Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Feminism in Indian literature
Indian feminism in Indian English literature
Feminism in Indian literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Feminism in Indian literature
“ ‘Your wife’s wow,’ added Prabal...For a moment Sanjeev stared at him blankly, then blushed; once at a dinner party Prabal had pronounced that Sophia Loren was wow, as was Audrey Hepburn.” (153)
The fragility of marriage is an issue that is almost constant throughout Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies. Lahiri demonstrates that marriages are held together by a verbal promise that obscures the fact that a person falls in love, not with another person, but with the way that person makes him/her feel about him/herself. In “A Temporary Matter,” Shoba and Shukumar’s relationship is destroyed because of their loss of the ability to make each other feel the way they once did. In “Sexy,” Miranda falls for Dev because he makes her feel important and
…show more content…
Lahiri writes, “As the cab sped down Beacon Street, he imagined a day when he and Shoba might need to buy a station wagon of their own, to cart their children back and forth from music lessons and dentist appointments,” (3) showing to what extent Shukumar identifies as a father. The station wagon in this passage represents a new role for Shukumar as well as a completely new lifestyle. Lahiri goes on to emphasize that “once, these images of parenthood had troubled Shukumar, adding to his anxiety that he was still a student at thirty-five” (3) because Shukumar identifies so much with becoming a father that he worries that his current situation isn’t adequate. Shukumar and Shoba have almost no qualities of lovers, so once they lose their identity as parents, they have essentially nothing holding them together. Lahiri writes, “He thought of how long it had been since she looked into his eyes and smiled, or whispered his name on those rare occasions they still reached for each other’s bodies before sleeping,” (5) illustrating the dullness of their relationship since the death of their baby. Another contributing factor to the decay of Shoba and Shukumar’s relationship is the different levels of closure that the each gets with their baby. Lahiri adds, “She would look around the walls of the room, which they had decorated together …show more content…
Shukumar escapes by passivity, and Shoba escapes by becoming more active and eventually leaving the marriage. Lahiri begins to show this by writing, “In the beginning he had believed that it would pass, that he and Shoba would get through it all somehow...But it wasn’t a consolation…pouring out the extra bit Shoba left for him, along with an empty mug, on the countertop.” (5) This passage proves Shukumar’s passive response to the rift between him and Shoba because of his assuming that their marriage will improve, but lack of action to fix anything on his own. The empty mug Shoba left for Shukumar is a symbol for the emptiness of their marriage and a sign that Shoba needs Shukumar to do something to fill it. Lahiri also shows Shoba’s more active reaction to her baby’s death by writing, “She’d come from the gym. Her cranberry lipstick was visible only on the outer reaches of her mouth, and her eyeliner had left charcoal patches beneath her lower lashes,” (1) demonstrating that opposite to Shukumar who spends his days inside their home and in the nursery, Shoba spends large parts of her days at the gym. This passage also shows the facade Shoba puts up by messily putting on makeup after her workout, to mask the true sadness she feels. This facade adds to the collapse of Shoba and Shukumar’s relationship because neither Shukumar
Diction is the precise choice of words and style of expression used by an author. The use of diction is observed multiple times in the short story A Temporary Matter by Jhumpa Lahiri. In A Temporary Matter, married couple Shoba and Shukumar experience the loss of their newborn baby during childbirth. The fatality of their child results in their marriage to slowly deteriorate and eventually cease. The conflicts within their marriage are perceived to be the result of a communication barrier; however, Lahiri's use of diction reveals they are experiencing greater conflicts. Diction has the capability to deliver powerful messages to readers; such as the concept that Shoba and Shukumar’s marriage is in a state of war.
