Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of media representation
Hollywood vs history
The nature of political propaganda in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of media representation
Jesse Yavner
Mr. Diamente
AP American History Course 3
06/01/2016
Argo, American Sniper, and, Zero Dark Thirty’s Role in Portraying Recent Conflicts in the Middle East
George Macdonald Fraser, the author of The Hollywood History of the World, once said, “What is overlooked is the astonishing amount of history Hollywood has got right... For better or worse, nothing has been more influential in shaping our visions of the past than the commercial cinema.” Fraser perfectly describes the impact and role of Hollywood in shaping our judgement of history. Not only has Hollywood portrayed various events and conflicts in history including the conflicts in the Middle East, but Hollywood has also portrayed various perspectives, opinions, and depictions
…show more content…
In order to be lucrative, the producers of films such as Argo, Zero Dark Thirty, and American Sniper have to attract the masses by promoting American nationalism. In fact, in Argo there are many events and ideas that are not based on facts and are just twisting the truth to make the storyline more interesting and increase ticket sales. For example, in the movie, the British turned away the fugitive American diplomats when they were trying to escape the U.S. embassy. In actuality, the British embassy sheltered the fugitives, but eventually the fugitives moved to the Canadian embassy when the British embassy became exposed to attack. Therefore, in the real Iranian Hostage Crisis the British attempted to help the United States, but in order to make Argo a more interesting story, the film deliberately alters the truth and portrays Britain ultimately not helping the United States. Argo, like many other films, appeals to inner fears and prejudices. “That is why Ben Affleck had a mild dig at the British in Argo... It is why American movies imply America won the war, and British ones that Britain did. It is why Hollywood has stopped killing orientals and started killing Arabs. Films must now sell in China” (Jenkins, How Many 'true Story' Films Should Be Classified L for Lie?). Also, Hollywood endorses America’s foreign policy in the Middle East. In fact, at the Golden Globe movie awards, a …show more content…
For example, when the US diplomats walk through Iran, every Iranian is portrayed as angry, shouty, and violent. This is similar in American Sniper. First off, the film never shows American troops cooperating with friendly Iraqi forces; Instead, it only shows negative interactions between Americans and Iraqis. In addition, all Middle Easterners, including civilians, are portrayed as the enemy and bad people. For example, Chris Kyle has dinner with an Iraqi man deemed to be a standard civilian and of course, this man turned out to be a terrorist. At the dinner table the Iraqi man bent down to pick something up and his elbow was exposed. It was a bright red color as if it had been burned. From this, Chris Kyle determined that this Iraqi was a insurgent sniper. Zero Dark Thirty does the same. For example, Muslim characters are presented as an “undifferentiated mass of enemies” and “bearded objects to be tortured for information about Osama Bin Laden” (Vejnoska, Muslims Slam TV Portrayals as Unfair); It shows that Americans believe that the Middle Eastern reasons for fighting are unimportant. In addition, while on the mission to capture and kill Osama Bin Laden, the American team killed many other Middle Easterners along the way, both terrorists and innocent civilians. This creates the American impression that the entire Muslim world and every Middle Easterner is
In today's day and age, it's rare to see famous historical events and societal disasters not be picked apart by film directors and then transformed into a box office hit. What these films do is put a visual perspective on these events, sometimes leaving viewers speculating if whatever was depicted is in fact entirely true. I have never felt that feeling more than after I finished watching Oliver Stone’s JFK.
... out of a 1950s woman's film. The melodramatic influences of the film continue to manifest themselves in the newer release, just as Apocalypse Now continues to influence the epic movies of contemporary filmmakers. The unison of operatic spectacle and personal conflict spawned an original genre in the 1970s that remains an effective method of addressing social concerns. As we enter another period of political unrest and social change, it is likely that a new wave of melodramatic films is beginning to form on the horizon; there are certainly parallels between a government that declares war on terrorism and the U.S. army in Vietnam, who "knew everything about military tactics, but nothing about where they were or who the enemy was" (Cowie 143). From Conrad to Coppola, nuclear family to nuclear terrorism; never get off the boat, unless you're willing to go all the way.
Every time a terrorist attack happens the media jumps all over it, and puts their own twist on what had happened. “Thus, the media has a strong potential to influence how the public thinks about social problems like terrorism, especially because most people only experience terrorism through mass-media accounts...This research also finds that media portrayals of terrorism increase anxiety among the viewing public.” (Chermak, 2006) The media is one of the leading causes of stereotypes, and what influences our beliefs today. When you think of a terrorist, you may think of either a middle aged muslim male or a middle aged white male with some sort of mental or social disorder. This isn 't always the case. A terrorist can be of any race, age, and social class. Due to the media 's influence, we all believe in the same stereotypes and imagine the same description of what a terrorist may look like. This is one of the main reasons behind racial profiling.
Among many theorists such as Brain L. Ott, the V for Vendetta movie is seen as an “allegory for life in George W. Bush’s America” (Ott 2). Because of this, Alan Moore “had his name removed from the credits” (Xenakis 135). But just because
Sterritt, David. “HOLLYWOOD'S HOLOCAUST”. Tikkun 24.3 (2009): 60-62. Literary Reference Center. Web. 10 Oct. 2013.
