Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about friedrich nietzsche
Essay about friedrich nietzsche
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Based on one of Friedrich Nietzsche's most distinguished philosophy books written during the 18th century, he develops a new philosophical ideal. In the book "Beyond Good and Evil," Nietzsche inquires a philosophy of the future for "free spirits". Conard argued that Bart Simpson was not Nietzsche's ideal while, on the contrary, Felder argues that Carrie Bradshaw embodies some of the ideals of Nietzsche's new brand of a philosopher. This leads to the question, is Nietzsche's ideal partly embodied in Carrie Bradshaw or Bart Simpson? Many people might view Nietzsche as the self-rule, bad boy, and philosophical delinquent. As a result, they have misinterpreted his ideal of the free spirit which Conard defines as "the person who rejects traditional …show more content…
In fact, it seems as if she is constantly attempting to uncover, interpret, and compose her own set of values. In an episode, Carrie has her shoes stolen at her friend Kyra's kids party. After telling her friends, Samantha, Charlotte, and Miranda, of the occurred events, they give her advice plus mention that she should have Kyra pay her for the stolen pair of shoes. Carrie takes this into consideration and the following day decides to go to Kyra's house and ask her if she had found her shoes. As she replies no, she tells Carrie "oh my gosh Carrie, I'm such a shit. I should have offered to pay for them. I'll write you a check, just tell me how much they were." Once Carrie names the price of her shoes($485), Kyra tells her that that is crazy/insane and she'll give her only 200 dollars. Carrie proceeds by telling her that, that was how much they cost, and she should know because she used to wear them. But then Kyra tells Carrie that yeah, she used to wear those type of shoes "Before she had a real life, but now she has responsibilities, kids, and a house." Through the whole episode, Carrie tried to answer her own question, to why Kyra thought she didn't actually have a "real …show more content…
As Nietzsche describes the free spirit, "To give style to one's character in a great and rare art" is demonstrated by Carrie Bradshaw who definitely has style and taste. She gives style to her life and in the process creates different values. From the episode "Women's right to shoe" we can see that Carrie does not learn valuable lessons about life or does she discover deep moral values, but rather, she discovers her own sense of style and the importance of that style in giving one’s life meaning and
An Analysis of Peter van Inwagen’s The Magnitude, Duration, and Distribution of Evil: a Theodicy
In Beyond Good and Evil 21 Nietzsche argues that an autonomous agent requires being causa sui. The problem with this requirement is that nothing can be causa sui, Nietzsche says that, “the concept of a causa sui is something fundamentally absurd” (BGE 15) and because of this no one can be an autonomous agent. In the following line, Nietzsche asks, “Consequently, the external world is not the work of our organs?” If this is true, that causa sui is absurd and the external world is of our organs, then is it possible that we are autonomous agents or have any sense of agency and responsibility? Nietzsche would say so it seems.
Friedrich Nietzsche was a brilliant and outspoken man who uses ideas of what he believe in what life is about. He did not believe in what is right and wrong because if who opposed the power. Nietzsche was against Democracy because how they depend on other people to make some different or change, while Nietzsche believe they should of just pick the ones that were gifted and talent to choose what to change. Nietzsche also does not believe in Aristocracy because how they depend on an individual person to create the rules or change those benefits for him. As you see Nietzsche did not like how they depend on one person to decide instead of each person to decide for himself for their own benefits.
In his 2004 City Journal article, Theodore Dalrymple expresses his view on the tremendous decline in the quality of life in Great Britain. He believed that society has accepted the notion that people are not responsible for their own problems. Also, that it is the “moral cowardice of the intellectual and political elites” that perpetuates the social dynamics that are responsible for the continuing decline of British society. According to the author, a physician about to retire after a career treating criminal justice offenders and victims, there are several pervasive misconceptions that explain the continuing decline of British society.
Nietzsche’s society depended more on the human’s strength, human nature was seen weak if someone lacks to specific strength. And so because of the society’s stresses and pressures, humans were seen as machines. There was the sense of frustration to be original and creative and that’s why Nietzsche thought that human should be led by a hero.
Characterization: as Carrie hopelessly looks for work she can’t help but keep her eyes off of all the expensive and valuable things in life, the readers later learn that Carrie looks at these things as necessities instead of wants. Motif: Dreiser’s showing that in this point of time, Carrie and others soon to come all have this idea where the less important things in life are needed to maintain a high status, confidence, image, etc.
Morrison has said, "I can easily project into other people's circumstances and imagine how I might feel if...I don't have to have done this things. So that if I'm writing of what I disapprove of, I can suspend that feeling and love those characters a lot. You know, sort of get inside the character because I sort of wonder what it would be like to be this person..." Both her novels, The Bluest Eye and Sula, speak to this statement.
We have grown weary of man. Nietzsche wants something better, to believe in human ability once again. Nietzsche’s weariness is based almost entirely in the culmination of ressentiment, the dissolution of Nietzsche’s concept of morality and the prevailing priestly morality. Nietzsche wants to move beyond simple concepts of good and evil, abandon the assessment of individuals through ressentiment, and restore men to their former wonderful ability.
