Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about nietzsche
Essay about nietzsche
Nietzsche the gay science book 5
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay about nietzsche
Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Gay Science offered us only a glimpse of what Nietzsche has to offer. By bringing his teachings into high school classrooms and becoming a standard high school curriculum can truly benefit and further enrich a young student’s education. Babette E. Babich talks about Nietzsche’s style in her article “Self-Deconstruction: Nietzsche’s Philosophy as Style.” In her article she states that, “Nietzsche’s style grants neither the casual reader nor the diligent commentator an automatic access to the text” (Babich 105). From what Babich says here, she is trying to allow her audience to know that Nietzsche’s work makes a challenge for the reader to digest. She goes on to explain how, “Nietzsche’s style is neither convoluted nor obscure. Owing to its manifold variety, however, Nietzsche’s style is elusive, and it is a truism that Nietzsche is difficult to read” (Babich 105). Babich describes how Nietzsche’s style is a bit more analytical, because how Nietzsche writes forces the reader to truly comprehend his work while knowing that it might be hard to read. Kathleen Higgins further talks about Nietzsche’s writing style in her article, “Nietzsche’s Nursery Rhymes.” She begins by saying that, “Despite this widespread recognition of Nietzsche as an attentive stylist…that open The Gay Science” (Higgins 397). Higgins tries to explain that the style of the rhymes that open The Gay Science should be valued rather than ignored. Finally she states, “Nietzsche’s exploitation of popular formats, illuminates the way they manipulate our awareness” (Higgins 400). Here she confirms how Nietzsche’s writing almost gives us a sense of strength in terms of building our awareness while reading his works. In another one... ... middle of paper ... ... (1986): 663-72. JSTOR. Web. 21 Apr. 2014. . Higgins, Kathleen. "Nietzsche's Nursery Rhymes." Historical Reflections / Réflexions Historiques 21.3, Nietzsche: Voices, Masks, and Histories (1995): 397-417. JSTOR. Web. 21 Apr. 2014. . Stegmaier, Werner. "Nietzsche's Doctrines, Nietzsche's Signs." Journal of Nietzsche Studies No. 31 (2006): 20-41. JSTOR. Web. 21 Apr. 2014. . Stern, Tom. "Nietzsche, Freedom, and Writing Lives." Arion 17.1 (2009): 85-110. JSTOR. Web. 21 Apr. 2014. .
Brizee, Allen, and J. Case Tompkins. "Purdue OWL: Literary Theory and Schools of Criticism." Welcome to the Purdue University Online Writing Lab (OWL). 21 Apr. 2010. Web. 21 Apr. 2011. .
Haas and Flower then provide an example [Page 177], of the differences of a student reader and an experienced reader. The example shows a remarkable difference between the two, the student reader was able to identify the situation and paraphrased what he found out. The experienced reader not only identified the situation, but provided a theory to attempt to explain what the author was trying to do; this is quite different than what the student reader provided. I believe Haas and Flower added the example to emphasize the difference of the conclusions that the student reader and the experienced reader came to. By adding the example, Haas and Flower were also able to support rhetorical reading and the difference it made between the readers. Haas and Flower then state the following: “While the student reader is mainly creating a gist and paraphrasing, the experienced reader does this and more – he then tries to infer the author’s purpose and even creates a sort of strident persona for the writer” [Haas and Flower, 177] The following quote is basically the description of the experiment, and explains the difference in the student reader’s response to the experienced reader’s
What do you think of when you think of complex writing? Many people would think of something that they couldn’t read because it was to hard to read. That issue is exactly what is being addressed in the world of academics today. Academics today are writing to a level that is very hard to understand, sometimes even to fellow academics. To the advantage of those who hate reading complex writing, other writers and researchers are starting to speak out on the topic. A newer style of writing is becoming more popular through the controversy. That style of writing is clear and concise writing. It is still controversial as to what is the “best” or what should be used as the common writing style, but there could be a time in the near future that writing by academics and less scholarly people, alike, are writing in the same way.
Fort, Keith. “The Function of Style in Franz Kafka’s ‘The Trial’.” Sewanee Review 72 (1964): 643-51. Rpt. in Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism. Ed. Dennis Poupard and Paula Kepos. Vol. 29. Detroit: Gale Research Company, 1988. 198-200.
1970, pp. 7-8. Rpt. In The Chelsea House Library of Literary Criticism. New York.:Chelsea House Publishers, 1988.
Berger makes his attempt to inform an audience with an academic background that there is a subjective way that we see things all around us every day and based on our previous experiences, knowledge, and other things that occur in our lives, no two people may see or interpret something in the same way. In the essay Mr. Berger uses art as his platform to discuss that we should be careful about how people look at things. Mr. Berger uses rhetorical strategies such as ethos, pathos, and logos. These rhetorical strategies can really help an author of any novel, essay, or any literature to truly get the information they desire across to the audience in a clear and concise
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, CSLI, Stanford University, 26 August 2004. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nietzsche-moral-political/> Strander, Brian. Who is the ‘Sovereign Individual’? Nietzsche on Freedom.
On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense, Nietzsche. United States of America: Bedford/St.Martin's, 2001. 1171-1179. Print
Myers, D.G. “In Praise of Prose.” Commentary Magazine May 2010: n. pag. Web. 27 Jan. 2011. .
By looking at one of Nietzsche’s specific postulations of perspectivism, we can get a better idea of precisely how this term applies to his philosophy and how it relates to the “tru...
Friedrich Nietzsche’s On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense represents a deconstruction of the modern epistemological project. Instead of seeking for truth, he suggests that the ultimate truth is that we have to live without such truth, and without a sense of longing for that truth. This revolutionary work of his is divided into two main sections. The first part deals with the question on what is truth? Here he discusses the implication of language to our acquisition of knowledge. The second part deals with the dual nature of man, i.e. the rational and the intuitive. He establishes that neither rational nor intuitive man is ever successful in their pursuit of knowledge due to our illusion of truth. Therefore, Nietzsche concludes that all we can claim to know are interpretations of truth and not truth itself.
Friedrich Nietzsche saw himself surrounded by a world of human constructs. Humanity had become a herd, clinging to these concepts like cattle grazing at a favorite patch of grass. Individual identity struggled to exist. The morality of the mediocre reigned supreme. Nietzsche lived in a dead world.
To truly comprehend works of Friedrich Nietzsche, one must speak only in riddles and think constructively of confusing contradictions. This is to reflect exactly how Nietzsche thought and wrote philosophy himself: paradoxically. A fine example from one his works to demonstrate this is Beyond Good and Evil, a compilation of Nietzsche’s random thoughts, “One MUST repay good and ill; but why just to the person who did us good or ill?” (42). Nietzsche in this context asserts the idea that one should do good or bad things regardless of what has been done onto that individual. Whatever the case, he is often remarked as a beautiful poet and proprietor of several rather significant ideas such as Will to Power, Übermensch, Amor Fati, and most notably,
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, the brilliant mind behind the 17th century’s epic poem “Faust”, illustrates a combining structure of desire and self-indulgence. His idea was to capture the ideal image of good vs. evil and how easily it can be misconstrued. “Of all the great dualities of hum an experience 'good and evil' have been the most instrumental in shaping the beliefs, rituals, and laws, of Homo Sapiens.”(Argano)