Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The ambiguity of hamlet
Interpretation of hamlet
Literary analysis of shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
During class we have reviewed many versions of the play Hamlet. The two movie versions that I chose to compare on the play Hamlet are the David Tennant version and the Kenneth Branagh version. I chose these two versions because these were the two that most interested me. I believe that some scenes from each movie were better than the other, but overall I liked these two versions just as equally. The three main scenes that stood out to me that I will be comparing are ‘Ophelia’s Mad Scene’, the ‘Hamlet Kills Polonius’ scene, and Hamlet’s ‘To be or not to be’ scene. Let’s first compare Ophelia’s mad scene, starting with David Tennant’s version. In David Tennant’s version of the scene, Ophelia starts out singing softly to the Queen, Hamlet’s mother, and the King, Hamlet’s father’s brother. …show more content…
She start’s to act like she’s out of control, by pushing and shoving the Queen, dancing in circles, and taking her clothes off. She starts screaming and shaking, and then later walks off happily like nothing ever happened. Branagh’s version of the scene begins with Ophelia lying on the floor wrapped in a straight jacket to refrain her from moving. She talks to the Queen, and convinces her to unwrap her. And when she does, she gets up and starts dancing and screaming, similar to Tennant’s version. She sings, lies on the floor and starts thrusting, and ends the scene with running out of the room with people chasing after her. Both scenes were good, but in my opinion Tennant’s version of the scene I thought was better. This is because I feel like Ophelia in this version did a better job in acting like she was losing her mind. Her actions and tones were fluctuating a lot more than in Branagh’s version, and her shoving people and taking off her clothes added to that. Even though I do like David Tennant’s version better, I do like the idea of Branagh’s version of putting her in a straight jacket. The second scene I will be comparing is the Hamlet killing Polonius scene. Tennant’s scene begins with Hamlet yelling his mother’s name in a strange tone. He’s acting like something is off about him, almost like he is turning insane. He accuses his mother of being a whore, and then grabs her and throws her on the bed. When the Queen starts yelling for help, Polonius responds, and Hamlet grabs a gun and shoots him through a mirror, thinking that it’s the king. Hamlet then goes to check who it is, and when he sees its Polonius, he doesn’t feel any guilt or remorse. He simply waves him off as being useless and continues to yell at the Queen, accusing her of betraying the family and being a whore. The Branagh version is much shorter than the Tennant version and gets straight to the point. But instead of the scene being on the bed in a bedroom, it is on a table. Hamlet begins yelling for the queen, and Polonius goes to hide behind a curtain. Hamlet starts accusing choking the Queen, and when she screams for help, Hamlet takes out a knife instead of a gun. The death is more violent, as Hamlet stabs Polonius multiple times before he realizes it is not the king. He still does not feel remorse, and continues yelling at the queen. In this scene, I liked both versions. I did not have a favorite. I do think though that Tennant’s version does a better job at showing that Hamlet was going insane, from the the tone of his voice when he is calling the Queen and yelling at her. His tone fluctuates, like Ophelia’s in her mad scene, compared to the Hamlet in Branagh’s version. I do not think that Branagh’s version really showed much of his insanity. Besides that he stabbed Polonius multiple times and choked the queen, the tone of his voice seemed more angry than insane. I also liked how Branagh’s scene stuck to the original Hamlet and killed Polonius with a knife instead of a gun. The last scene I will be comparing is Hamlet’s ‘To be or not to be’ scene.
Both the Tennant and the Branagh version repeat the same soliloquy from the original Hamlet. However they are in different settings with different characters present. They also both speak in a slightly different tone in this speech. In Tennant’s version, Hamlet seemed more sad when giving the speech compared to Branagh’s version, who seemed more calm and relaxed. The Hamlet in Branagh’s version was holding a knife up to the mirror, looking as if he was debating or not to end his life, while the Hamlet in Tennant’s version was just staring off into the distance. They were both in a room, but the Hamlet in Branagh was looking into a mirror. Hamlet in Tennant’s version was by himself, while in Branagh’s version, there were two characters present behind the two-way mirror. I liked Branagh’s version more than Tennant’s version in this scene, because Hamlet’s character I feel fit the speech. It made it seem more interesting to me. With Tennant’s version, I feel it was a little boring because he was not really doing anything, just looking from behind a wall. This is why I like Branagh’s version better in this
act. The two movie versions of the play Hamlet I believe were both good. Though I did think some scenes from each movie were better than the other. I liked David Tennant’s version of Ophelia’s mad scene more than Branagh’s version, because of the fact that Ophelia in Tennant’s version seemed more into character, making the scene more interesting to me. With the Hamlet killing Polonius scene, however, I did like both versions. I liked the idea of both and thought it was interesting how Tennant made it a little more modern by using a gun instead of a knife. However I still liked the Branagh version where they stuck to the original and used a knife in the killing scene. With the last scene, the ‘To be or not to be’ scene, I liked Branagh’s version more. I thought both versions were good, but Hamlet in Branagh’s version was more interesting because his tone fit the part and in addition he was holding a dagger. He was also looking into a two-way mirror with two other characters looking at him from the other side. Even though I thought that some scenes from each version were better than the other, I thought both versions of the movie were good and liked them just as equally.
