Napster Case Study

713 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Napster incident according to legal and ethical

A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. is a landmark case in which the application of intellectual property laws has forever impacted contemporary culture with regards to digital works. The legal issues presented in the instant case resulted in a holding, which set forth a precedent that has influence the mode and means of digital works distribution. The outcome of Napster affects both businesses and individuals. Napster, a free online file sharing network, allowed peers to share digital files directly with each other by way of connections through its software and system. The no cost peer-to-peer sharing gained popularity, particularly with trendy music. A&M Records took notice of all the free digital music downloads and brought suit against Napster for direct, contributory, and vicarious copyright infringements (Washington University School of Law, 2013). First, it is important to discuss the direct, contributory and vicarious infringement claims against Napster. Direct copyright infringement claims are based on a breach of a copyright owners’ exclusive rights to the copyrighted work(s). A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004, 1013 (9th Cir. 2001). Napster was found liable for this because the users used its platform to upload and download copyrighted music, thus infringing on
Id at 1013-1014. Fair use is a limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights, as well as a defense to infringement. It states that activities that would normally constitute infringement do not if used for “for purposes of such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research.” 17 U.S.C. § 107. There are four factors to consider when applying this

Show More
Related

  • The Napster and Grokster Cases: Differences and Similarities

    883 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the text A Gift of Fire, Napster “opened on the Web in 1999 as a service that allowed its users to copy songs in MP3 files from the hard disks of other users” (Baase, 2013, p. 192, Section 4.1.6 Sharing Music: The Napster Case). Napster was, however, “copying and distributing most of the songs they traded without authorization” (A Gift of Fire, Section 4.1.6 Sharing Music: The Napster Case). This unauthorized file sharing resulted in a lawsuit - “eighteen record companies sued for contributory infringement claiming that Napster users were blatantly infringing copyrights by digitally reproducing and distributing music without a license” (Communications Law: Liberties, Restraints and the Modern Media, 2011, p. 359).

    Read More

  • Online Music Distribution In A Post-Napster World

    994 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before the 1990’s, if people want to listen to music, they just visit a music store and pick up a CD and then put it into a stereo equipment. However, the development of MP3 file format gradually changed the way people listen to music. This format lets everyone download music easily and it can be converted to CD as well. But, there is still a problem: searching MP3 files on the internet is maddening and people seldom can find the music they want. Therefore, the birth of Napster solved this problem, creating a virtual music community in which music fans could use the Web as a “swap meet” for music files. More importantly, Napster is easy to use and it’s free, which expands the range of audience in age. Bandwidth also contributed to Napster’s success. The greater the bandwidth, the faster the file can be transferred. So, Napster really changed the way people listen to music, discover music and interact with music.

    Read More

  • Universal Music Group Case Study

    835 Words  | 2 Pages

    Universal Music Group (UMG), an American-French global music corporation is one of the world 's’ top three major record labels. It has about 28 percent of the total US album market share and earns yearly revenues of $1.5 billion dollars. The label has one of the most impressive catalogs globally which include superstars such as Lady Gaga, Justin Bieber, Avicii, Kanye West and Bon Jovi. Universal, like all the other major labels, has sub-labels. Def Jam Recordings and Island Records are a couple examples of the many labels that exist under UMG.

    Read More

  • Walt Disney Studios Copyright

    588 Words  | 2 Pages

    Walt Disney Studios is suing Professor Faden for infringing its copyright by using Disney clips in “A Fair(y) Use Tale.” Professor Faden claims he did not infringe Walt Disney Studios copyright. He took bits and pieces of Disney movies and made a video of all the clips that he used for fair use. Faden was using pieces of Walt Disney Studios movies for educational purposes, and never broke the copyright laws, therefore, it was noninfringing. The definition of fair use is a legal doctrine that portions of copyrighted materials may be used without permission of the copyright owner provided the use is fair and reasonable, does not substantially impair the value of the materials, and does not curtail the profits reasonably expected by the owner. He didn’t use a whole movie from Disney, just

    Read More

  • Investigating the Factors Affecting the Time Peiod of a Pendulum

    1434 Words  | 3 Pages

    involved. After I have done this I can decide which factor to use as a

    Read More

  • Copyright Law: Fair Use

    1447 Words  | 3 Pages

    Fair use is somewhat a replication of copyrighted work completed for a restricted purpose, for example to leave a remark, duplicates a copyrighted work or, censure. These uses could be done without the copyright owner’s approval. Instead of breaking the copyright law, fair use is a defense. The four factors used to determine whether or not a use is fair are “(1) the intention and disposition of the use.- which is the determining factor which the courts rely on to make a decision as to whether the use is fair and what was the purpose. (2) The copyrighted features. – When the reproducer is sent to court they exam the types of material to see if it factual. (3) How much form was taken from the copywriter. – No one really knows how much to take from a copyright work because there is no manual. As an alternative courts evaluate the uses and their comparative to the work. (4) If market or income was taken away from the owner. – This is one of the utmost important factors in the court because the court will exam the affect of the market. (Crew 2).

