Analysis of Friedrich Nietzsche´s Book 5 of The Gay Science

Friedrich Nietzsche’s own skepticism symbolized the secular changes in contemporary Western civilization, in which he details mankind’s break away from faith into a new rule of chaos. In Book 5 of The Gay Science, Nietzsche establishes that “God is dead”, meaning that modern Europe has abandoned religion in favor of rationality and science (Nietzsche 279). From this death, the birth of a ‘new’ infinite blossoms in which the world is open to an unlimited amount of interpretations that do not rely on the solid foundations of faith in religion or science. However, in contrast to the other philosophers of his age such as Immanuel Kant and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Nietzsche deviates from the omniscient determinism of history towards a more disorganized progression of history. In short, Nietzsche objects to Hegel’s and Kant’s notion of the teleological aspect of the progressive history of humanity because Nietzsche views that human progress cannot be distinctly determined by a single plan but rather random events that support individual freedom.

Nietzsche exclaims that the establishment of the new infinite was a direct consequence out of humanity’s general seclusion from faith. Since the old infinite was built out of a divine foundation in a desperate human attempt for certainty, much of the interpretations of the old establishment were widely accepted to the whole, while individual perspectives were abandoned for a herd mentality. Kant and Hegel are unintentional supporters of the old infinite, since their own interpretations about finding truth in the world and its past experiences are similarly trying to advocate a collective perception of the world, much like Christianity. The two philosophers look back on the history of huma...

... middle of paper ...

...ur new infinite since we finally have the capacity to voice our very own thoughts.

Nietzsche demonstrates how the world and its human inhabitants are more productive when left to its own intentions. Even though “God is Dead”, science has served as religion’s substitute, in which Nietzsche can only describe as the “Error of errors” (Nietzsche 301). Ultimately, Nietzsche advocates for the rule of chaos, since it separates from humanity’s need for certainty and truth that arises from science and religion. The importance of such unpredictable events nurtures the freedom of spirit of the individual as he relishes in the uncertainty and the spontaneous elements of new infinite. In such independence, there is hope that the individual can create his own destiny in such that we now possess the capacity to claim our own interpretations in a world we are undeniably a part of.