1. In this specific version of Hamlet there are various characters that demonstrate an exaggerative and dramatic persona; Brain Blessed chose to interpret the role of the ghost in the traditional eerie, spooky, and mysterious manner. He does this by being portrayed as a reoccurring pale figure that is only visible to certain people (the traditional characteristics for a ghost). Also he does this by deepening his voice to sound more frightening. In my opinion, I do not think that the performance of the apparition was believable in any scenes in which it appeared simply because I do not think that something that does not exist in reality can be displayed realistically. Moreover and in contrast, I believe
The difference between the setting shows how modern the Kenneth Branagh version of Hamlet is compared to the Mel Gibson version of Hamlet. One of the difference between the two films is the setting and time period. Mel Gibson version of Hamlet is set in a dark and medieval time castle during the 19th century. Kenneth Branagh's movie of Hamlet was set in 19th century making the setting of the castle more of a luxurious modern palace. For instance, In Act 4 Scene 4 during Hamlet’s soliloquy, Hamlet is seen in a setting full of snow in which he emphasize his anger towards the world and Claudius, “How all occasions do inform against me, And spur my dull revenge! What is a man if his chief good and market of his time be but to sleep and feed? A beast, no more.”(4.4. 31-34). The lighting of the movie plays a major role in the production of the film because it demonstrates emotions and feelings from the characters. For instance, in Hamlet starring Mel Gibson the lighting was adjusted to make the scenes darker to show sadness and grief. However in the Branagh version of hamlet the lighting was fairly bri...
William Shakespeare was a legend of playwrights in the 16th century. Centuries have passed since he died, but his work is immortal. Many directors have adapted into plays written by him to make movies after years. The directors adapt and interpret the plays in various ways to influence a specific target audience. Shakespeare’s Hamlet character is very complex because of the two sides of him- real him who wants to avenge his father’s death and the fake side of him where he shows everyone he is completely mad. Each director tries to develop the Hamlet that can influence their audience. Act 5 Scene 2 in Hamlet is a unique scene because of the very famous sword fight between Hamlet and Laertes and various characters’ developments as well as the tragic outcome that makes Hamlet a tragedy. Kenneth Branagh’s version directed in 1996 and Gregory Doran’s version directed in 2009 has adapted and interpreted the original text so to affect their target audience using various filmmaking techniques to show different
William Shakespeare’s plays included different characters and different methods of characterization. The two plays that will be compared and contrasted are William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing and Hamlet. As for the characters from each play, Beatrice, Benedict, Don John, Don Pedro, Claudio, and Hero will be assessed from Much Ado About Nothing and from Hamlet, Hamlet, Claudius, Gertrude, Polonius, Laertes, and Ophelia. The importance of the above characters from each play is that they serve as the basis for identifying characteristics.
Throughout Shakespeare 's play it is clear that Ophelia and Hamlet were lovers but it is not entire certainty whether Hamlet loved Ophelia at the present time. His declaration of love in the written play could have been seen as an indication of his madness. In the film version Hamlet is seen hiding in the bushes while Ophelia 's funeral begins and once he discovers it is her he is overcome with grief to the point where Horatio has to hold him back (Hamlet). The pain on Hamlet 's face is apparent as well as his sanity. Another example of their relationship is in act 3 scene 1 after Hamlet finished his soliloquy he says the line “the fair Ophelia” (Shakespeare 4.1.97) while reading the play I assumed he said this line when he addressed her, and that he was pleasant to her until his madness took over and he became rude. In Doran’s adaptation however Hamlet spoke the line “the fair Ophelia” before she even saw him, he was speaking to himself with a tone of love and affection. Additionally, Hamlet remained pleasant to her until he turned and noticed the security camera (Hamlet). It was only then that Hamlet began to act mad and unpleasant towards Ophelia. This version gave a new depth to Hamlet’s madness and strengthens the idea that he was simply
Applying Showalter’s Idea’s to Branagh's Film Version of Hamlet. Elaine Showalter begins her essay, Representing Ophelia: Women, Madness, and the Responsibilities of Feminist Criticism, by criticizing analyses of Shakespeare's Hamlet that have virtually ignored the character of Ophelia in the past. The feminist critic argues that Ophelia is an important character in her own right, not just a foil to Hamlet.
