capturing the traditional work behind Shakespeare’s well-known play.
Shakespeare illustrates Hamlet’s thoughts by showing a huge difference in the communicated thoughts employed in the back to back scenes. In Scene 3, Hamlet concluded the scene with intense feelings of anger and motivation to kill, although he was reluctant to act when he had the opportunity to take down Claudius. Shifting over to Scene 4, Hamlet is much calmer while speaking to Gertrude, but maintains a sense of cruelty and judgment within the words he uses to criticize and compare himself to his mother. In both scenes, Hamlet displays an enormous amount of respect for his father by reminding himself and others of what they have done to wrong the previous
Throughout a variety of movie interpretations of a given film, one version proves to be the most effective for distinct reasons. Within Act 3, Scene 4 of Hamlet, Shakespeare provides little direction by which the scene should be interpreted, but the play, taken in its entirety, proposes a certain way in which Hamlet and Gertrude express their emotions. This has led to distinctive cinematic interpretations of this scene, all in which portray the storyline in a unique way. Kenneth Branagh’s version of the closet scene provides a more realistic portrayal of the conflict between Hamlet and Gertrude than the Gregory Dovan and Campbell Scott versions; Branagh’s view on the mother-son relationship, Hamlet’s reaction to the ghost and Gertrude’s guilt is closer to the original text in which Shakespeare leaves room for audience interpretation.
Hamlet, one of the most intricate and influential plays by Shakespeare, debatably of all time. It has inspired not only appreciative readers and writing critiques but continuous generations of people. The inspiration led to the fabrication of many great movies, which wasn’t achievable until the 20th century. Before cinema was the prevalent method of sharing appreciation and spilling emotion for a specific subject, art portrayed what would fly through our minds such as the many interpretations of Ophelia’s death. With the imagery put into motion we can try and pick apart how certain people might view the play being portrayed and choose what best suits our expectation of this tragedy. Other things that only film has been able to present to us is the various camera angles, a setting that isn’t restricted to a stage and an audience that can be reached anywhere in the world. Also who is casted and how they will be dressed is crucial to the success of the movie although sometimes overlooked during the production process. Some movies represent these elements of mise-en-scene in an excellent matter such as the Kenneth Branagh version of Hamlet, while others would seem to disappoint my expectations for a great re-visualization of our suicidal hero like Micheal Almereyda’s Hamlet staring Ethan Hawke. Admirably though every Hamlet film to date has its own unique style, something that will please all audiences, with its unique pros and cons.
In Lesson 19 of the videotape “Literary Visions';, the actor performs two interpretations of the monologue, “To be or not to be';. As said in the video, there are many ways that an actor can choose to interpret that particular speech in Hamlet. Many actors relish the opportunity to perform Hamlet, because of that particular speech. In a play, the actors’ interpretation of the character is what gives the audience the background and insights into the characters’ feelings, since there is not a narrator, like in a short story. Each actor’s version of Hamlet is different, and therefore the interpretation by the audience will be different. There is not a right or wrong interpretation, but a change in the actor’s tone of voice or facial expressions, can transform the meanings of the words. As seen in the video, the actor’s two interpretations of “To be or not to be'; from the video are very different from each other.
Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy is conceivably the most prominent soliloquy in the archive of the theatre. Even now, more than 400 years after it was originally written there is still an air of familiarity that reaches others even if they do not know the play itself in detail. In act 3, scene 1, Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” Soliloquy is critical in developing the plot because this is when Hamlet discusses his most suicidal thoughts.
Different adaptations of William Shakespeare’s works have taken various forms. Through the creative license that artists, directors, and actors take, diverse incarnations of his classic works continue to arise. Gregory Doran’s Hamlet and Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet bring William Shakespeare’s work by the same title to the screen. These two film adaptations take different approaches in presenting the turmoil of Hamlet. From the diverging takes on atmosphere to the characterization of the characters themselves, the many possible readings of Hamlet create the ability for the modification of the presentation and the meaning of the play itself. Doran presents David Tenant as Hamlet in a dark, eerie, and minimal setting; his direction highlighting the
Hamlet's "To be, or not to be" soliloquy is arguably the most famous soliloquy in the history of the theatre. Even today, 400 years after it was written, most people are vaguely familiar with the soliloquy even though they may not know the play. What gives these 34 lines such universal appeal and recognition? What about Hamlet's introspection has prompted scholars and theatregoers alike to ask questions about their own existence over the centuries?
The scene then cuts to Hamlet walking into the theatre and Gertrude asking him to sit by her. Hamlet says no because he would rather sit next to Ophelia who is more attractive. Hamlet then jumps over a row of seats to get next to Ophelia and asks if he can lit on her lap. She says no and then he says no and Hamlet says “my head upon your lap” and Ophelia says that he can. I feel that this sequence shows a lot about Hamlet. First off, wh...
Therefore, it would only make sense if the costumes the actors wear resemble outfits from that time period. Mel Gibson’s costume is black and ordinary. In general, it is something you would expect to see in the medieval era. Kenneth Branagh’s costume is very formal. It makes Hamlet seem very wealthy. After all, he is a prince, therefore this outfit fits the character. Branagh is seen wearing a black suit jacket over a white button up, along with black slacks and black dress shoes. Once again, this resembles something you might expect from the medieval era. Looking both Branagh’s and Gibson’s outfit, the viewer would not think twice about the choice in clothing and the time period it belongs to. David Tennant’s attire, however, does not fit the time period Hamlet is set in. He is wearing an orange shirt and jeans. This takes away from his performance. It is impossible for Shakespeare to envision Hamlet to be wearing something like this. This type of clothing did not even exist during the medieval era. Thankfully, the camera is positioned on his face and not much attention is drawn to his outfit, at least for this scene. Gibson and Branagh make much better use of costume design than
Through the elements of technique portrayed in this essay, it is clear to see that Shakespeare is able to influence the reader through soliloquies, imagery, and dual understanding. This overall influence being both the communication of a deeper meaning, and a more complex understanding of the events and statements within Hamlet.