    Read More

  • Why Is Texting More Popular Than Making Phone Calls?

    668 Words  | 2 Pages

    Under some situations, called fair use, it is legal to reproduce a copyrighted work without the permission of the copyright holder. Some of the examples of fair use are citing short excerpts from copyrighted works for the purpose of teaching, scholarship, research, criticism, commentary and news reporting. Some of the factors that have to be considered for treating as fair use are

    Read More

  • Is Downloading Free Music from the Internet Legal?

    903 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 2000, Metallica filed a lawsuit against Napster and won. As a result, Napster banned about 300,000 of its users who were sharing Metallica songs. Soon after, the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) filed a suit against Napster and the file-sharing server was forced to shut down. [1]

    Read More

  • Essay On P2p Networking

    777 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...music. Napster worked through the use of a main server hosted by Napster that contained a central repository. Users would connect to this main server to search for a desired MP3 file and the server would search the server database for a different user in possession of that file. Once a user with the file was found, the two users would become directly connected and the file could be downloaded. Due to the use of this central server, Napster could be considered a type of “brokered” P2P networking, as the two peers only connect after Napster resolved the IP addresses between the two PCs [4]. Regardless of the moral or legal issues surrounding Napster, it is irrefutable that Napster was instrumental in how peer-to-peer networks work today.

    Read More

  • Pieles de La Garriga Case Study

    1850 Words  | 4 Pages

    The next step is to choose the criteria that we are going to take into consideration. In my opinion, the most important criteria are the following (their order does not indicate their importance):

    Read More

  • Copyright vs. the Right to Copy

    2191 Words  | 5 Pages

    RIAA. "Copyright Basics", "Napster Lawsuit Q & A." Recording Industry Association of America Home Page. May 7, 2000. http://www.riaa.com

    Read More

  • Copy Right Law Essay

    1100 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Copyright law, provision was made for specific uses of copyrighted work where permission to use is not required, and the copyright holder cannot sue for unauthorized use. This is called "fair use." Specifically, these uses are: teaching, criticism, review, news, parody and satire. Many people have interpreted fair use to mean "as long as you don't sell it, you can copy it. " This is not true.

    Read More

  • Copyright Law

    990 Words  | 2 Pages

    particular interest to educators is the “fair use” doctrine, which extends a get-out-of-jail-free card (so to speak) to anyone using copyrighted...

    Read More

  • Essay On Downloading Music

    759 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the modern world, as technology improves, it has become popular to obtain the digital copies of songs from online stores such as Amazon and iTunes, without even leaving the house. Unfortunately, many people choose to steal their favorite songs from countless available file sharing sites and peer to peer networks. Most music files downloaded from internet and peer to peer networks are illegal, this commonly includes MP3s created from CDs that are posted online by people who have not acquired permission from the artist or record company to do so. Downloading MP3s and other illegal music formats distress the music industry radically. It is estimated by the RIAA that 3.6 billion songs are illegally downloaded each month and It is also believed by (IFP, 2009) that 95% of music files downloaded from the internet are illegal. Thus, colossal number of dollars are lost as an eventual outcome of pirating. The primary explanation for downloading music illicitly is because it is available and free. Some music downloaders do not even feel that downloading and sharing music through peer-2-peer and copying from CDs as ‘stealing’ astute work of the musicians, composers and recording companies and this creates the problem.

    Read More

  • File Sharing

    1349 Words  | 3 Pages

    Napster was just another step into the huge world we know as the internet or the World Wide Web. It was a step I believe in the right direction, but some people have differing views. Napster is a program in which people could chat, share files such as mpeg or mpeg3 layered files or other formatted files across the internet. This program was very controversial because it was a very well made program. Its design and user interface was extremely easy to use. Therefore it attracted more and more people to the files sharing business. I am going to tell you about how Napster works, why it is so controversial, some supporting points, some countering points, its status today, and what is on the outlook for the future.

    Read More

More about Napster Case Study

Open Document