Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ambiguity in language
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ambiguity in language
Ambiguities in Natural Language Processing
Anjali M K1
, Babu Anto P2
Department of Information Technology, Kannur University, Kerala, India1,2
ABSTRACT: Ambiguity can be referred as the ability of having more than one meaning or being understood in more than one way. Natural languages are ambiguous, so computers are not able to understand language the way people do.
Natural Language Processing (NLP) is concerned with the development of computational models of aspects of human language processing. Ambiguity can occur at various levels of NLP. Ambiguity could be Lexical, Syntactic, Semantic,
Pragmatic etc. This paper presents a study about different types of ambiguities that comes under Natural Language
Processing.
KEYWORDS: Ambiguity, Natural
…show more content…
Consider the example,
The horse ran up the hill. It was very steep. It soon got tired.
The anaphoric reference of ‘it’ in the two situations cause ambiguity.
Steep applies to surface hence ‘it’ can be hill. Tired applies to animate object hence ‘it’ can be horse.
2.5 Pragmatic Ambiguity: Pragmatic ambiguity refers to a situation where the context of a phrase gives it multiple interpretation [2]. One of the hardest tasks in NLP.The problem involves processing user intention, sentiment, belief world, modals etc.- all of whichare highly complex tasks.[3]
Consider the example,
Tourist (checking out of the hotel): Waiter, go upstairs to myroom and see if my sandals are there; do not be late; I have tocatch the train in 15 minutes.
Waiter (running upstairs and coming back panting): Yes sir,they are there.
Clearly, the waiter is falling short of the expectation of thetourist, since he does not understand the pragmatics of the situation.[3] Pragmatic ambiguity arises when the statement is not specific, and the context does not provide the information needed to clarify the statement. Information is missing, and must be inferred.[5]
Consider the example
I love you
Moral ambiguity is lack of clarity in decision making. Basically, moral ambiguity is when you have an issue, situation, or question that has moral or ethical elements, but the morally correct action to take is unclear, due to conflicting. The author of The Kite Runner is Khaled Hosseini, the book is about a boy named Amir and how much of a easy life he has at first, but near the middle of the book his life is horrible from there to the end of the book.
If you have ever had a conversation with someone whose first language is not the same as your own, you are probably familiar with the idea that there are certain words and phrases that do not translate perfectly from one language to another. This conflict is usually a matter of one language having a single word or succinct phrase for a concept which another language might need an entire sentence to capture.
364) - This leads to the confusion of a statement's meaning. Due to a phrase being unclear, it can be interpreted with many different meanings.
At times, we sometimes say things without having a full understanding of what we are talking about.
Chapter seven begins by explaining an example that would make the case against using ambiguity. In fact, the title of chapter seven is “Avoid Ambiguity”. While it is true that vague statements leave questions unanswered, the traditional idea behind gathering information is to find specific details and clear communicated information. Ambiguous communication can be dangerous in some situations where the consequences of not understanding the complete picture can cause harm. Therefore, communication of specific information is needed in some situations, however, the author then goes on to explain how the ambiguous statement or event can lead to more accurate and applicable solutions.
e-b) What context clue(s) did you expect the other person to consider so that they could accurately interpret what you said and did? (10)
Besides, Donnellen criticized that Russel on ambiguity denoting phrase, which means that there is a different meaning. I think that what Kripe do can solve it because as people may use semantic meaning differently and they may be affected by the environment. This seems that all theory cannot avoid this, which means it is not a problem of Russell solely. Also, even different people have different use of words, it seems that this will not affect the true value of a definite phrase. For example, even I mistake on Peter and think that he is Ben. It seems that when I use the name, I still refer to that person, Ben. The name which I used still belongs to that person that the name
Sentiment analysis known also as polarity classification , subjectively analysis, opinion mining, affect analysis, its relishing field of study that that deal with people’s opinions, sentiment , emotions and attitudes about different entities such as products ,service ,individuals ,companies ,events and topics; and includes many fields like natural language process, machine learning, computational linguistic ,statistics, and artificial intelligence . it’s a set of computational and natural language techniques which could be leveraged in order to extract subject information in a given text .
Pragmatics Aspects: Deixis and Distance, reference and inference, conversational implicature, anaphoric and cataphoric reference, presupposition, entailment, direct and indirect speech acts and speech events, cultural context and cross cultural pragmatics, conversational analysis and background knowledge, denotation and connotation meaning, the four maxims and hedges.
There are many types of polysemy, some of which view the polysemous word as having primary meaning and secondary meaning, i.e. the meaning which a word refers to in the external world and what it refers to in the second understanding of the word. Other types of polysemy can be dealt with lexically, i.e. these types view the literal meaning and the figurative meaning of the polysemous word. Accordingly, there is referential polysemy, and lexical polysemy which is subdivided into linear polysemy and subsuming polysemy.
... applied on different Domain data sets and sub level data sets. The data sets are applied on Maximum entropy, Support Vector Machine Method, Multinomial naïve bayes algorithms, I got 60-70% of accuracy. The above is also applied for the Unigrams of Maximum entropy, Support Vector Machine Method, Multinomial naïve bayes algorithms achieved an accuracy of 65-75%. Applied the same data on proposed lexicon Based Semantic Orientation Analysis Algorithm, we received better accuracy of 85%. In subjective Feature Relation Networks Chi-square model using n-grams, POS tagging by applying linguistic rules performed with highest accuracy of 80% to 93% significantly better than traditional naïve bayes with unigram model. The after applying proposed model on different sets the results are validated with test data and proved our methods are more accurate than the other methods.
Expressions such as these can cause miscommunications, misunderstandings, and basically just a lot of confusion.
The field of Computational Linguistics is relatively new; however, it contains several sub-areas reflecting practical applications in the field. Machine (or Automatic) Translation (MT) is one of the main components of Computational Linguistics (CL). It can be considered as an independent subject because people who work in this domain are not necessarily experts in the other domains of CL. However, what connects them is the fact that all of these subjects use computers as a tool to deal with human language. Therefore, some people call it Natural Language Processing (NLP). This paper tries to highlight MT as an essential sub-area of CL. The types and approaches of MT will be considered, and limitations discussed.
Meaning can be studied in two ways: semantically and pragmatically. Semantics is the study of the meaning of words, phrases and sentences of what the speaker says. The focus is on what the words and sentences conventionally mean. For example, semantic studies are concerned with topics such as metonymy, prototypes and synonyms. However, pragmatics deals with what the writer or speaker of certain words or sentences intends to convey. Leech (1983) defines pragmatics as the study of meanings according to speech situations. Yule (1996) states that pragmatics is the study of what a speaker means of uttering a sentence .In uttering...
C. Bizer, J. Lehmann, G. Kobilarov, S. Auer, C. Becker, R. Cyganiak, and S. Hellmann. Dbpedia – a crystallization point for the web of data. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the WWW, September 2009.