"I was raped," the girl said to me overtaken with tears. I was taken by surprise and was at a complete loss for words. She had just taken one of the darkest secrets of her life and brought it out to the splendid light for just me to gaze upon. A little apprehensive, I responded, "I'm sorry." What is one to say at the revelation of such a horrid thing? Anything else I thought of saying sounded stupid and insensitive, so I opted for silence and hugged her to comfort her to the best of my ability. A few months later the girl came to me and thanked me. She said that my gesture meant more to her than anything anyone else had said about the rape. I then realized that sometimes, if not most of the time, actions can speak louder than words. The parts of us that are less vocal, such as our clothing, gestures, facial expressions, etc. can be more impacting than words.
“I like the movie but it was not as good as the book” is a saying that is said by most people. In most cases, a movie changes drastically from the book it is based on. Hamlet is one of those cases. Although it does not change completely, there are some big differences and similarities within the book and movie. Reading the play and then watching the movie makes it easier to pick out the differences and similarities. Being able to compare and contrast the movie and play of Hamlet might make it easier to decide which one is better or which one gives a better story. The movie and play of Hamlet are different because of the chronological order, parts being left out and parts being added. They are the same in ways through dialogue, characters,
Hamlet and Lion King are the same and different in many differents ways. Some ways that they are the same is that. In hamlet the brother kills the king (Old Hamlet), and in Lion King scar kills his brother Mufasa. Some differences are that in the lion king it ended happy and in hamlet it didn't end good because hamlet died and his mother did to but he did get his revenge on his uncle. These are just some of the ways that they are.
Hamlet starring Kenneth Branagh exhibits a different approach than most other productions. In the version with David Tennant, we see a slightly modernized way of telling Shakespeare’s story. The director utilizes modern technology to gain a new perspective on the story. Though, it lacks the full context of the play by rearranging and leaving out scenes. This is why I enjoyed the Kenneth Branagh version better despite it being significantly longer. Although, I can not help, but enjoy David Tennant’s better portrayal of Hamlet.
Kenneth Branagh’s interpretation and version of William Shakespeare's Hamlet is better than David Tennant's Hamlet because of the way the directors were able to establish the setting and because the way that the characters were able to interpret and act out the scene.
Different adaptations of William Shakespeare’s works have taken various forms. Through the creative license that artists, directors, and actors take, diverse incarnations of his classic works continue to arise. Gregory Doran’s Hamlet and Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet bring William Shakespeare’s work by the same title to the screen. These two film adaptations take different approaches in presenting the turmoil of Hamlet. From the diverging takes on atmosphere to the characterization of the characters themselves, the many possible readings of Hamlet create the ability for the modification of the presentation and the meaning of the play itself. Doran presents David Tenant as Hamlet in a dark, eerie, and minimal setting; his direction highlighting the
Both Claudius and Hamlet are similar in many ways. They both have trouble taking action and are very indecisive. This can be seen when Claudius wants to pray and repent for his sins but has trouble praying because he does not want to give up everything that he has gained from that sin. He refuses to let everyone know that it was in fact him that killed the king and deal with the consequences that would follow, like him losing the power and respect he gained from being king. This indecisiveness can also be seen in Hamlet when he has trouble deciding whether to avenge his father’s death or if Claudius even killed his father. Even though the ghost of his father came to him and told Hamlet that Claudius poisoned him to take his position as king, Hamlet has trouble acting
For example, when Claudius is praying for forgiveness, Hamlet pulled out his sword and thought that it will be good to kill him at that instance. Hamlet started to think as to how he would kill Claudius and got a flashback of stabbing him in the head. This example shows that he is crazy because he is not able to control is id and wanted revenge right away. A sane person would not fantasize about stabbing another person in the head, especially when they are praying. However, all three films also differ greatly when portraying Hamlet as well. Hamlet is different in his personality when contrasting the three films. In the movie by Laurence Oliver, Hamlet is seen to be more of a dark and depressing person. His clothes are all dark and he is dressed formally which gives the impression of being a quiet person. An example of this is when Hamlet is on top of the cliff. When Hamlet decided not to kill himself, he starts to walk back down the stairs. The stairs are seen to be foggy and dark and this tells the audience of Hamlet’s personality, which is depressing. The effect that this had on Hamlet’s character is that it made him seem to be suicidal. Hamlet did not seem to be very revengeful and made
Michael Almereyda’s movie adaptation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet brings about a new perspective through its performance. The movie adaptation, Hamlet (2000), retells the original play in a modernized setting, bringing out various different elements of characters, which highlights a new reading of these characters as individuals, and a newfangled reading of the play as well. Throughout the movie, Ophelia and Gertrude, the woman-leads, are advanced in a progressive manner compared to the original play. In particular, Gertrude from Hamlet (2000) is noticeably altered from Hamlet, the play. This new interpretation of Gertrude and the play created by the movie adaptation advances the position of Gertrude as a woman, as well as motifs of incest, misogyny,