Knowledge sharing: Knowledge sharing occurs when an individual is genuinely interested to have or to give knowledge to someone then this process is successful and effective, if a person provided with wrong or vague knowledge that’s mean the knowledge sharing process is stuck over there. Goh (2002) proposes that knowledge sharers should always share the full circumstances of a case, not selected circumstances. Bornemann and Sammer (2003) say: Knowledge as a resource of value creation, allows
information and knowledge is a powerful resource that enable organization and employees or individuals to achieve several benefits such as improved decision making, learning, general knowledge and level of understanding. Therefore, any organization public or private can get benefits from implement knowledge management on their organization. According to Tallman (2004), organization engaged in collaborative inter-organization business process need to distribute information and knowledge to upsurge their
search for knowledge when they need it. However only some of them will take the initiative to share their knowledge or expertise with the others. Hendriks (1999) believes that knowledge sharing is a process of communication in which the knowledge creator externalises and the knowledge recipient internalises knowledge. Knowledge sharing is defined as the sharing of community related information, ideas, suggestions
Importance of Sharing Cultural Knowledge Understanding academic-level texts requires a certain level of cultural literacy. If a group of people were to read one article about cats and one about the quantum entanglement theory, it is quite clear as to which article would be better comprehended among the group. Ignorance of a particular subject will inevitably lead to confusion and misunderstanding among readers. Best-selling author and educator E.D. Hirsch, Jr. believes that a shared cultural knowledge is crucial
1.8 Martin Soley and Kaushik V. Pandya presented a different perspective to achieving competitive advantage through cultivating Knowledge sharing culture in their article, “Culture as an Issue in Knowledge Sharing: A Means of Competitive Advantage”. When considering the role that culture plays in knowledge and Information Management (IM) of any organization there are several aspects of the business one can look into. The article looked at business activities of several UK based companies as a major
impacts the way companies manage their information and internal knowledge. This position has many titles, but most commonly is referred to as the CKO, the chief knowledge officer. The responsibilities of this position primarily focus on managing unstructured information and internal knowledge. Xerox refers to this raw data as assets, or more formally, “intellectual capital,” “knowledge assets,” or “intangible assets.” Because knowledge management is considered a tactical occupation, Xerox considers
Knowledge Management (KM) is taught at the Mission Command Center of Excellence (MC CoE) located at the back side of Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Some will argue that KM is the mission command enabler and the bridge between mission command Warfighting Function (WfF) and the network (Kitchens, 2011). There are 12 principles to Army Knowledge Management Doctrine. A crucial piece of KM is leadership support and buy in. The four most relatable principles to me are: Principle 1, Train and educate KM leaders
FILE SHARING Ethical Debate with Today’s Technology (INTRO) You may have illegal content on your computer right now! File sharing has become a very large issue today in society even though it has existed for decades. It has been the recent advances in our technology that has made it main stream and in the eyes of the general public. File sharing today tests the limits of technology along with our ethics making it a fuzzy grey area. When discussing file sharing's effect on society, first you should
information flows freely and knowledge is infinite. We have embraced the concept of freedom and taken several levels farther than what our forefathers imagined. Whether we realize it or not, we naturally question the unknown and demand answers to our questions (and quick answers at that). The technology we live with today was nothing more than dream decades ago. Yet with these new technologies and information at our disposal, an issue we fight against unnecessarily is file-sharing music online: a redundant
movie pirating occurs due to the fast online connections that the universities provide. File sharing programs like Kazaa and Limewire run ramped on college campuses making this an interesting alternative to explore. With this subject hitting close to home, I choose to research it and find out why it would be a good alternative to the free downloads that we receive from online people to people file-sharing programs. While there are a few sites out there that offer this kind of pay-per-view service
Napster was an American company that created a revolutionary platform that allowed for music sharing online. Originally, it was established as a peer-to-peer file sharing service that emphasized the exchange of MP3 formatted soundtracks. Founded in 1999, by Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker, who rebounded post-Napster to become the first President of Facebook, it operated between June 1999 and July 2001. It was a revolutionary because the network allowed for music to be “set free” – suddenly, an incredible
services sectors and the domestic or consumer service sectors, across the fields of entertainment, communication, and information sharing and the website that I am using for my case study is one of them. Imeem.com is a unique file sharing social networking site where individuals pool their time, experience, wisdom, resources, and creativity to form new information, knowledge, and cultural goods. Drawing from Henry Jenkins work I will focus on how the website is redesigning the digital economy, renegotiating
precedent that has influence the mode and means of digital works distribution. The outcome of Napster affects both businesses and individuals. Napster, a free online file sharing network, allowed peers to share digital files directly with each other by way of connections through its software and system. The no cost peer-to-peer sharing gained popularity, particularly with trendy music. A&M Records took notice of all the free digital music downloads and brought suit against Napster for direct, contributory
The Ethics of File Sharing Software Introduction The purpose of this paper is to discuss the ethical problem that file sharing software creates when used to transfer copy written material. It is contested that the very existence of this software promotes piracy. The paper will focus on the creators of the file sharing software, knowing that the user employs their product illegally. The software creators (Kazaa, Grokster, Morpheus, etc) are claiming that they cannot control what the end user
distributing that information. They are based on the belief that those who discover information should have some control over who can use that information. The control is mostly intended to allow the discoverers to make money through distributing the knowledge only to those who pay them. However, such control is inherently inefficient and infringes on the rights of the users to obtain the information they need. Copyright laws should be abolished because they are economically unsound. If a person obtains
Facts of the case: Napster was a peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing application that was created by Shawn Fanning in 1999. This application was developed so that users could share compressed music files with other users by searching their hard drives and transferring copies of the files via the free Napster software. Though Napster aided in the facilitation of these file transfers, it did not store music files on a server or any other company owned computer or storage device. Popularity of Napster
pirate and hacker subcultures there is a hierarchy that is based on the level of technical skill and the amount of files that are shared. Those with a high level of technical skill, who readily break copyright law and share files and provide file sharing services are given a high level of respect. Those individuals are called “citizens” by the rest of the community because they disseminate pirated materials to the rest of the community and work to better the community as a whole instead of focusing
infringement would proliferate in the following years, causing a radical revision of American ideas and laws towards intellectual property. What has happened since then? Who was right? This paper analyzes the situation then and now, with the knowledge that these trends are still in a state of transformation. As new software and hardware innovations make it easier to create, copy, alter, and disseminate original digital content, this discussion will be come even more critical. Whereas Rose
Piracy is a form of theft. Specifically, it refers to the unauthorized copying or use of intellectual property. Intellectual property is knowledge or expression that is owned by someone. There are three major types of intellectual property: 1) creative works, including music, written material, movies, and software, which are protected by copyright law; 2) inventions, which are protected by patent law; and 3) brand-name products, which are protected by trademarks. Many of the issues surrounding piracy
amendment and will lead to a corrupt information sharing system. One of the biggest reasons that SOPA should be stopped is because it is directly against the first amendment. For example, Wikipedia would be able to write articles on a site such as The Pirate Bay or Kick A** Torrents, but if they were to include the link to the sites, they could get into trouble with government for supplying their readers with the links to sites that support online file sharing. This would go against freedom of speech. “As