Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American sniper the movie + analysis
American sniper analysis
Gender stereotypes and representation in film usa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American sniper the movie + analysis
Hollywood not only struggles with representing minorities but often demonizes foreign cultures, particularly in war films. This can be observed in films such as American Sniper which portrays Navy seal snipers Chris Kyle and his experiences in Iraq. While the film is based on personal recounts from Chris Kyle the film fails to show Kyle's true opinions on his actions. In his book Kyle refers to people he has killed as “savages” and “only wishes he had killed more”, however this was completely excluded from the film. The film also fails to provide any sort of context into why American Soldiers are engaged in the conflicts being portrayed. This then leaves the viewer to believe that the enemy in the film has no true reason for shooting at the …show more content…
heros of the film other than a Vehement hatred for America. American sniper however is not only appealing to a small gun totting audience but was the highest grossing film of 2014 and received wide critical acclaim including six academy award nominations. This is particularly alienating for Muslim audience members who have been under constant fire following 9/11 and the continued conflicts in the middle east. Captain Phillips was not a war film however it showed the same lack of cultural representation and context that films such as American Sniper often exhibit. In the film a harmless family man is kidnapped by somali pirates wanting a piece of American prosperity. The film offers little context to justify the actions of the villains in the film. Following the collapse of the Somali government commercial fishing vessels began illegally fishing in Somalia stealing according to a UN report some 300 million pounds of fish in 2006 alone. This has forced many men who would otherwise use the ocean as their livelihood to resort to pirating to survive. Captain Phillips ofcourse provides no context of this forcing the audience to believe the worst about these exploited fishermen. For any audience members who do come from Somalia or similar situations they might feel unheard and disconnected by the film. The issue with both Captain Phillips and American Sniper particularly in their lack of objective storytelling can be attributed to stringent military oversight. In order to use resources such as battleships and weapons among other military resources the Pentagon has to oversee the filming and approve final edit of the film. If the film does not follow the Pentagons guidelines they are unable to use the equipment to make their films. Because of this films cannot tell stories that the pentagon might perceive as unfavorable to the image of the military. Saving Private Ryan, Catch 22 and Full Metal Jacket were all declined funding from the pentagon for their unfavorable portrayal of the military. While Pearl Harbor (2002), A Few Good Men and Top Gun all not only received funding but underwent script changes to make their movies more favorable to the US government. Film makers are then being complicit to censorship and by doing so allowing for cultures and the realities of war to be skewed. Given that these films are being supported by the American government it makes sense that viewers who find themselves alienated would feel disconnected from America. It can be argued that the depiction of the American experience within films might disconnect us from our own experiences, given that the lives we see on screen are often far more glamourous. Martin Scorsese’s Wolf of Wall Street tells a story of a wealthy man who finds his way to success. Moviegoers might relate with the main character's values of working hard to achieve wide success and building a better life for himself and his family. An American institute study sighted a pew study conducted in 2014 that stated 73 percent of Americans believed that success was directly correlated to hard work. For this reason people may feel disconnected from their own experience, believing that if they had worked harder they would be wealthy and there for happy. However this is a fallacy given that the American dream being portrayed in the Wolf of Wall street only causes the characters more unhappiness. However not all films portray the American dream in a unrealistic and materialistic way. American beauty is a fantastic piece of American Cinema that analyzes flawed aspects of the American dream. The film follows a man in white suburbia with all the cornerstones of an ideal American. It's not his lifestyle that is significant but the fact that he hates it. While the American dream is defined as prosperity through hard work, that hard work is not always in line with the pursuit of happiness. This is shown by a conversation between the main character, Lester Burnham and his Wife. Prior to this conversation Lester is trying to kindle his dying marriage when his wife stops him for fear that he will spill beer on the couch. Lester responds “It’s just a couch, this isn’t life! This is just stuff. And it’s become more important to you than living”. This quote is an excellent example of why this film connects so well to the viewers American experience. While many people are consumed with working to achieve material wealth they forget what makes them happy. This has been supported by a study conducted by the University of British Columbia which showed that while money can help people feel less sad it does not correlate to being happier. Therefor American beauty is connecting us to our American experience by showing that happiness comes from within, not from money or “things”. Despite the faults of hollywood American Cinema is not entirely confined to hollywood.
