As a health and human service professional the two theories I would consider to be effective while assisting clients would be Attribution Theory and Communication Accommodation. I believe these two theories are the most useful in setting the tone in communicating with customers. Attribution Theory supposes that one attempts to understand the behavior of others by attributing feelings, beliefs, and intentions to them. Attribution can be examined from an external or an interpersonal aspect as it can
Communication Accommodation Theory This theory highlights beneath aspirations and consequences of the possible occurrence when two respondents change their styles of communication. Theorists under this theory contests that during communication, people adjust or accommodate their speaking style to one another. This is mostly done through convergence or divergence. People with stronger racial or ethnic groups highlight their identity through divergence. In case of social approval mostly by the powerless
The Theory of Communication Accommodation Everyone has a unique speech style of their own and this talking style would change depending on infinite numbers of variables reasons such as the surroundings, the topic, the person you are talking to, how close you are and other factors. People can adjust their accent, pronunciation and gestures to interact with others. The theory of communication accommodation is an evolution of speech accommodation theory which developed by Howard Giles in 1973. This
memories and build a bond. In friendships I am more comfortable expressing my feelings. If any noise interferes with a message between my friends and I we know how to talk it out instead of arguing or we perceive it as ambiguity. The communication accommodation theory is disassociated with my friendships because I do
Communication accommodation theory and face-negotiation theory supply principles that guide actions while communicating with one another within a diverse community. The melting pot of the United States contains a deeply diverse community that these theories apply to every single person. In order to live in a communication stable nation we need to accommodate others with our behaviors, we need to evade conflict and let the Lord handle it. Rejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with them that
Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) is a concept that explains how people modify their communication styles to accommodate other people during interactions (Giles & Ogay, 2007). In this paper I will be discussing how Communication Accommodation Theory is used in the context of clinical therapy work. For the purposes of this paper, Communication Accommodation Theory will be referred to as CAT. I will use the term mental healthcare professional (MHP) to encompass all professionals who work in
The Communication Accommodation Theory developed by Giles while broad and complex is undeniably important to the field of Communication Studies. The broad focus of CAT can be perceived as a drawback, but could also be viewed as a merit by allowing researchers to apply CAT principles in almost any situation dealing with communication between representatives of differing cultural backgrounds. By using CAT, Communication Researchers can objectively make observations of the communication strategies,
Interpersonal communication drives and influences all aspects of life. Close friends, business partners, and mentors all affect a person in ways that often change their entire way of life. As an individual talks to someone else, or becomes a part of another's life, they often start to accommodate the other, changing the way they talk, or even how they look and act, to ensure that the different party is as comfortable as they can be. Within the same relationship, the people involved are often constantly
The Communication Accommodation Theory states when people interact they alter their speech to fit in or accommodate for other. CAT describes the psychological, social, and linguistic behaviors that people exhibit when communicating with each other (Coupland, Coupland, Giles, Henwood, 1988). Each individual has his or her own personality and motivation when involved in a conversation, this attribute are reflected in how the individual speaks, listens and then responds to the other person involved
Specifically, in language brokering the issues of face, culture, and power may be salient in respect to identity and relationships. Politeness theory (Brown & Levinson, 1987) is based the concept of face, or a person’s social identity. According to the theory, individuals strive to maintain themselves as likeable, socially approved, capable, and independent individuals. Issues of face may arise for children when language brokering, as acting as a socially-approved
Although the assumptions and reasons for accommodation are not fully demonstrated in Nike’s decision to produce a new garment, it strongly applies to another component of the theory. Giles and other CAT researchers divide the theory into two components: convergent and divergent communication. Convergent communication is defined as “a strategy whereby individuals adapt to each other” (West & Turner, 2014, p. 499). Accommodation is argued to be both conscious or unconscious depending on the situation
The Social Penetration Theory (SPT) by Irwin Altman and Dalmas Taylor (1973) provides a framework for describing the development of interpersonal relationships between individuals. During the development, SPT explains the way of two individuals communicate and how the relationship evolve from superficial to intimate and vice versa. Onion analogy is commonly used in explaining SPT in depth that people personalities are much like onions, made up of many layers. The theory of social penetration works
A Critique of Berger's Uncertainty Reduction Theory How do people get to know each other? Bugs Bunny likes to open up every conversation with the question, "What's up Doc? Why does he do this? Is Bugs Bunny "uncertain"? Let's explore this idea of uncertainty. Shifting focus now to college students. As many other college students at Ohio University, I am put into situations that make me uncertain of my surroundings almost every time I go to a class for the first time, a group meeting, or social
Coordinated Management of Meaning Throughout the semester, we have studied numerous communication theories. Their purpose is to help understand exactly what happens when we interact with others. We might not necessarily agree with all of the theories, but the idea is to develop tools to evaluate situations we may encounter. Often, when the theories are explained in the readings or lecture, it is beneficial to apply the concepts to a "real life" situation. Using this approach, I will use a situation
Interpersonal communication is the process of people exchanging messages in relationships. Ranging from role relationships, to interpersonal relationships, to close and intimate relationships, each one of our interactions contribute to the formation, strengthening or weakening of relationships. Through these interactions and relationships, people fulfill the main interpersonal needs, consisting of social inclusion, affection and behavioral control. By exploring communication theories, such as social
Communication, as defined by Griffin is the relational process of creating and interpreting messages that elicit a response. Griffin states theory is a set of systematic, informed hunches about the way things work (Griffin, 2012, p. 4). Pairing the two together, Communication theory is using a systematic approach in order to understand the relational process of creating and interpreting messages. Many communication theories have been created to understand how and why things are the way they are
In the world of communication, there are many theories which describe different ways people communicate. According to Doctor Thomas Hanitzsch, an associate professor of communication at the University of Munich in Germany, “Communication Theory is an international forum publishing high quality, original research into the theoretical development of communication from across a wide array of disciplines” (“Communication Theory”). A specific communication theory that will be highlighted is the Face-Negotiation
Please answer the following questions. Bullet points are fine, should that be appropriate. 1. Using the Content/ Relationship axiom of Interactional Theory, evaluate a disagreement you have had with a best friend. Using the content/relationship axiom of interactional theory, a disagreement I have had with my best friend sheds light on the issues of control existing between us within a series of messages. This is following a punctual commitment to transporting other to their household given
Introduction Conversation Analysis (CA) is the study of talk-within-interaction that attempts to describe the orderliness, structure and sequential patterns of interaction in conversation. It is a method of qualitative analysis developed by Harvey Sacks with the aid of Emmanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson in the late 1960s to early 1970s. Using the CA frame of mind to view stories shows us that what we may think to be simplistic relaying of information or entertaining our friends is in fact a highly
remove all doubt.” Twains words apply in the sense that communication without competence isn’t communication at all but rather words that form sentences that are exchanged between one another. If one lacks the capability to execute the intended message in an utterance then that utterance is deemed useless. In order to achieve competency one must implement the components that make up communication theories. The overarching theme of communication competence is effectiveness and appropriateness. These