Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Intercultural communication concepts
Weaknesses and strengths of social identity theory
Intercultural communication introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Intercultural communication concepts
Interpersonal communication drives and influences all aspects of life. Close friends, business partners, and mentors all affect a person in ways that often change their entire way of life. As an individual talks to someone else, or becomes a part of another's life, they often start to accommodate the other, changing the way they talk, or even how they look and act, to ensure that the different party is as comfortable as they can be. Within the same relationship, the people involved are often constantly seeing whether the value and worth of it are more than the costs involved with maintaining the connection that they have established. For the week consisting from April 23th-April 30th, a log was kept of all of the interactions that were between …show more content…
Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) is an objectivist, intercultural communication theory that emerged within the 1970s. Originally known as Speech Accommodation Theory, it argues that when two people take part in communication, they change some aspect of their behavior in order to accommodate the other person. This can range from how they dress and look to their body language, and is in response to the differences that people have in their culture, such as age, occupation, or ethnicity.
The goal of CAT is to explain how this happens, and predict the extent to which this shall occur between different people. To achieve this goal, it makes certain assumptions, the most important being that the way that we perceive the actions of others while communicating will determine how we evaluate interaction and adapt as needed. As we adapt, we shall start to accommodate who we are communicating with in one of four different ways: convergence, divergence, maintenance, and over-accommodation. Important within this theory is that there are various reasons for why one would want to accommodate, based upon social identity theory, as well as how the other person perceives the one who is
Beebe, Steven A., Susan J. Beebe, and Mark V. Redmond. "Understanding Self and Others." Interpersonal Communication: Relating to Others. Boston: Allyn and Bacon/Pearson, 2009. 43. Print.
In every society nonverbal communication is one of the most powerful tools that a person can use to interpret the message that is being delivered. Even though verbal communication is fairly straightforward, nonverbal communication allows others to sense the true emotions of the person that is expressing them. For example even though a person may say that they are not irritated, their usage of voice may display otherwise. Nonverbal communication not only reveals hidden messages, but it also complements, substitutes, and exaggerates verbal communication.
This classic love story describes how people can change once they interact with other people. Moreover, this is an example of how human beings in general need interaction to be normal functioning citizens of society. Having relationships, can make a person feel better about him and can possibly revolutionize or emerge a personality that was quiescent due to lack of interaction. This video demonstrates many facets of interpersonal communication.
The book definition is it’s a theory that suggests individuals simultaneously adapt their communication behaviors to the communication behavior of others. This means when one person says something the other person tries to understand the message by adapting to their communication style. It is probably the most common thing in interactions between humans. . “Broadly construed as the modification of one’s behaviorto adjust to one’s communication partner(s), interpersonal adaptation has beendescribed as accommodation (Gallois, Ogay, & Giles, 2005; Giles, Coupland, & Coupland, 1991), mimicry (Chartrand & Bargh, 1999; Scheflen, 1964), reciprocity(Burgoon, Stern, & Dillman, 1995; Burgoon & White, 1997), synchrony (Bernieri,Reznick, & Rosenthal, 1988; Condon & Ogston, 1966), or style matching (Niederhoffer & Pennebaker, 2002; Scissors, Gill, Geraghty, & Gergle, 2009).”(C.L Toma Pg.156) This theory is used to understand the process of adaption. This theory can be used to predict if the listener understands the speaker. The IAT says everyone enters an interaction with requirements, expectations, and desires. The requirements mean the needs during the interaction like speaking louder or closer to the speaker. The expectations mean what to expect based on past experience or general communication, etc. And desires are the preferences and goals of the interaction. These things combine to form a speaker’s interaction position. “This determines the receiver’s behavior will be reciprocated or compensated.” (C.L. Toma 161)
This theory has been subject to many articles and studies in the communication and social departments. Indeed, studying this theory can help us understanding human relations in interpersonal communication. Each of us has been one day confronted to uncertainty, whereas in initial encounters, or moving to a new a new place, or beginning a new work.