Shaheen, J. (1985). Media Coverage of the Middle East: Perception of Foreign Policy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v482, pp. 160-75.
Movies, one can argue, are one of America’s greatest pastimes. Unfortunately, after 9/11, films have become increasingly prejudiced against American Muslims. In movies Muslims are frequently portrayed negatively. According to James Emery, a professor of Anthropology, Hollywood profits off of “casting individuals associated with specific negative stereotypes”. This is due to the fact that viewers automatically link characters with their clichéd images (Emery). For Muslims, the clichéd image is of the violent fundamentalist, who carried out the terroristic attacks on 9/11. As a result, the main stereotypes involved in movies display Muslims as extremists, villains, thieves, and desert nomads. An example of a movie that has such a negative character role for Muslims in film is Disney’s cartoon Aladdin, depict...
The film “Zero Dark Thirty” is an important film as it highlights one of our nation’s longest periods of darkness and fear, and America found a way to persevere. Its success in the awards circuit will make it stand as an iconic film that Kathryn Bigelow took a chance on by shelving a passion project and morphing it into Zero Dark Thirty. Its themes of man vs man,
Doherty, Thomas. Projections of Power-Hollywood, American Culture, and World War II. New York City: Columbia University Press, 1993. Book.
Media texts are created from past events that have occurred and often times Hollywood would try and manipulate the event so it represents the past and the reception it gets through different communities. The film Argo (2012) is no exception trying to show a “Hollywoodize” event of the Iranian Hostage Crisis which received mixed receptions and is controversial on how the event is portrayed. The film is often criticized for the authenticity and accuracy of how the event is portrayed; the film directed by Ben Affleck chose to add “drama” and manipulate the actual event in order to obtain a wider audience. With the film involving a variety of government during the hostage crisis, the film focuses only specific on U.S. government and Canadian government. The film focuses on showcasing how powerful C.I.A. and American government is. While the Canadian government portrayed played a minor role in the film and other governments was not even mention. The film was criticized by United States, Canada, and British and New Zealand’s critics for the role each country had in the film as it shows the film is deceptive in telling the truth and accuracy of the event. United States had its role glorified that it seemed to have done most of the work; while Canada had its role minimized, and that the film was made out to have a small role that Canada had with United States, but some countries like New Zealand was not even mentioned. Therefore, with the mixed reception the film received it makes the understanding of Iranian Hostage Crisis on how that event better understands the role of government in cinema is shown between countries: U.S., British and New Zealand, and Canada.
Films are necessary in our time period because the human eye can articulate the message intended through sight allowing visual imagination to occur. In the book, world 2 by Max Brooks, he creates a character by the name Roy Elliot who was a former movie director. Roy Elliot manages to make a movie titled “Victory at Avalon: The Battle of the Five Colleges” and some how it goes viral. Similarly, Frank Capra’s film, “Why we Fight” expresses a sense of understanding the meaning of wars. Films do not inevitably portray truth because they display what the film director views as important and beneficial for people to know.
...ctual roles, or adding in exciting events that revise the storyline. These changes are beneficial to producers because they engage a large audience and generate massive profits. In contrast, they do not always have a positive effect on viewers. Although they are entertaining which is an important aspect of theatre culture, they also are often misguiding. Many spectators take movies at face value, without considering that they may not exactly qualify as primary source material. Even when an historical event is fabricated to teach or enhance a moral message, it still doesn’t compensate for bending the truth. Moviegoer’s may have a positive experience and gain some skewed historical perspective, perhaps better than what they knew before the movie, but they loose out on the truth and therefore, a genuine understanding of the historical event, and its significance.
Hollywood not only struggles with representing minorities but often demonizes foreign cultures, particularly in war films. This can be observed in films such as American Sniper which portrays Navy seal snipers Chris Kyle and his experiences in Iraq. While the film is based on personal recounts from Chris Kyle the film fails to show Kyle's true opinions on his actions. In his book Kyle refers to people he has killed as “savages” and “only wishes he had killed more”, however this was completely excluded from the film. The film also fails to provide any sort of context into why American Soldiers are engaged in the conflicts being portrayed. This then leaves the viewer to believe that the enemy in the film has no true reason for shooting at the
The critically acclaimed documentary The War You Don’t See was released in 2010, and was produced to protest the media’s role in past wars/conflicts. The War You Don’t See is a British film, however it consistently focuses on the United States’ involvement in war, and how the media manipulated citizens into supporting mediation in the Middle Eastern conflicts (Hupp 57). The film frequently uses anecdotal sources, and includes some that trace back to World War I. However, it primarily focuses on the recent conflicts in the Middle East. In addition to using an abundance of primary sources, the film also takes time to provide copious amounts of analytical statistics, research, and unedited footage to the viewer. With my protracted history of being
SCHECHTER, Danny (2001). "Covering Violence: How Should Media Handle Conflict?" mediachannel.org. Online at: http://www.mediachannel.org/views/dissector/coveringviolence.shtml, consulted on March 27, 2004.