Many independent films have given women and minorities a fair representation on camera, explored other cultures with an objective view and attempted to fairly portray the American experience. The 2009 film the visitor told the story of a widowed college professor who befriends a Syrian immigrant and his Senegalese girlfriend who live in a small apartment next to him in Manhattan. This film in particular is significant given that it was still nominated for an oscar, but more importantly was filmed independently, “Mr. McCarthy also noted, his was also a low-budget, character-driven indie film, which gave him the freedom to take his story where he wanted, without having to worry about high-concept pitches, marketing strategies or focus groups.” (New York Times). Another film titled 3 and ½ minutes is a documentary which tells the story of a black teenage shot in Jackson Florida and analyzes the current relationship between races in America. This is a highly relevant film however it was not widely popular. Advantageous is among many films given the 2015 sundance film festival award that focused on life for women in a constantly shifting society, These movies show that there American Cinema does exist that gives a voice to people and cultures that are unrepresented however hollywood still has a long way to
go. In conclusion we are connected to our American experience through films such as American beauty which accurately portray some of the realities of life in America. We are also connected through independent cinema, which gives a voice to those that would otherwise not be represented in big budget cinema. At the same time we are disconnected by films that disparage women and minorities by not representing them in films. Furthermore Americans of various cultural backgrounds are disconnected when there cultures and races are demonized within films.
The film that I decided to watch for this assignment was the show Jane the Virgin. The film is about a working and religious young Latina virgin, who becomes pregnant after being unintentionally artificially impregnated. The program humorously mocks commonly used figures and plans in Latin telenovelas. The show has never shied away from getting into political topics, which is why it is one of the most advanced shows on TV right now. The intersectionality aspect in Jane the Virgin is how the show gives us a lesson about abortion, teen pregnancy, and the institutional racism that Latino people face.
The incident in which Chris wastes the moose is a turning point in the story. Discuss the scene in relation to his character.
Likewise, Chris McCandless, from Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, exhibits all the characteristics of a hero, as described by Ernest Hemingway’s code. First and foremost, McCandless has a profound moral code and a desire for adventure. Even before he decided to venture into the wilderness on his own, Chris was not fond of the way society worked. This is typical of code heroes because they have strong moral codes that make them see the world in a way different from everyone else. A passage from the book reads, “More than most teens, he tended to see things in black and white. He measured himself and those around him by an impossibly rigorous moral code” (Krakauer 122). Chris’ moral code mostly came from reading books from authors such as Jack London,
Words and images are the couple that should never be separated. As mentioned in Scott McCloud’s, “Show and Tell,” we are taught from childhood that we should mature out from using images in our writing. Comics are viewed as amateurish in the professional field of English. We are continuously told that comics and usage of images in a text are pretty “childish” and should not be tolerated by the “higher” level of English. If the meaning of a text is transferred through the employment of images and words, then it is done correctly. Readers across the nation admits that demonstration of images and words in any literary work amplifies the understanding of the work, as also mentioned by McCloud.
Since many of the roles are given to white actresses, actresses of color are underrepresented in the industry. Only six out of the top 500 box office films feature a woman of color as their protagonist, none which are at the top 200. This only leaves it to around 1% of the protagonist to be a woman of color. As we head towards a better society, more and more examples of media that challenge these statements are being created.
The White Savior Complex is a damaging subconscious underlay of the Hollywood system, and more broadly all of western society. It is used to further separate the notions of “us” and “other” by creating a firm separation fueled by self-righteousness, and a sense of entitlement. Hollywood attempts to address race relations, but fails because of this trope. Kingsle, from the article “Does My Hero Look White In This?” described that both racism and colonialism are acknowledged, but not without reassuring that not only were white people against the system of racist power dynamics, but also were actively fighting against it in leadership roles (2013). In the remainder of my essay I will be commenting on many modern films and their use on this trope, and why subscribing to this filmmaking strategy is problematic.
Everyone in the world has to make a first impression on something new, sometimes it is a bad impression and they assume that you are always like that or that’s how you view everything. Whether you make a good impression or bad impression everyone is worthy of respect. You can’t just hate somebody just because how they act, and this is exactly what the Americans did. Many people have thought of someone in a certain way including myself, after you make those actions you look back and really think about it and how you had no right to do whatever you did. September 11th had a huge impact on the Middle Eastern people, I know that I had view on Arabs that were not right, just because a select few people did the wrong thing, doesn’t mean that everyone their culture is one of them. Another thing is gay marriages, I really do not think that they are right and gays are just stupid, but everyone has their right to do what they want and I think that is how it should be even though it’s not supported by many people. Stereotyping is the one of the worst traits that Americans possess. In the movie John Dunbar was almost the near opposite of the average person back then. He took the time to understand what these Indians were really like. It turns out that they were extremely friendly and very helpful. The average American would kill John Dunbar for being a traitor even though he was one of them. Nobody takes the time to take in what people have to say over a period of time, they jump to conclusions. If everyone in the world acted as John Dunbar did the world would be such a better place. People keep talking about the bad of someone more than the good and that is all that spreads throughout the country.
