Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the effects of texting
Advantages and disadvantages of text messaging and calling
Channels of communication advantages and disadvantages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the effects of texting
1. Why is texting more popular than making phone calls? Texting is more popular than making phone calls because it is quick, easy and convenient to connect to the people. Texting is more convenient because they can reply whenever they want as to having to answer phone call. For example it is easier to text compared to phone call when they are working at office or in an important meeting. It is used to communicate with friends and family. Multiple conversations can be done at a time by replying to several people. Communication through phone calls can be time consuming, costly and an inefficient way to share electronic data. 2. What are two benefits and two disadvantages of Internet censorship? Benefits of Internet censorship Protecting children …show more content…
Some consider freedom of expression to be a basic right and if they restrict on this they might stop sharing their creative works and thoughtful opinions. Decreased access to vital information There are different websites on internet that provide useful content and harmful content. It might be difficult for the government to make right decisions about what to eliminate and what to keep. There are chances that in this process some websites which has useful information might be censored and public will not be able to access the site. Some might rely on the internet for fun activities, where as others use it for a wide range of necessary information. 3. Should universities have the right to suspend students enrolled on their campuses who brag about breaking university rules on their personal Facebook or MySpace Pages? Universities should understand and develop policies about social networking sites before taking any action against students. They should clearly mention what is misconduct in their policies. The students should follow the rules that universities has and they should not post any offensive material about the university on their personal Facebook
In “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” Dana Fleming presents an essay concerning the safety of social networking sites and how Universities can deal and prevent problems. This article is targeted towards school administrators, faculty, and a social networking user audience who will either agree or disagree with her statement. I believe Fleming presents an excellent, substantial case for why she reasons the way she does. Fleming gives a sound, logical argument according to Toulmin’s Schema. This essay has an evident enthymeme, which has a claim and reasons why she believes in that way. Toulmin refers to this as “grounds."
Higher education law attorney Dana L. Fleming voices her controversial opinion in favor of institutionalized involvement in social network protection in her article “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” (Fleming). Posted in the New England Journal of Higher Education, winter of 2008 issue, Fleming poses the question of responsibility in monitoring students’ online social networking activities. With a growing population of students registering on social networks like Facebook and MySpace, she introduces the concern of safety by saying, “like lawmakers, college administrators have not yet determined how to handle the unique issues posed by the public display of their students’ indiscretions.” However, while Dana Fleming emphasizes the horror stories of social networking gone-bad, she neglects the many positive aspects of these websites and suggests school involvement in monitoring these sites when the role of monitoring should lie with parents or the adult user.
In the case described in Document D,a student named J.S. was suspended for creating a Myspace profile which ...
...own Facebook account and be “friends” with their students to keep them safe like Boyd recommends. Instead, I believe by talking to students and children about how their posts directly impact their reality is a more effective approach in teaching how to prevent and remedy any inflictions that will be caused by adolescent lapses in judgment. Just as my brother has never posted another indecent photo and learned to limit his online profile content, people do learn from their mistakes. Educators should have an open door policy fortified by trust between themselves and their children in order to guide them in making appropriate decisions.
Social media prevents you from getting into college, especially when you post bad things. The article “How Social Media Can Affect College Admissions states” “The Kaplan study also reported that 12% of college admission applicants we rejected were because of what they saw on social media” (2014). This shows that even though 12% might not seem like a lot it should be 0%, considering it is a very easy thing to prevent. Also, you can be so booksmart and still not get into your dream college because of your account. This is important because you have to use social media wisely. Therefore, all social media pages should only be clean information.
According to Document D it states, “ Randy Nunemacher, a Middle School math teacher, experienced a disruption in his class when six or seven students were talking and discussing the profile; Nunemacher had to tell the students to stop talking three times, and raised his voice on the third occasion.” (Doc D) This is proof because the profile was disrupting the students education when they were talking about the profile in class and the teacher caused other students not to learn when he had to raise his voice. Based on the information presented in Document D it states, ” This Pennsylvania case arose when the school district suspended J.S. for creating, on a weekend and on her home computer, a MySpace profile (“the profile”) making fun of her middle school principal, James McGonigle.”(Doc D) I know this because J.S. made it on her home computer which is not disrupting classmates education because she created it at home and not at her school. Some people say we shouldn’t limit students online speech, but I think schools should limit students online speech because it is disrupting other students and their own
Lately, students have been spending considerable amounts of time on social media rather than face-to-face interaction. People make their thoughts and opinions public information by posting on social media. Checking social networking profiles is an acceptable practice for potential employers or college admission officers.
Coaches and athletes should discuss the choices that the athletes make while using social media networks instead of completely banning them. Another way to approach this issue would be to stress for the players to keep their social media accounts under control. Prohibiting the use of social media due to harmful actions is also prohibiting all communications that would be made that are unrelated to the college/university.
The situation revolving around these sites is not likely to clear up any time soon; in fact, as freshmen enter higher education institutions, more activity regarding social networking will take place. Christine Rosen, “a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington” (2), said that the amount of freedom and control that technology gives us also provides a direct route for marketers to advertise products to these users. In addition, she says that college administrators use Facebook as a means of snooping around to find evidence of illegal activity of students. Many of these administrators and employers also create fake profiles in order to conduct these investigations, although, as spokesman for Facebook Chris Hughes says, creating...
Copyright and fair use laws are laws that allow for creators of works to have rights to their creations. But, they also allow the free use of works, in the effort to get your point across. Fair use can be defined as the doctrine that brief excerpts of copyrighted material may, under certain circumstances, be quoted verbatim for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching, and research, without the need for permission from or payment to the copyright holder. This doctrine shows how the general public is available to reproduce copyrighted material without acquiring consent. While, this is true, we are only allowed to reproduce part of the information, not the entirety of the work. These can include news reporting, teaching purposes,
The question of young people and cell phone use and texting causing young people to be less able to concentrate and focus has always been a difficult one to answer. Technology gives teenagers so much but includes many drawbacks. Cell phone use and texting has it’s advantages such as teachers embracing tech,uses for educational purposes, and easy to use;however,some drawbacks are as socializing,time away from homework,and bad communication skills.
Texting is a lot more private and if you are in a public place you are not distracting other people by talking on the phone. You can also have an argument with someone via text without anyone knowing it. Can you imagine the attention you get by fighting with someone over the phone? You will probably turn heads and get some nasty stares. Besides, you can also get more things done while you text aside from talking on the
First of all, schools should keep students focused during classes. By giving students access to social media for anything in the class, that starts leading to these issues. “All universities have been struggling to balance freedom of speech and the right to express an opinion, with reasonable
Not many Colleges check up on their students through Facebook, but Oxford University is an expert at doing just that. Any picture or comment pertaining to illegal activities will lead to a student being charged with a fine. Since I am about to head off to college soon, I would disapprove of this invasion of privacy. Nonetheless, other colleges may soon pick up this way to spy on their students.
Scientific evidence shows that by avoiding the heat waves, cancer and other harmful diseases, is by using handsets to talk on because it does not release that much electromagnetic radiation and does not cause diseases that cell phones cause and use text messaging because text messaging is cheaper and you don’t have to stick to your ear.