Miranda thinks she is in love with Dev but in reality she is not because she doesn 't know him as a person at all. She soon realize this after the child tell her the meaning of Sexy. It because of her innocent and lack of knowledge of good relationship with people. She finally lets go of the romance when she knew that it would not change at all because he is a marry man. The main character seem to not be in love with Mala even though they have meet several of times before, It just like how Miranda does not know Dev in any way and is in love with him. They are arranged to be married to each other and force to live with each other. He even mention how he was not touch by her words when a letter was sent to him. The main character did not even kissed or hugged his wife. He just knew that she was the perfect wife do to the explanation given to him by his older brother.” The only thing I ws not used to was Mala.” (Lahiri 's 190). I think he was afraid to get to know someone he didn 't know about. It may be because he grew up in a different way than his wife. It was something he could not get used to. Shoba fell out of love with his wife even though he tried to get back with her. He did not know that he was not in love with her anymore. He assume that they would be together after the second day of the game they played. It was like he was getting things
“Theory of Marriage” is one of the poems in which Mark Doty read while visiting the students here at Ramapo College. After reading the title of the poem one expects that the content of this written work will focus on, well the theory of marriage; however, after reading the poem it is to some confusion to find out that the face value of the poem is actually about Doty and his friend at a massage parlor. It was only through Doty’s emphasis on certain words such as “oh” that I later realized his poem is not about the pain that the masseuse was giving to him but rather the pain that marriage caused. The way he read the lines, from the pauses to his facial expression really opened up my eyes to see that nothing is as it seems, especially when it comes to
Brockmeier’s short story represents a damaged marriage between a husband and a wife simply due to a different set of values and interests. Brockmeier reveals that there is a limit to love; husbands and wives will only go so far to continually show love for each other. Furthermore, he reveals that love can change as everything in this ever changing world does. More importantly, Brockmeier exposes the harshness and truth behind marriage and the detrimental effects on the people in the family that are involved. In the end, loving people forever seems too good to be true as affairs and divorces continually occur in the lives of numerous couples in society. However, Brockmeier encourages couples to face problems head on and to keep moving forward in a relationship. In the end, marriage is not a necessity needed to live life fully.
...as the day we married.” (p 23) On the surface, all seems well; however if on looks closer one can see a very sad occurrence-taking place. Most couples who have lasted a goodly time together will not answer the question, “Do you love your spouse like the day you married?” Invariably man and wife will reply, “No, I love him/her more than the day we married.” Long married couples become closer. Intimacy grows in the physical as the couple’s love proportionally grows all more. The growth is palpable to the individuals within the marriage. Furthermore, as life’s hardships are over come together, the couple’s love will grow exponentially. Welty understands this yet chooses a different path for the Fletchers. Some place in time, either by Mrs. Fletchers pride or by Mr. Fletcher’s inability to deal with confrontation, the growth of which should have taken place will happen.
Not all characters get a happy ending, and a particular character’s husband turned out to be someone much different than who she believed to be marrying. Through dishonesty, confusion, and chicanery, each character had a helping hand in dishing out each other’s fate, but nonetheless, the relationships that resulted in a law-binding marriage beat destiny and overcame every hardship standing in the way of love and happiness.
A History of Marriage by Stephanie Coontz speaks of the recent idealization of marriage based solely on love. Coontz doesn’t defame love, but touches on the many profound aspects that have created and bonded marriages through time. While love is still a large aspect Coontz wants us to see that a marriage needs more solid and less fickle aspects than just love. The first chapter begins with an exploration of love and marriage in many ancient and current cultures.
Love and affection is an indispensable part of human life. In different culture love may appear differently. In the poem “My god my lotus” lovers responded to each other differently than in the poem “Fishhawk”. Likewise, the presentation of female sexuality, gender disparity and presentation of love were shown inversely in these two poems. Some may argue that love in the past was not as same as love in present. However, we can still find some lovers who are staying with their partners just to maintain the relationship. We may also find some lovers having relationship only because of self-interest. However, a love relationship should always be out of self-interest and must be based on mutual interest. A love usually obtains its perfectness when it develops from both partners equally and with same affection.
In the short story “The Cheater’s Guide to Love” by Junot Diaz, the author pinpoints on the Yunior’s life as a writer and college professor who is also struggling with his romantic relationships. The short story is filled with his experiences of using women for his beneficial needs and how it negatively affects him. It focuses on Yunior’s downfall through life after the destruction of his relationship with his fiance. The diction includes the narrator’s hateful consideration of women and a paradox of his own endeavors which prevent him from pursuing a meaningful relationship, but he grows to realize that he treats women awfully and his ex did the right thing by leaving him due to his untruthfulness.
