Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad
British impact of imperialism on africa
Analysis of heart of darkness by conrad
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad
Chinua Achebe’s essay An Image of Africa and Hunt Hawkin’s work Heart of Darkness and Racism both discuss the nature of Racism that is manifested on the novella by Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness. According to Achebe’s essay, Conrad is a ‘’thorough-going racist’’ (p.343), who refuses to grant human expression and language on Africans. He criticizes Conrad for having an antipathy towards Black people and accuses Heart of Darkness for depicting the Western culture’s stereotype of Africa and therefore giving a false impression of the continent and its people to readers. On the contrary, Hawkin’s essay in a certain degree agrees with Achebe that Conrad’s work has some parts which are racist, and its language dehumanize the Africans. However, …show more content…
Conversely, Hawkin opposes this notion and attributes Conrad’s image of Africans as necessary for his objective to show Europeans as the true hazard. Furthermore, Marlow disapproves the cruel exploitation of Africans in the novel and he appears to be ‘horror-struck’ (p.373) and resentful of the Belgian’s conquest. According to Hawkin, this makes it clear that Conrad’s racism is not his own but intentional and aims to make the reader censorious about who the real enemy of the novel is. Similarly, Achebe foresees the view that Conrad’s racism is not his own and it is intentional and therefore admits that ‘Conrad very clearly expresses his condemnation of European cruelty’ (p.369). However, Achebe draws the ultimate conclusion that Conrad’s racism was not to oppose European cruelty due to the lack ‘of an alternative frame of reference by which we may judge the actions and opinions of his characters’ (p.342). He argues that Conrad chose to distant himself from the characters consciously so that readers won’t accuse his literary work as racist. In brief, Achebe halts that Conrad’s racism is part of his personal attitude rather than a political attack to European
Chinua Achebe, a well known writer, once gave a lecture at the University of Massachusetts about Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, entitled "An image of Africa: Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness." Throughout his essay, Achebe notes how Conrad used Africa as a background only, and how he "set Africa up as a foil to Europe," (Achebe, p.251) while he also "projects the image of Africa as the other world,' the antithesis of Europe and therefore of civilizations" (Achebe, p.252). By his own interpretations of the text, Achebe shows that Conrad eliminates "The African as a human factor," thereby "reducing Africa to the role of props" (Achebe, p.257).
Imperialism in America At the turn of the century, America and the views of its people changed. Many different ideas were surfacing about issues that affected the country as a whole. The Republican Party, led by William McKinley, was concentrating on the expansion of the United States and looking to excel in power and commerce. The Democratic Party at this time was led by William Jennings Bryan, who was absorbed in a sponge of morality and was concerned with the rights of man.
Achebe, Chinua. "An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness." The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch. New York: Norton, 2001. 1783-1794.
In the present era of decolonization, Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness presents one of fiction’s strongest accounts of British imperialism. Conrad’s attitude towards imperialism and race has been the subject of much literary and historical debate. Many literary critics view Conrad as blindly accepting the arrogant attitude of the white male European and condemn Conrad to be a racist and imperialist. The other side vehemently defends Conrad, perceiving the novel to be an attack on imperialism and the colonial experience. Understanding the two viewpoints side by side provides a unique understanding that leads to a commonality that both share; the novel simply presents a criticism of colonialists in Africa.
Modern American imperialism continues to thrive on the racial domination and national oppression of African Americans, albeit in a different way. The historical relationship between slavery and capitalism is important because the racial context of American capitalism continues to be staggeringly evident in our society today. African Americans can no longer be bought and sold as slaves, but they are the ones most affected by our current economic crisis. They suffer higher unemployment rates, sharp declines in household wealth as well as losses of homes, health services, and pensions. According to The State of Working America, in 2010, 27.4% of African Americans lived in poverty, compared to the overall U.S. poverty rate of 15.1%. In addition
Achebe, Chinua. An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness. New York: Wylie Agency, 2006. Print.