I think it is very difficult to define the exact character of Dreiser’s "Sister Carrie", and his original intention. I would say, "as many eyes, so many opinions", so no wonder there are different approaches and interpretations towards the novel which is influenced not just by the reader’s reading or personal experience, but also by their particular philosophy of life as well as knowledge about the historical background. "Sister Carrie" can be read as a novel of desire, seduction, or the critique of capitalism and consumerism. It’s definitely not the plot or characters which are dominant elements of it. The taste and the literary value of Dreiser’s novel is shaped and created by its setting and the author’s tone. Chicago and New York have almost as organic and important role in the novel as the characters. They do not just form the simple environment for the novel, but they influence its character and a very strong impression. Chicago’s character is kind of more "positive", it is a city of promise, luck, rise (Carrie). We can say that in Chicago, Hurtswood means something. New York ‘s character is different. It’s a city of lies, fall, impersonal isolation of "walled city where surviving is much more difficult than in Chicago. In New York, Hurstwood means nothing. The setting creates different expectations to people. During the reading of "Sister Carrie", I was interested in searching and revealing the different kinds of desire. Generally we can say that Dreiser deals with the desire of wealth, social status, material things which are represented by money. Within this generalization, we can find and identify many other faces and forms of lust and longing. Carrie, as an ambitious and strong woman embodies the social values of the consumer culture. All she longs for is a material wealth, which represents power. She can be seen as a symbol of money. But Carrie lives in a world of prices. Her labor costs $4.50; board $4 a week; car fare $.60; cheap lunch $.10; etc. She imitates everything perfectly and that’s why she is becoming what people want her to become. Her desires come from other people’s desires. It is exactly Drouet, who introduces her to the world of wealth, to materialism. He gives her money, flat even "name when she enters the world of theater. She plays her role according to Drouet’s desires – once acts as his mistress or "wife".
In philosophy “Nihilism” is a position of radical skepticism. It is the belief that all values are baseless and nothing is known. The word “Nihilism” itself conveys a sense of abolishing or destroying (IEP). Nietzsche’s work and writings are mostly associated with nihilism in general, and moral nihilism especially. Moral nihilism questions the reality and the foundation of moral values. Nietzsche supported his view on morality by many arguments and discussions on the true nature of our inner self. Through my paper on Moral Nihilism, I will explain 5 major arguments and then try to construct a deductive argument for each, relying on Nietzsche’s book II “Daybreak”.
There are points in his essays where he shows that slave has forged a very unique set of skills such as cleverness, and that nobles do not posses this creativity that the slaves might have, but in the my opinion those skills, such as cleverness do not do away with the consistent obsession and passion with the noble that has completely derailed the ability of a person who has the slave morality to be able to see life in the present. Instead the slave focuses on hatred and jealousy. When really they should spend their time on bettering themselves, learning to grow with in their constraints. They should be considering the origin of what good is based on what they do, and not what the world is doing. In conclusion Nietzsche and I both side with the noble morality, and that a person should be focusing on their betterment and not on those who are doing better than them. For that will help a person grow and reach his
Nietzsche’s critique of religion has a lot of merit. To use an example from Nietzsche’s works, if you do not appreciate the dentist who rips out a sore tooth, why then would you follow a value system that kills all passion to prevent one from their stupidity(Nietzsche 51). While many of the values that Christianity condemns have the potential to be harmful,t many positive things may come from them. Ask the question, who does more good; the humble Mother Teressa serving soup to the poor or the greedy Bill Gates providing jobs for millions of people? The humanist values urged by Nietzsche offer a healthier lifestyle than those urged by Christianity. Take enmity for example. Whether it is witches in Salem or heretics in medieval times, in every age the church has tried to destroy its enemies. Immoralist, those who follow anti-Christian morals, recognize the advantage in keeping our adversaries around, and thus are more to...
...ns, he loses validity in his critique of objective thinkers such as Aquinas. His arguments’ inherent contradictions undermine his own assertions and do nothing to lessen the validity of objective claims to truth either. This is again not to agree with Aquinas, but to point out that Nietzsche is still working in a system correspondence in order to refute the correspondence theory of truth. Nietzsche’s primary contribution to ethical theory is the realization that we no longer truly believe in God, that we must confront the consequences of this moral and spiritual gap in our lives and look for something to replace Him. His writings contain criticisms of these new replacements such as skepticism, nihilism, feminism, democracy, utilitarianism and scientific positivism, but these criticisms I don’t believe justify the demarcation of ‘False’ by Nietzsche’s own standards.
On the train to Chicago, Carrie had met a traveling salesman, Charlie H. Drouet. She is impressed by the way he talks and dresses. When they meet again, Drouet is aware of her beauty and innocence and he hopes to charm and seduce her. He "lends" Carrie money to buy nice winter clothes, treats her to fine meals, takes her to the theater, and shows her the sights of Chicago. Because Carrie is young and inexperienced in the world of men, she is not wise enough to understand where all Drouet's attention is leading toward. Although she senses that the money should be given back, her desire and longing for the good things in life are so powerful that she ignores her beliefs in what is right and wrong.
Interestingly, despite Nietzsche’s uncertainty of a self existing he does promote selfishness as a component involved in becoming master minded. This appearance of contradiction further supports his quest for going ‘beyond good and evil’. He chose not to reject the possibility of a self existing because both truth and untruth have worth according to his philosophy and there is much knowledge that we lack, “here and there we grasp that fact and laugh at how it is precisely the best knowledge that wants most to hold us in this simplified, altogether artificial, fabricated, falsified world, how it is willy-nilly in love with error because, as a living being, it is – in love with life!” (Nietzsche 55) To say that because something is uncertain or stereotypically a negative attribute are both actions that go against Nietzsche’s overall philosophy and categorize those articles into being definable as good or evil. Therefore, Nietzsche unabashedly defends selfishness as being a positive characteristic due to it not only being a means to acquire the power he thinks is required to create a master morality, but also because he questions whether the honored characteristics are always being considered worthy for the right reasons. He proposes the following, “Lofty spiritual independence, the will to stand alone, great intelligence even are felt to be dangerous; everything that raises the individual above the herd and makes his