Love is a concept that has puzzled humanity for centuries. This attachment of one human being to another, not seen as intensely in other organisms, is something people just cannot wrap their heads around easily. So, in an effort to understand, people write their thoughts down. Stories of love, theories of love, memories of love; they all help us come closer to better knowing this emotional bond. One writer in particular, Sei Shōnagon, explains two types of lovers in her essay "A Lover’s Departure": the good and the bad.
The women we have encountered in this unit are trapped in various ways. Mrs. Mallard in Kate Chopin's "The Story of an Hour" is most trapped by love. The protagonist in Godwin's "A Sorrowful Woman" is a little freer and the protagonist of Minot's "Lust" is the freest of all. Mrs. Mallard wants to be free from her husband love. She is a target in their. She felt mistaking getting married and non-end able love of Breantly. However, she is feeling happy after hearing the new, of her husband's death. This news was confirmed by the man were working near the railway line and her husband friend Richards. She does not think it is a bad news, she "stood, facing the open window, a comfortable, roomy armchair". She started thinking, "in the open square before her house the tops of trees that were all aquiver with the new spring life" want her to get ready and start spring with a new ways. As compared to the protagonist of Godwin's "A Sorrowful Woman", she free of doing or saying anything to anyone. Her husbands always say, "I want you to feel freer, he said, understanding these things (40)". Ev...
...e same home, As a result Shukumar loses work time when Shoba is home. After the loss of their child, this couple really fell apart. The reader can interpret this as the couple got together to reproduce and when that failed they had nothing left. Considering how recent this was it is surprising that the couple is already over the death of the child. The couple is not completely over the death of the child, but they aren’t still grieving and only are upset when it is brought up.
These factors lead to the unraveling of the relationship as the conflict precedes and is described through both of their views on the issue. As the topic of their son was brought up, which is the cause of the confrontation, the woman immediately “withdrew shrinking from beneath his arm”, illustrating how she feels as she faces him in such a situation (33). The woman feels she must make herself and her emotions smaller, ultimately concealing them completely from him, as she faces him due to his inability to understand her, avoiding his questions and comments. Throughout the poem she seems insistent in leaving their home saying “[She] must get out of [there]. [She] must get air” because she feels suffocated both by his way of responding to situations which have taken an emotional toll on her and her incapability of being able to have closure on the situation while living in conditions that are not being of assistance to her (39). These actions show how she has to alter some aspects of her personality when speaking to him to please him, and he feels like he has to do the same. As he says “A man must partly give up being a man / With women-folk”, he is describing how he feels he must give up his opinion or view on certain topics and even says “[they] could have some arrangement by which [he’d] bind [himself] to keep hands off / Anything special [she’s] a-mind to name” (52-55). He continues by describing how having such disagreements and having to make compromises with each other are part of being in a relationship “Though [he doesn’t] like such things ‘twix those that love”, but now that he sees how serious she is about
Marriage a la Mode, by John Dryden, is an ode to the concept of marriage and love within the period of Restoration England. Dryden, presumably, presents two pairs of couples, Rhodophil and Doralice, as well as Melantha and Palamede, in a way that expresses an imperative tone towards marital relations. Throughout the playwright, he uses these couples and their mistresses to allocate the issue of broken, miserable, thorny marriages. Although marriage was common, there was a strong presence of moral emancipation, which Dryden presents through these relationships. These themes of dissatisfaction and obligation towards the concept of marriage are noted throughout the playwright, as Dryden uncovers how each character feels.
The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy tells the story of the communist state of Kerala and the forbidden love between two castes, which changes the lives of everyone. In the novel an ‘Untouchable’, Velutha is a carpenter and works at Paradise Pickles and Preserves for much less than he deserves because of his status as an Untouchable in the caste system. Velutha falls into a forbidden love with a divorced woman, Ammu who is associated with an upper caste Syrian Christian Ipe family. Marriage was the only way that Ammu could have escaped this life, but she lost the chance when marrying the wrong man, as he was an alcoholic and this resulted in them getting a divorce. Ammu breaks the laws that state ‘who should be loved, and how and how much’, as their affair threatens the ‘caste system’ in India, which is a hierarchal structure and social practice in India in which your position in society is determined and can’t be changed. Arhundati Roy portrays the theme of forbidden love within the caste systems and shows how they are t...