In addition, due to negative feelings about Asian Americans prevalent in American culture, Hollywood’s attempt to expand its target audiences is constrained, and despite the increasing market values of Asian Americans, Hollywood is possibly unwilling to portray successful Asian characters for fear of provoking its mainstream audiences who hold prejudice against Asians. There is a dominant white preference over the effects certain stereotypes may have on Asians and Asian Americans (Park, 2005).
First, was the police profiling portrayed in the movie. Stereotyping an African American or any ethnicity based on color is a negative multicultural issue. Per Farbota (2015) African Americans make of forty percent of the prison population and are more likely to arrested and convicted that any other race and are more heavily policed. Combined, African American and Hispanics totaled fifty-eight percent of all prisoners incarcerated in 2008, even though those two races make up approximately one quarter of the U.S. population (NAACP, 2017). However, in the film showed the bias happening to several races with different socioeconomic levels which is a positive example for the public to watch. Each ethnicity portrayed in the movie, were victims of racism or were participants of implicit and explicit racism themselves. Furthermore, the movie promoted racism negatively with racial slurs. I realize it was necessary for the movie to be as “real” as possible, but calling others names, or blaming one person for 911, or mocking the way another race speaks further hurts those of that ethnicity/race. Moreover, using racial slurs further promotes biases for all ethnic minorities
Many people have stated in reviews around the globe that American Sniper is glorifying war. This movie I feel is far from glorifying, if anything it’s more of an anti-war movie. The film shows Chris Kyle serving his 4 tours of Iraq, but shows more the mental and physical side of war, what really happens to those brave men and women that actually get sent to war. It shows Chris calling her wife multiple times on missions, one where they get ambushed. It then also shows the time in between tours at home and how his condition worsens. This movie I think would be reassuring for war veterans that have been suffering because this movie really shows how horrible war is, and how it should not be glorified at such a
By whitewashing the main protagonist, sometimes the real-life back story is of the main character is entirely ignored. Hollywood films tend to forget and disregard other cultures, but implement stereotypes instead. These stereotypes continue to generalize and portray some of the worst in ethnic groups with offensive representations. As the entertainment industry have a wide audience, these unrealistic depictions can leave a bad impression of these ethnic groups, and therefore contribute to racism. This is why I chose movie as a genre to base my film on, as the entertainment industry has a huge influence on society and the media, especially the young generation. Because of this, these racial issues and depictions of cultural groups in Hollywood need to be
One of the biggest problems we face today in the media is the lack of characters represented by minorities. According to Vadim Rizov, a reporter for The Dissolve,” Across 100 top-grossing films of 2012, only 10.8 percent of speaking characters are
Lasting from Feb. 23-26, the film festival will include nearly 20 films made exclusively by independent filmmakers. Shedding light on films that would otherwise not be seen in theatres dominated by major production companies is another one of Minarovic’s intentions. By intertwining both short and full-length films made independently into the festival, gives filmmakers the exposure needed to thrive in an industry so heavily weighted on
Some may argue that there is enough representation of minorities in American television, but the statistics show otherwise. A study conducted by researchers at Harvard University shows “minority” groups are not represented as much as “majority” groups are on American television. Their researchers found that Caucasians make up seventy-five percent of commercials aired on television whereas, African Americans were only in them twelve percent of the time, and the rest were of other races. The issue of representation doesn’t stop at how much but at how. In most cases, minorities are depicted in a negative light to make the majorities look superior. Additionally, researchers at the University of Southern California studied the seven hundred top-grossing films from 2007 to 2014 and analyzed the ethnicities of more than thirty thousand characters to reveal the true amount of diversity in the film industry. In their study, they found that seventy-three percent were Caucasian, five percent Asian, five percent Hispanic, and the other seventeen percent covered all other
Many others would believe instead when making this into a film would be better to have the film focused in its entirely on action scenes and less on character development. Action in movies usually makes a film more exciting and entertaining. People, in general, will be expecting action in this film of a war photographer. When then adding action into a film one must see that sometimes people add events that didn't happen in the book. Isaac Guzmán writes in an article from TIME about American Sniper from adapting it from the memoir of one Chris Kyle. He interviews Clint Eastwood in one section, “I guess you could call it a war film, because it's about the war," Eastwood says. "But really it's about relationships and the obstacles people have to overcome when they're involved in the service". Like Addario's memoir, it's about war so the action would play a part ultimately, but what one should focus on is after seeing all that action what is the film trying to convey to the viewers watching this movie, so the action is a necessity for the