"I don't want to bother you much with what happened to me personally,' [Conrad] began, showing in this remark the weakness of many tellers of tales who seem so often unaware of what their audience would most like to hear" (Conrad, 9). Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad's best-known work, has been examined on many bases more than I can possibly list here, but including imperialism, colonialism, and racism. I would reason that all bases of analysis are perfectly acceptable through which to critique Conrad's novella, or any piece of writing. I would reason this, were some of these bases mainly, racism not taken to an extreme level. In arguing racism, many critics seem to take Heart of Darkness as Conrad's unwavering view on Africa, Africans, life, or whatever else one may please to take it as. I, therefore, propose that Heart of Darkness be taken for what it truly is: a work of fiction set in late 19th century Europe and Africa.
* Watts, Cedric. “‘A Bloody Racist’: About Achebe’s View of Conrad” in Joseph Conrad; Critical Assessments, Keith Carabine, ed., Volume II: ‘The Critical Response: Almayer’s Folly to The Mirror of the Sea’ (Mountfield: Helm Information Ltd., 1992)
In “An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness," Achebe takes note of the ways that Conrad degrades Africans by reducing their religious practices to misconceptions, belittling their complex geography to just a single mass of jungle, telling them to remain in their place, and taking away their capability of speaking. Achebe criticizes Joseph Conrad for his racist stereotypes towards the people of Africa. Achebe also sensibly labels these stereotypes and shows that Africa is, in fact, a rich land full of intelligent people who are, in fact, very human. Works Cited Achebe, Chinua. JSTOR.com - "The New York Times" Indiana University Press, 1978.
Depiction of Africa in Heart of Darkness Chinua Achebe believes that Joseph Conrad's Heart Of Darkness is racist based on Conrad's descriptions of Africa and it's people. Achebe, author of Things Fall Apart, stresses Conrad's depiction of Africa as the antithesis of Europe and civilization, and the animal imagery present throughout the novella. Heart of Darkness, written in 1899 during the period of British Imperialism, concerns a British trading company and their expedition into the Congo for ivory. The African natives are treated brutally by the Europeans, and despite Conrad's casual condescension towards the Africans, one cannot help feeling resentment at the unnecessary cruelty they must endure.
An Image of Africa Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad has been depicted as “among the half-dozen greatest short novels in the English language.” Chinua Achebe believes otherwise. In Chinua Achebe’s An Image of Africa: Racism is Conrad’s Heart of Darkness he simply states that, “Joseph Conrad was a thoroughgoing racist” [pg.5]. Achebe argues that the racist observed in the Heart of Darkness is expressed due to the western psychology or as Achebe states “desire,” this being to show Africa as an antithesis to Europe.
For many, the novella Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad is a tale of ambiguity. Through racism, moral corruption, violence and many other factors contributing to many different critiques and criticism, people are torn between the good and bad of Joseph Conrad. Achebe was one who made their beliefs on Conrad clear; Conrad was a racist whose racist views were shown through his tale. On the contrary, Jonathan Jones and Mark Dintenfass argue that Conrad was not racist, that he was trying to “.. capture life's true nature - which for Conrad was unsettling and anxious..”. For me, Joseph Conrads novella portrayed racism, but I cannot directly connect the racism to Conrad because of the imperialistic views of that time frame.
Achebe, Chinua. "An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness." Heart of Darkness: An Authoritative Text, Backgrounds and Sources, Essays in Criticism. 3rd ed. Ed. Robert Kimbrough. New York: W.W. Norton, 1988. 251-262.
Heart of Darkness is a story in which racism presents itself so deliberately that, for many, the dilemma of race must be tackled before anything else in the book may be dealt with. Conrad used derogatory, outdated and offensive terminology to devaluate people’s color as savages. This use of language disturbs many readers who read this book. Although Conrad uses racist language in this book, it doesn’t mean that he is really racist. When we look at the language, we are just looking at the very surface of the story.
Conrad is essentially comparing the distant and primitive past of Europe to the present time of Africa. This contrast of the civilized Europeans and the savage Africans is common throughout the entire book. For example, Marlow, after being in the jungle for some time, had a moral change when he transitioned from hating lies with a burning passion into telling his own lie at the end of the story. The corruption that Africa has upon the sophisticated Europeans arises throughout the entire novella. Some might say that this is racist in some way, but others might argue that it is a matter of fact instead of being racially charged.