Throughout the semester, we have studied numerous communication theories. Their purpose is to help understand exactly what happens when we interact with others. We might not necessarily agree with all of the theories, but the idea is to develop tools to evaluate situations we may encounter. Often, when the theories are explained in the readings or lecture, it is beneficial to apply the concepts to a "real life" situation. Using this approach, I will use a situation that many of us have faced, or will face, and analyze it according to a particular communication theory.
Steve A. Beebe, S. J. (2008). Interpersonal Communication. In A. a. Pearson, Interpersonal Communication, Relating To Others- Fifth Edition. Toronto, Ontario: Pearson Education, Inc.
Higher social status or power and commonalities between the individuals may explain why they are willing to do so. In attempt to demonstrate associative behavior, these individuals will partake in accommodation. According to the Communication Accommodation Theory, the interactants converge either upward or downward, unimodal or multimodal, or symmetrical or asymmetrical in order to adapt to the conversational setting (Zhang & Imamura, 2017). For instances, adults would speak slowly and use simple vocabulary when talking with children. In A Class Divided, the teacher would converge downward for her third-grade students to understand the
The need for interpersonal communication across all human endeavors is growing especially in the context of
The Communication Accommodation Theory states when people interact they alter their speech to fit in or accommodate for other. CAT describes the psychological, social, and linguistic behaviors that people exhibit when communicating with each other (Coupland, Coupland, Giles, Henwood, 1988). Each individual has his or her own personality and motivation when involved in a conversation, this attribute are reflected in how the individual speaks, listens and then responds to the other person involved in the conversation. According to this theory, communication between two people can at any time be adjusted by either party in response to actual, perceived, or stereotyped expectations of the other person (Coupland, et al., 1988). This means that either party can change their communication style based on what they feel or pick up on during the conversation. The CAT theory can help understand how humans interact with one another while communicating.
In interpersonal communication there are many theories that are similar yet different in many ways. The theories can be combined to describe people and how those people interact and communicate with each other. Many of these theories help explain how people in society form impressions of others, how they maintain these impressions, why people interact with certain people in society, and how people will use these impressions that they have formed later on in life. These theories also help people to better understand themselves, to better understand interpersonal communication, and to better understand people in general. There are two theories in interpersonal communication that, despite their differences, can go hand in hand. The first is interaction adaptation theory and the second is emotional contagion theory. These two theories’ similarities and differences and their relevance to my everyday life will be discussed in this paper. These two theories are very important in understanding how people interact with others and why people do the things they do sometimes.
In life people communicate every day through many types of responses and behaviors. There are plenty examples that have been expressed over time by people trying to explain these communicative behavior and analyze them in different ways.
The Communication Accommodation Theory developed by Giles while broad and complex is undeniably important to the field of Communication Studies. The broad focus of CAT can be perceived as a drawback, but could also be viewed as a merit by allowing researchers to apply CAT principles in almost any situation dealing with communication between representatives of differing cultural backgrounds. By using CAT, Communication Researchers can objectively make observations of the communication strategies, as well as the motivations for those strategies on both small and large scales. By understanding such information, individuals and organizations alike could potentially make great strides in the improvement of relations with other cultural counterparts. In a sense, the Communication Accommodation Theory is significant because it can be applied to any cultural interaction, can help disseminate the causes of intercultural incongruity, and potentially help prevent future misunderstanding.
The presence, or absence, of skills that relate to communication with oneself (intrapersonal communication) are critical influencers of many other aspects of oneself (Beebe, 2015). In particular, one’s intrapersonal communication impresses on one’s intrapersonal communication: mutual communication between yourself and at least one other (Beebe, 2015). The relationship between these two types of communication is complex and worth exploring. Using examples from seminar and my own life, in this paper, I will analyze my own self-concept and perception, and relate my intrapersonal communication skills to their effects on my interpersonal communication skills. I
Interpersonal communication is very important in everyday life. It helps us build a relationship with another, also it helps us to satisfy our physical needs, identity needs, social needs and practical goals. Communication lets people exchange their feeling and information through verbal and non-verbal communication through social media or face to face communication. Communication can be effective and ineffective depend on the individual communication skills. The ways we communicate with another can be influenced by family, friends, significant other also within the culture and region where we stay. Each person has a different set of rule to communicate with another, so this is how miscommunication happen. There are some expectation and way