Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Building cohesive teams through mutual trust
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Building cohesive teams through mutual trust
1. INTRODUCTION The application of information communication technology such as an Internet connection and a computer, smart phone or a tablet has facilitate to link people from different location.. Even though they are physically distant from one another, they can be linked up from just about anywhere. Most virtual community users search for knowledge when they need it. However only some of them will take the initiative to share their knowledge or expertise with the others. Hendriks (1999) believes that knowledge sharing is a process of communication in which the knowledge creator externalises and the knowledge recipient internalises knowledge. Knowledge sharing is defined as the sharing of community related information, ideas, suggestions …show more content…
They might not feel comfortable to interact and share their knowledge and insight with someone they do not know. The fundamental problem faced by organizations is that many employees lack the desire to share their knowledge with other members of the organization (Denning, 2006). It is important to educate people the value of sharing critical and personal knowledge with colleagues across an entire enterprise, providing them with a way to easily connect with one another as well as to create their sharing reputation virtually. Workers need to keep pace with new knowledge and insights that are available around the organization to be used effectively in order to help the company stay relevant. When knowledge workers hoard their most precious asset, they stifle the company’s ability to innovate and remain competitive. Thus might affect the organization’s performance as they can’t maximum their worker’s knowledge …show more content…
As trust plays a more important role in social transactions than in economic transactions (Bartol and Srivastava, 2002; Mariotti, 2011; O’Donohue et al., 2007), trust can therefore facilitate knowledge sharing because voluntarily sharing one’s knowledge with others is a social transaction (Montoro-Sanchez et al., 2011; Soliman and Spooner, 2000). In order to make the knowledge as an asset, it is important to build up trust berweeen the company workers in order to encourage them for knowledge sharing. If they felt their knowledge is secured, they it is more easy for them to share their knowledge with their co-workers. However, there is none recognized method that is available to meet the user’s requirement in order to build trust and relationship
Knowledge work according to Raman, (1999), contains activities, which are "information-based, knowledge intensive and knowledge generating" (p. 2). The paper's theme is, "organizations staying ahead of the competition have come to realize knowledge and knowledge workers are their key to success in today's environment where knowledge and information have become commodities" (Raman, 1999, p. 1). This paper's theme traces the historical development of knowledge management and knowledge workers; differentiates between knowledge workers and non-knowledge workers, and illustrate the knowledge workers experience in the author's organization. Knowledge systems contain the potential to increase business value (Bang, Cleemann, & Bramming, 2010).
According to me, the claim that shared knowledge is better than personal knowledge does hold true for majority of the time because no matter how smart one person is, a group of people would always have more knowledge to contribute than one person would. Since shared knowledge is possessed by many peopl...
To start my answer related to trust, I would like to start with few quotes that shows the power of trust like, “without trust we don’t truly collaborate, we merely coordinate or at bets cooperate. It is trust that transforms a group of people into a team “- Stephen M.R Covey
Today's business world is a very delicate model and can break down with the slightest of ease. One of the most important aspects of a successful business is a good, strong management team followed by a good, intertwining associate team. The two groups serve, as different operational structures yet need to coincide on a very strict level. For a business's employees to be at arms with each other can create a big problem that happens to be at the prime area of business. This area is the area of direct customer interaction. To not keep the customer happy is to douse oneself with gasoline and proceed to striking a match. This problem brings us back to the introduction of trust and professionalism among workers.
Three basic functions of knowledge creation, knowledge storage/ retrieval, knowledge transfer and knowledge application are mostly discussed in present literature (Holzner & Marx 1979; Pentland, 1995). However, very few studies are found providing all three functions in a single ground to facilitate knowledge management outcomes and optimal performance within given context. Thus, knowledge management framework is built on two critical dimensions: knowledge management outcomes (knowledge creation, retention and transfer) and properties of knowledge management context (properties of units- an individual, a group and an organization, properties of the relationships between units and properties of knowledge) (Linda Argote et al., 2003). According to their view, all knowledge management outcomes are related to each other and occur within any knowledge management contexts. The contribution of this framework is to take count on all basic knowledge management functions in all possible contextual aspects to integrate the literature, where most of the theory in knowledge management is designed to discuss only one outcome and/or one context at a point of investigation. It entails that the property of units, property of relationship between units and property of knowledge in knowledge management context determine the effectiveness of knowledge management outcomes. Ability, motivation and opportunity are three
An online community is a network of people who come together and communicate online, usually because of a common interest or goal. There are many different types of online communities. Some examples of online communities are: email distribution lists, message boards and newsgroups, instant message (IM) services, chat rooms, blogging sites, social networking sites such as MySpace and Facebook, and online classrooms/school groups. I intend to discuss three of these types of online communities – chat rooms, social network sites, and online classrooms/school groups – and look into the pros and cons of using each of these.
...bjectives and realize growth. Knowledge Management Knowledge management plays a key role in ensuring that the different functions and activities of a company are synchronized. In Google’s case, the purchase of Motorola (which has turned out not to have been the best business decision) probably could have been avoided if the knowledge within the company was managed and used better. Knowledge enables a company to create, recognize and distribute opportunities. When every employee of a company contributes his or her part of knowledge into the knowledge pool, it is very beneficial as it contributes to the overall success of the company. Proper application of the available knowledge in a company can offer several competitive benefits to both the company and the employees. Application of accurate knowledge at the correct situation helps a company to make good decisions.
However, the mobile society helped to connect people and places together, for example, I talk to my aunt everyday and she also used to visits us every year in the summer. The example proves that even if there are distances between the people or the relatives they easily can talk and visit each other because of the new technology. the relationships can still be strong from distances, my cousins and my family members live in many different countries, but we still talk, chat and communicate every single day. even if there are distances between people they still can be in a strong relationships with their friends and relative.
Today the world has more and more of free flow of information leading to transfer of knowledge from a person or an organization to others. Whereas this invariably leads to faster development, it also impacts the competitive advantage held by the innovators of processes or technology. It has therefore become strategically important for one and all in business to understand the knowledge, processes and controls to effectively manage the
People also known as human resources are key in knowledge management and as such must be given consideration in any knowledge management practice. As already stated, knowledge is the basic of knowledge management, and people are the primary conveyor of this knowledge in the form of tacit knowledge, even in explicit knowledge, people are needed to ensure codification. In line with this, Aziri, Veseli and Ibraimi (2013) note that organizational knowledge and knowledge management is dependent on human resources. Also, Armstrong (2006) asserts that people influence knowledge management by promoting an open culture that values/inspires sharing of knowledge; promote a climate of commitment and trust; develop systems and policies for knowledge management among
A new vocation has developed within corporations that drastically impacts the way companies manage their information and internal knowledge. This position has many titles, but most commonly is referred to as the CKO, the chief knowledge officer. The responsibilities of this position primarily focus on managing unstructured information and internal knowledge. Xerox refers to this raw data as assets, or more formally, “intellectual capital,” “knowledge assets,” or “intangible assets.” Because knowledge management is considered a tactical occupation, Xerox considers the CKO a part of the upper management team. An effective CKO should be able to create an alignment with unambiguous knowledge and culture within a company (Leibowitz, 2002).
The growth and advances in information system technology nowadays have lead to the sharing of data and information in variety of digital or electronic form such as newspaper online, e-journal, video, images and many more. This happens because of the existence internet and technology that used by almost everyone around the world. The technology makes it possible for people to access valuable information through millions of websites that have been produced by people who are willing or intend to share the knowledge. The technology also allows people to communicate with one another by sharing the digital information through email, instant messaging or in social networking medium.
In most organizations, effective utilization of knowledge increases productivity, creates competitive advantage and, ultimately, improves profits.
Wang, J., & Fang, Y. (2005). Benefits of Cooperative Learning in Weblog Networks. Online Submission, Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Knowledge retention is an important part of knowledge management. According to Daniel Alpert at the University of Oklahoma, knowledge retention strategies improve innovation, organizational growth, efficiency, employee development, and competitive advantage. At the UNESCO meeting on High Level Group of Visionaries on Knowledge Acquisition and Sharing, which met in June 2007, they stressed the need for improved knowledge acquisition models and strategies (Liebowitz, 2009). He also mention the key reason for performing knowledge retention is to grow the institutional memory of the organization. In this manner, employees can learn from past successes and failures to ensure positive results. Learning from others could help avoid going down the wrong paths or reinventing the wheel.